banca tercas
on 1 january 2011 the group sold banca caripe to banca tercas, the bank only section in abruzzo .
on 1 october 2014, the special administration of banca tercas was lifted and new management was appointed by banca popolare di bari in its new capacity of sole shareholder of banca tercas .
after the transactions banca tercas and its subsidiary banca caripe, the major saving banks in abruzzo, became subsidiaries of bp bari .
while banca tercas has received incompatible aid, the commission did not find evidence of aid to the buyer, banca popolare di bari .
on 1 january 2011 banca tercas acquired the controlling interests of banca caripe (95 %) for? 228 million from banco popolare .
how can i put and write and define banca tercas in a sentence and how is the word banca tercas used in a sentence and examples? 用banca tercas造句, 用banca tercas造句, 用banca tercas造句, banca tercas meaning, definition, pronunciation, synonyms and example sentences are provided by ichacha. net .
about bpbari banca popolare di bari is the parent company of the homonymous banking group, whose subsidiaries are “banca tercas”, “banca caripe”, “cassa di risparmio di orvieto” and “popolare bari corporate finance” .
in 2007 intesa sanpaolo sold their 20% shares on banca tercas for? 89 million to other investors .
fondazione pescara abruzzo, the banking foundation which originated from caripe, owned 3. 5% shares of banca tercas as well as 5% of banca caripe .
in 2014 bp bari contributed the capital increases of banca tercas, which was under special administration by the state .
headquartered in teramo, italy, banca tercas spa reported total consolidated assets of eur3. 5 billion at june 2010 .
banca tercas is headquartered in teramo, italy. at december 2011, it had total assets of eur5. 3 billion .
in december 2015, european commission ruled that the capital injection to banca tercas in 2014, would be classified as state aid .
in october 2006
' banca tercas s. p. a .
' was found with the foundation sold 15% shares to the public, as well as banca intesa retained their 20% shares .
with this acquisition banca tercas will become leading local bank in the abruzzo region, with a market share of about 17% of deposits and 11% of loans .
banca piccolo credito valtellinese: finalisation of the purchase of 100% equity. .
banca piccolo c: finalisation of the purchase of 100% equity in cla. .
on 27 july 2014 the extraordinary shareholders' meeting of banca tercas, called by the special administrator, decided to cover the losses, which had occurred during the special administration through the cancellation of all existing ordinary shares and a cash injection by the fitd. with the same occasion the shareholders approved a capital increase of eur 230 million reserved to banca popolare di bari, which after the subscription of the capital increase became the sole shareholder of banca tercas .
the fund carried 11 interventions, which 2 out of 11 banks returned to normal operation (cassa di risparmio di prato and banca tercas). 4 additional bank were bail - out by newly established italian national resolution fund of single resolution mechanism in 2015. (banca delle marche, banca popolare dell' etruria e del lazio, cassa di risparmio della provincia di chieti and cassa di risparmio di ferrara) istituto per il credito sportivo, gbm banca and banca popolare delle province calabre were still under special administration as at 2015 .
banca monte dei paschi di siena s. p. a. p. i. 00884060526
banca monte dei paschi di siena s. p. a. p. i. 0088406052
in july 2014, the fitd with the approval of the bank of italy, provided approximately €300 million in support (through capital injections and guarantees) to banca tercas for its acquisition by banca popolare di bari. these measures were not notified to the commission as required by the treaty .
furthermore, although banca tercas' existing shareholders were fully written down at the time, subordinated creditors did not make any contribution to the cost of restructuring, as is required under burden - sharing principles .
banca piccolo c: 2018 - 2020 business plan - the de - risking plan envi. .
banca piccolo credito valtellinese: 2018 - 2020 business plan - the de - risking pl. .
banca piccolo credito valtellinese: creval business plan 2018 - 2020 - project & l. . ;
following an in - depth probe, the european commission has concluded that the support granted by the italian mandatory deposit guarantee scheme to banca tercas constitutes incompatible state aid based on the facts and circumstances at hand .
banca tercas is the holding company of a banking group operating mainly in the abruzzo region. at the end of 2011, banca tercas had a total balance sheet of €5. 3 billion and a market share of about 0. 1% of total banking assets in italy. on 17 april 2012 based on the findings of a supervisory inspection performed by bank of italy, the bank was placed under special administration .
banca tercas is a small italian bank with a market share of about 0. 1% of total banking assets in italy. in july 2014, the italian mandatory deposit guarantee scheme fondo interbancario di tutela dei depositi (fitd) intervened in favour of banca tercas in order to cover the losses of the bank and support its sale to banca popolare di bari. the commission found that the fitd acted on behalf of the italian state. the measures are not in line with eu state aid rules, because italy did not present a restructuring plan and the measures did not minimise the aid nor the resulting distortions of competition. the commission welcomes that private banks are now considering supporting banca tercas voluntarily. in any case, depositors remain fully protected .
contrary to those rules, banca tercas' subordinated creditors weren' t forced to take losses on their holdings, the commission said. italy has challenged the recovery decision before the general court of the eu (gc) .
milan, oct 8 (reuters) - italian mid - tier lender credito valtellinese said on tuesday its board had decided not to start talks for a merger with troubled peer banca tercas, as conditions were not in place .
european commission ruled that the bail out of banca tercas by fitd in 2014 was a state aid, while new bank recovery and resolution directive of eu required to bail - in some investors of the bank before any state intervention .
creval, which holds 7. 8 percent of tercas, said last month it had started a due diligence on tercas, which is under special administration, to evaluate the possible tie - up. (reporting by francesca landini, editing by danilo masoni )
milan (reuters) - italian mid - tier lender credito valtellinese said on wednesday it was considering a possible tie - up with troubled peer banca tercas but that it had not taken any decision about a possible recapitalisation linked to the deal .
milan, january 04, 2011 - - moody' s investors service has today downgraded the standalone bank financial strength rating (bfsr) of banca tercas spa (banca tercas) to d + from c -, which now maps into a baa3 on the long - term rating scale, from baa1 previously. at the same time, its long - term deposit rating was downgraded to baa2 from a3. the short - term deposit rating of p - 2 was affirmed. all ratings have a stable outlook .
the innovfin agreement will allow bp bari to provide loans to innovative companies in italy over the next 2 years with the support of a guarantee provided by the eif and backed under horizon 2020, the eu framework programme for research and innovation. the eu support for innovative italian companies is expected to generate a portfolio of eur 100m of bank loans. banca popolare di bari will provide loans to innovative businesses and some loans will also be channelled via the following banks - cassa di risparmio di orvieto, banca tercas and banca caripe .
brad wanamaker extended his contract with banca tercas teramo until january. the rookie guard signed another short - term deal with the team to replace trey johnson, still out due to an injury. in the first three games in serie a, wanamaker averaged 9. 7ppg and 4. 7rpg .
on 27 february 2015, the commission preliminarily concluded that the intervention by the fitd in favour of banca tercas constitutes state aid and opened an in - depth investigation. at that stage the commission also considered that the information available was insufficient to establish whether the aid is compatible with the internal market .
the downgrade of banca tercas' s long - term deposit rating to baa2 from a3 follows the downgrade of the bank' s standalone bfsr. the bank' s deposit rating benefits from moody' s expectation of a moderate probability of systemic support, resulting in a one - notch uplift from its baa3 bca .
credito valtellinese, which holds 7. 8 percent of tercas, said it expected to complete the due diligence by the end of september and hold a board meeting to discuss the issue on october 8. italian newspaper mf said on wednesday credito valtellinese could inject 200 million euros in tercas, and would need a capital increase to be able to do that .
in a statement credito valtellinese said it had recently started a due diligence on tercas, which is currently under special administration, to evaluate the possibility of a merger among other things .
according to the information available to the commission, the fitd has in the meantime consulted its members as to whether they would voluntarily agree to support banca tercas. if private actors decide according to their own objectives and from their own funds, without mandate from the state, to support banks in difficulties, no state aid issues would arise .
deposit guarantee schemes are mandatory under eu law to ensure that covered deposits are paid out when a bank is liquidated and exits the market, in which case there are no state aid issues. however, in the present case, the fitd intervened beyond this pay - out function to depositors by granting support to a bank in difficulty, banca tercas .
banca tercas teramo will extend brad wanamaker contract who is going to expire in few days. trey johnson, signed in the summer, is still injured and wanamaker will be kept in the roster waiting for a final decision about johnson. wanakamer is averaging 9. 7ppg and 4. 7rpg in serie a in the first three games of the season .
siena, 9 may 2018 – banca monte dei paschi di siena announces that today received the resignation from the position of alternate statutory auditor of mrs carmela regina silvestri .
the principal methodologies used in this rating were
bank financial strength ratings: global methodology
published in february 2007, and
incorporation of joint - default analysis into moody' s bank ratings: a refined methodology
published in march 2007. moody' s previous rating action on banca tercas was implemented on 18 june 2009, when the ratings were affirmed .
siena, 4 may 2018– banca monte dei paschi di siena announces that today received the resignation from the position of board member of professor giuseppina capaldo, for professional reasons .
the commission opened an in - depth probe into the support measures in february 2015, because it had doubts on their compatibility with eu state aid rules. the commission’s investigation showed that fitd acted on behalf of the italian state when it granted support to banca tercas. furthermore, the aid measures are not compatible with eu state aid rules, in particular the 2013 banking communication, because :
milan, may 07, 2012 - - moody' s investors service has today downgraded banca tercas' bank deposit rating to b3 from baa3 and the prime - 3 short - term rating to non - prime; at the same time, the bank' s standalone bank financial strength rating (bfsr) was downgraded to e +, mapping to a b3 standalone credit strength, from d + / baa3. all ratings remain on review for downgrade .
in early 2016, fitd added a voluntary scheme in its article of associations, which bail out banca tercas by voluntary contribution of the member banks of fitd. (it was followed by cassa di risparmio di cesena, a small bank in mid 2016) even before the introduction of the voluntary scheme, the officials of fitd had also declared that the fund could not bail out the aforementioned 4 banks entirely, due to small size of the fund .
no. the bank of italy is tasked with authorizing requests for mergers between banks on the basis of criteria established by law, designed to ensure that the newly established bank can be managed in a sound and prudent manner. in the case of banca popolare dell’etruria - banca popolare di vicenza the proposed merger was independently mooted by banca popolare di vicenza. the bank of italy, as is its custom, examined the arguments put forward on both sides in order to rapidly form an opinion prior to a possible request for authorization. but the talks stalled because the parties failed to reach an agreement and there was no formal request for authorization .
eu commissioner in charge of competition policy margrethe vestager said :
eu state aid rules set strict limits for providing support to banks in difficulty – they protect taxpayers and fair competition. all member states have to take care to respect these rules. however, of course other banks are free to put up their own funds for such cases, by their voluntary decision and without state interference - i welcome they are now considering to step in for banca tercas .
banca tercas' bfsr could be moderately upgraded - - although unlikely in the short to medium term - if its controls, governance structure and operations are visibly and demonstrably strengthened, accompanied by improving profitability and capitalization over a sustained period. the bfsr could be downgraded further if the administration weakens the bank' s franchise or funding profile, if further credit quality issues surface, or if there are steps taken by the administrator that would be to the detriment of creditors or depositors .
however, the amount raised from the private sector for atlante 1 fell short of solving the sector' s problems and resources became stretched in june 2016 when the fund bought shares worth €2. 5 billion of struggling lenders veneto banca and banca popolare di vicenza. therefore, in august 2016, in order to tackle the immediate problems of monte dei paschi di siena, a second privately backed bank support fund with similar features was set up – atlante 2 .
not all forms of public intervention fall within the definition of state aid but it might be surprising that the use of resources stemming from banks themselves, i. e. private resources, can also be subject to state aid scrutiny. the road to setting up atlante 1 began in december 2015 when the european commission declared that italy' s decision to provide regional lender banca tercas with a €300 million injection from its deposit guarantee fund was incompatible with the european union' s state aid rules .
banca tercas operates 112 branches in the region of abruzzo in italy, with total assets at june 2010 of eur3. 5 billion. credit strengths include the bank' s good market position in its home region and in the home town teramo (market share for loans and deposits at 19% and 44 %), its solid liquidity profile with significant retail funding and its strategy to remain focused on traditional banking in its local territory. financials are satisfactory, although they have been weakening during the crisis .
italy did not present a restructuring plan, so the commission was not able to evaluate if the aided entity could return to long - term viability. this is notwithstanding the efforts that banca popolare di bari may have made after its acquisition .
siena, 22 march 2018 – following certain rumors reported in the press, banca monte dei paschi specifies that no capital increase deals are being evaluated and that the implementation of the restructuring plan proceeds according to the scheduled timing, as already communicated to the market. in parti…
the european investment fund (eif) and banca popolare di bari (bp bari) assisted by finanziaria internazionale, have signed an innovfin agreement for smes benefiting from the support of the european fund for strategic investments (efsi), the heart of the investment plan for europe .
banca monte dei paschi di siena s. p. a. informs that it has reached a binding agreement with cerved group s. p. a. (“cerved”) and quaestio holding s. a. (“quaestio”) for the sale of its non - performing loans platform
the fitd began to create a scheme – to run in parallel with the obligatory one – open to the ‘voluntary’ participation of the banks, in order to resolve the tercas case ex post. work on its establishment began on 22 november 2015 and ended on 25 january 2016. the scheme is endowed with €3 billion for interventions, roughly equal to the amount already transferred from the fitd to tercas and which must now be repaid to the fitd as a result of the requirements of the european commission’s decision. for the four banks subsequently placed under resolution, the banking system was unable to gather sufficient consensus within its ranks to attempt this solution .
siena, 12 april 2018 – the ordinary shareholders' meeting of banca monte dei paschi di siena, held today under the chairmanship of stefania bariatti, has approved the separate and consolidated financial statements as at 31 december 2017. the group closed 2017 with a consolidated net loss for the …
siena, 12 march 2018 – the board of directors of banca monte dei paschi di siena has resolved to convene the ordinary general meeting in siena, viale mazzini 23, on 12 april 2018 at 9: 30 a. m. , on a single call, to discuss and pass the following resolutions: individual and consolidated financia…
the combination of these factors point to a significantly higher risk profile, compatible with an e + standalone financial strength rating. the review for downgrade will focus on the developments over the coming weeks and the actions that will be taken by the regulator, assessing whether they can underpin the bank' s current risk profile or whether they may lead to a possible further deterioration for creditors. the review will also assess the future direction and prospects for banca tercas, including steps the bank can take to reinforce its risk management, governance and control structures. the review will also consider any actions or plans to strengthen the bank' s capital base to improve its resilience against further credit losses and against the broader challenges facing the italian banking system, notably a deteriorating operating environment, weakening asset quality and more challenging wholesale funding markets .
la banca d’italia utilizza cookie tecnici e di terze parti per il funzionamento del sito: per maggiori informazioni e per sapere come disabilitarli puoi leggere l' informativa sulla privacy. la prosecuzione della navigazione mediante accesso ad altra area del sito o selezione di un elemento dello stesso (ad esempio, di un' immagine o di un link) comporta la prestazione del consenso all' uso dei cookie .
banca caripe operates with 51 branches mainly in the region of abruzzo, with a strong presence in the province of pescara, it' s home town. as of 30 june 2010, the bank had total assets of eur1. 6 billion. the bank was established in 1871 and became part of the banco popolare group in 2001. tier1 ratio stood at 8. 75% in june 2010 and the bank closed the first half of 2010 with net income of eur5. 6 million (2009: eur1million, 2008: eur7million). the remaining 5% shareholding is held by the local foundation pescarabruzzo .
as was communicated in the case of the cassa di risparmio di teramo (tercas), even if the fitd only uses resources provided by the banking system, according to the european commission, the fund is fulfilling a public function and therefore its intervention qualifies as state aid. the european commission – in discussions with the italian government – confirmed that the rules on state aid would also have applied in full to interventions by the fitd in the case of the four ailing banks later placed under resolution. this would have led to the application of the burden - sharing principle to shareholders and holders of subordinated debt. recourse to fitd intervention in the four banks despite the unfavourable opinion of the european commission could have ultimately led to an obligation on the part of the four banks to repay in full the sums disbursed by the fund, with the likely introduction of a bail - in during 2016, entailing the reduction and / or conversion of unsubordinated debt .
html public
- / / w3c / / dtd xhtml 1. 0 strict / / en
urltoken
for inquiries related to this message please contact support. for sales inquiries, please visit urltoken
if you believe this to be in error, please confirm below that you are not a robot by clicking
i' m not a robot
below .
please make sure your browser supports javascript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. for more information you can review the terms of service and cookie policy .
html public
- / / w3c / / dtd html 4. 01 transitional / / en
urltoken
html public
- / / w3c / / dtd html 4. 01 transitional / / en
$ { application. url. prefix. internal } $ { application. root. path } dtd / loose. dtd
finally, no measures were implemented that would have sufficiently limited the distortion of competition created by the aid .
the non - confidential version of the opening decision is already available in the state aid register on the competition website under the case number sa. 39451, and the final decision will become available there once potential confidentiality issues have been resolved .
please log in for full access to your permissions. password is case sensitive .
we brought you to this page based on your search query. if this isn' t what you are looking for, you can continue to search results for

the maximum number of items you can export is 3, 000. please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left .
thank you for your interest in sharing moody' s research. you have reached the daily limit of research email sharings .
you have successfully sent the research. please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access .
by clicking “i agree” [ at the end of this document ], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [ after clicking “i agree” ] (the “information”). references herein to “moody’s” include moody’s corporation, inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates
unless you have entered into an express written contract with moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form .
2. you acknowledge and agree that moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities. moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision .
no warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any moody’s credit rating is given or made by moody’s in any form whatsoever .
3. to the extent permitted by law, moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the information .
4. you agree to read [ and be bound by ] the more detailed disclosures regarding moody’s ratings and the limitations of moody’s liability included in the information .
to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the state of new york located in the city and county of new york, borough of manhattan .
the downgrade of the deposit rating is in line with the lowering of the bfsr rating and standalone credit strength. the b3 long - term deposit rating reflects a low likelihood of systemic support, providing no uplift from the b3 standalone credit strength. the long - term deposit rating remains on review for downgrade, in line with the bfsr .
the methodologies used in this rating were bank financial strength ratings: global methodology published in february 2007, and incorporation of joint - default analysis into moody' s bank ratings: global methodology published in march 2012. please see the credit policy page on urltoken for a copy of these methodologies .
for ratings issued on a program, series or category / class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category / class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with moody' s rating practices. for ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider' s credit rating. for provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. for further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer / entity page for the respective issuer on www. moodys. com .
the rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent (s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure .
information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary moody' s investors service information .
moody' s considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating .
moody' s adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources moody' s considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third - party sources. however, moody' s is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process .
moody' s investors service may have provided ancillary or other permissible service (s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. please see the special report
ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by mis' s eu credit rating agencies
on the ratings disclosure page on our website urltoken for further information .
please see the ratings disclosure page on urltoken for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests .
please see the ratings disclosure page on urltoken for information on (a) mco' s major shareholders (above 5 %) and for (b) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of mco and rated entities as well as (c) the names of entities that hold ratings from mis that have also publicly reported to the sec an ownership interest in mco of more than 5% . a member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of moody' s corporation; however, moody' s has not independently verified this matter .
please see moody' s rating symbols and definitions on the rating process page on urltoken for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery .
please see ratings tab on the issuer / entity page on urltoken for the last rating action and the rating history .
the date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before moody' s ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. consequently, moody' s provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. please see the ratings disclosure page on our website urltoken for further information .
please see urltoken for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the moody' s legal entity that has issued the rating .
christina sterr analyst financial institutions group moody' s italia s. r. l corso di porta romana 68 milan 20122 italy telephone: + 39 - 02 - 9148 - 1100
releasing office: moody' s italia s. r. l corso di porta romana 68 milan 20122 italy telephone: + 39 - 02 - 9148 - 1100
© 2018 moody' s investors service, inc. , moody’s analytics, inc. and / or their affiliates and licensors. all rights reserved .
html public
- / / w3c / / dtd xhtml 1. 0 transitional / / en
urltoken
albania armenia austria azerbaijan belarus belgium bosnia bulgaria croatia cyprus czech rep. denmark estonia finland france fyr macedonia georgia germany greece holland hungary iceland ireland israel
anguilla antigua argentina aruba bahamas barbados belize bermudas bolivia brazil brit. v. isl. cayman isl. chile colombia costa rica cuba dominica dominican rep. ecuador el salvador grenada
guatemala guyana haiti honduras jamaica mexico montserrat nicaragua panama paraguay peru p. rico st. kitts st. lucia st. vincent surinam trinidad turks / caicos uruguay us v. isl. venezuela
mongolia myanmar north korea nepal oman pakistan palestine philippines qatar saudi arabia singapore s. korea sri lanka syria taiwan thailand turkmenistan uae uzbekistan vietnam yemen
american - samoa australia cook islands fiji guam marshall islands micronesia nauru new caledonia new zealand n. mariana palau papua ng samoa solomon islands tahiti tonga vanuatu
algeria angola benin botswana burk. faso burundi cameroon cape verde cent. africa chad congo - br. dr congo egypt eq. guinea eritrea ethiophia gabon gambia ghana guinea guinea - bissau ivory coast kenya lesotho liberia
join us! !! we are looking for someone to help us cover italian basketball. please send us an e - mail .
via de albentiis, 12 / a 64100 teramo (te) tel. : 0861 / 241220 fax. : 0861 / 245460 city: teramo
copyright (c) 1998 - 2018 sports i. t. solutions disclaimer warning: do not copy, redistribute, publish or otherwise exploit information that you download from the site! do not encumber, license, modify, publish, sell, transfer or transmit, or in any way exploit, any of the content of the site, nor will you attempt to do so .
a positive outlook on the ratings could develop from (i) the successful integration of caripe; (ii) increased profitability at a consolidated level; (iii) successful implementation of all envisioned capital measures; and / or (iv) credit losses at an aggregate level in line with current expectations .
downward pressure on the ratings could result from (i) a decrease in capital and profitability associated with higher than expected credit losses; and / or (ii) difficulties arising from the integration process .
information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary moody' s investors service information .
moody' s investors service considers the quality of information available on the issuer or obligation satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining a credit rating .
the rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agents and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure .
moody' s investors service may have provided ancillary or other permissible service (s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the three years preceding the credit rating action. please see the ratings disclosure page urltoken on our website for further information .
moody' s adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources moody' s considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third - party sources. however, moody' s is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process .
please see ratings tab on the issuer / entity page on urltoken for the last rating action and the rating history .
the date on which some credit ratings were first released goes back to a time before moody' s investors service' s credit ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. consequently, moody' s investors service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. please see the ratings disclosure page on our website urltoken for further information .
please see the credit policy page on urltoken for the methodologies used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery .
milan christina sterr analyst financial institutions group moody' s italia s. r. l telephone: + 39 - 02 - 9148 - 1100
london johannes wassenberg md - banking financial institutions group moody' s investors service ltd. journalists: 44 20 7772 5456 subscribers: 44 20 7772 5454
moody' s italia s. r. l corso di porta romana 68 milan 20122 italy telephone: + 39 - 02 - 9148 - 1100
all content © 2000 - 2018 realgm, l. l. c. all rights reserved .
commenting on the signature, eif’s chief executive, pier luigi gilibert said: “ i am pleased to be announcing this innovfin sme guarantee agreement with the bp bari banking group for the benefit of innovative companies in italy. this deal will help to support innovative and growing italian businesses in need of finance, especially in the southern part of the country. ”
carlos moedas, european commissioner for research, science and innovation, said :
innovation is essential for jobs and economic growth in europe, which is why it is at the heart of the investment plan for europe. with today' s agreement, we are bringing €100 million in fresh loans to innovative italian smes .
this transaction implemented thanks to efsi in italy, reflects the eib group’s commitment to respond swiftly to calls from member states, the european commission and the european parliament for a rapid launch of concrete initiatives under efsi, accelerating lending and guaranteeing transactions capable of boosting jobs and growth in the eu .
about the eif the european investment fund (eif) is part of the european investment bank group. its central mission is to support europe' s micro, small and medium - sized businesses (smes) by helping them to access finance. eif designs and develops venture and growth capital, guarantees and microfinance instruments which specifically target this market segment. in this role, eif fosters eu objectives in support of innovation, research and development, entrepreneurship, growth, and employment .
founded in 1960, bpbari is endowed with a network made up of about 380 branches, located in 13 italian regions .
eif: david yormesor tel. : + 352 24 85 81 346, e - mail: d. yormesor @ urltoken
bp bari: christiano spagnoletti tel. : + 39 080 5274 938, e - mail: c. spagnoletti @ urltoken
european commission: annika breidthardt tel. : + 322 295 6153, e - mail: annika. breidthardt @ urltoken
european investment fund 2017 – the european investment fund is not responsible for the content of external internet sites .
html public
- / / w3c / / dtd xhtml + rdfa 1. 0 / / en
urltoken
state aid rules remain one of the decisive factors in dealing with distressed bank situations. but uncertainty remains over whether governments should be able to intervene and rescue banks in danger of failing .
the european banking authority (eba) released its latest stress test results on 29 july 2016. in the run - up to the publication, there had been widespread speculation as to whether state support may be needed for some of the region' s banks. this culminated in the italian government requesting that eu rules on bank resolution and state aid should be amended or suspended to deal with some of its distressed lenders and their high levels of non - performing loans. the european commission and many member states rebuffed these ideas and with most of the european banks receiving a reasonably clean bill of health (even under adverse scenarios), the eba stress test results temporarily muted the discussion. for monte dei paschi di siena, one of italy' s embattled lenders, which looked particularly vulnerable in terms of its considerable recapitalisation needs, a private sector solution was announced just shortly before the publication of the stress test results .
however, these results were not able to dispel entirely concerns about capitalisation in the eu banking sector. a combination of high levels of non - performing loans, faltering economic growth, zero to low interest rates across the eu, low profitability and increasing regulatory capital requirements mean that europe' s banking sector still faces challenges almost eight years on from the collapse of lehman brothers .
in particular, there are questions as to whether italy can push through a much - needed restructuring of its financial sector purely by relying on the limited firepower of the private sector. this leaves one issue on the table: should governments be able to support banks in distress and if yes, under what conditions? the eu resolution framework is designed to ensure an orderly wind - down of failing financial institutions. yet, surprisingly, the interaction between the eu resolution framework and the eu state aid rules is still unexplored in many respects and raises a multitude of unresolved questions. the recent experience of the italian banking sector shines a light on some of these questions .
the new european resolution framework for banks took full effect on 1 january 2016. the cornerstone of the legislation is the bank recovery and resolution directive (brrd), which harmonises the rules for the recovery and resolution of banks throughout the 28 member states of the european union. in the eurozone, the brrd is implemented through the single resolution mechanism, which includes the establishment of the single resolution board, a single authority to deal with bank resolutions, and of the single resolution fund, a fund dedicated to facilitate bank resolution .
the aim of the new bank resolution framework is to avoid the bail - out of banks by taxpayers through creating a framework for the rescue of systemically important bank functions and the orderly winding down of the remaining parts of a bank without using taxpayers' money. thus, the new resolution framework tries to shift the major burden of a bank failure to the bank' s shareholders and creditors. the new rules are designed to ensure that use of public money will be limited to extraordinary situations and only allowed after shareholders and creditors have substantially contributed to the bank rescue through burden sharing .
the default solution under the european bank resolution framework is to put a failing bank into resolution prior to any public recapitalisation. under the brrd, this requires prior burden sharing by shareholders and creditors of at least 8 per cent of the bank' s liabilities through bail - in or otherwise, before resolution authorities can look to access other forms of stabilisation funding such as recapitalisation with public funds. equity and subordinated debt holders must be bailed - in first. senior creditors and non - covered depositors must participate in the burden sharing if this is required to reach the 8 per cent threshold. only depositors with deposits of up to €100, 000 that are covered by mandatory deposit guarantee schemes (dgs) are automatically exempted. the brrd leaves open the possibility of taxpayer intervention, but this is on a limited basis and any such intervention would be subject to the eu' s rules governing state aid .
as an exception to the rule, public funds may be injected into the banks without triggering a resolution via' precautionary recapitalisation' under article 32 (4) (d) brrd. this article permits capital injection from state funds, provided that the injection is precautionary, follows a stress test, and specifically addresses capital shortfalls implied by an' adverse scenario'. precautionary public sector recapitalisation is not permitted for banks that are insolvent or considered likely to fail in the near future under the' point of non - viability test' in the brrd. the article also permits public sector guarantees to be given in respect of access to central bank liquidity. however, again, the use of public funds must be in compliance with state aid rules .
with respect to banks, the current eu framework for state aid is further specified in the 2013 banking communication of the european commission. the 2013 banking communication continues to define detailed rules applied by the commission in cases where the provision of state aid is related to banks. it is worth noting that the 2013 banking communication was enacted prior to the adoption of the new european resolution framework and is therefore not fully aligned with it. in practice, this can create frictions, in particular, with respect to the required level of burden sharing .
both the brrd and the 2013 banking communication stipulate mandatory burden sharing of shareholders and creditors before any state aid is granted. however, unlike the brrd, the 2013 banking communication does not oblige senior debt holders to contribute to restructuring costs. therefore, the burden sharing rules set out in the 2013 banking communication are of particular importance if a bail - in is not already required by the brrd, such as in the case of precautionary recapitalisation. otherwise, the burden sharing requirements under the brrd are stricter .
despite stressing the importance of burden sharing, the 2013 banking communication acknowledges that there may be exceptional circumstances in which burden sharing would not be proportionate or where burden sharing is considered to be counter - productive to the preservation of financial stability. thus, no burden sharing is required if implementing such measures would endanger financial stability or lead to disproportionate results. this exception could cover cases where the aid amount to be received is small in comparison to the bank' s risk weighted assets and the capital shortfall has been reduced significantly in particular through capital raising measures, such as rights issues, a voluntary conversion of subordinated debt instruments into equity, a liability management exercise, capital - generating sales of assets and portfolios or securitisations, earnings retention, and other measures reducing capital needs. while the european commission has made clear that it is determined to interpret this provision narrowly, the exception may open a path to avoid a bail - in if at the same time resolution under the brrd can be avoided .
it goes without saying that the burden sharing requirements under the state aid regime are only triggered if the measure in question actually constitutes state aid. yet, this is not true in all cases where state resources are used to intervene in distressed banks, in particular if a government decides to intervene in a bank in the same way as a private investor would .
this is the course that italy pursued in april 2016 when its government sponsored the creation of a private - backed bank rescue fund to tackle concerns over the health of its financial sector .
the problem stems from the fact italian banks are nursing more than €360 billion of non - performing loans which are proving to be a drag on economic recovery. due to state aid rules, italy turned to the private sector for a solution. the result was atlante 1, a €4. 25 billion back - stop fund sponsored by cassa depositi e prestiti (a state - owned institution), banks, insurers and other institutional investors, such as the italian banking foundations. the fund aims to stabilise italy' s financial system by purchasing (i) newly issued shares of banks which do not meet their srep capital requirements and (ii) npl portfolios .
in order to attract a wide range of investors for selling notes to the securitised assets it holds, atlante 1 can benefit from a guarantee scheme introduced by the italian state. despite the government' s intervention, the european commission has found the scheme free from state aid since the risk for the state is limited and, in particular, the state' s remuneration for the risk taken is on market terms .
the ongoing problems facing the italian banking sector represent the first serious challenge to brrd and when the uk voted to leave the european union, this triggered a sharp sell - off of italian banking shares on 27 june amid concerns about their financial health. italy' s prime minister matteo renzi argued that eu rules on the provision of state aid should be waived on the grounds of preserving financial stability. the european union rejected this request. the need for a taxpayer - funded capital injection was alleviated when the country' s banks did reasonably well in the stress tests, and a plan is in place for a private sector rescue of stricken lender monte dei paschi di siena .
likewise, support by resolution funds, even if sponsored by private banks, generally falls under eu state aid control, since they are regularly created by the state and run by the resolution authorities. state aid control remains applicable even in case of resolution .
even if a bank is under resolution, this does not mean that state aid control ceases to apply. on the contrary, state aid rules will retain their importance alongside the brrd. as an example, the sale of a bridge bank to which assets of a bank under resolution have been transferred will have to comply with state aid provisions. this has implications for the sale procedures and can limit the support for the bridge bank or its buyer in connection with or following re - privatisation. the same is true for any form of public financial support used during resolution. as a consequence, measures implying the use of the resolution fund cannot be granted without the commission' s prior approval.
banca tercas is an italian bank based in teramo , abruzzo . on 1 january 2011 the bank purchased banca caripe from banco popolare , which the bank group also referred as tercas caripe . however the bank was acquired by banca popolare di bari in 2014 , which in turn the bank became part of the bp bari group . 
banca tercas is an italian bank based in teramo, abruzzo. on 1 january 2011 the bank purchased banca caripe from banco popolare, which the bank group also referred as tercas caripe. however the bank was acquired by banca popolare di bari in 2014, which in turn the bank became part of the bp bari group.
banca tercas is an italian bank based in teramo, abruzzo. on 1 january 2011 the bank purchased banca caripe from banco popolare, which the bank group also referred as tercas caripe. however the bank was acquired by banca popolare di bari in 2014, which in turn the bank became part of the bp bari group.