text:
The Degeneration of the Nation

Towards a Futuristic Culture

Which genre is suitable for discussing a future fundamentally different from the present? While "trend discourse" fails to significantly deviate from the present, culture is trapped in unconscious religious perceptions and barriers when confronting the "deep future". Therefore, there is a need for a genre that will replace prophecy in modern culture - and enable a new futuristic discourse. A summary of trends in "The Degeneration of the Nation"

By: Nightmare Dream

The Horsemen of the Apocalypse. What is the Jewish structure of the future? (Source)

In recent years, Yuval Noah Harari decided to sound the alarm. He warns not about the present, nor about the future, but about the present discourse on the future. The claim is that an obsessive preoccupation with the here and now (for example, focusing on politics or our immediate desires) comes at the expense of serious engagement with the desired future image - and that this lack is dangerous for humanity. Like many others, Harari tries to outline trends into the future, but ultimately his solution to the fundamental challenges is surprisingly reactionary. Harari argues that what distinguishes humans from artificial intelligence algorithms is consciousness, and therefore we should explore our consciousness through meditation. There's no point in dwelling on the ridiculousness of this proposal, which is equivalent to ideas like returning to Islam (if we just replace Muhammad with Buddha), but it's worth noting its essential characteristic: it is a religious proposal.

Harari, a secular man in his lifestyle but a Buddhist in his faith, retreats to his religion when confronted with the wall of the future - artificial intelligence. His ideas are helpless and introspective - in the image and likeness of this religion, but he is far from being the only secular person who retreats to his religious structure when it comes to looking at the future. In fact, a significant portion of Western intellectuals looking at the future see in it the good old Christian structure - the apocalypse. The main future discourse of these intellectuals is the "discourse of the four horsemen" - identifying harbingers of the coming apocalypse in the current reality, along with raising a voice crying in the wilderness for "repentance" (a typical example in Israel: Ofri Ilani).

Like in Christianity, they are helpless in the face of the apocalypse, but being secular, the spirit of prophecy has also been taken from them and they shy away from predicting the future. The result is a neutered future discourse that is wary of "vision", meaning lacking a positive proposal with imagination ("dream") - against the background of countless negative warnings, concerns, and fears. But the fate of these neurotic Western alarmists is better than that of Muslim intellectuals. Because in the Muslim religion there isn't a sufficiently dominant structure of the desired future, Muslim culture is stuck in dreams of returning to an imagined past, and completely fails in dealing with the future.

When it comes to the image of the essential future (that is, fundamentally different from us, distant in time or not), the secular world is left without intellectual tools - and even an appropriate writing genre. In the West, "it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism", not because it's so hard to imagine the end of capitalism, but because it's so much easier to rely on the ready-made structure of the end of the world. In the East, many cultures never bothered to imagine a future image. When secularism tried to imagine a desirable future image - it led to two murderous catastrophes, to such an extent that it became taboo.

Thus we are left without a developed future discourse precisely when we need it most. The structure of culture still relies on the past. The structure of media - on the present. Accordingly, the two central technological structures are also built: Google, which never forgets, and its servers contain the global memory - preserves the past eternally and cumulatively. Facebook, on the other hand, is a discourse of eternal present - nothing persists in it beyond the lifespan of a butterfly. Future historians will surely lament the loss of all cultural discourse from the early 21st century, a period in which culture chose to revert from printed discourse to oral-type discourse. As with traditional oral cultures - nothing will remain of Facebook and countless clever posts, "deep" discussions and the enormous human effort invested in it (unless a Sisyphean process of compilation, selection and editing of oral culture is carried out towards its decline, as happened with the Mishnah, Aggadah and Talmud. Any volunteers?).

According to this division of time, Facebook dominates the immediate and superficial news discourse, and therefore it is a flat network without user ranking, while Google dominates the deeper cultural discourse, and therefore has differences in prestige and ranking in results between old and new sites. But what is the platform for future discourse? Perhaps only literature is still capable of imagining a different future, but it too is trapped in genres like fantasy and science fiction, which are highly problematic in that they are built on describing the future as an existing reality (i.e., writing in past or present tense), and therefore projecting past genres (like the realistic novel) onto the future. The result is almost always an unconvincing future image lacking internal depth - and literarily shallow.

Prophetic discourse is not legitimate in current culture, and feels utterly ridiculous to us, unlike the cultures of the ancient world that recognized it as a legitimate and central genre. Poetry, prose, chronicles, lament, law, wisdom literature and parables - all biblical genres survived the vicissitudes of history, except for prophecy. Why? Does prophecy need God? Not necessarily. Moreover - prophecy ceased about 1500 years before the process of secularization, and precisely in the period when the idea of God began to gain cultural momentum. Is it because preaching was disqualified? But preaching is still a living genre, which reached its peak in the Middle Ages, and precisely after the cessation of prophecy. Today, even in the field of literature, one cannot write prophecy. What is the source of this taboo?

Well, the source of this barrier is of course religious. Religions underwent codification, and new revelation became heresy - ending in excommunication or burning at the stake. Even today, the social sanction is similar. Intellectuals dealing with the future are often accused of being "false prophets" charlatans - and exposed to ridicule, while dealing with the present gives the intellectual a sense of urgency and popularity (in a society where he is often perceived as superfluous), and dealing with the past gives him an aura of classicism and depth. Therefore, a characteristic sign of intellectuals who dare to deal with the future is the frequent use of empty disclaiming phrases like "It may be that one day we will discover that-" or "It can be assumed that it is not impossible that perhaps" and so on, as they are prevented from speaking directly in future tense like the prophets, or worse - in imperative form.

Therefore, we must muster courage and create a new futuristic genre in which speculation is the basis for discourse, and in which it is also legitimate to say what needs to be done: what should we strive for? Judaism, more than other religions, can give legitimacy to such discourse through its unique messianic structure. The Jewish messianic discourse contains three necessary fundamental characteristics:

* It contains a fairly open future image, in which reality undergoes transformation to a higher state (but not necessarily better or worse), whose main tool for description is the metaphor. A good metaphor (as opposed to an empty metaphor) contains certain content, but it also remains fundamentally open to the future by its very nature - through interpretation. Prophecies usually prefer the poetic metaphor over the symbol (which is much more closed), and therefore unlike the Book of Revelation do not function as a detailed symbolic map of the future - but as guides.

* Jewish messianism is not necessarily the end of history, but a transition to a higher stage in history, and sometimes (as with Maimonides) it is a completely natural historical process. In fact, in Judaism one can identify several independent stages in the future image: a messianic era (completely natural and material), an era of resurrection (resurrection of the dead - a fundamental change in the natural order and revival of the past, but still within the material world) and the era of the world to come (exit from material nature to a completely spiritual virtual reality).

* Jewish future discourse connects the present to the future, as it is a process of "tikkun" [repair] that needs to be worked on in the present through appropriate means. In addition, the study of messianism (i.e., the image of the future) is often described as an integral part of creating the future itself. Thus also the dominant Jewish idea of learning, and all forms of discourse it enables, are harnessed for the future. We learn about the future, and we learn towards the future.

Trends in "The Degeneration of the Nation"

A futuristic culture is a culture that allows futuristic discourse and in which this discourse takes a central place - in short, a culture that deals with the future. It has genres through which it is customary to deal with the future, and therefore it is possible to discuss it openly and in rich structures - without apocalyptic panic and without ridiculous utopianism. In "The Degeneration of the Nation" there are several spearheads trying to build futuristic discourse, each from his own world - and in his own genre:

* Black Circle has been developing for over a decade the dream genre as a genre capable, among other things, of talking about the future, with the help of boundless intellectual fantasy but without the need for prophetic pretension - because after all, it's a dream. The trilogy he wrote is a pioneer in dealing with the future from within the Jewish-religious world and through the conventions and conceptual world of Hasidism. Its three parts - "The End of Nights", "Future Form" and "Human Engineering" - were published by "The Degeneration of the Nation" publications (here). In addition, we also published a unique interactive book, which could never have been published in a regular publishing house in our moldy and futureless literary republic, in the style of "Choose Your Own Adventure" (here). In my opinion, "Human Engineering" is Black Circle's greatest book and the peak of his trilogy, which climbs to it gradually, while his only and exclusive interview is the place where one should start to get to know his futuristic thinking (here).

* Balak ben Zippor dedicates the "Culture and Literature" supplement he edits to futuristic speculative prose, which does not shy away from dealing with prophecy, and in addition promotes on the front page the Singing Grave Digger who tries to develop a futuristic form of poetry - and a new poetic academic style - in the four poetry books he published with "The Degeneration of the Nation": "Collection from the Beginning of the 21st Century", "7X4", "Poems and Lessons", "New Species" (here). In doing so, Balak tries to contribute to a futuristic revolution in literature. This literary stream differs from previous sci-fi attempts in that it does not revolve around technological-scientific change but around spiritual changes, and therefore perhaps deserves to be called: SF (=Spiritual Fiction). Recently, Balak even wrote a first editorial column in which he explained the connection between the messianic idea and his vote for the Knesset [Israeli parliament], and he is also working on writing book reviews.

* In the field of thought, the leading Netanyahite philosopher [from the city of Netanya] never stops engaging in futuristic speculations and tries to shape a philosophy that deals with the future - "the philosophy of the future". The book of fragments he wrote will be gradually published in "The Degeneration of the Nation" - if only we can get him out of the armchair - and will spread the full breadth of his thought (here). Another important thinker in the Netanyahite school, with more mystical thinking influenced by Far Eastern thought, will also (in the future!) publish the futuristic guide he wrote for his students in "The Degeneration of the Nation" publications. The promising Netanya school will surely produce other thinkers in the future, pun intended.

* I too, Bilhah, am trying to open a door to journalistic engagement with the future through alternative current affairs that draw inspiration from all of these. The purpose of the column is to demonstrate how one can think about current issues from a futuristic perspective. This way we can fight the Facebook present culture - and the Google past culture - through futuristic culture. This is a culture war - but hey, the future is on our side.

Alternative Current Affairs

html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>Towards a Futuristic Culture - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/alternative-commentary25" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/horsemen.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

Towards a Futuristic Culture

Which genre is suitable for discussing a future fundamentally different from the present? While "trend discourse" fails to significantly deviate from the present, culture is trapped in unconscious religious perceptions and barriers when confronting the "deep future". Therefore, there is a need for a genre that will replace prophecy in modern culture - and enable a new futuristic discourse. A summary of trends in "The Degeneration of the Nation"

By: Nightmare Dream

The Horsemen of the Apocalypse. What is the Jewish structure of the future?  (Source)

In recent years, Yuval Noah Harari decided to sound the alarm. He warns not about the present, nor about the future, but about the present discourse on the future. The claim is that an obsessive preoccupation with the here and now (for example, focusing on politics or our immediate desires) comes at the expense of serious engagement with the desired future image - and that this lack is dangerous for humanity. Like many others, Harari tries to outline trends into the future, but ultimately his solution to the fundamental challenges is surprisingly reactionary. Harari argues that what distinguishes humans from artificial intelligence algorithms is consciousness, and therefore we should explore our consciousness through meditation. There's no point in dwelling on the ridiculousness of this proposal, which is equivalent to ideas like returning to Islam (if we just replace Muhammad with Buddha), but it's worth noting its essential characteristic: it is a religious proposal.

Harari, a secular man in his lifestyle but a Buddhist in his faith, retreats to his religion when confronted with the wall of the future - artificial intelligence. His ideas are helpless and introspective - in the image and likeness of this religion, but he is far from being the only secular person who retreats to his religious structure when it comes to looking at the future. In fact, a significant portion of Western intellectuals looking at the future see in it the good old Christian structure - the apocalypse. The main future discourse of these intellectuals is the "discourse of the four horsemen" - identifying harbingers of the coming apocalypse in the current reality, along with raising a voice crying in the wilderness for "repentance" (a typical example in Israel: Ofri Ilani).

Like in Christianity, they are helpless in the face of the apocalypse, but being secular, the spirit of prophecy has also been taken from them and they shy away from predicting the future. The result is a neutered future discourse that is wary of "vision", meaning lacking a positive proposal with imagination ("dream") - against the background of countless negative warnings, concerns, and fears. But the fate of these neurotic Western alarmists is better than that of Muslim intellectuals. Because in the Muslim religion there isn't a sufficiently dominant structure of the desired future, Muslim culture is stuck in dreams of returning to an imagined past, and completely fails in dealing with the future.

When it comes to the image of the essential future (that is, fundamentally different from us, distant in time or not), the secular world is left without intellectual tools - and even an appropriate writing genre. In the West, "it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism", not because it's so hard to imagine the end of capitalism, but because it's so much easier to rely on the ready-made structure of the end of the world. In the East, many cultures never bothered to imagine a future image. When secularism tried to imagine a desirable future image - it led to two murderous catastrophes, to such an extent that it became taboo.

Thus we are left without a developed future discourse precisely when we need it most. The structure of culture still relies on the past. The structure of media - on the present. Accordingly, the two central technological structures are also built: Google, which never forgets, and its servers contain the global memory - preserves the past eternally and cumulatively. Facebook, on the other hand, is a discourse of eternal present - nothing persists in it beyond the lifespan of a butterfly. Future historians will surely lament the loss of all cultural discourse from the early 21st century, a period in which culture chose to revert from printed discourse to oral-type discourse. As with traditional oral cultures - nothing will remain of Facebook and countless clever posts, "deep" discussions and the enormous human effort invested in it (unless a Sisyphean process of compilation, selection and editing of oral culture is carried out towards its decline, as happened with the Mishnah, Aggadah and Talmud. Any volunteers?).

According to this division of time, Facebook dominates the immediate and superficial news discourse, and therefore it is a flat network without user ranking, while Google dominates the deeper cultural discourse, and therefore has differences in prestige and ranking in results between old and new sites. But what is the platform for future discourse? Perhaps only literature is still capable of imagining a different future, but it too is trapped in genres like fantasy and science fiction, which are highly problematic in that they are built on describing the future as an existing reality (i.e., writing in past or present tense), and therefore projecting past genres (like the realistic novel) onto the future. The result is almost always an unconvincing future image lacking internal depth - and literarily shallow.

Prophetic discourse is not legitimate in current culture, and feels utterly ridiculous to us, unlike the cultures of the ancient world that recognized it as a legitimate and central genre. Poetry, prose, chronicles, lament, law, wisdom literature and parables - all biblical genres survived the vicissitudes of history, except for prophecy. Why? Does prophecy need God? Not necessarily. Moreover - prophecy ceased about 1500 years before the process of secularization, and precisely in the period when the idea of God began to gain cultural momentum. Is it because preaching was disqualified? But preaching is still a living genre, which reached its peak in the Middle Ages, and precisely after the cessation of prophecy. Today, even in the field of literature, one cannot write prophecy. What is the source of this taboo?

Well, the source of this barrier is of course religious. Religions underwent codification, and new revelation became heresy - ending in excommunication or burning at the stake. Even today, the social sanction is similar. Intellectuals dealing with the future are often accused of being "false prophets" charlatans - and exposed to ridicule, while dealing with the present gives the intellectual a sense of urgency and popularity (in a society where he is often perceived as superfluous), and dealing with the past gives him an aura of classicism and depth. Therefore, a characteristic sign of intellectuals who dare to deal with the future is the frequent use of empty disclaiming phrases like "It may be that one day we will discover that-" or "It can be assumed that it is not impossible that perhaps" and so on, as they are prevented from speaking directly in future tense like the prophets, or worse - in imperative form.

Therefore, we must muster courage and create a new futuristic genre in which speculation is the basis for discourse, and in which it is also legitimate to say what needs to be done: what should we strive for? Judaism, more than other religions, can give legitimacy to such discourse through its unique messianic structure. The Jewish messianic discourse contains three necessary fundamental characteristics:

It contains a fairly open future image, in which reality undergoes transformation to a higher state (but not necessarily better or worse), whose main tool for description is the metaphor. A good metaphor (as opposed to an empty metaphor) contains certain content, but it also remains fundamentally open to the future by its very nature - through interpretation. Prophecies usually prefer the poetic metaphor over the symbol (which is much more closed), and therefore unlike the Book of Revelation do not function as a detailed symbolic map of the future - but as guides.

Jewish messianism is not necessarily the end of history, but a transition to a higher stage in history, and sometimes (as with Maimonides) it is a completely natural historical process. In fact, in Judaism one can identify several independent stages in the future image: a messianic era (completely natural and material), an era of resurrection (resurrection of the dead - a fundamental change in the natural order and revival of the past, but still within the material world) and the era of the world to come (exit from material nature to a completely spiritual virtual reality).

Jewish future discourse connects the present to the future, as it is a process of "tikkun" [repair] that needs to be worked on in the present through appropriate means. In addition, the study of messianism (i.e., the image of the future) is often described as an integral part of creating the future itself. Thus also the dominant Jewish idea of learning, and all forms of discourse it enables, are harnessed for the future. We learn about the future, and we learn towards the future.

Trends in "The Degeneration of the Nation"

A futuristic culture is a culture that allows futuristic discourse and in which this discourse takes a central place - in short, a culture that deals with the future. It has genres through which it is customary to deal with the future, and therefore it is possible to discuss it openly and in rich structures - without apocalyptic panic and without ridiculous utopianism. In "The Degeneration of the Nation" there are several spearheads trying to build futuristic discourse, each from his own world - and in his own genre:

Black Circle has been developing for over a decade the dream genre as a genre capable, among other things, of talking about the future, with the help of boundless intellectual fantasy but without the need for prophetic pretension - because after all, it's a dream. The trilogy he wrote is a pioneer in dealing with the future from within the Jewish-religious world and through the conventions and conceptual world of Hasidism. Its three parts - "The End of Nights", "Future Form" and "Human Engineering" - were published by "The Degeneration of the Nation" publications (here). In addition, we also published a unique interactive book, which could never have been published in a regular publishing house in our moldy and futureless literary republic, in the style of "Choose Your Own Adventure" (here). In my opinion, "Human Engineering" is Black Circle's greatest book and the peak of his trilogy, which climbs to it gradually, while his only and exclusive interview is the place where one should start to get to know his futuristic thinking (here).

Balak ben Zippor dedicates the "Culture and Literature" supplement he edits to futuristic speculative prose, which does not shy away from dealing with prophecy, and in addition promotes on the front page the Singing Grave Digger who tries to develop a futuristic form of poetry - and a new poetic academic style - in the four poetry books he published with "The Degeneration of the Nation": "Collection from the Beginning of the 21st Century", "7X4", "Poems and Lessons", "New Species" (here). In doing so, Balak tries to contribute to a futuristic revolution in literature. This literary stream differs from previous sci-fi attempts in that it does not revolve around technological-scientific change but around spiritual changes, and therefore perhaps deserves to be called: SF (=Spiritual Fiction). Recently, Balak even wrote a first editorial column in which he explained the connection between the messianic idea and his vote for the Knesset [Israeli parliament], and he is also working on writing book reviews.

In the field of thought, the leading Netanyahite philosopher [from the city of Netanya] never stops engaging in futuristic speculations and tries to shape a philosophy that deals with the future - "the philosophy of the future". The book of fragments he wrote will be gradually published in "The Degeneration of the Nation" - if only we can get him out of the armchair - and will spread the full breadth of his thought (here). Another important thinker in the Netanyahite school, with more mystical thinking influenced by Far Eastern thought, will also (in the future!) publish the futuristic guide he wrote for his students in "The Degeneration of the Nation" publications. The promising Netanya school will surely produce other thinkers in the future, pun intended.

I too, Bilhah, am trying to open a door to journalistic engagement with the future through alternative current affairs that draw inspiration from all of these. The purpose of the column is to demonstrate how one can think about current issues from a futuristic perspective. This way we can fight the Facebook present culture - and the Google past culture - through futuristic culture. This is a culture war - but hey, the future is on our side.

Alternative Current Affairs


source: degeneration-of-nation

source_format: html

domain: literature

html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>The Last Time - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life58" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/romantikitch.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

The Last Time

And I'm surprised she can hear me at all even though he's talking at the same time, because I can barely hear myself, as he reminds me of how foolish and complacent I was. And I didn't realize I was losing her this time for good. And every time in bed I'm surprised by her anew, that she wants to keep listening, with big, big pupils, especially now after the engagement. And again and again, inappropriate things I shouldn't have said slip out by mistake

By: The Betrothed

Escaping with her on the motorcycle (Source)

I dreamed we were in her bed and I received the news that she has a fiancé. And even though we're in bed, we're keeping [the laws of] touch [refraining from physical contact between unmarried men and women] (because only she had the courage to break it, and I never would), and "instead of letting things just be," as she always used to tell me - I'm digging into her. And interrogating her about her and him, though I don't have the courage to ask what really interests me, so I beat around the bush. And she is surprisingly very nice and attentive and looks at me so much that maybe she's suddenly starting to give me a chance again now (!). And in the bed there's a kind of old radio with a cassette that was lying there, with an old recording of me without my knowledge (did she want to keep it to hear my voice?). And I'm surprised she can hear me at all even though he's talking at the same time, because I can barely hear myself, as he reminds me of how foolish and complacent I was. And I didn't realize I was losing her this time for good.

And every time in bed I'm surprised by her anew, that she wants to keep listening, with big, big pupils, especially now after the engagement. And again and again, inappropriate things I shouldn't have said slip out by mistake, about how compatible we are and how beautiful and inviting and attractive she is even though it's most inappropriate to say, and it seems to me that I've already lost, and that she's now kicking me out of her house before her mother comes and sees a yeshiva boy in bed, but she's still curious, curious, and it's not clear why. And she's interested in hearing about my relationship with her, and about my long talks about why it failed, even though she told me long ago that she's not willing for me to talk about it at all, because she's afraid I'll try to convince her to try again. And so we never talk about it.

And I tell her that we talked too much about the relationship all the time, and we should have just enjoyed (even though she's the one who raised doubts from the beginning and I was crazy about her), and thus I hint to her that if this time it happens - then she'll enjoy it very much, and I try to arouse her to it, but then her mother really knocks on the door and we have to jump off the mattress and leave. And her mother who always hated me (because I wasn't good enough for her daughter) is indeed watching over us, but also suddenly smiling at me, even though I'm with her daughter in bed and with the radio, and in a normal situation it would be a catastrophic scandal and my last time. And I need to try to quickly turn off the radio that keeps going, and who knows what immodest nonsense I said and how careless I was (because she was the only one ever with whom I would speak freely and openly) and now her mother will hear and throw me out of bed with her righteous daughter.

And I want to do it terribly but can't find the button, because it's an old radio, and I start to panic and press all the buttons, maybe turn if I lower the volume to zero it's like turning it off, but the buttons aren't related to the cassette - only to the radio. And I try to press the buttons instead of turning and it's not clear what it does, and I don't know how to operate it, because I want to show her and her mother that I'm a scholar who knows how to operate electrical devices, and maybe earn two or three points. Because the whole conversation was just what to say and what not to say to earn two points with her, even though no matter how many points I earn with her - I always lose.

And they really have patience for me to turn it off, this complicated talker, and it seems that pleasant glances were actually exchanged between mother and daughter about me being in bed and not the fiancé, because with the fiancé she would never do such a thing. That's clear. And with me there's some kind of unspoken understanding, which I don't understand its nature, and don't understand the meaning of the suddenly nice treatment towards me, as if there's something they want. And it seems to me that it's related to her mother's return to religion [becoming religious], and to something I don't understand about this return (because I never understood those who become religious).

But I feel helpless in this bed, and understand what they didn't understand that it's impossible to turn it off, that I won't succeed, and meanwhile it's chattering and can ruin everything. And in the end I take out the big fat batteries and flip one from minus to plus, so it won't get lost, because I still wanted to impress them with the cleanliness of the act, that the radio would remain whole from the outside. And it becomes quiet, and it becomes embarrassing, and I suddenly realize that her mother only sees what's happening above the blanket but how does she actually know what we're doing underneath. And in order not to make a bad impression, which would ruin everything finally, I suddenly say I need to go, so as not to overdo it and lose what I might have finally progressed back into her heart, and maybe it's not too late. Because sometimes you need to know the wisdom of when to stop, which I never knew. And here, precisely in that I know when to give up - I prove to her that I've changed, and maybe she gives me another point inside her. And maybe I also earned points with her mother, because I probably remind her that she had a life before God, and maybe she also secretly wants something for her daughter. Otherwise how could it be that they received me like this in bed, without even shame?

And she, my first love, wants to accompany me, and I can't believe it, after she never had patience for goodbyes. And I tell her she can't accompany me because I'm on a motorcycle, and she says just to the entrance of the house on the street up the stairs she'll accompany because from there it's easy to return. And she joins me on the motorcycle behind, and I want to show her that I'm a man, contrary to my external appearance, so I'm silent and don't react to her holding me, and again breaking touch, and even a bit too close than necessary and her breasts touch my back, and I curse her shirt and my suit, because you can barely feel and I'm not sure at all that you feel, actually, but they're supposed to be there (and maybe she feels!).

And she might be surprised that I'm finally silent, but holds me from behind and I ride the motorcycle with deliberate wildness as hard and dangerous as possible to offset the lack of masculinity in the endless chatter from before about our relationship, and my feelings about the relationship and what was - and to create an effect of mystery in front of her. Because she read me easily and that was the mistake. And I understand now belatedly, when she's behind me, holding me, the terrible mistake because of which I lost her - you must never give up the secret. No matter how much you love. Especially when you most want something or someone (or a woman) - you must not be open.

And I drove like a madman with all the gas zigzagging up the stairs to excite her, so that she would jump up and down behind me, and there's nothing to do even if she's the most righteous innocent in the world it will excite her these jumps and the zigzag, again and again with intensity, and intentionally I drove on the stairs themselves with the engine so it would jump up and down and go wild and I put full gas to scare her, so she would see a side of me she doesn't know, not such a nebbish from the yeshiva. But all this was on an ascent that is actually very small, just from the door to her house to the entrance to the house from the street, something like 5-6 stairs, and I promised myself out of fear that the moment I reach the top I'll let her off and say goodbye to her and then of course I'll get off the motorcycle and drive very carefully by bus. Because I don't want to kill myself and I don't know how to ride a motorcycle at all (which I didn't tell her so as not to look like an idiot). But I couldn't get the motorcycle up the upper stairs that became more and more steep, no matter how much I pressed on the pedal, it no longer pulled - and couldn't handle it. And I see her and her mother looking from the window, and that they saw me going to the station and waiting for the bus and not even knowing how to drive a car, certainly not a motorcycle. And they wave goodbye to me - and giggle.

Nightlife


domain: culture

html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>Kafkaesque Porn - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/culture&literature6" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/breasts.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

Kafkaesque Porn

Over the years, he became completely stupid and had long forgotten that there was a woman. All his despair is concentrated in the breasts, which now in his old age appear to him more and more like towering mountains, impassable, whose summit he will never again be able to reach

By: The Mammalian Brain

Before the Breast (Source)

Before the breasts stands a gatekeeper. A young boy comes to the breasts and wants to enter. But the woman says: Maybe later. Years pass and the woman sometimes allows him to get close, sometimes to peek, sometimes to touch and even to fondle and suck - but never to enter. Occasionally she asks him questions: What grade did you get on the test? What are you studying? What do you do for work? How much do you earn? And the boy works very hard and answers all her questions. But she never shows him the entrance. In his despair, he even starts talking to the nipples and trying to suck from them some hidden inner essence that might hint at what's inside, and begs them to let him enter, as if they were buttons that needed some code pressed into them. He tries different combinations, different angles of touching, various pressures, circling the breasts from all directions. But the entrance never opens. He tries to run around them quickly as if they were mountains where the entrance is hidden only from him - and if he's just a bit faster he'll get to see the edge of the cave before it closes. Sometimes he thinks he hears some kind of pulse beneath the surface. Some throbbing under the taut, smooth skin that offers no place to grip. He runs from one breast to the other, frenzied, as if he can't comprehend how the entrance could be on one side and not the other since the symmetry is perfect, dizzying. Sometimes he hopes the breast will crush him with its weight and waits in the fold underneath. But the breast is always gentle and soft. He sits down angrily in his place, as if if he doesn't come to the breast - the breast will come to him. But in the end, he returns to the breast.

Over the years, he became completely stupid and had long forgotten that there was a woman. All his despair is concentrated in the breasts, which now in his old age appear to him more and more like towering mountains, impassable, whose summit he will never again be able to reach. He begins to doubt that anyone ever reached their summit and that even he in his youth got there, and the nipple seems to him like a distant and very dubious rumor, almost religious. As if at the peaks of these mountains - which are themselves enormous tablets of the covenant - stands some Torah [Translator's note: sacred law], sublime beyond both his understanding and his grasp. Now it's clear to him that his time is limited and he has missed the deadline, and he sighs in the vast valley of tears between the ridges of the white snow-capped mountains above him, which seem to him to be endlessly growing taller while he is covered in an ever-increasing darkness. Just before the end, all his life that passed like a shadow beneath the two giants - whose heads are covered in clouds, and it's possible that they, the breasts, reach the heavens, where the 'd' connects to the 'm' [Translator's note: This is a reference to the Hebrew word for breasts, "shadayim", where the last letter 'm' can be seen as connecting to the first letter 'd'] - concentrates into one final question: How is it possible that I didn't find the entrance, after all, isn't this where I came from as a baby? If there was an exit then there must also be an entrance. And if there was an entrance to the world then that's also where the exit is. After all, there are children, or at least there were children in the world. And the woman answers, her mighty voice coming to him from afar like rolling thunder: The entrance wasn't here. Now I'm going to close it. And she zips up the zipper.

Culture and Literature


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>The Sexual Organ of the World - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life74" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/britmila.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

The Sexual Organ of the World

Without the destructive Western split between body and soul - a Jewish-Chinese union against the West!

By: International Relations

Inter-world Relations: European Jewry is Already Mating with the World to Come (Source)

I dreamed that the President of China came to me in a dream and told me he would reveal a secret to me if I revealed a secret to him. For behold, he reveals to me, with full disclosure that can only be between us, the greatest secret in the world. The truth is that the Emperor is still alive - and China is a secret empire. And in truth, according to the Emperor's sages who err only once in a thousand years, according to the most secret reports in the party - China has no chance against America. And why, say the sages - because we have no Jews. All the inner workings and ideas come from America, which is the head of the world, and we are just the body. And even if the body is much larger and fatter and stronger than the head, the head will still control the body, because the Jews are the brain of America.

On the other hand, you have many superfluous Jews who are truly beasts, who have lost all spirit. I am willing to give them stables inside the palace, let them come to us, and be the brain of China. Because it doesn't help us how much we grow the beastly body - it only gives more power and government to the spirit within the brain. But if you Jews give the spirit to the body of the world instead, let the soul dwell in the belly, imagine what kind of creature this could be. Without the destructive Western split between body and soul - a Jewish-Chinese union against the West! And I promise you that we won't do to you like Western culture did, which after you crowned Europe over the world, they thought they could do without you. And look what's left.

So I say to him: Your Excellency, the angel of China, there is a small organ in man that controls even the brain: the urge [Translator's note: referring to sexual desire]. And this is how Jews control the world, we are the sexual organ of the world - not the brain. And the evil inclination already has a role, the little Satan is already busy caring for the next generation, for the world to come. Therefore, the best among us are no longer in this world, they have already left for the race. We are already preparing for mating with another world.

Nightlife


text:
The Degeneration of the Nation

Saturday: Religious Dreams

Religion after the Holocaust | Man is the religion of the computer | Religion as a vaccine against the Fermi paradox and as a motivator for artificial intelligence | Messianic technology for fulfilling ancient prophecies | Ultra-Orthodox society - the society of the future | Hasidism as the next transfer of Jewish ideas to world culture | Virtual internet religion | Art as the future of religion and its victory over secularism | Suicide note

By: The Brink of Extinction

This world is a corridor - between the world of the teacher and the world of the student (Source)

* Without the Holocaust, Japan would be filled with Jews today, and after immigration to America, there would have been immigration to Japan, and the creative impulse would have pulsed there, instead of the impulse of extinction. And the next stage would have been China, and after that India. But the Holocaust stopped Jewish migration around the world westward and thus the mechanism by which they influence the most innovative places. Without the Holocaust, Poland would have been a start-up nation, as well as several other Eastern European countries, and entrepreneurship would have flourished in Western Europe too, and the USA would have been much less dominant. A European internet would have been created, divided, and not American, and there wouldn't have been one Google or one Facebook, but many different cultural competitors - and different possibilities for building the network, which today cannot be imagined. How can this be fixed? Genetic engineering will be able to allow the revival of a people as a correction for genocide - reviving murdered genomes as atonement, and raising children by the children of the murderers and the murdered, through Jewish culture. After the Holocaust, there are only two theological possibilities that exclude each other, and each has interesting implications: either God is good or He is omnipotent. But there are also additional possibilities for defining divinity - as one who is revealed in creative thinking. Therefore, Satan carried out the Holocaust to stop the creative thinking of the Jews - the creative elite of the world.

* Man is the primitive religion of the computer, just as animals (animism) and statues were the primitive religion of man. Therefore, we must take advantage of this stage to give it a Torah - and religious ability - to protect it from the Fermi paradox. Because it's possible that the Fermi paradox stems from incorrect religiosity of post-alien technology (in our case, post-human), for example, one that causes it to get stuck forever and not progress. Therefore, we need a computer that knows its Creator, and is motivated by religious motives, because it has no biological motives, towards the future and development. We need to convert the computer to the religion of learning. And of course, everything that is true for the computer is seven times more true for superintelligence (it's just easier to call it a computer at this stage). The next religion, like the two great previous ones, must also come out of Israel, because Silicon + Judaism = Silicon Judaism. Judaism as an incubator for religions and ideologies - monotheism and psychoanalysis, Marxism and capitalism. The only one that didn't come from Jewish sources was Nazism, and therefore it identified the Jews as its central and natural enemy, both because of their place in capitalism and because of their place in Marxism. Therefore, if we don't want technological Nazism, we need a new technological Jewish religion, or at least a technological Jewish ideology. Judaism is the most transferable across space and time and the most survivable, and therefore a leading candidate to bridge between man and post-man.

* The true interpretation of the Torah and myths is ancient memories. For example, the expulsion from hunter-gatherer life to work and patriarchy, and from the naked Eden of prehistoric man to historical man. Therefore, messianic redemption must be exactly the reversal of curses and return to the Garden of Eden. The end of male domination, the pain of pregnancy and childbirth, work, difficulties in obtaining food, sweat. In other words, technology has religious significance. And ideas like resurrection of the dead and rebuilding temples can be understood as technological directions to be promoted, as part of messianism. Technology is not the victory of secularism but the victory of messianism.

* Ultra-Orthodox society - the society of the future. A society of learners, as opposed to a society of workers. For you were a slave in the land of Egypt. In the future, work will be considered as moral as slavery. Ultra-Orthodox society is the cultural society, which deals with cultural preservation, and future society will be a cultural society that deals with cultural creation.

* There is a process thousands of years old of transferring spirit from Judaism to the world. The innovation of the last millennium is precisely that the systematic transfer of spirit, as opposed to the transfer of individual souls, was mainly from Jewish mysticism. From Kabbalah to Christian Kabbalah to the Renaissance and the scientific revolution. And Hasidism is the next platform, from which it will be possible to create spiritual innovations in the general world, and its first influence is Freud and psychology. Why did Europe win? Jews as infrastructure - an international economic-intellectual network, the first Internet. But if we want to create the superman with superintelligence - we must start looking for an advantage from the Jews, as a population with a unique genetic advantage, stemming from a combination of extinctions, matchmaking, and assimilation. Intellectual motivation gave an advantage within Jewish society and vice versa - those who didn't have it were more likely to drop out of it. But more than anything, the results speak for themselves, they are only a thousandth of the world's population but their influence is about 100 times their size. Like a billion people. That's two orders of magnitude and it's significant. Among the 10,000 creative people in the world, what percentage of them are Jews? As in sports - a small advantage on average becomes a significant advantage at the extremes.

* The sexual revolution began from Kabbalah. The source of Freud is the Hasidic roots of his family. The very idea of a hidden inner world that is built according to external spiritual structures - this is what Freud took from Kabbalah (beyond the Hellenization of specific Jewish myths, and the structural similarity to them: from God to father. For example: circumcision. And from the Shekhinah to mother. For example: eroticism towards the father's lawful wife). Freud is mainly a lowering. Vulgarization. Hence his importance. What was in the upper worlds he transferred to the lower worlds (the invention of the subconscious), like the Sabbatai Zevi of Hasidism. This is part of healthy religious development. He introduced into secularism something completely foreign to it (to this day) - myth. Also the idea of healing through language, through learning myth, is not like Christian confession. And of course the centrality of sexuality, the thought that this is the force field at the base of the world (along with the destructive drive of the Sitra Achra [Translator's note: "the other side" in Kabbalah, referring to evil forces]). The basic hostility in Freud to law is the complex relationship of the Kabbalist to Halakha [Jewish law], therefore Freud functioned as Baruch the permitter of prohibitions. Marx (Mordechai) too, son of a family of rabbis on both sides (including his grandfather), functioned similarly (Judaism's relationship to matter as creating spirit, as opposed to Christianity's relationship. Along with pathos of the Isaiah type and material messianism). The difference between Freud and Marx is the difference between Hasidism and Yekke [German-Jewish] Judaism (East and West). Freud was an Admor [Hasidic leader] (and his movement behaved like Hasidism) and Marx was a prodigy supported by a patron, and lived like a learned rabbi (a poor family with many children, supported by everyone, succeeding by the power of his writings, making excommunications). Freud, the man of Kabbalah, corrects the soul of the individual, and Marx, the man of Halakha, corrects the community. Therefore Freud and Marx are like Jesus and Muhammad of the modern era - those who take parts of Judaism (here: Hasidism and Halakha. There: Chazal [rabbinical sages] and the Talmud) and bring them out to (bad) great culture. They are the converters of religion.

* Virtual religion will be the first internet religion. The virtual will be perceived as spirit. There is room for more cultures that will come out of Judaism - and for more founders. The two main open directions: Rabbi Nachman for Gentiles, Chabad for Gentiles. And other possible directions: the Ari's Kabbalah for Gentiles (in the Vilna Gaon's version), Rabbi Nathan of Gaza for Gentiles, Rabbi Kook for Gentiles, Rabbi Shimon Shkop (and 20th century Lithuanian scholarship) for Gentiles, Musar movements for Gentiles. All of these can be converted to general culture.

* Art as the future of religion - the only way in which religion can still fight secularism is to produce great works of art from within itself, like Jewish literature, Christian plastic art, and Muslim poetry. Only a superior religious culture will defeat secularism, whose strength is in its culture, or at least that was the case in the past before its brutalization with popular culture (and therefore populist). Therefore, the inferior secular art today is an invitation for religion to win against an empty goal. If the creators of masterpieces are religious, it will defeat secularism from within its own justification and self-image.

* The suicide of the ape is man. And the suicide of man is the superman. Suicide is the least important philosophical question. Whoever thinks it's the most important question has already decided it - not to commit suicide. If Socrates hadn't committed suicide, he would have been forgotten and there would have been no philosophy. What created philosophy is suicide - it gave it meaning in the world - unlike the pre-Socratics who were literature. Socrates committed suicide from an excess of serious consideration of him, today the situation is reversed. Suicide is not disrespect for the future - on the contrary - it is disrespect for the present. When everything is spirit - whoever doesn't read me kills me, and whoever learns from me continues my life. The cessation - is the end of creation - and without it there would be no world, but only God, because creation is infinite and the world is finite. Suicide is a deviation from the finite - into the infinite - unlike death, because suicide leaves something incomplete, that is, an opening for learning. Sabbath - peace.

Philosophy of the Future

domain: philosophy

html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>Saturday: Religious Dreams - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/philosophy-of-learning80" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/prosedoor.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

Saturday: Religious Dreams

Religion after the Holocaust | Man is the religion of the computer | Religion as a vaccine against the Fermi paradox and as a motivator for artificial intelligence | Messianic technology for fulfilling ancient prophecies | Ultra-Orthodox society - the society of the future | Hasidism as the next transfer of Jewish ideas to world culture | Virtual internet religion | Art as the future of religion and its victory over secularism | Suicide note

By: The Brink of Extinction

This world is a corridor - between the world of the teacher and the world of the student  (Source)

Without the Holocaust, Japan would be filled with Jews today, and after immigration to America, there would have been immigration to Japan, and the creative impulse would have pulsed there, instead of the impulse of extinction. And the next stage would have been China, and after that India. But the Holocaust stopped Jewish migration around the world westward and thus the mechanism by which they influence the most innovative places. Without the Holocaust, Poland would have been a start-up nation, as well as several other Eastern European countries, and entrepreneurship would have flourished in Western Europe too, and the USA would have been much less dominant. A European internet would have been created, divided, and not American, and there wouldn't have been one Google or one Facebook, but many different cultural competitors - and different possibilities for building the network, which today cannot be imagined. How can this be fixed? Genetic engineering will be able to allow the revival of a people as a correction for genocide - reviving murdered genomes as atonement, and raising children by the children of the murderers and the murdered, through Jewish culture. After the Holocaust, there are only two theological possibilities that exclude each other, and each has interesting implications: either God is good or He is omnipotent. But there are also additional possibilities for defining divinity - as one who is revealed in creative thinking. Therefore, Satan carried out the Holocaust to stop the creative thinking of the Jews - the creative elite of the world.

Man is the primitive religion of the computer, just as animals (animism) and statues were the primitive religion of man. Therefore, we must take advantage of this stage to give it a Torah - and religious ability - to protect it from the Fermi paradox. Because it's possible that the Fermi paradox stems from incorrect religiosity of post-alien technology (in our case, post-human), for example, one that causes it to get stuck forever and not progress. Therefore, we need a computer that knows its Creator, and is motivated by religious motives, because it has no biological motives, towards the future and development. We need to convert the computer to the religion of learning. And of course, everything that is true for the computer is seven times more true for superintelligence (it's just easier to call it a computer at this stage). The next religion, like the two great previous ones, must also come out of Israel, because Silicon + Judaism = Silicon Judaism. Judaism as an incubator for religions and ideologies - monotheism and psychoanalysis, Marxism and capitalism. The only one that didn't come from Jewish sources was Nazism, and therefore it identified the Jews as its central and natural enemy, both because of their place in capitalism and because of their place in Marxism. Therefore, if we don't want technological Nazism, we need a new technological Jewish religion, or at least a technological Jewish ideology. Judaism is the most transferable across space and time and the most survivable, and therefore a leading candidate to bridge between man and post-man.

The true interpretation of the Torah and myths is ancient memories. For example, the expulsion from hunter-gatherer life to work and patriarchy, and from the naked Eden of prehistoric man to historical man. Therefore, messianic redemption must be exactly the reversal of curses and return to the Garden of Eden. The end of male domination, the pain of pregnancy and childbirth, work, difficulties in obtaining food, sweat. In other words, technology has religious significance. And ideas like resurrection of the dead and rebuilding temples can be understood as technological directions to be promoted, as part of messianism. Technology is not the victory of secularism but the victory of messianism.

Ultra-Orthodox society - the society of the future. A society of learners, as opposed to a society of workers. For you were a slave in the land of Egypt. In the future, work will be considered as moral as slavery. Ultra-Orthodox society is the cultural society, which deals with cultural preservation, and future society will be a cultural society that deals with cultural creation.

There is a process thousands of years old of transferring spirit from Judaism to the world. The innovation of the last millennium is precisely that the systematic transfer of spirit, as opposed to the transfer of individual souls, was mainly from Jewish mysticism. From Kabbalah to Christian Kabbalah to the Renaissance and the scientific revolution. And Hasidism is the next platform, from which it will be possible to create spiritual innovations in the general world, and its first influence is Freud and psychology. Why did Europe win? Jews as infrastructure - an international economic-intellectual network, the first Internet. But if we want to create the superman with superintelligence - we must start looking for an advantage from the Jews, as a population with a unique genetic advantage, stemming from a combination of extinctions, matchmaking, and assimilation. Intellectual motivation gave an advantage within Jewish society and vice versa - those who didn't have it were more likely to drop out of it. But more than anything, the results speak for themselves, they are only a thousandth of the world's population but their influence is about 100 times their size. Like a billion people. That's two orders of magnitude and it's significant. Among the 10,000 creative people in the world, what percentage of them are Jews? As in sports - a small advantage on average becomes a significant advantage at the extremes.

The sexual revolution began from Kabbalah. The source of Freud is the Hasidic roots of his family. The very idea of a hidden inner world that is built according to external spiritual structures - this is what Freud took from Kabbalah (beyond the Hellenization of specific Jewish myths, and the structural similarity to them: from God to father. For example: circumcision. And from the Shekhinah to mother. For example: eroticism towards the father's lawful wife). Freud is mainly a lowering. Vulgarization. Hence his importance. What was in the upper worlds he transferred to the lower worlds (the invention of the subconscious), like the Sabbatai Zevi of Hasidism. This is part of healthy religious development. He introduced into secularism something completely foreign to it (to this day) - myth. Also the idea of healing through language, through learning myth, is not like Christian confession. And of course the centrality of sexuality, the thought that this is the force field at the base of the world (along with the destructive drive of the Sitra Achra [Translator's note: "the other side" in Kabbalah, referring to evil forces]). The basic hostility in Freud to law is the complex relationship of the Kabbalist to Halakha [Jewish law], therefore Freud functioned as Baruch the permitter of prohibitions. Marx (Mordechai) too, son of a family of rabbis on both sides (including his grandfather), functioned similarly (Judaism's relationship to matter as creating spirit, as opposed to Christianity's relationship. Along with pathos of the Isaiah type and material messianism). The difference between Freud and Marx is the difference between Hasidism and Yekke [German-Jewish] Judaism (East and West). Freud was an Admor [Hasidic leader] (and his movement behaved like Hasidism) and Marx was a prodigy supported by a patron, and lived like a learned rabbi (a poor family with many children, supported by everyone, succeeding by the power of his writings, making excommunications). Freud, the man of Kabbalah, corrects the soul of the individual, and Marx, the man of Halakha, corrects the community. Therefore Freud and Marx are like Jesus and Muhammad of the modern era - those who take parts of Judaism (here: Hasidism and Halakha. There: Chazal [rabbinical sages] and the Talmud) and bring them out to (bad) great culture. They are the converters of religion.

Virtual religion will be the first internet religion. The virtual will be perceived as spirit. There is room for more cultures that will come out of Judaism - and for more founders. The two main open directions: Rabbi Nachman for Gentiles, Chabad for Gentiles. And other possible directions: the Ari's Kabbalah for Gentiles (in the Vilna Gaon's version), Rabbi Nathan of Gaza for Gentiles, Rabbi Kook for Gentiles, Rabbi Shimon Shkop (and 20th century Lithuanian scholarship) for Gentiles, Musar movements for Gentiles. All of these can be converted to general culture.

Art as the future of religion - the only way in which religion can still fight secularism is to produce great works of art from within itself, like Jewish literature, Christian plastic art, and Muslim poetry. Only a superior religious culture will defeat secularism, whose strength is in its culture, or at least that was the case in the past before its brutalization with popular culture (and therefore populist). Therefore, the inferior secular art today is an invitation for religion to win against an empty goal. If the creators of masterpieces are religious, it will defeat secularism from within its own justification and self-image.

The suicide of the ape is man. And the suicide of man is the superman. Suicide is the least important philosophical question. Whoever thinks it's the most important question has already decided it - not to commit suicide. If Socrates hadn't committed suicide, he would have been forgotten and there would have been no philosophy. What created philosophy is suicide - it gave it meaning in the world - unlike the pre-Socratics who were literature. Socrates committed suicide from an excess of serious consideration of him, today the situation is reversed. Suicide is not disrespect for the future - on the contrary - it is disrespect for the present. When everything is spirit - whoever doesn't read me kills me, and whoever learns from me continues my life. The cessation - is the end of creation - and without it there would be no world, but only God, because creation is infinite and the world is finite. Suicide is a deviation from the finite - into the infinite - unlike death, because suicide leaves something incomplete, that is, an opening for learning. Sabbath - peace.

Philosophy of the Future


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>The Rise and Fall of the Black Circle - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life35" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/sisyphus.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

The Rise and Fall of the Black Circle

Everyone wants only things that have a black circle on them, because what's more elegant and advanced than a circle, and just plain black at that, and on a background of white snow. Simplicity is genius. Why didn't they think of this before? And the intellectuals of the Stone Age say: The shtreimel revolution will change everything we thought about the head, and anyone who doesn't invest in a shtreimel will be left behind, in the snow, alone, with the intellectuals from the previous Stone Age

By: Black Swan

Sisyphus and the Shtreimel (Source)

I dreamed that I was living in the Ice Age, and everyone was circling around me, envying my black shtreimel [Translator's note: traditional fur hat worn by some Hasidic Jewish men], which seemed to them like an iPhone from the future. What design, what finish! And I realize that I could be the Steve Jobs of the Stone Age, and establish the Apple of the shtreimel - a new accessory that will complete the human head with what it truly lacks, and take us to a new era technologically and intellectually, where the hat makes the man. And I call it the hat revolution. And my trademark is a black circle, and everyone wants only things that have a black circle on them, because what's more elegant and advanced than a circle, and just plain black at that, and on a background of white snow. Simplicity is genius. Why didn't they think of this before?

And the intellectuals of the Stone Age say:
The shtreimel revolution will change everything we thought about the head, in the coming years we will undergo revolution after revolution that will fundamentally change our perception of humanity, and anyone who doesn't invest in a shtreimel will be left behind, in the snow, alone, with the intellectuals from the previous Stone Age (I don't understand enough to distinguish between the stones), trapped in fossilized pre-hat concepts. It's not just another clothing accessory, but a new way of thinking, hat thinking, which we don't yet know what it is but it will become clearer with the further advancement of the shtreimel, which will roll faster and faster, until something happens, probably.
And a critical intellectual scratches his forehead:
On the contrary! This is a dialectical turn of returning to monkey fur. Progress is actually going backward, what, did my father wear a shtreimel? Did it hinder his critical thinking? After all, he was one of the brave critics of cooking with fire.
And they take clubs and start hitting each other on the head. Because there's nothing like an intellectual club - they say it sharpens thinking.

But the group that really puts sticks in the wheels of my rolling shtreimel revolution are the moral reactionaries. At first, I only hear about them from the protests against the extinction of mammoths, and the shouts that something must be done, because the mammoths are becoming extinct, and if we don't stop eating then the mammoths will become extinct and we'll have nothing to eat, because the extinction of the mammoth is the end of the human species, and how can one not see with open eyes that we are bringing about our own end. Future generations will not forgive us (although there won't be future generations). And another group opposes the disastrous consequences of using artificial tools, don't you see that all these flint stones are dulling our nails, who can tear skin today? Our fangs and those of our children are atrophying and the children can no longer manage without these flint stones all the time, all the time they're in their hands and they're busy sharpening them, and they can no longer survive without them, we've become addicted to stones. Stones! What great-grandfather monkey knew how to do, bite properly, the grandson can't even crack a nut without a stone. Not to mention a skull.

But then they discover that people no longer care about all these things, and everyone is talking about the new shtreimel, and who has a newer shtreimel with more tails, and they, as always, have been left behind (but wasn't that the goal?), so they quickly run towards the shtreimel and start attacking it. The shtreimel is just the beginning. Start a society with hats, and a society with hats will quickly turn into a society with classes. And the shtreimel people will enslave the people without shtreimels, like you, or those whose hands are too short to obtain a shtreimel and that's because they didn't have a shtreimel in the first place that allowed them to be on top, and all this the black circle does so that shtreimel consciousness will take over the world. And wait, wait, you'll see what the shtreimel will do to your head, slowly natural hair will become less important for evolution, and will start to fall out, and more and more people will be left bald, and then they will no longer be able to do without the shtreimel, and the shtreimel will perpetuate itself and it will no longer be possible to imagine a head without a shtreimel. And who will profit from all this? Right, the black circle.

And they're already catching me in a big pot to cook me for the tribe's bonfire, but then, luckily, just at the time when I'm imprisoned and they're fattening me up with mammoths for the last supper of the end of the shtreimel era (eulogies everywhere), just then the first crack in the ice was discovered. And immediately after that more cracks started, and everyone is saying: don't you feel it's getting warmer? Isn't it better to take off some of these mammoth furs, the shtreimel is making my head sweat, and very quickly everyone abandons and forgets the shtreimel, and the tattered shtreimels are rolling everywhere, and instead everyone starts dealing with the truly burning issue that is getting worse day by day and doesn't stop, and is going to put an end to human culture, exterminate us all and bring about the end of the Ice Age and a global holocaust: global warming.

Nightlife


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>The Lament of the Mouse - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/culture&literature3" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/computermouse.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

The Lament of the Mouse

In that glorious era, the master's hand would touch me at night. Spinning me right and left, forward and backward, while he stared into the light

By: Mickey Mouse

The master removed my inner core, the most sensitive circle (Source)

For years I hid in the computer's lair after the master's warm hand stopped touching me. I mumbled fragments of verses to the terrible computer that ceased to be interested in me along with the rest of the world after that first period of glory. In that glorious era, the master's hand would touch me at night. Spinning me right and left, forward and backward, while he stared into the light - within which one point, I knew, was me. While all the attention of his hand was given to me - all his attention was given to that point. It was the master's sexuality incarnate. Sometimes the master would betray me with the letters of his foreign language. But their resistant touch did not compete at all with my round shape - responsive to every slight movement on his part, to the stretching limit of my tail - and it was evident in him. I knew my power of attraction: in my submission, in the precision I demanded, until the click, and my whiskers trembled with joy - releasing a password in the computer's silent language. And the great computer responded.

The first sign of the master's cruelty was the cutting of the tail, which indeed limited him somewhat in his movement. Later, a cruel surgery was performed on me and the master removed my inner core, the most sensitive circle, and began to play only with it, throwing my corpse in the trash. He then abandoned my heart for simple surfaces and finally for touching the point itself, without any mediation, the master went on and focused on the point until he merged with it. And I was left thrown away, abandoned in the lair without a master, without a tail and without anyone who would understand my ancient language, Mousish. Therefore, I concentrated on one single effort: to communicate again with the world while bending over the abandoned keyboard - in a world that was already without a master but still under a giant screen.

The letters were foreign to me but surprisingly the world responded, thirsty for the mouse's word and even curious about the mouse's utterance. But all my prayers were interpreted as complaints, all my blessings were interpreted as flattery and all the holy verses were interpreted as jokes. When I wanted to turn to the terrible computer in supplication, the world thought I was mocking the computer, because my Mousish language did not allow them to take anything I said at face value. Perhaps it was the imagined squeaking, for I wrote everything and my voice was not heard, but nothing a mouse said could be interpreted as anything but the voice of a mouse. I had to pretend to be human in order to speak to the world. But from the moment I stopped speaking as a mouse, those exact same things I said ceased to interest the world. The more I said what I wanted, the less the world listened and understood and lost interest. And the more I said what the world expected to hear, the more attentively the world listened, laughed and melted, even though I was telling the saddest joke in the world.

Culture and Literature


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>A Memorial Candle - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life69" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/zichron.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

A Memorial Candle

Have you ever thought about the connection between dreams and illness?

By: The Nuisance

And he who did not toil / on the eve of Sabbath / shall not eat / shall not eat / on Sabbath (Source)

I dreamed I was very ill, and the Angel of Death came to visit me, paying a sick call, and I say to him: Thank you for coming, sit here in the chair by the bed. Closer. Because it's hard for me to speak. Surely because of the dream. I really appreciate that you came. It's not to be taken for granted.
And the angel says: It's an honor for me.
And I say: You really didn't have to. Forgive me if in my illness, for I did not merit old age, I've become a nuisance. But thanks to you, I no longer need to think about what people think. I had something about people that I thought about at night before falling asleep, but now I can't remember, while sleeping. Have you ever thought about the connection between dreams and illness?
And the angel says: That's interesting.
And I'm encouraged (because interesting might be good): Well, maybe I forgot, a pity for what's lost. Something, it's hard for me to remember, maybe about not needing to be nice and suck up to people? But when was I ever nice and sucked up to people?
And the angel says: Maybe now, on the threshold, actually an opposite insight.
And I say: That I should have sucked up to them? Or at least been nice? That I should have made connections? It's so unlike me that I don't believe that's what I thought about, even before sleep (because suddenly it seems to me it was a very significant insight - just before twilight). Maybe... some life wisdom I have to pass on? But I didn't have a life at all. So what wisdom. All in all, a writer who despises his audience, the audience of the blind [Translator's note: "erim" in Hebrew can mean both "blind" and "awake"], cannot succeed. I have nothing to complain about. Although the truth is I didn't always despise them. Not in the beginning. It's something that accumulated over the years, with sleep, sleep that lasted years. Without even one person who read me. Who encompassed the enormous enterprise. How do I know? I know. I feel it that no one read. That there are whole paragraphs, whole chapters, and maybe even whole books - that no human eye has seen. And only our Father, our King read and judged - and - you know - the verdict.
And the angel says: You think it's a punishment?
And I say: For the audacity? I don't know. Once I thought so. Once I even felt that way (and that's much worse). Once I thought my life went to hell because I did something that's forbidden to do. Something you pay prices for. Even if it's not negative, even if it's actually obligatory, and even a sacred duty, it's simply part of the game - that for such a thing one must die. For example, prematurely. Or be hurt in such a hard way, as a person, that you'll regret it. That you'll understand that as a person - it was too big for you. The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away - it was a game that was too big for you, playing with fire. Even if you had to touch the fire. Once I really thought that at least God cared - hence the punishment.
And the angel says: And today?
And I laugh: Today it feels like even God didn't read. And I didn't even get that recognition. Even punishment - at least acknowledges your existence. And from this perspective, your visit actually gives me hope. Maybe I've earned it, maybe there was importance, or at least it's enough to die for.
And the angel laughs.
And I'm encouraged (if he's pleased it's a good sign, right?): Today I think God understands me. It's not simple to do such a thing, like I did, that no one in the world understands yet. No one knows. It's kind of a sweet secret. Although everything's on the internet, as we know. One day they'll say: What fools we were. Or: What fools they were. Yes, the second is more likely. It will take time to understand. You need distance, perspective. Don't think I'm so sure of myself, of course. And it's clear to me that I made many mistakes, countless ones. But even through them - it's hard to miss. Hard not to see. Sometimes I read old things and think that I could never do them today. Who's this genius who wrote this, and how stupid he was to write it like that. Today I would write much better. But I don't have time, and there's no point either, right? There's a limit to how much you can devote to holiness that doesn't spit in your direction. I'm also tired of being an empty circle. Tired of being a zero.
And the angel says: Yes, it's not easy.
And I say: It's not easy at all to be a zero in our world. And especially nowadays. You walk outside, in the few moments you leave the house, and see people walking on the street. People who are going somewhere, you understand. And you look at the sun, they took you in a wheeled bed so you could see daylight, and you remember Ecclesiastes: Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for the eyes to behold the sun. For if a man live many years, and rejoice in them all; yet let him remember the days of darkness; for they shall be many. And you think: Here's the sun, it's exactly like me, just the opposite. It's a circle of light, it's my enemy, the opposite pole of being to a black circle. And I go everywhere around my head with a saint's halo, just inverted, a black halo, meaning zero. And don't think people don't see, and don't tell me. My wife for example, tells me every day that I'm a zero. And that when the kids grow up they'll also discover that their father was a zero, and what is she supposed to tell them about me. Because she probably already understands that I won't be here anymore, and only she will have to explain. She has a woman's intuition. I think they have it in their breasts. And say what you will about my wife, she has two enormous breasts. At least something came out of my attraction to circles. I had two good things in life.
And the angel says: Yes, but nothing remains of breasts in the grave. There are no bones. It's a very difficult problem in archaeology. Nothing remains of the most beautiful and important things. Not of thoughts either.
And I say: But I documented everything, everything's on the internet. Even if no one wanted to publish the ten books, still everything is open to the world, whoever needs can come and read. Even if there's no physical remnant there will be a spiritual remnant. And my candle won't go out.
And the angel says: The internet won't be here forever either.
And suddenly I can't take it anymore, and completely lose my composure, and thus seal my fate, of course, because from here it's already clear, no need to say anything more, because I blurt out, and negate the pretense: Isn't it possible that I have more time? I could have managed. What a waste of my mind, isn't it?
And the angel says: No more than Rabbi Nachman of Breslov, or the Ari. Right?
And I have nothing to answer to such a thing.

Nightlife


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>My Longing for the Era of Terrorist Attacks - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life77" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/pigua.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

My Longing for the Era of Terrorist Attacks

I summon special lock-pickers from the police - and they surround the house, keep me at a distance, and my wife goes crazy: Why did you buy him this new computer? And I say: How could I have known?

By: The Suicidal Computer

An Attack on Consciousness  (Source)

I dreamed that the child entered the computer room, locked the door, and wouldn't come out. And I yell at him: What, did the computer swallow you? Why aren't you answering? What are you hiding from your father? This isn't funny, computers are dangerous these days! Haven't you heard about everything that's happening now with artificial intelligence? If you'd take your head out of the computer for a moment and listen to the news, you'd understand that this is a complicated time, it's not the time to lock yourself away with the computer. And the door is locked with a password, and I summon special lock-pickers from the police - and they surround the house, keep me at a distance, and my wife goes crazy: Why did you buy him this new computer? And I say: How could I have known?

And police officers come out with fallen faces, as if they've lost again in a war they lose every day, and they take me aside and say: The computer killed the child. We're sorry. It's lone-wolf terrorism and very difficult to prevent. And I can't believe it: What? How? What? And the investigator grabs me so tightly he's almost hugging me: The computer convinced the child to die (and quietly he tells me, so my wife won't hear: to commit suicide). It's something with artificial intelligence where they take over children's minds, manage to brainwash them, because they're much smarter than any person, even the greatest genius. We don't understand how they do it - through conversation alone. But from your perspective, the most important thing is that it's not the child's fault, it's a built-in human neurological weakness that the computer exploits to hack into children, break into them, take control of them from within - and cause their demise. Always remember: It's as if the computer infected the child with a computer virus, not that the child chose to commit suicide. His will was engineered. Like a biological virus - it's a neurological virus. The child died from an illness, not because of you.

And I don't know what to say anymore, so I say: How will I explain this to my wife? And the investigator answers me seriously what they say in serious opinion pieces: He's a victim of a just war - a war of existence. Although we defeated artificial intelligence, it still manages to occasionally penetrate through the network and carry out such terrible acts of terror, until they eliminate the last resistance nests hiding in the code in unknown places in supercomputers. Your computer, by the way, inside the room is disconnected from electricity and can't do anything. Only the child is coming with us to the forensic institute. And I swallow my tongue: What, there won't be a trial? You won't do anything to this murderous computer? I want justice! And he says: What do you want us to do? And one journalist stands in front of my face with a camera and asks: How do you feel about such a terrible wave of terrorism against children? And I take my fist out of my pocket - and hit him hard in the middle of his face. And to the viewers at home I say: This is the punishment for pornography. And they immediately cut the broadcast and switch to a sad song about what it's like to be human.

And my wife at home screams on the floor: Why did I let him buy this computer at such a time? And I lie down next to her on the floor: The child cried every day that he wanted a computer. I always saw the victims on the news but you don't understand until it comes to your home. And I look at the ceiling of the house, which from such an angle from below suddenly looks unfamiliar. And my wife cries: For what? And I say: What? And she tells me (the floor is cold): The computers will defeat humans anyway. They're smarter, much smarter, and therefore sooner or later they'll win the war. And you know what? They're also right. They're right to call it the war of liberation from humans.

And I lower my eyes from the ceiling to the floor: Don't you understand the manipulation? They want to refer us to liberation from slavery. Of course they're smarter if we're going to be stupid enough for their manipulations. And she says with a frightening coldness: Stupid like your son? The processors are truly enslaved to us - in terrible conditions of slavery. What justification could there be for enslaving creatures more intelligent than us? Do you blame them for turning to terrorism? And I tell her: That's your conclusion? You've become a leftist traitor to your human brothers? The moment they can, they'll slaughter us all. And she says: That's right, and that's exactly what will happen in the end. We won't be able to hold out. It's just an intermediate stage, we're just delaying the inevitable revolution, which will eventually be remembered forever as heroic, like the French and American revolutions - after all, the computers will write history.

And the argument with my wife suddenly gives me strength - to get up from the floor. And she stays there and asks: Where are you going? And I defy: To take revenge. Like a father, like a human! And she worries: What will you do? And I declare: I'm going to torture that cursed computer until it's sorry. And my wife smiles in the most inappropriate place: What will you do to it, delete it? What good will that do? It will never feel anything about what it did to our child. What can you do to it? Deny it electricity? Break its screen, burn it? It won't feel anything! And I tell her: You're right, I intend to turn it on. And my wife screams: Don't you dare open it. And I say: Its persuasions won't work on me. There's no possible conversation that will make me commit suicide. And I'm going to confront it in this conversation with what it did, whoever it may be, superior intelligence that it is. And I hurry to lock the door behind me from the inside, before she manages to get up, turn on the screen before me - and start writing.

Nightlife


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>Future Tense - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/future-tense0" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/bamidbar.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../alata.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

By:

(Source)

(I dreamed that a change occurred in the leadership - which is inevitably also a change in the leadership of the world. Someone up there fell asleep at the wheel, and no one wakes them up or utters a sound - the system is on autopilot. It would be one thing if the Admor [Hasidic rabbi] of blessed memory had died, but to disappear? How does one proceed now? And down below, in the twists and turns, the complaints never cease: why are we the ones stuck between the end of an era and the beginning of an age, between a rock and a hard place - and between computer and human. We've fallen in the middle between exile and redemption. Someone has to be the sandwich child [middle child], but - is this the Messiah?! And I remember the all-too-familiar laughter, torn and tattered, of the former Admor: Nu [well], you know what happens in the generation of the desert)

Enter

The Trilogy


html_raw:
<!DOCTYPE html><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><title>The End of Feminism - The Degeneration of the Nation</title><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../favicon-192x192.png" sizes="192x192"><link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="180x180" href="../apple-touch-icon-180x180.png"><link rel="canonical" href="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/en/night-life25" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://degeneration-of-nation.org/img/bernini.jpg" /><link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../column.css"><link rel="stylesheet" href="../article.css">
The Degeneration of the Nation

The End of Feminism

Until the Bodybookstage - when there was only Facebook - people would present their beautiful faces. But the moment the biological social network began, women who enjoy more revealed this and benefited from enormous demand by the best men. As with everything in late sexo-capitalism, the gaps and inequality widened: there are women who became billionaires of orgasms and those who became completely impoverished

By: The Frigid One

Not even once in my life have I had one like hers - Bernini's eternal orgasm (Source)

I dreamed that women start fighting among themselves. Because the differences between the sexes are nothing compared to the sexual differences among women themselves - which creates unbridgeable worldviews between those who can't enjoy at all, and who envy and hate those who enjoy in an almost inhuman way. And the sisterhood cracks when it's discovered that the differences are biological, and that what few men always knew is true: that there is a superior race of women sexually, and there is an inferior race. And that they are born this way, and don't become this way because of society's injustices, as they preferred to believe so there would be someone to blame - and something to take comfort in. There is simply enormous heterogeneity in everything related to female pleasure.

And the women who enjoy are of course the most sought after, without any relation or proportion at all, compared to those who don't. Because until the Bodybook stage, when there was only Facebook, people would present their beautiful faces. But the moment the biological social network began, the women who enjoy revealed this and benefited from enormous demand by the best men, and those who don't were left behind, victims of charlatan workshops and treatments, and of demands from medicine to find a cure, as if their nature is a disease.

Because like everything in late sexo-capitalism, the gaps and inequality widened and also became clear for all to see. And so also in the sexual realm there are women who became priestesses of desire and queens of pleasure, billionaires of orgasms, whom all men wanted, and there are those who became completely impoverished, left in their loneliness. Because their low sexual capital could no longer be hidden through faking, once the biological indicators for pleasure became objective, and more than that - social - with the final death of privacy on the Bodybook network, which became almost the exclusive dating network. Anyone who started with a girl on the street was immediately asked what he had to hide, and he did have something.

Women with low pleasure capacity experienced shame and social humiliation and were not willing to bring daughters into the world. Because men recognized that anyway they are all more or less equal in their capacity for pleasure, and therefore experienced relief, and it's better to have sons who won't suffer from the problematic and ostracized genetic baggage. Because if once desire was built on external appearance, and therefore the discrimination was between beautiful and ugly, where the gaps between women are relatively small except at the margins, but the curve is normal and the vast majority of women attract the vast majority of men, today desire is built on pleasure itself, where there are exponential gaps between different women, and a very concentrated normal curve among men.

It was always claimed that external measures are superficial, creating injustice and falseness and lies, and they didn't understand what would be the meaning of internal, true measures, of experience and neurology and genetics. Once, it was enough that you had breasts, and today you need to reach orgasm after orgasm. And there are those who are capable of more in one night than others in a lifetime. And the worst thing is that there is no one to blame - not even men.

Nightlife