compass lexecon
glassdoor has 60 compass lexecon reviews submitted anonymously by compass lexecon employees. read employee reviews and ratings on glassdoor to decide if compass lexecon is right for you .
catalina campillo is a senior economist in compass lexecon’s european competition policy practice, based in brussels .
compass lexecon was created in 2008 through the combination of competition policy associates (compass) and lexecon. lexecon was founded in 1977 and pioneered the application of economics and finance to legal and regulatory issues in litigation cases; competition policy associates was founded in 2003 .
many of our experts are nonemployee independent contractors who under certain circumstances may pursue commercial engagements outside compass lexecon .
compass lexecon is a wholly owned subsidiary of fti consulting, inc. , a global business advisory firm .
edit much? i mean come on, read it over before you post it. “the firm is now known as compass lexecon, and fischel serves as chairman and president of the firm (now known as compass lexecon). ”
advisory board consulting and healthy communities institute submitted reports on april 7, while compass lexecon submitted its report on april 11 .
fischel, a law and economics expert, founded lexecon, a hugely successful economic consulting firm. the firm is now known as compass lexecon, and fischel serves as chairman and president .
compass lexecon expert professor dennis carlton is cited more than 50 times in judge leon' s 172 - page decision. read more
compass lexecon' s staff includes more than 425 professional consultants, analysts, and practice support personnel including nobel prize winners and former chief economists at the department of justice’s antitrust division. in addition to our full - time professional staff, compass lexecon maintains affiliate relationships with distinguished academics. many of our experts are nonemployee independent contractors who under certain circumstances may pursue commercial engagements outside compass lexecon .
compass lexecon is a dynamic, growing company with some of the sharpest minds in the field of economic consulting. we are hiring .
how much do compass lexecon employees make? glassdoor has salaries, wages, tips, bonuses, and hourly pay based upon employee reports and estimates .
compass lexecon regularly assists both defendants and plaintiffs in antitrust litigation, including cases involving issues such as price fixing, predatory pricing, bundling, and various forms of allegedly exclusionary conduct. an integral part of compass lexecon' s role in many of these cases involves the estimation of lost profits or damages from elevated prices and output restrictions .
• intellectual property – compass lexecon has been involved in intellectual property proceedings such as patent, trade, copyright, and royalty cases as well as licensing negotiations and strategy .
by clicking submit you may receive news about compass lexecon services or invitations to special events. you may withdraw your consent at any time by emailing us at unsubscribe @ urltoken .
compass lexecon currently has a professional staff of more than 425 individuals, including 150 highly skilled ph. d. economists and econometricians and more than 165 other individuals with advanced degrees located in 20 offices. for the past 11 years, compass lexecon has been ranked as one of the leading antitrust economics firms in the world by the global competition review .
• mergers and acquisitions – compass lexecon has been involved in many of the largest and most influential mergers in the telecommunications industry, including the at & t - bellsouth, sbc - at & t, verizon - mci, sbc - ameritech, bell atlantic - gte, and qwest - us west mergers. compass lexecon also provides analyses of the antitrust implications of mergers being considered by potential acquirers .
• civil litigation – compass lexecon economists have been involved in a variety of civil lawsuits related to telecommunications and media. these cases include private antitrust suits, breach of contract issues, and estimation of damages .
before joining compass lexecon, catalina worked for one year for the global competition policy practice at lecg. catalina has also worked as an associate lecturer at instituto de empresa business school and instituto de estudios bursátiles .
a compass lexecon team advised the officemax board of directors and then provided an economic analysis of the proposed deal. the firm also worked with lawyers working for office depot on the deal, the client letter said .
compass lexecon is also working for comcast, and, according to a document filed by the telecomms giant, four of its economists were on hand for the may 6 meeting with more than two dozen fcc staff members .
compass lexecon, one of the world’s leading economic consulting firms, offers employment opportunities to top candidates with strong academic backgrounds and professional experience. a complete application consists of a cover letter, resume, writing sample, and transcripts .
• antitrust – compass lexecon has performed a wide variety of antitrust analyses related to telecommunications and media. we have provided critical analysis of mergers and acquisitions as well as private antitrust actions involving telecommunications, wireless services, and regulatory obligations .
comcast, which has said it expects the deal to be approved by early next year, declined to comment on its use of economic consulting firms, and compass lexecon declined to comment on its work for comcast. but a redacted version of a 19 - slide presentation made by mark israel, a compass lexecon economist, at the may meeting makes several conclusions about the proposed merger, calling it “pro - consumer, pro - competitive, and in the public interest. ”
as the global economy has moved increasingly to online channels, compass lexecon similarly has built its expertise in providing economic consulting and expert testimony to a wide range of clients who conduct a substantial portion, or even all, of their business on the internet .
one of our founding practices, antitrust remains a key area of expertise at compass lexecon. we have provided expert advice and testimony in hundreds of complex antitrust matters and have assisted clients with many of the highest - profile u. s. antitrust actions of the last 30 years .
compass lexecon has evaluated hundreds of proposed mergers and acquisitions on behalf of both private parties and government agencies. using rigorous analytical methods applied to complex data combined with careful attention to detail, we evaluate the likely effects of proposed mergers and acquisitions on prices, costs, and competition .
compass lexecon aviation experts have provided independent expert testimony and litigation support for numerous airlines in labor arbitrations, presidential emergency boards and in federal court. our aviation experts have unparalleled experience at analyzing issues related to scope clause challenges, labor productivity and costing and statistical analyses of potential job actions .
take compass lexecon, whose web site boasts of a staff that includes “135 highly skilled ph. d. economists and econometricians and more than 145 other individuals with advanced degrees. ” the firm does work in many areas and often gets called on when economic experts are needed in big legal battles .
• regulatory proceedings – compass lexecon has been involved in regulatory proceedings at all levels, including presenting before the federal communications commission and state regulatory commissions. these proceedings have involved such matters as cost calculations, pricing, section 271 applications, spectrum allocations and regulation, ownership requirements, and many other regulatory issues .
during his tenure with compass lexecon, mr. grant has submitted testimony on behalf of major oil companies related to the value of hydrocarbons, refining and transportation assets, and damages stemming from contractual disputes. he has, on behalf of the world’s major oil, natural gas, and energy services companies, managed compass lexecon’s efforts in complex energy - related disputes, including privileged support on merger and acquisitions in the energy services sector. other recent work includes the examination of the economic factors determining the market value of crude oil, natural gas, and lng, including the different institutional and contractual arrangements within the oil and gas sectors .
the 38 - page compass lexecon report concludes, “based on our experience, interviews with key stakeholders, and review of the extensive record of evidence, including the proposed commitments, we conclude that the proposed merger' s benefits likely substantially outweigh any disadvantages that may result from the loss of competition between the parties. ”
as an expert witness, fischel has testified on behalf of charles keating, ken lay, and jeffrey skilling. his work so upset plaintiffs’ law firm milberg weiss that they engaged in a vendetta against fischel and lexecon, leading to a defamation suit by fischel and lexecon that led to a landmark supreme court decision about multi - district litigation (lexecon inc. v. milberg weiss bershad hynes & lerach, 523 u. s. 26 (1998) ) and a $ 50 million settlement .
in matters relating to sports, compass lexecon economists combine deep antitrust experience with extensive knowledge of labor economics. our experts are uniquely positioned to bring analytical skills and economic tools to bear on all aspects of sports - related antitrust, competition, and valuation issues encompassing players, tournaments, team movements, tv rights, and sports memorabilia / collectibles .
“compass lexecon performed detailed econometric analyses of the competitive retail price effects of the transaction and the merging parties’ pricing, ” the firm said. “the analysis concluded that there was no systematic evidence that the proposed merger would result in higher retail prices, ” a finding that was cited by the federal trade commission as one of the main reasons to approve the merger .
one of the world’s leading economic consulting firms, compass lexecon provides law firms, corporations and government clients with clear analysis of complex issues. we have been involved in a broad spectrum of matters related to economics and finance – providing critical insight in legal and regulatory proceedings, strategic decisions and public policy debates. our experience and expertise apply to virtually any question of economics, in virtually any context of the law or business .
it wouldn' t be listened to anyway. anyone who has ideas let alone suggestions would be dubbed a whiner. i would just say that there are some obvious yet simple changes that could be made to make compass a great place to work .
compass lexecon’s practices were developed by some of the most respected economic thinkers in the world. antitrust, our founding practice area, remains a central part of our business. our practice areas have expanded to include other areas of litigation including securities, intellectual property, accounting, risk management, valuation, corporate governance and employment matters. in each of these areas, we often provide detailed damages analyses. our non - litigation - related practice areas include matters such as business consulting and public policy .
kenny grant is an executive vice president and managing director of compass lexecon’s boston office. mr. grant provides business consulting, privileged consulting, and expert witness testimony, both domestic and international. he specializes in matters of competitive analysis, market value, antitrust, and public policy and has analyzed market structures and economic factors impacting firm behavior and competitive outcomes on behalf of clients in the energy industry, including producers, midstream entities, refiners, electricity producers and oil and natural gas field services companies .
public interest advocates who oppose the deal point out that the consulting firms are filled with economists who have passed through the revolving door and can give clients an insider’s view of the process. one of the best known in the field is michael katz, a professor at berkeley’s haas school of business who served as the fcc’s chief economist and in a top job at the justice department’s antitrust division. katz, who is affiliated with compass lexecon, said in an email friday that he isn’t currently working on the transaction for any company .
the lexecon v. lerach battle is actually pretty interesting for legal geeks. it was a long, drawn out case, and the settlement came only after a jury awarded compensatory damages of $ 45 million (if my memory is correct) and was then going to decide the punitive award, which could have been substantial given the emails from lerach that sunk his case (lots of name - calling and basically admitting that lexecon was hurting his plaintiff work). fischel was dean at chicago at the time of the settlement and promised the school some dough, but he was removed shortly thereafter under less than ideal circumstances and i’m not sure if he ever gave any of the money to the law school. finally, i believe judge posner was also one of the co - founders of lexecon before leaving the company when he went on the bench .
at compass lexecon, we believe that critical economic issues – whether in connection with litigation, regulatory review, strategic planning or other corporate activities – are best understood when subjected to a rigorous empirical analysis. our firm is known for developing a thorough understanding of the issues that face our clients, relating those issues to relevant economic theory, and then supporting our analysis with solid and persuasive empirical evidence. one of our most valuable assets is our ability to present complex concepts and data in an understandable manner. our successes in the courtroom and before regulatory agencies over the years have validated our approach .
compass lexecon economists have evaluated the competitive impact of many mergers and alliances in the airline industry using complex data and analytics. we have used cutting - edge econometric techniques to analyze the costs and benefits of domestic airline mergers to determine whether those mergers would be pro - competitive or anti - competitive and have presented our economic analyses to the u. s. department of justice and in federal court. we have analyzed the competitive impact of granting antitrust immunity to international airline alliances. we also have assisted with price - fixing investigations and litigation concerning the setting of air cargo rates and fuel surcharges .
with extensive experience in the rail industry, both in the u. s. and abroad, we have been involved in a number of high - profile railroad mergers, providing competitive and cost - saving analyses and evaluating claims by specific shippers. compass lexecon has been retained on antitrust cases involving railroads, including price - fixing allegations for the transportation of bulk chemicals on tanker ships, and in fuel surcharge antitrust litigation. the breadth of our railroad experience makes us uniquely qualified to testify in rate cases and stand - alone cost proceedings. we also have provided policy testimony in hearings before congress and the stb and regularly present seminars on the railroad industry for regulators. when a matter calls for in - depth knowledge of rail costing or engineering, we have the unique ability to call upon our colleagues at fti network industries strategies for assistance with quantitative analysis. compass lexecon aviation experts provided independent expert testimony and analysis throughout the chapter 11 restructurings of united air lines, delta air lines, northwest airlines, us airways, atlas, comair and mesaba. our experts have testified on behalf of the debtors in u. s. bankruptcy court during numerous section 1113 (c), 1113 (e) and section 1114 hearings .
jonathan orszag is a senior managing director and member of the executive committee of compass lexecon, llc, an economic consulting firm. as a consultant, orszag has conducted economic and financial analysis on a wide range of complex issues in antitrust, regulatory, policy, and litigation matters for corporations and public - sector entities. these engagements have involved a wide array of mergers and other economic matters in various markets, such as the sports, media, telecommunications, financial services, and high - tech industries. he has testified before the united states congress, u. s. and international courts, the european court of first instance, and u. s. and international regulatory authorities on competition and economic policy issues .
in the rapidly changing communications environment, independent, reliable economic analysis is fundamental to address the complex business and regulatory matters and regulations involving the telecommunications and media industries. compass lexecon performs a wide variety of economic analyses related to voice and data services, the internet, fiber - optic networks, telecommunications equipment, and other areas. our work in these matters involves the evaluation of mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property analysis, the pricing of network interconnection and network elements, the evaluation of the impact of new products and services on consumer welfare, and the estimation of damages. our experts have presented their analyses in state and federal courts and before the federal communications commission, the department of justice, and a wide variety of state regulatory commissions .
no one knows exactly how pervasive these financial relationships are, but many of academia’s most influential centers for energy and climate research appear to have financial ties to fossil fuel interests, including harvard’s consortium for energy policy research (which has received funding from shell and apache corporation), harvard’s environmental economics program (bp, chevron, and shell), and mit’s energy initiative (bp, exxonmobil, saudi aramco, shell, chevron, schlumberger, statoil, and total, to name a few). harvard' s belfer center for science and international affairs, where i am a research fellow, receives funding from bp. columbia’s center on global energy policy recently had its funding from exxonmobil exposed; the fact that such funding arrangements have to be exposed at all invites the question, why so much secrecy for academic research? and vocal opponents of divestment—including harvard economist rob stavins, stanford economist frank wolak, and daniel fischel, president of the consulting firm compass lexecon and professor emeritus at the university of chicago—tend to have financial or professional ties to the fossil fuel industry .
jonathan b. baker joined compass lexecon as a senior consultant and a member of our advisory committee. baker is professor of law at american university' s washington college of law, where he teaches courses primarily in the areas of antitrust and economic regulation. from 2009 to this past summer, professor baker served as the chief economist at the federal communications commission. in addition, from 1995 to 1998, baker served as the director of the bureau of economics at the federal trade commission. previously, he had worked as a senior economist on the president’s council of economic advisers, special assistant to the deputy assistant attorney general for economics in the antitrust division of the department of justice, an assistant professor at dartmouth' s amos tuck school of business administration, an attorney advisor to the acting chairman of the federal trade commission, and an antitrust lawyer in private practice. he is a co - author of an antitrust casebook, a past editorial chair of the antitrust law journal, and a past member of the council of the american bar association’s section of antitrust law. professor baker has published widely in the fields of antitrust law and policy and industrial organization economics. in 2004, he received american university’s faculty award for outstanding scholarship, research, and other professional accomplishments, and in 1998 he received the federal trade commission’s award for distinguished service. he has a j. d. from harvard and a ph. d. in economics from stanford university .
david gross' s areas of expertise include finance, applied microeconomics, econometrics and macroeconomics. he has served as a testifying expert and conducted studies on a wide range of topics including financial markets, estimation of damages, the economics of merger and acquisition transactions, mortgage finance, mutual funds, antitrust and industrial organization, and intellectual property disputes. before joining lexecon, gross served on the faculty at the university of chicago graduate school of business from 1995 to 2000. he has made numerous presentations to business, government, and academic audiences and has published articles in scholarly journals including the quarterly journal of economics and the review of financial studies. gross has a ph. d. in economics from the massachusetts institute of technology and an a. b. from stanford university .
for inquiries related to this message please contact support. for sales inquiries, please visit urltoken
if you believe this to be in error, please confirm below that you are not a robot by clicking
i' m not a robot
below .
please make sure your browser supports javascript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. for more information you can review the terms of service and cookie policy .
our practices are led by some of the most recognized and respected economic thinkers in the world including six former chief economists of the department of justice antitrust division. we maintain relationships with numerous high - profile academic affiliates, including nobel prize winners .
antitrust, our founding practice area, remains a central part of our business. our practice areas have expanded to include other areas of litigation including securities and financial markets, intellectual property, accounting, valuation and financial analysis, erisa, corporate governance, bankruptcy and financial distress, derivatives and structured finance, class certifications and employment matters. in all these areas, we often provide detailed damages analyses. our non - litigation - related practice areas include matters such as business consulting, regulatory investigations and public policy .
urltoken no longer supports internet explorer 9 or earlier. please upgrade your browser .
news about fti consulting inc. , including commentary and archival articles published in the new york times .
the change comes as the struggling electronics retailer is trying to repair its finances .
fti consulting, the business advisory firm, named steve gunby its president and chief executive on monday, succeeding jack dunn, who is stepping down after 21 years at the firm .
although the carmaker will exit the north american market due to low sales volumes, suzuki’s united states sales were up 22 percent in november when compared with november 2011 .
the head of fti consulting hosted baltimore orioles stars at his birthday parties when he was growing up, and now leads 3, 800 employees in offices in 24 countries .
four days after eastman kodak filed for bankruptcy protection, the beleaguered camera maker said monday that it had named a new chief restructuring officer .
hostess brands is back in bankruptcy again, arguing that its last filing did not really accomplish all that much, despite taking a rather long time .
investing in the second act of michael milken, the onetime king of junk bonds, has not been a rewarding experience for everyone. just ask the shareholders of nextera enterprises, a company controlled by mr. milken and his brother, lowell, and lawrence j. ellison, the chairman of the oracle corporation. nextera' s shareholders are scheduled to meet friday to vote on the company' s proposed sale of its only operation, a corporate consulting business, to fti consulting for $ 130 million. the transaction, which is expected to close before the end of the year, would leave nextera as a penny stock representing ownership of an empty shell whose purpose is unclear .
new venture hopes to offer some peace of mind to c. e. o.' s
an insurer, two law firms and a consulting firm have formed a venture that aims to give a level of comfort to nervous executives and board members. the venture, corporate diagnostics, will review financial records and corporate governance structures. its review may lead to reduced premiums for directors and officers' liability insurance for companies .
accessibility concerns? email us at accessibility @ urltoken. we would love to hear from you .
david cohen, executive vice president of comcast corporation, left, speaks during a house committee hearing on the proposed merger of comcast and time warner cable, on capitol hill, may 8, 2014. (michael reynolds / european pressphoto agency )
when executives from comcast and time warner cable met with federal communications commission staffers last month to make the case for their merger, the expected antitrust and communications lawyers went along with them .
but the companies also took four economists — part of a highly specialized but low - profile set of number - crunchers who can be highly influential when it comes to winning approval for big deals like these .
“people think lawyers run the world, ” said matt wood, policy director at free press, a consumer advocacy group that opposes the merger. “these are the people the companies hire to help the lawyers do that. ”
these elite economists — some earning as much as $ 1, 000 an hour, like their law firm peers — try to predict the questions that antitrust regulators will have about a deal. and then, using gobs of data about products, companies, markets and industries, they help prepare answers that will persuade regulators to see the deal — and its effect on things like prices and consumer choice — as their clients do .
some work full - time at speciality consulting firms, and others are based at top universities. and while they don’t like to talk publicly about their work, especially while a proposed deal is under review, public filings and company statements reveal quite a bit about what they do and the impact they can have .
but it got its start with antitrust issues, and last year worked on several big deals, including us airways / american airlines, officemax / office depot and omnicom / publicis, helping make 2013 the firm’s best year ever, according to a recent letter to clients .
two other economists working for comcast’s lawyers, one a professor at stanford and the other an antitrust expert at cornerstone research, another consulting firm, also declined to comment on their work. their early assessment of the deal, filed with the fcc in april, reached similar conclusions. “the proposed combination... will benefit current and future residential consumers, businesses, and advertisers across the footprint of the combined company, ” they wrote .
while firms like these are most often hired by companies trying to win approval of a big deal, they are occasionally tapped by other companies with a stake in the outcome, or by government agencies that need help on a particular case .
on the comcast deal, discovery communications, a large programming supplier, has hired two analysts at charles river associates, another well - known consulting firm, according to a company filing with the fcc. a discovery executive said last week that the company was still studying the deal .
critics of the deal also complain that they can’t afford the high - priced statistical help that companies use to advocate in front of regulators. but they acknowledge that the government has its own economists charged with weighing big mergers and that sometimes other companies share their views and weigh in with their own heavy - hitters .
for the economists who do the work, the debates tend to be about different things .
“it’s very academic, and often very technical, ” said a person who runs an economic consulting firm, about things like error structures and regression analysis. “it makes economists very excited. ”
just how much trouble is rep. jim jordan in over alleged ohio state sexual abuse ?
daniel fischel' s areas of expertise are securities, corporation law, regulation of financial markets, and the application of the economics of corporate finance to problems in these areas. he has been cited by state and federal courts at all levels including the united states supreme court. fischel has given expert testimony on numerous occasions in federal and state courts, before arbitration panels, and in regulatory proceedings in the areas of securities, commodities, corporation law, regulation of financial markets, and the application of the economics of corporate finance. he was, for example, the principal damages witness for the united states department of justice in a series of breach of contract cases involving over $ 100 billion, commonly called the winstar cases. fischel has published widely in books and scholarly journals. his article
use of modern finance theory in securities fraud cases involving actively traded securities ,
business law 1 (1982), is the seminal article describing the application of financial economics to securities fraud litigation. he is also co - author of the economic structure of corporate law with judge frank h. easterbrook. he is the lee and brena freeman professor of law and business, emeritus at the university of chicago .
in 2004, orszag was named by the global competition review as the youngest member of “the world’s 40 brightest young antitrust lawyers and economists” in its “40 under 40” survey. in 2006, the global competition review named orszag as one of the world’s “best young competition economists. ” since 2007, orszag has been named one of the foremost competition economists in the international who’s who o f competition economist s .
prior to entering the private sector, orszag served as the assistant to the u. s. secretary of commerce and director of the office of policy and strategic planning. in this capacity, orszag was the secretary of commerce’s chief policy adviser and was responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of policy initiatives, from telecommunications issues to international trade issues. previously, orszag served as an economic policy advisor on president clinton’s national economic council. in 1999, the corporation for enterprise development awarded orszag its leadership award for “forging innovative public policies to expand economic opportunity in america. ”
orszag is a lecturer at ucla, teaching a class on merger analysis. orszag also serves as a member of the board of directors of jmp group, inc. (nyse: jmp); the friends of the global fight against aids, tuberculosis, and malaria; and the tiger woods foundation board of governors .
orszag received a m. sc. from oxford university, which he attended as a marshall scholar. he graduated summa cum laude in economics from princeton university, was elected to phi beta kappa, and was named a usa today all - usa college academic team. he is also a graduate of phillips exeter academy .
orszag and his wife (mary) have two daughters (baye and eden) and a black labrador named petite. orszag is an avid golfer, having played all top 100 golf courses in the world, and is a lifelong boston red sox and new england patriots fan .
who' s who legal released it' s list of the best antitrust and competition economists in the world. read more
previously, mr. grant was an economist with the overseas private investment corporation in washington, d. c. working in the investment development division, he conducted market analyses and researched capital requirements and economic effects of proposed projects. as an instructor for the harvard institute for international development, mr. grant taught cost - benefit analysis, project analysis and microeconomics to officials from utilities, regulatory agencies and economic development banks in the developing world. mr. grant’s testimony experience includes compañía mega v. petróleo brasileiro s. a. , frontier oil corporation v. holly corporation; texaco inc. , et al. , v. duhe, et al. ; sadie r. long, et al v. texaco inc. , et al. ; and canyon oil & gas company v. phillips petroleum company .
other selected reports and testimony include “supplementary proposed rule for establishing oil value for royalty due on federal leases, ” before the united states of america, department of interior, minerals management service; “further supplementary proposed rule for establishing oil value for royalty due on federal leases, ” before the united states of america, department of interior, minerals management service; and “critique of ‘sparks and wires’” (assessment of the restructuring of the electricity industry) .
mr. grant has a master in public policy from the john f. kennedy school of government at harvard university and a bachelor of arts in economics from middlebury college. he is a member of the american bar association and energy bar association .
glassdoor will not work properly unless browser cookie support is enabled. learn how to enable cookies .
your trust is our top concern, so companies can' t alter or remove reviews .
senior management could communicate better. work life balance is a serious issue. work can get tedious and repetitive at analyst level. no clear path to promotion and company is slow to promote .
seems to have lots of cases and you have to opportunity to work on big, important cases that have the ability to change things in that particular industry. this is not always the case but it could happen .
irregular hours. hired to do healthcare work but wasn' t given any healthcare .
ok job. good pto policy. take this job as seriously as the employer takes you (i. e. use your pto to travel). leverage the opportunity to go to a great grad school .
there is no company culture. it' s neither an enjoyable nor an efficient place to work. it' s actually kind of sad; many analysts up to vps feel used by case managers. and the truth is they are used and everyone is aware of it. i' ve heard multiple sources (experts within 2 leading economic consulting firms) brag about how great their business model is i. e. take advantage of smart and hard - working 20 somethings and justify it by the fact that all 20 somethings are getting taken advantage of in the
marketplace
. you' ll hear a lot of arguments about the
market
while being here; it' s a great defense for major corporations. but maybe don' t think about your employees who log upwards of 2000 billable hours as everyday market participants. think about them as people, hardworking, loyal and bright, not part of a game which you can handwave away as the
market
. the more you treat people as part of a game, the more they will play it. and the more you reward people for
playing the game
instead of actually creating stellar work product, the more filled up with disloyal market participants who really want to do as little as possible and
play the game
your workplace will become. all this being said, there are some great people who work here. hopefully, they see something more than small incremental gains for the actual value they provide at some point down the road .
my experience was horrible. i worked in a toxic environment with verbally abusive case managers and co - workers, some of whom took credit for my work and ganged up on me when i caught mistakes in their work product. not worth the high profile cases .
office politics is very messy and people are not rewarded based on talent or hard work if you are very smart, you are a potential threat to your bosses and will be overlooked for promotion / career advancement a lot of smart people left the company when i was there because several less worthy people were promoted at their expense you can get lucky if you find an influential boss to work for. otherwise your quality or difficulty of work does not matter no training or investment in employee' s personal growth whatsoever
this will replace the current featured review for targeted profile. are you sure you want to replace it ?
copyright © 2008–2018, glassdoor, inc .
glassdoor
and logo are proprietary trademarks of glassdoor, inc .
upload a resume to easily apply to jobs from anywhere. it' s simple to set up .
know your worth™. get a free, personalized salary estimate based on today' s job market .
glassdoor has millions of jobs plus salary information, company reviews, and interview questions from people on the inside making it easy to find a job that’s right for you .
search our positions by entering a keyword or location below. the list below includes only a subset of all available positions .
each job description includes a link for applying and submitting your resume to us online. if you have specific questions about any of our positions, you can contact our recruiting team
. due to the large volume of applicants, please do not send inquiries regarding application status .
sorry, we couldn' t find your location. please type in a location you are interested in .
working hours can be erratic, but it is the same across the industry. cases can drag on much longer than expected
very, very long hours for months on end without adequate compensation for over - time. poor development opportunities, though this depends on the office .
great atmosphere, very collaborative, lots of involvement with senior management, lots of contact with colleagues at other european offices, co - location with parent company makes it feel like a bigger company, semi transparent leadership team .
team can work very very long hours and can get very stressful, sometimes at the expenses of praise for hard work and feeling valued. stressful atmosphere sometimes means that people can become unresponsive and over focused. management need to take more care of hr procedures and work with hr to uphold them. hr procedures not always upheld and followed .
great variety with industries, projects. exposure is fantastic because you are always working closely with the senior management. secondments between european offices are very common .
small company atmosphere can sometimes get in the way of simple things. firm focuses only on competition (this applies to cl europe only) .
establish processes as the firm grows (which it is doing very fast) .
abstract: the reforms proposed in this paper pursue one common objective. our aim is to reduce the burden of notifying and controlling unproblematic mergers, such that resources can be focused on the most complex cases. this would facilitate adequate assessment of complex transactions. these are more and more common in the new economy, where the variety of both potential harm and possible efficiencies has dramatically increased. therefore, enforcement agencies now, more than ever, need to concentrate resources on complex cases and design procedures that allow for a thorough debate. this paper identifies three main avenues for the improvement of the ecmr .
we first argue that the current time pressure during phase ii mergers, and in particular after the so has been sent, is counterproductive and against the interests of all parties. the tight time constraint does not allow for a serene and thorough debate that is needed. we propose to allow more time for the exchange of views in complex merger cases. in such cases, it is actually very challenging to have a debate through only one exchange of pleadings. this exposes the parties and the commission to serious legal risks. while it is possible that just releasing time pressure will be sufficient to enable an adequate dialogue, it could be worthwhile to consider moving from one exchange of pleadings to two in merger control, just as it is done in courts .
second, as turnover thresholds are not correlated with harm, they do not lead to a proper prioritization of cases in merger control in europe. thresholds could increase or decrease with no effect on the proportion of non - problematic mergers being notified. regardless of the change in thresholds, this proportion would remain high, therefore wasting the scarce resources of all parties to the proceedings, including enforcement agencies. we show that no other threshold, or combination of thresholds, would perform better. therefore, there is no room for further incremental improvements to the merger control system. we believe that only moving in the direction of a properly framed voluntary notification would significantly enhance the efficiency of merger control in europe. this would be consistent with the 2003 reform in antitrust .
however, the commission should be able to intervene in due time against problematic mergers that are not notified. at the same time, the parties that decide not to notify need to know when it is safe to implement the merger. therefore, we propose that parties planning to implement a merger of european interest should disclose their intentions to the commission by submitting an electronic form containing readily available information about the merger. this would be similar to the hsr document used in the united states. we also propose that the parties make their intentions regarding the transaction public, or at least that they inform their largest customers and suppliers .
the completion of these two steps would start the period when the commission can receive complaints and use its market investigation tools. at the end of this period, the commission could decide to take no action, clearing the way for the implementation of the merger, or to open proceedings. this would be more efficient for all parties than the simplified procedure or any reform of the notification thresholds. here, the commission would not be required to make a formal investigation and draft a clearance decision in all cases that are clearly not anticompetitive, as is currently the case. the parties would not be required to enter in formal contacts with the commission in these cases .
last, we also propose to further the integration of the ecn, which, as the commission mentions in its own documents, is not working perfectly yet. we first propose to increase the efficiency of one stop shopping by letting parties self - assess whether their operation affects trade between member states. if they believe it does, they would then either voluntarily notify to the commission, or simply disclose their intentions to merge by submitting the electronic form mentioned earlier. member states would naturally be able to request a referral, but they would have the burden to prove that either trade is not affected or that they are better placed than the commission to control the merger. moreover, there has not been any systematic review of the effective application of the new substantive test by member states. we would welcome such a review, followed by a public consultation on the ways to promote more convergence in the competitive assessments and rights of defence in the eea .
the proof on the quantification of the damage in assumptions of defense of competition. (spanish law )
subscribe and get breaking news, commentary, and opinions on law firms, lawyers, law schools, lawsuits, judges, and more .
law professors generally don’t earn as much as biglaw partners. legal academic salaries, while generally in the low six - figures, rarely go over, say, $ 400, 000. but some law profs own very, very nice homes. see, e. g. (in descending order by value): columbia professor hans smit ($ 30 million mansion — yup, that’s seven zeros); yale professor james [ … ]
law professors generally don’t earn as much as biglaw partners. legal academic salaries, while generally in the low six - figures, rarely go over, say, $ 400, 000 .
but some law profs own very, very nice homes. see, e. g. (in descending order by value) :
yale professor james whitman ($ 5. 7 million co - op) ;
“feldsuk, ” aka harvard professors jeannie suk, who has a new book out that looks quite interesting, and noah feldman ($ 2. 8 million mansion) ;
sometimes the professors get financial assistance for these purchases from the schools that employ them. but sometimes the professors buy them on their own, without any university help .
for example, as reported in the new york observer, daniel fischel, former dean of the university of chicago law school, just picked up an $ 8. 45 million manhattan pied - à - terre. as breathlessly described by writer max abelson, the apartment features “custom electric shades, a steam shower, and a sub - zero wine refrigerator. ”
fischel’s famous neighbors, plus the story of how he got this rich — being a law school dean pays well, but not that well — after the jump .
dean fischel’s apartment is in one beacon court, the celebrated luxury condominium that’s home to beyonce and brian williams. and things at one beacon are looking up, now that the notorious marc dreier has left the building .
how did dan fischel become this wealthy? abelson notes that fischel is “famous for helping gentlemen like ken lay, charles keating and michael milken. ” but fischel didn’t represent them (probably a good thing, since they all got convicted); rather, he testified as an expert witness on their behalf .
his net worth may have been helped, inadvertently, by the plaintiffs’ bar. from his wikipedia entry :
we would happily be defamed for $ 50 million. heck, we put up with it every day for free (see the atl comments) .
moral of the story for law students: pay attention to the law and econ stuff, and maybe someday you too will have an $ 8 million apartment .
p. s. the observer article also mentions a recent real estate purchaser by another notable lawyer — marc weitzen, chief legal adviser to billionaire carl icahn. but that apartment, at $ 4. 2 million, pales in comparison to daniel fischel’s place .
earlier: lawyerly lairs: marc dreier’s penthouse goes for $ 8. 2 million
love atl? let' s make it official. sign up for our newsletter .
totally thought you were talking about topanga. those last few seasons, she was almost as fat as you mystal .
only penurious wretches count the money of others. stop ridiculing obscene wealth and start working .
mystal lives in his mother’s basement and slides around the concrete slab like a walru .
hans smit (not smith) only paid about $ 300k for his mansion. and he doesn’t live there (he lives in an apartment a few blocks away). when i visited the mansion, hans’s son (a partner at simpson) lived there. yeah, it’s worth a lot more than $ 300k now, and he tried to sell it for $ 30mm, but nobody actually thinks it’s worth that much. except hans .
we are counting money, jake. we are pointing out egregious selfishness and greed .
james whitman is an amazing professor. his dad is an obscenely rich investor tycoon, so you can guess why he’s able to buy that kind of pad … not from his yls salary .
9 – yup. click on the link: “professor whitman comes from serious money. his father, martin whitman, is a highly successful hedge fund manager (and professor at the yale school of management). ” urltoken
jake, please may i deposit my man spigot in your mouth and anus? there is a dust storm coming and this needs to be done. shafeef
here’s an ny sun article on the smit place, i. e. how did a professor buy it. as noted above, he paid around $ 300k in the 1970’s, bought it from the university. urltoken
compass lexecon is an economic consulting company with headquarters in chicago , illinois . it provides analysis of economic issues for use in legal and regulatory proceedings , strategic decisions , and public policy debates . compass lexecon llc was formed in january 2008 through the combination of competition policy associates ( compass ) , founded in 2003 , and lexecon , founded in 1977 , and operates as wholly owned subsidiary of fti consulting , inc. , a global business advisory firm . daniel fischel is the chairman and president . jonathan orszag is senior managing director . in may 2013 , compass lexecon acquired princeton economics group , which provides economic research , data analysis and testimony to law firms and corporations . the company has 17 office locations in the americas and europe . 
compass lexecon is an economic consulting company with headquarters in chicago, illinois. it provides analysis of economic issues for use in legal and regulatory proceedings, strategic decisions, and public policy debates. compass lexecon llc was formed in january 2008 through the combination of competition policy associates (compass), founded in 2003, and lexecon, founded in 1977, and operates as wholly owned subsidiary of fti consulting, inc., a global business advisory firm. daniel fischel is the chairman and president. jonathan orszag is senior managing director. in may 2013, compass lexecon acquired princeton economics group, which provides economic research, data analysis and testimony to law firms and corporations. the company has 17 office locations in the americas and europe.
compass lexecon is an economic consulting company with headquarters in chicago, illinois. it provides analysis of economic issues for use in legal and regulatory proceedings, strategic decisions, and public policy debates. compass lexecon llc was formed in january 2008 through the combination of competition policy associates (compass), founded in 2003, and lexecon, founded in 1977, and operates as wholly owned subsidiary of fti consulting, inc., a global business advisory firm. daniel fischel is the chairman and president. jonathan orszag is senior managing director. in may 2013, compass lexecon acquired princeton economics group, which provides economic research, data analysis and testimony to law firms and corporations. the company has 17 office locations in the americas and europe.