chicken delight
yes chicken delight is looking for people to open up new locations. if your in a state without chicken delight contact them about what is required to start your onw chicken delight .
i remember the chicken delight in south gate. the delivery person wore a chicken outfit. i loved that chicken .
chicken delight is also very big in staten island and old westbury long island. if anyone is interested in opening a chicken delight in the united states just go to the chicken delight website and they explain how it works. chicken delight to me is the best fast food chicken anywhere .
if you live in an area where chicken delight does not exist call them on their website and look into opening your own chicken delight .
saturaday night fever had a bay ridge delight which used to be a chicken delight (it had a cd mascot) .
chicken delight of california inc v. state farm mutual automobile insurance company | findlaw
chicken delight was owned by the same people as pizza man. their slogan was
don' t cook tonight... .. call chicken delight !
chicken delight has a colorful and important place in north american fast - food history .
the trial court concluded that' (a) lthough the financial interest of chicken delight, inc. is advanced and the reputation and good will of chicken delight, inc. are enhanced by the delivery of hot chicken delight food products, such is not sufficient to establish a basis for the imposition of liability on chicken delight, inc.'
winnipeg couple jim and nadine cartman became the new owners of chicken delight in june 2012 .
chicken delight, patterson road 1955 -... - dayton history books online | facebook
chicken delight is still alive. the location in rahway, nj still puts out the food you remember. don' t cook tonight, call chicken delight... we deliver !
chicken delight moved in the district court for a partial summary judgment granting a declaration that, in the event its franchise arrangements are found to be unlawful, they are voidable and terminable by chicken delight. the court denied both that motion and chicken delight' s request for an order authorizing an interlocutory appeal of the question. chicken delight now petitions this court for a writ of mandamus commanding the district court to declare the franchise contracts terminable at chicken delight' s option .
chicken delight is an australian owned and operated business based on the gold coast, queensland, australia .
the following are links about chicken delight you may find interesting. also check out the other pages .
economic scene; microsoft, chicken delight and competition for an imperfect world. - the new york times
in the lowley united states chicken delight has faded from view thanks to chains like popeyes, churches, and the vatican of fried chicken ...
winnipeg entrepreneur otto koch purchased his first chicken delight franchise in 1969. seeing the potential of the chain in canada, koch built and acquired additional franchise locations and in 1976 bought chicken delight of canada ltd .
reading down the list of alphabetical foods and came across chicken delight. i knew it was familiar but not sure why. i grew up in long beach, ca. we must have ordered from chicken delight .
chicken delight' s second argument against allstate is that it really is ‘the named insured. ’ in the allstate policy the named insured is simply described as ‘chicken delight. ’ the address given is ‘26169 south western ave. , san pedro, calif. ’ the place where swan did business as a franchisee of chicken delight .
i lived in long beach n. y. and had chicken delight there too. i really miss that chicken. do they still make it any where ?
by 1984, chicken delight was canadian - owned with 86 outlets in the united states and 34 in canada .
william f. mclaughlin, administrator (estate of eura d. mclaughlin) v. chicken delight, inc .
i worked for chicken delight in the mid 1960s in parma, ohio. i made pizzas mostly and drove the fiat with a chicken on top. great memories .
chicken delight of california, inc. , and chicken delight, inc. , an illinois corporation, plaintiffs and appellants, v. state farm mutual automobile insurance company and allstate insurance company, a corporation, defendants and respondents .
by providing quality service and cleanliness, the canadian operation prospered. this success led to koch’s acquisition of the u. s. and international arm – chicken delight international inc. in 1979. for the first time the total chicken delight system was under one roof. otto koch passed away in december 2010 – but that wasn’t the end for chicken delight .
i' m from the bronx, the chicken delight my parents patronize was on crotona park and 174th right above the cross bronx expressway. early 60ties, it was great chicken, i live in denver colorado now, they never heard of chicken delight. in my neighborhood that was the chicken to buy, their were no kfc among other brands
declaratory relief. two corporations, chicken delight of california inc. , and chicken delight inc. , an illinois corporation (‘chicken delight’) 1 appeal from an unsuccessful attempt to obtain a declaration that state farm mutual automobile insurance company (‘state farm’) and allstate insurance company (‘allstate’) should have defended them in an action for personal injuries and are responsible for reimbursing them for the cost of defense and the sum of $ 15, 000 which chicken delight paid for a release .
this antitrust suit is a class action in which certain franchisees of chicken delight seek treble damages for injuries allegedly resulting from illegal restraints imposed by chicken delight' s standard form franchise agreements. the restraints in question are chicken delight' s contractual requirements that franchisees purchase certain essential cooking equipment, dry - mix food items, and trade - mark bearing packaging exclusively from chicken delight as a condition of obtaining a chicken delight trade - mark license. these requirements are asserted to constitute a tying arrangement, unlawful per se under sec. 1 of the sherman act, 15 u. s. c. sec. 1 .
chicken delight' s jingle from a radio spot, circa 1963. from my personal collection of old public domain radio spots .
i grew up in anaheim california in the 1960' s and i clearly remember the chicken delight commercials and jingle. my aunt in long beach and my grandma in lakewood would often order chicken delight when my family came over to visit. good times .
siegel v. chicken delight, inc. , 311 f. supp. 847 (n. d. cal. 1970 )
okay. chicken delight and sweet corn chicken were old stock from 15 / dec / 2016. vegetable soup was from feb. 2017. no further comments, make your own deductions .
5. ‘i have submitted your request and demand that state farm take over the defense of chicken delight... to ‘the company, and have recommended that the company refuse to take over the defense of chicken delight... for the reason that neither of those entities would qualify as an additional insured under the omnibus clause of our policy. ‘chicken delight... in a motion for summary judgment, which was denied, made a declaration in writing to the court that chicken delight... had no control whatsoever over the operations of chicken delight of san pedro and / or robert john hutchins. if the declaration be true, then certainly chicken delight... would not be legally responsible for any of the acts of chicken delight of san pedro. ‘we are returning the copy of the complaint for damages and personal injuries to you at this time for whatever further action you desire to take. ’
chicken delight is looking for business - oriented individuals seeking long - term financial independence who are dedicated to the success of their business .
the following are comments left about chicken delight from site visitors such as yourself. they are not spell checked or reviewed for accuracy .
under their leadership, chicken delight is now undergoing a brand refresh with focus on renovating existing stores, adding new menu items and improving customer service. the cartmans and their team keep a close eye on the marketplace and are constantly looking to expand chicken delight through franchising .
help me. i remember i chicken delivery service with a chicken perched a top the delivery vehicle leaving from preakness shopping center, wayne, nj. can' t find picture of it. i think it was chicken delight. am i alone on this ?
chicken delight licensed several hundred franchisees to operate its stores. it did not charge its franchisees a franchise fee or royalties; rather, it allowed its franchisees to use its trademark and follow its business methods in exchange for purchasing their cooking equipment and certain supplies from chicken delight .
some franchisees sued, and a federal appeals court ruled that chicken delight had engaged in an illegal so - called tie - in arrangement .
in the 60' s or 70' s there was a chain of fast food delivery restaurants known as
chicken delight
, it was just chicken, fries, and rolls with honey, delivered to your home in between two paper plates. anyone remember the jingle ,
don' t cook tonight, call chicken delight
?
this settlement was consummated in september 1970. in the meanwhile chicken delight, through its counsel, had made various attempts—including but not limited to the filing of the complaint in this declaratory relief action—to cause state farm and allstate to take over the defense of chicken delight. both refused .
3. chicken delight of california, inc. , a corporation, is a wholly - owned subsidiary of chicken delight, inc. , an illinois corporation. the illinois corporation in turn is owned by consolidated foods, a corporation, which is not a party to this action .
i grew up in lansing, michigan, and my parents sometimes ordered chicken delight. it was always a treat, the way the colonel would become a decade later, except cd delivered. chicken delight was referenced in harvard lampoon' s satirical novel
bored of the rings .
siegel v. chicken delight, inc. , 311 f. supp. 847 (n. d. cal. 1970): : justia
chicken delight has shown that it has the recipe for success and is very proud to be based in winnipeg, manitoba, canada. with quality chicken, ribs and pizza we offer our customers a variety of menu
owned a chicken delight in brooklyn 1970, wish i remembered the recipe. we use to use their breading so the recipe is probably non existent .
we the jury find that requiring franchisees to purchase cookers and fryers solely from chicken delight has not been legally justified under instructions given by the court .
we’re the original chicken delight. we’ve been in business more than 60 years and offer our customers a variety of traditional menu items without breaking the bank .
we the jury find that requiring franchisees to purchase dip and spice mix solely from chicken delight has not been legally justified under instructions given by the court .
before the case was actually settled, there appears to have been a certain amount of maneuvering on the part of chicken delight, designed, no doubt, to extend the state farm and allstate policies beyond their $ 15, 000 limits. specifically on august 28, 1970, counsel for chicken delight wrote a letter to allstate, state farm, chicago and their attorneys advising them that chicken delight was about to pay $ 15, 000 ‘for appropriate releases and dismissals. ’ the letter demanded, in effect, that the insurance companies addressed pay the $ 15, 000 which chicken delight was about to pay and threatened that if such payment—or in the alternative, a defense on behalf of chicken delight—were not forthcoming, the companies' refusal would be considered in bad faith .
chicken delight in rahway was opened in september 1965. in september 2012, it was sold for only the second time it' s long history. in the few months since the acquisition, chicken delight has undergone a major interior face lift and revamped the menu by introducing a healthier - options for lunch and updating the more traditional chicken, ribs, and seafood combination offerings. in addition, it has returned to serving its made - to - order chicken parts in the iconic chicken delight bucket. they hope to serve the residents of rahway and it' s neighbors for the next 50 - plus years .
a couple were converted to chicken tonight, (not to be confused to the ragu sauce), in lindenhurst n. y. , pudgies, chicken galore, and cluck u chicken, mostly in jersey .
chicken delight quickly grew to more than 1, 000 outlets throughout the united states and became the biggest fast - food company of its kind in north america .
then in 1958 a group of local businessmen in winnipeg purchased the chicken delight trademarks and franchising rights for canada and started the first store in portage la prairie .
my family ate at the richmond, california cd back in the 60s ...
don' t cook tonight... call chicken delight !
there was a chicken delight in santa rosa, ca. am i remembering right that the food was delivered on heavy paper plates with another stapled on top ?
the third justification chicken delight offers is the
marketing identity
purpose, the franchisor' s preservation of the distinctiveness, uniformity and quality of its product .
using pressurized oil fryers to cook his chicken quickly tunick founded his chicken delight in illinois in 1952. he decided to market this method though small take - out outlets and his was the first fast food chain to offer home delivery .
[ * ] earlier opinions regarding the propriety of the class action: siegel v. chicken delight, inc. , 271 f. supp. 722 (n. d. cal. 1967); chicken delight, inc. v. harris, district judge, 412 f. 2d 830 (9th cir. 1969) .
chicken delight quickly grew to more than 1, 000 units throughout the united states and became the biggest fast - food company of its kind in north america. chicken delight is one of the oldest, if not the oldest chicken fast - food franchisor in the world. in 1958 a group of local businessmen in winnipeg purchased the chicken delight trademarks and franchising rights for canada and started the first store in portage la prairie, manitoba. in the same year another outlet opened its doors in st. boniface, a location that is still in operation to this day .
unaware of the possible consequences of the case, local entrepreneur otto koch purchased his first chicken delight franchise in 1969. seeing the potential of the chain in canada, koch built and acquired additional franchise locations and in 1976 bought chicken delight of canada ltd. a big task lay ahead to rebuild an ailing franchise system. koch concentrated on revitalizing the system in canada by updating the stores and recreating the chicken delight name and brand image. by providing quality service and cleanliness, the canadian operation once again began to prosper. this success led to koch' s acquisition of the u. s. and international arm - chicken delight international inc. in 1979. for the first time the total chicken delight system was under one roof. since then, chicken delight has continued to prosper under the guidance of past and current president and owner mr. otto koch. meeting ever changing consumer demands with system improvements and the introduction of new menu items has led to the long lasting success of the company .
growing up in kentucky, we always heard of chicken delight, but never had it at our fingertips. lily tomlin' s edith ann mentions it on her lp, and that' s the truth. there was still a chicken delight on hollywood blvd, here in hollywood, (it may still be there ,) a few years back. very wierd place! !! now there' s a freaky little restaurant with a recycled chicken delight sign. i guess it costs less to buy a used sign and replace or rearrange the letters a little. this place is called kitchen delight .
there is still a chicken delight in westbury ny. just 30 min from long beach. love that place. hasn’t changed since i was little. don’t cook tonight .
when i was a little boy back in the 60' s my parents ordered chicken delight all the time here in california. i sure do miss it. i hope someday they come back to california. i sorta remember the logo back then... something like
everything is right with chicken delight
great food! !! !
he began franchising his operation and it grew quickly. tunick expanded into canada in 1958 and by the mid 1960s chicken delight of canada; ltd had more than 50 outlets .
by the late 1960s, however, chicken delight in the us was a troubled operation. today, some of the old us stores operate independently under names reminiscent of the original
chicken delight asserts error in the instructions given. in our view, however, the essential question - whether specification under the circumstances was practicable - was properly presented to the jury
chicken delight' s main problem with respect to the allstate policy is that it is not the named insured thereunder. it attempts to get around this problem in two ways .
a chicken delight is opening soon in burlington nc on huffman mill road. i had never heard of it, and found your blog while researching it online. is the chicken good? i' m a southern girl. do they really know how to fry chicken? guess we will know soon enough! thanks for this post !
i just emailed chicken delight they said they are not expanding selling any. i used to go to the one in nj in rahway st george ave. it was the best chicken i ever ate. i never had any other chicken to compare to it. i wish they were in florida i would be there all the time .
best chicken in jersey city, their corn nuggets are out of this world .
four pieces of juicy fresh chicken, french fried potatoes, and dinner roll .
i used to listen to dan ingram on wabc radio in the 1960s and it was his big sponser. dont cook tonight call chicken delight and dan used to go yessssssssssssss sirrrrrrrrrrrr .
it can hardly be denied that the chicken delight trade - mark is distinctive; that it possesses goodwill and public acceptance unique to it and not enjoyed by other fast food chains .
hi! i like to let you know that i grew up eating, chicken delight, here in west covina, california. it was on vincent avenue, when it was taken away from us. it was the very best tasty chicken around. it made our friday and saturday nites meals the best fun meals we ate. i wish they would bring, chicken delight, back to our town, again. thank you for time, helen
consider chicken delight, a franchise operation that was the subject of a 1971 antitrust case. instead of collecting a percentage of store revenue, chicken delight required franchisees to buy all supplies from the parent company. from a transaction - cost perspective, this was an elegant solution to a basic problem: in a cash business, it is easy to lie about sales .
at chicken delight we’ve been proudly serving customers delicious food for more than 60 years. we hand - bread and marinate fresh, locally farmed chicken with our great - tasting coating. we’re also known for our signature crinkle - cut and locally - grown french fries .
chicken delight filed an answer, prepared by the attorneys who have represented it throughout this dispute. it also filed a motion for summary judgment in which it was claimed that there was no triable issue of fact with respect to its vicarious liability for the tort of one of san pedro' s employees. in ruling on that motion the court had before it declarations from swan and one w. m. rule, a vice president of chicken delight to the general effect that the relationship between chicken delight and san pedro was simply that of franchisor and franchisee, and that the only controls over san pedro which chicken delight exercised were those ‘pursuant to the franchise agreement and primarily designed to protect (chicken delight' s) trademark and to protect its business image. ’ also before the court were the franchise agreements of december 4, 1961 and october 24, 1968. the motion for summary judgment was denied in february 1969 .
hi all, chicken delight has two locations in new york one on staten island and the other on long island in old westbury. someon needs to open some more in the united states
our dad owned a chicken delight franchise in chicago. i want to say that it was on irving park road. my sister and i would help out in the store with odd jobs. we had fun there! !! and great memories. an interesting tidbit. one day dad gave our dog a taste of the chicken delight chicken. he would never eat anything else after that. and we tried hard, but nothing else would do! helen
tuna, chicken, gelling agents, soybean oil, vitamins & minerals, taurine .
to sum up: state farm may have been wrong in refusing to defend. nothing however was shown that this refusal increased chicken delight' s costs of defending or of buying its peace .
harvey siegel and elaine siegel, husband and wife, et al. , plaintiffs - appellees, v. chicken delight, inc. , et al. , defendants - appellants. chicken delight, inc. , et al. , appellants - petitioners, v. george b. harris, district judge, respondent, harvey and elaine siegel et al. , real parties in interest .
the theory advanced by chicken delight is that, if the franchise contracts are unlawful and thus not enforceable against the franchisees, there would be a failure of mutuality and consideration which should preclude enforcement by the franchisees. in more practical terms, chicken delight' s concern is that the district court' s decision might entitle the plaintiffs to a royalty - free franchise license in the future .
chicken delight maintains that, even if its contractual arrangements are held to constitute a tying arrangement, it was not an unreasonable restraint under the sherman act. three different bases for justification are urged .
harvey siegel and elaine siegel, husband and wife, et al. , plaintiffs, v. chicken delight, inc. , et al. , defendants, vance e. shepherd and ben zachary, a partnership, et al. , intervening plaintiffs. chicken delight, inc. , et al. , cross - claimants, v. harvey siegel et al. , cross - defendants .
without an offset for the supposed value of the chicken delight trademark, the overcharge on the tied items is established. as a matter of law therefore, the court finds the fact of damage .
chicken delight urges us to hold that its trade - mark and franchise licenses are not items separate and distinct from the packaging, mixes, and equipment, which it says are essential components of the franchise system. 2 to treat the combined sale of all these items as a tie - in for antitrust purposes, chicken delight maintains, would be like applying the antitrust rules to the sale of a car with its tires or a left shoe with the right. therefore, concludes chicken delight, the lawfulness of the arrangement should not be measured by the rules governing tie - ins. we disagree .
it is by no means clear that any of the parties to the tying arrangements understood that the tying items were to be given free of charge. indeed, the more reasonable reading of the contracts and of chicken delight' s representations is that they stated simply that the contract prices for the tied items were to be the full compensation asked by chicken delight for both those items and the franchise licenses .
chicken delight claims protection under an endorsement to the allstate policy and asserts that allstate' s refusal to defend extended allstate' s limit beyond the $ 15, 000 which it contributed to the settlement .
chicken, surimi, carrot, pumpkin, thickening agents, vitamins & minerals, taurine .
chicken delight—or more realistically its insurer, travelers—was in a slightly different position. an eventual judgment against chicken delight was quite debatable. on the other hand the risk of having to pay a substantial share of such a judgment, if chicken delight were found vicariously responsible, was great. we do not have the terms of the travelers' policy before us and therefore do not know whether that company ran the risk of having to pay, on a proration basis, almost 90% of any judgment. it seems certain, however, that travelers would have been solely responsible for any award over $ 130, 000 .
we find no merit in this contention. whatever claim chicken delight might have had to a new business defense in 1952 - a question we need not decide - the defense cannot apply to the 1963 - 70 period. to accept chicken delight' s argument would convert the new business justification into a perpetual license to operate in restraint of trade. see id. , 187 f. supp. at 558, 561 .
what chicken delight is attempting to do is an absurdity when one reads the policy and the endorsement together. the reference to ‘non - ownership’ on the declarations page is obviously intended to refer to the employer' s non - ownership liability endorsement, from which chicken delight gets no benefit because it is not the named insured. this, however, chicken delight would have us ignore. instead the word ‘non - ownership’ is supposed to be read into the basic policy so that where the omnibus clause therein refers to ‘the automobile’ it refers really to hutchin' s volkswagen. this, however, does violence to the definition of ‘automobile’ in the basis policy, which—for present purposes—is admittedly confined to ‘the motor vehicle... described in this policy. ’ chicken delight' s answer to that is that the word ‘non - ownership’ describes a vehicle .
looks like the chicken delight in california is closed now. it' s still on the canada website but there' s a story elsewhere about it closing late last year for some trendy new eatery. : (
first, chicken delight refers to a declaration sheet to swan' s policy which, under the heading of ‘description of the automobile’ has the following notations: ‘item 3 73 ford (serial number), 4 non - ownership. ’ somehow or other, under chicken delight' s theory, this cryptic notation brings the omnibus clause of the basic policy covering the described ford into play with respect to non - owned automobiles .
two pieces of juicy fresh chicken, four jumbo gulf shrimp, fried potatoes and dinner roll .
six pieces of juicy fresh chicken, single order of french fried potatoes and three dinner rolls .
whether you’re in the mood for dine - in, take - out, drive - thru or delivery for yourself, your family or your large party gathering, one call takes care of it all at chicken delight .
but, professor joskow notes, the franchisees didn' t have to sign up with chicken delight in the first place. there was plenty of competition. he teaches the case as an example of bad antitrust policy .
there was a chicken delight on main st in passaic, nj when i was a kid (50' s). but what i remember most was their delivery vehicle - a metropolitan with a big plastic chicken on the roof, lit fom inside. i can still see that little car riding around passaic, delivering chicken to those who choose to
not cook that night
( paraphraseed). anyone else remember those metropolitans with the chicken? dreichel123 @ urltoken a picture would be worth a thousand words
over its eighteen years existence, chicken delight has licensed several hundred franchisees to operate home delivery and pick - up food stores. it charged its franchisees no franchise fees or royalties. instead, in exchange for the license granting the franchisees the right to assume its identity and adopt its business methods and to prepare and market certain food products under its trade - mark, chicken delight required its franchisees to purchase a specified number of cookers and fryers and to purchase certain packaging supplies and mixes exclusively from chicken delight. 1 the prices fixed for these purchases were higher than, and included a percentage markup which exceeded that of, comparable products sold by competing suppliers .
8. state farm never claimed that chicken delight' s initial appearance and its activities in the radakovich case before tendering the defense, were in violation of the insurance contract. (see fn. 5, ante. )
i, too, remember the chicken delight in richmond, ca, although i was pretty young at the time. every time i pass the old storefront, i remember that tune much more than eating the chicken. also, i believe this outlet did home delivery? somehow, i think i remember a vw bug or a similar - type vehicle that sported the chicken perched atop the roof? thanks for this posting !
my father owned 3 chicken delights is the 60' s and 70' s. they were in oakland and san leandro california. i grew up stapling napkins to the plates. my sister was six and would dress up in a chicken custom and walk back and forth in front of the store as advertizement. she still has mental damage about that. chicken delight should market their chicken batter. they could make a ton of money and i could once again indulge in that wonderful flavor. donna uhler, daughter of william
four pieces of juicy fresh chicken, french fried potatoes, tangy cranberry sauce & a dinner roll .
eight pieces of juicy fresh chicken, a small bucket of french fried potatoes and four dinner rolls .
leg and thigh. two pieces of juice fresh chicken, french fried potatoes, and dinner roll .
breast and wing. two pieces of juice fresh chicken, french fried potatoes, and dinner roll .
items all at excellent value. whether it is dine in, take out, drive thru, or delivery for individuals, families, or large party gatherings -
one call takes care of it all
at chicken delight .
san pedro' s franchise was originally obtained from chicken delight, the franchisor, on december 4, 1961. at that time san pedro was a partnership, consisting of swan and one russell l. richards. this partnership was dissolved a few months before the automobile accident of june 30, 1968. on october 24, 1968, swan and chicken delight entered into a new franchise agreement, the terms of which differed in certain respects from the 1961 agreement .
refrigerate fresh chicken immediately and keep under 5°c. frozen chicken should be maintained under - 15°c. thaw frozen chicken in the fridge or microwave. once thawed it cannot be re - frozen unless it is cooked then frozen. wash hands thoroughly before and after handling chicken products. always store separately and use different utensils (chopping boards, knives, etc .) when preparing raw chicken and other products such as cooked products or fruit and vegetables that may not need further cooking. wash hands and utensils in hot soapy water
© 2017 red lea chicken pty ltd. all rights reserved. design and development by million dollar branders .
30 pieces chicken, 2 boxes large fries, 1 large gravy, 2 large salads, 7 rolls .
thus we conclude that the district court did not err in ruling as matter of law that the tying product - the license to use the chicken delight trade - mark - possessed sufficient market power to bring the case within the sherman act .
chicken delight' s assertions that only a few essential items were involved in the arrangement does not give us cause to reach a different conclusion. the relevant question is not whether the items are essential to the franchise, but whether it is essential to the franchise that the items be purchased from chicken delight. this raises not the issue of whether there is a tie - in but rather the issue of whether the tie - in is justifiable, a subject to be discussed below .
back in the early 60' s i work for a chicken delight store on queens blvd, in forest hills, the owners were a great husband and wife couple sal & lana. thanks for the great memories, great food, great people .
fn3. this sum of $ 15, 000 was paid on behalf of chicken delight by the travelers insurance company which insured its liability, if any, with respect to the radakovich accident up to a limit of $ 1, 000, 000. although counsel for chicken delight valiantly attempted not to let this particular cat out of the bag, it inevitably appeared from the oral and documentary evidence that it was the travelers which had retained counsel for chicken delight in radakovich litigation. it escapes us why this fact of life which was known to everybody concerned was considered unmentionable in the context of this declaratory relief action. (cf. causey v. cornelius, 164 cal. app. 2d 269, 273–280, 330 p. 2d 468 .). fn3. this sum of $ 15, 000 was paid on behalf of chicken delight by the travelers insurance company which insured its liability, if any, with respect to the radakovich accident up to a limit of $ 1, 000, 000. although counsel for chicken delight valiantly attempted not to let this particular cat out of the bag, it inevitably appeared from the oral and documentary evidence that it was the travelers which had retained counsel for chicken delight in radakovich litigation. it escapes us why this fact of life which was known to everybody concerned was considered unmentionable in the context of this declaratory relief action. (cf. causey v. cornelius, 164 cal. app. 2d 269, 273–280, 330 p. 2d 468. )
chicken delight points out that while it was an early pioneer in the fast food franchising field, the record establishes that there has recently been a dramatic expansion in this area, with the advent of numerous firms, including many chicken franchising systems, all competing vigorously with each other. under the circumstances, it contends that the existence of the requisite market dominance remained a jury question .
my wife and i miss the chicken delight which was located on 15th street in moline, illinois. it could have been the 1st cd. we went there most saturday afternoons before we were married. this was during 1949 and 1950. i went into the military in january 1951 and it was still there. we were married in 1951. we often talk about their excellent chicken .
the district court ruled, however, that chicken delight' s unique registered trade - mark, in combination with its demonstrated power to impose a tie - in, established as matter of law the existence of sufficient market power to bring the case within the sherman act .
the packaged foods to be sold were limited and the only name that could be used was' chicken delight'; the place of business had to be known as' chicken delight,' and the precise method and manner of cooking was specifically defined. the franchisee had to purchase numerous articles and equipment stated by the franchisor to be essential. this equipment had to be purchased from the franchisor or meet the standards prescribed by it. the franchisee was required to sell its food in a container bearing the trademark' chicken delight' and buy its entire requirements for the various packaging kits defined by the franchisor. the business could be conducted only at an approved location, and its construction and remodeling had to meet the franchisor' s standards. the preparation and cooking of all foods had to meet specific standards .
the company was started in illinois in 1952 by american entrepreneur al tunick a pioneer in fast food franchising. tunick purchased some deep fryers from a restaurant that was going out of business. he and some friends tried cooking different foods looking for a product other than french fries. at that time, chicken was pan - fried, steamed or oven - roasted. due to the long cooking times, it was not a good fast - food item. tunick coated some chicken in a spicy breading and lowered it into the hot oil. the chicken cooked much faster while the juices remained sealed inside. thus, chicken delight was born .
still one on long island. best fried chicken anywhere. just bought 24 pieces and it lasted a day at my house��
we had the chicken delight in goleta, remember the thick paper plates, they would flip one over and staple them together to seal, looked like a fat flying saucer, thought about this today, as the jingle came out of nowhere and into my thoughts ...
there was a chicken delight right next door to the executive room bar on wilshire blvd in los angeles. this is the bar where billy joel played the piano for six months in 72. he surely ate his share of chicken and was using his middle name martin, he was kinda hiding out at this place because of a bad record deal he signed. piano man was written about this bar .
my parents owned 3 different chicken delights in the san francisco bay area in the 60s - 70s! i sure do miss the great chicken i grew up on. wish we could find a way to bring this company back to life here in ca !
medium 2 - topping pizza, 6 pieces of chicken, medium fries & medium gravy. serves appr. 3 - 5 .
large 2 - topping pizza, 8 pieces of chicken, medium fries & medium gravy. serves appr. 5 - 7 .
founded in illinois in 1952, the chain grew to over 1, 000 locations in the 1960s. they were purchased by consolidated foods in 1964. their jingle
don' t cook tonight, call chicken delight
, emphasizing their delivery service, was widely broadcast on american radio. they were known by their use of plymouth valiants volkswagen beetle cars for deliveries that featured a huge plastic chicken on the roof .
chicken delight' s claim against allstate thus founders on the fact that it was neither a named nor an additional insured on the allstate policy. this makes it unnecessary to consider to what extent the reasons for which we are about to affirm as to state farm, apply equally to allstate .
i grew up in thousand oaks, ca and we had a cd in our area (simi valley) and it was great. never had chicken that good before or since and yes that includes kfc which is a poor substitute. and i loved the little
don' t cook tonight call chicken delight
jingle - all the kids knew it, always ran on t. v. back in the day. the rolls and slaw were good too. everything just tasted better then! but their chicken was very good. i miss it !
the district court ruled that the license to use the chicken delight name, trade - mark, and method of operations was
a tying item in the traditional sense ,
311 f. supp. at 849, the tied items being the cookers and fryers, packaging products, and mixes .
2 large 2 - topping pizzas, 15 pieces of chicken, large fries & large gravy. serves appr. 8 - 10 .
no one disputes the basic rule that the duty to defend arises when the insurer “... ascertains facts which give rise to the potential of liability under the policy... . ” (state farm mut. auto. ins. co. v. allstate ins. co. , 9 cal. app. 3d 508, 526, 88 cal. rptr. 246, 257 .) under well established law it seems quite settled that chicken delight had an exposure in the radakovich action on some theory or other, 7 that state farm' s position that chicken delight lost any right to be defended simply because it made its unsuccessful motion for a summary judgment is erroneous and that the duty to defend under the omnibus clause came into play simply because the radakovich complaint alleged an agency relationship which, if proved, would have made chicken delight vicariously liable for hutchins' tort. 8
chicken must always be cooked thoroughly or well done. the juice should run clear with no pink tinges. it should be 75°c in the thickest part. if you need to keep the cooked chicken hot it should be kept at 60°c. if you need to cool or store cooked chicken, place it in the fridge as soon as the steam has evaporated. it should be used within two days .
we conclude that the district court was not in error in holding as matter of law (and upon the limited jury verdict) that chicken delight' s contractual requirements constituted a tying arrangement in violation of sec. 1 of the sherman act. upon this aspect of the case, judgment is affirmed .
with all respect, this argument seems almost demeaning. a franchisor who, as the record shows, insisted in its franchise contract that the franchisee ‘shall use only the name ‘chicken delight’... and that his place of business shall be known only as ‘chicken delight’,' now claims that it is the named insured in a policy of liability insurance issued to the franchisee under the name he is contractually obligated to use, at his own address, where no one but the franchisee does business! the very extravagance of the claim must be the reason why no case directly in point has been found .
16 piece chicken. served with one pint of salad, six rolls and small bucket of french fries. serves 4 - 5 people .
12 piece chicken. served with one pint of salad, six rolls and small bucket of french fries. serves 3 - 4 people .
gourmet delight premium cat cuisine, is proud to be natural as nature intended. grain free with real natural meat & fish and containing no artificial flavours and preservatives its a healthy gourmet meal. available in a range of delectable fish & meat flavours there is something to suit the fussiest eaters. delight your loved one with gourmet natural cat cuisine .
tunic marketed his method through small take - out and delivery locations. as this was all happening near the end of the korean war, many women were working outside the home and had no time to cook. the slogan ‘don’t cook tonight... call chicken delight’ became a household phrase throughout north america .
the district court found factual issues to exist as to whether effective quality control could be achieved by specification in the case of the cooking machinery and the dip and spice mixes. these questions were given to the jury under instructions; and the jury, in response to special interrogatories, found against chicken delight. 10
chicken is high in protein, low in fat, low in kilojoules and low in cholesterol. it contains many vitamins and minerals including protein, vitamin e, niacin, riboflavin, iron, zinc, phosphorous and magnesium. chicken is a healthy choice for you and your family .
at the time of the accident hutchins was making deliveries for donald j. swan, a chicken delight franchisee, by whom he was employed. swan did business under the name of chicken delight of san pedro (‘san pedro’). allstate had issued an automobile policy on a ford automobile owned by swan. the per person limit on that policy was also $ 15, 000. in addition swan had purchased a so - called ‘employers' non - ownership liability endorsement’ to that policy. further, he carried an excess policy with chicago insurance company (‘chicago’) which apparently had a per person limit of $ 100, 000. 2
since, in view of the circumstances of this case, chicken delight is not entitled to recover even under established principles of automobile insurance law, this is obviously not the occasion for making second - class insureds out of the beneficiaries of the statutory omnibus clause. (ins. code, s 11581. 1. )
tunick coated some chicken in a spicy breading and lowered it into the hot oil, cooking it in a flash and sealing the juices inside .
karen and others, i grew up in marin county and remember getting chicken delight delivered to our home frequently (my mom was a great cook, but it was the 60' s so why bother ?). i wonder if there was one in san rafael or if it came over from richmond? i loved the taste of that chicken. i can still taste it! i' m in boston now, so happy to know there are some in nj
both the appeal and the petition are interlocutory. the issues involved may become more clear after the case is completely settled in the district court. (it may even be that chicken delight will not desire review of the district court' s disposition at that point .) since the district court' s theory of damages and its refusal to allocate any of the purchase price to the tying product has been reversed, the factual background of the issue raised in the petition is already quite different from that anticipated when the petition was filed. chicken delight' s interests can be adequately protected by an appeal at the end of the district court proceedings .
it should be readily apparent that, measured against these tests, the package sales here in question are quite different from the sale of an automobile and its tires or a left shoe and the right. in particular, there are several factors in this case which other courts have deemed sufficient to find a tie - in. undisputed testimony at trial established that other franchisors in fast food businesses similar to that of chicken delight sold their licenses separate from the essential supplies. the various supplies sold here were sold individually and in differing amounts, rather than in a preassembled package, and the franchisees were billed accordingly. at no time were the franchises required to purchase all their various supplies from chicken delight. chicken delight did not itself manufacture the tied items. see associated press v. taft - ingalls corp. , 340 f. 2d 753, 764 (6th cir. 1965); united states v. jerrold electronics corp. , supra, 187 f. supp. at 559
he decided to market his method through small take - out and delivery locations. it was near the end of the korean war when many women were working outside the home and had no time to cook. the slogan' don' t cook tonight... call chicken delight' became a household phrase throughout north america.
chicken delight is a chain of restaurants offering eat in , take out , and delivery service with a menu featuring chicken , pizza and ribs . based in winnipeg , the chain mostly has outlets in that city and throughout manitoba . although as of 2017 six chicken delight restaurants are located in the new york metro area , none of these are included in the corporate web site list of franchise locations . 
chicken delight is a chain of restaurants offering eat in, take out, and delivery service with a menu featuring chicken, pizza and ribs. based in winnipeg, the chain mostly has outlets in that city and throughout manitoba. although as of 2017 six chicken delight restaurants are located in the new york metro area, none of these are included in the corporate web site list of franchise locations.
chicken delight is a chain of restaurants offering eat in, take out, and delivery service with a menu featuring chicken, pizza and ribs. based in winnipeg, the chain mostly has outlets in that city and throughout manitoba. although as of 2017 six chicken delight restaurants are located in the new york metro area, none of these are included in the corporate web site list of franchise locations.