if a body meets a body
if a body meets a body is the eighty - sixth columbia pictures short subject starring the three stooges .
if a body meets a body is available as part of the three stooges dvd collection, three stooges collection volume 4 .
looking for movie tickets? enter your location to see which movie theaters are playing if a body meets a body near you .
if a body meets a body is the 86th short subject starring american slapstick comedy team the three stooges. the trio made a total of 190 shorts for columbia pictures between 1934 and 1959 .
our editors will review what you' ve submitted, and if it meets our criteria, we' ll add it to the article .
, known as “body meets dress, dress meets body, ” which consisted largely of stretch dresses pulled over ballooning pads. there has been, of course, a long history of body modification through dress — corsets have pulled the figure in to control the waist, and crinolines, panniers and bustles exaggerate and extend the body. but with that one collection, kawakubo became a lone
source: if a body meets a body (1945) added by mr77100 on 2009 - 04 - 30 09: 04: 08 status: confirmed team stooge comments: a couple of curly' s 1944 appearances also hint at oncoming health problems, particularly the yoke' s on me .
even if a private entity is not the functional equivalent of a public body, if it contracts with a public body, its records may be obtained under the public records law from the public body if the public body has custody of copies of the records. [ 13 ] in addition, a public body by rule or contract may require private bodies with which it deals to make pertinent records available for public inspection. [ 14 ] records in a private body’s possession may also be subject to disclosure where a public body actually owns the records. [ 15 ] back to top
( b) any public record of a public body other than a county clerk .
if requested by a public safety officer as defined in ors 181. 610 :
directed by jules white ,
if a body meets a body
is a pretty good three stooges comedy with a spooky premise. however, this film offers the first signs that curly howard was not a well man, that his health was beginning to deteriorate from years of living in the fast lane. he would only make about a dozen more stooge shorts with larry and moe before a major stroke forced him to leave the act for good. here are my favorite highlights from
if a body meets a body .
the stooges dodge a parrot flying inside a skull. they also humorously agonize over 67 cents. when the boys first arrive at the haunted house, they shake the rainwater off of their garments and onto the butler, named jerkington (played by theodore
ted
lorch). curly (known as curly q. link in this film) does a hilarious backward high jump when he learns that his uncle was murdered on the very spot where he' s standing. despite curly' s poor health ,
if a body meets a body
manages to succeed with its
haunted house
theme. ted lorch does a great characterization of a sinister butler, and bushy - eyebrowed fred kelsey is fine as a tough, no - nonsense detective .
if a body meets a body was the first film made after curly howard suffered a mild stroke. as a result, his performance was marred by slurred speech, and slower timing. though the trio did not know it at the time, curly' s health would gradually deteriorate, resulting in languid, almost sickly performances right up to his last film with the team, half - wits holiday .
its title is a pun on the comically macabre theme of the film, and taken from a line from the old scottish song by robert burns ,
coming through the rye
( as in
should a body meet a body / coming through the rye / should a body kiss a body / need a body cry ?
). the short has a very similar plot to the laurel - hardy murder case, which also features actor fred kelsey .
a statement that the public body is uncertain whether the public body possesses the public record and that the public body will search for the record and make an appropriate response as soon as practicable .
records of a public body pertaining to litigation to which the public body is a party if the complaint has been filed, or if the complaint has not been filed, if the public body shows that such litigation is reasonably likely to occur. this exemption does not apply to litigation which has been concluded, and nothing in this subsection shall limit any right or opportunity granted by discovery or deposition statutes to a party to litigation or potential litigation .
so that' s all well and good until several chapters later when holden' s sister phoebe corrects him: first of all, it' s
if a body meet a body”; second, it' s not a song—it' s a poem by robert burns. here' s the poem itself :
( b) the badge or card was prepared solely for internal use by the public body to identify employees of the public body .
an individual may submit a written request to a public body not to disclose a specified public record indicating the home address, personal telephone number or electronic mail address of the individual. a public body may not disclose the specified public record if the individual demonstrates to the satisfaction of the public body that the personal safety of the individual or the personal safety of a family member residing with the individual is in danger if the home address, personal telephone number or electronic mail address remains available for public inspection .
“…so if you don’t mind, i’m going to crack this one alone. ”
if a request is made in writing, the public body must provide a response acknowledging receipt of the request “as soon as practicable and without unreasonable delay. ” the response must also include one of the following :
if the attorney general or a district attorney orders a public body to disclose a public record, a public body other than a health professional regulatory board must comply with the order in full within seven days, or else give notice within that period that the public body intends to institute proceedings for injunctive or declaratory relief in circuit court. [ 275 ] copies of this notice must be sent to the attorney general or district attorney, and by certified mail to the petitioner. the public body then must institute those proceedings within seven days after issuing the notice of its intention. ors 192. 450 (2). the attorney general will not represent a state agency in such a case. ors 192. 450 (3). nor will a district attorney represent another public body in such a case, even if the district attorney generally acts as attorney for that public body .
if the request was denied by a public body that is not a state agency and not an elected official, the requester may petition the district attorney in the county where the public body is located for an order compelling disclosure of the responsive records. ors 192. 460 (1) .
see p. b - 5 for a sample form of response to a public records request. the public body may request additional information or clarification from the requester for the purpose of expediting the public body’s response to the request. [ 35 ] except in the rare cases where the last of these responses may be implicated, this requirement is straightforward. a public body may wish to take a brief time to make a more informed response. but a number of the responses permitted by the statute facilitate a prompt response by the public body, even if the public body does not know whether it has custody of responsive records. timely acknowledgment of a request lets a requester know that the process is underway. it also provides a good opportunity to pursue any needed clarification of a request. back to top
the public records law authorizes a public body to establish fees “reasonably calculated to reimburse the public body for the public body’s actual cost of making public records available. ” ors 192. 440 (4) (a). the statute also permits a public body to include in its fees “costs for summarizing, compiling or tailoring the public records, either in organization or media, to meet the person’s request. ” ors 192. 440 (4) (a). a public body has authority to charge a fee in excess of $ 25 only if it first provides a written cost estimate to the requester and receives confirmation that the requester wants the public body to proceed with responding to the request. ors 192. 440 (4) (c). a public body may require prepayment of its estimated charges before taking further action on a request. [ 50 ] of course, if the actual charges are less than the prepayment, any overpayment should be refunded promptly .
unless an employee consents in writing, this provision prohibits a public body from disclosing the employee’s identification badge or card if it contains a photograph of the employee and was prepared solely for internal use by the public body to identify its employees. the provision also prohibits disclosure of a duplicate of the photograph appearing on the badge or card .
ce marking is a visible declaration by the manufacturer or his authorised representative that the pressure equipment to which it relates satisfies all the provisions of the regulations. by affixing ce marking to pressure equipment, you are making a statement that the equipment meets the requirements of all relevant directives .
this section provides that exempt records remain exempt after being transferred to another public body, if the reasons for confidentiality remain applicable. [ 251 ] before disclosing records that it has received from another public body, a public body should discuss with the “furnishing” public body whether any prohibitions against disclosure apply to the records. [ 252 ] the public bodies may also want to discuss whether any disclosure exemptions apply to the records. back to top
oregon health and science university, the oregon state bar, any intergovernmental entity formed by a public body with another state or with a political subdivision of another state, or any intergovernmental entity formed by a public body with an agency of the federal government .
a statement that the public body does not possess, or is not the custodian of, the public record .
( 3) the public body may not disclose a duplicate of the photograph used on the badge or card .
the first mention we get of this mysterious catcher in this mysterious rye is when holden overhears a little kid singing ,
if a body catch a body coming through the rye .
for just a second, it makes him feel not so depressed, in part because holden is a fan of little children, and we can all agree that the only things better than little kids are singing little kids .
unlike most other exemptions, which merely permit a public body to refuse to disclose records, ors 192. 445 prohibits a public body from disclosing records if the requirements of this section have been met. however, ors 192. 445 (4) permits a public body to disclose an exempt home address, personal telephone number or electronic mail address in response to a court order, a request from a law enforcement agency, or with the individual’s consent. ors 192. 445 (5) provides that a public body may not be held liable for granting or denying an exemption from disclosure of an individual’s home address, personal telephone number or electronic mail address, or for releasing that information if an exemption is granted .
a statement that the request was denied including the person denying the request and the date of the denial, if known .
state and local public bodies regularly exchange records with each other in connection with their mutual functions and duties. if a public body that has received records from another public body gets a request for those records, it must first determine whether it is the records custodian for purposes of the public records law. a public body is not the custodian of the records if it has custody of the records merely as an agent for another public body that is the custodian. ors 192. 410 (1) (b). when a public body is not the custodian of records, it has no duty to permit inspection or copying of the records, unless the records are not otherwise available, and may merely refer the requester to the public body that is custodian of the records. id. it is possible that both the public body furnishing the records and the public body receiving the records are custodians because both bodies have the records for their own programmatic purposes. in that case, the receiving public body has all duties of a records custodian under the public records law .
if the public record is maintained in a machine readable or electronic form, the custodian shall provide a copy of the public record in the form requested, if available. if the public record is not available in the form requested, the custodian shall make the public record available in the form in which the custodian maintains the public record .
we recommend that a public body consult with its legal counsel for advice in responding to a request for records potentially exempt under the personnel discipline exemption .
before seeking formal review of a decision by a public body’s employee, it may be worthwhile for a disappointed requester to seek a decision at a higher level within the public body. this increases the probability of a favorable decision without the need to seek review, and may encourage the agency to obtain legal advice concerning disclosure of the records at issue. back to top
also, the exemption is not limited to records in the custody of a law enforcement agency or official. if, as part of a criminal investigation, a law enforcement agency has collected or gathered records from another public body, that public body (or any other public body that is also a “custodian” of the same records) may apply the exemption in reliance on the law enforcement agency’s representation that public disclosure of records would interfere with the pending criminal prosecution. [ 129 ]
i propose that the human body always says this: make me equal to you .
, or biological stability, including acid - base balance in the blood and body .
a statement that the public body is the custodian of at least some of the requested public records and that an estimate of the time and fees for disclosure of the public records will be provided by the public body within a reasonable time .
public bodies receiving a public records request should first determine whether disclosure is prohibited by ors 192. 445, ors 192. 447, or by another state or federal law. if disclosure is not prohibited, and the public body sees no reason to withhold a requested record, the public body may disclose the record without further analysis .
in any case in which a requester petitions for judicial review and fully prevails, the public body will be required to compensate the requester for the cost of the litigation at trial and on appeal, including “reasonable attorney fees. ” ors 192. 490 (3). [ 278 ] if a public body that has been ordered to disclose records fails within seven days to either disclose the records or to state its intention to seek judicial review, that public body will be required to pay the requester’s litigation costs regardless of which side prevails. ors 192. 490 (3). [ 279 ] if the public body has disclosed all requested records before trial, the case is generally moot, and no attorney fees will be available. [ 280 ] however, the public body may be required to pay these costs even if it offers to furnish the requested information, if the public body incorrectly asserts that disclosure is not required because the requested information is exempt. [ 281 ]
we believe that a public body may require the records request to be in writing. [ 29 ] a state agency should adopt such a requirement in compliance with the state administrative procedures act. [ 30 ] see p. b - 2 for a sample form of written records request. written requests help public bodies identify the records requested. it also creates a record of the reason the public body released the record, which is helpful if releasing the record results in a legal challenge .
o, jenny' s a' wat, poor body; jenny' s seldom dry; she draiglet a' her petticoatie coming thro' the rye .
if a public body asserts an exemption that is ultimately rejected by the courts, the public body may be required to pay the requester’s litigation costs and attorney fees, as well as its own costs. see discussion of court proceedings, below. in addition, knowingly concealing a public record is a crime unless there is lawful authority for concealment. ors 162. 305. back to top
it is helpful if the petition also explains why the requester believes that asserted exemptions do not apply .
but, more commonly a public body may choose to disclose records even if they are exempt from disclosure. the availability of an applicable exemption, without more, simply means that disclosure is not required by the public records law .
the fourth condition is whether the public body obliged itself in good faith not to disclose the information. this is the other side of the first condition. the public body need not have given a written commitment, so long as there was a clear statement or understanding that the public body would not disclose the information. [ 214 ] an explicit statement that the public body will not disclose the information unless required by law is sufficient .
the requester can also seek court review in marion county or the county where the public body is located if the attorney general or the district attorney has denied any part of a petition. ors 192. 450 and 192. 460 .
the ce marking will need to be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body if it is involved at the production control phase. the ce marking must not be affixed to sep equipment .
if the communication contains factual material together with the advisory recommendations, then the public body is under a duty to segregate the factual material and make it available for inspection. ors 192. 505. it may be appropriate to withhold or redact a communication that is not advisory in itself, if disclosing that communication would effectively disclose the substance of a communication that is exempt under ors 192. 502 (1) .
if you' re a pressure equipment manufacturer, find out the safety requirements you need to meet, your role, and methods of compliance .
a public body must determine that disclosure of personal information would be an unreasonable invasion of privacy before this exemption will apply. even if disclosure would constitute an unreasonable invasion of privacy, however, the public body also must determine whether the public interest by clear and convincing evidence requires disclosure in the particular instance. [ 189 ] only when there is no overriding public interest in disclosure may the public body lawfully withhold the information .
specific operational plans in connection with an anticipated threat to individual or public safety for deployment and use of personnel and equipment, prepared or used by a public body, if public disclosure of the plans would endanger an individual’s life or physical safety or jeopardize a law enforcement activity .
secret panel corpses a secret panel opens revealing a stiff body that leans forward on a stooge' s shoulder. he pushes it back and it leans forward again. the stooge turns around and sees the body and gets scared. also used in: who done it? · for crimin' out loud
personally identifiable information about customers of a municipal electric utility or a people’s utility district or the names, dates of birth, driver license numbers, telephone numbers, electronic mail addresses or social security numbers of customers who receive water, sewer or storm drain services from a public body as defined in ors 174. 109. the utility or district may release personally identifiable information about a customer, and a public body providing water, sewer or storm drain services may release the name, date of birth, driver license number, telephone number, electronic mail address or social security number of a customer, if the customer consents in writing or electronically, if the disclosure is necessary for the utility, district or other public body to render services to the customer, if the disclosure is required pursuant to a court order or if the disclosure is otherwise required by federal or state law. the utility, district or other public body may charge as appropriate for the costs of providing such information. the utility, district or other public body may make customer records available to third party credit agencies on a regular basis in connection with the establishment and management of customer accounts or in the event such accounts are delinquent .
on its face, the public records law does not apply to private entities such as nonprofit corporations and cooperatives. however, in a 1994 case, the oregon supreme court held that if the ostensibly private entity is the “functional equivalent” of a public body, the public records law applies to it. the court stated that the following factors, although not exclusive, are relevant in determining whether a private entity is the functional equivalent of a public body :
a statement that state or federal law prohibits the public body from acknowledging whether the record exists or that acknowledging whether the record exists would result in the loss of federal benefits or other sanction. a statement under this paragraph must include a citation to the state or federal law relied upon by the public body .
again the crucial term is “reasonable. ” the statutory right to inspect public records encompasses a right to examine original records, and inspection of originals ordinarily should be allowed if requested. but the right to inspect does not include a right to rummage through file cabinets, file folders or electronic files, [ 48 ] and a public body may adopt administrative measures to supervise original document review. nor does the right to examine original records require inspection of an original record that contains some information that is exempt from disclosure. in such a case, a public body acts reasonably if it furnishes a copy of the original, with the exempt material blanked out. see ors 192. 505. furthermore, a public body’s rule or determination under ors 192. 430 that copies will be furnished in lieu of inspection of original documents would be valid if “necessary for the protection of the records and to prevent interference with the regular discharge of [ the public body’s ] duties. ” [ 49 ] back to top
this exemption is intended to protect against unauthorized access to, and fraudulent use of, information that a public body possesses in relation to fund transfers. a public body may transfer funds to or receive a transfer of funds from members of the public as well as other public entities. to execute such transfers, the public body may have records containing information that could allow a person to access funds maintained in a private or public account. this provision protects that information from disclosure. back to top
encyclopædia britannica articles are written in a neutral objective tone for a general audience .
if you have any suggestions for improving our site. now over 750, 000 movie quotes & tv quotes .
the residence address of an elector if authorized under ors 247. 965 and subject to ors 247. 967 .
the “compelling public interest” exception. under this exception, the public body may disclose “the name, age and county of residence of the [ concealed handgun license ] holder or applicant” if “ [ t ] he public body determines that a compelling public interest requires disclosure in the particular instance. ” ors 192. 448 (1) (d) .
oar 137 - 004 - 0800 (3) requires the public body to notify the individual requesting nondisclosure of its decision. a public body may ask the individual to submit additional information to assist it in making its decision. back to top
as government “privatizes” various governmental functions, as the legislative assembly exempts state agencies from the application of various statutes and as government is directed to perform various functions through contracts with private entities, numerous quasi - public entities are being created. a similar analysis would be used to determine if a quasi - public entity is a public body .
sensitive business, commercial or financial information furnished to or developed by a public body engaged in the business of providing electricity or electricity services, if the information is directly related to a transaction described in ors 261. 348, or if the information is directly related to a bid, proposal or negotiations for the sale or purchase of electricity or electricity services, and disclosure of the information would cause a competitive disadvantage for the public body or its retail electricity customers. this subsection does not apply to cost - of - service studies used in the development or review of generally applicable rate schedules .
the public body must show that it has obliged itself in good faith not to disclose the information .
when a person who is a party to litigation involving a public body or who has filed a tort claim notice under ors 30. 275 (5) (a) uses the public records law to request information relating to the litigation or notice, the party must notify the attorney for the public body. ors 192. 420 (2). [ 32 ] an attorney may request public records directly from a public body without consent of the public body’s legal counsel, but the attorney could violate section 4. 2 of the oregon state bar’s rules of professional conduct by asking questions about the meaning of records or attempting to elicit admissions when the attorney knows that the public body is represented by legal counsel on a matter to which the records are relevant. [ 33 ] back to top
public bodies often must consult with legal counsel regarding public record requests. briefly postponing the disclosure of records for that purpose does not violate the public records law. it is reasonable for a public body to obtain legal advice before responding to an extensive public records disclosure request when compliance will seriously disrupt the records custodian’s operations. similarly, it is reasonable for a public body to consult counsel about disclosure of documents that appear to be exempt, in whole or in part, from the disclosure requirements of the public records law. when a public body receives a request for records that the public body believes may be pertinent to a legal claim or litigation against the public body, it is also reasonable to consult counsel .
coming thro' the rye, poor body, coming thro' the rye, she draiglet a' her petticoatie coming thro' the rye .
the “custodian” of public records bears the duty to make nonexempt public records available for inspection and copying under the public records law. the term “custodian” is defined as that public body mandated to create, maintain, care for or control the records. ors 192. 410 (1) (b). more than one public body can be a custodian of a given public record, and each custodian is responsible for responding to public record requests directed to it. in general, any public body that possesses a public record for purposes related to one or more of its particular functions is a custodian of the record. however, the term does not include a public body that has custody of a public record as an agent for another public body that is the custodian, unless the record is not otherwise available. [ 34 ] ors 192. 410 (1) (b). when a public body that is a custodian of public records has received the records from another public body, it should consult with the originating body regarding whether the records may be exempt from disclosure. see ors 192. 502 (10). back to top
note that a public body may not charge a person with a disability to cover any additional costs of providing records in an alternative form, although the public body may charge a fee for all other “actual costs” that may be recovered under the public records law just as it would for any other requester. see waiver or reduction of fees, discussed below. back to top
public records or information described in this section, furnished by the public body originally compiling, preparing or receiving them to any other public officer or public body in connection with performance of the duties of the recipient, if the considerations originally giving rise to the confidential or exempt nature of the public records or information remain applicable .
corrections? updates? omissions? let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login) .
investigatory information relating to any complaint or charge filed under ors chapter 654, until a final administrative determination is made or, if a citation is issued, until an employer receives notice of any citation .
the “victim or protected person” exception. under this exception, a public body may “confirm [ ] or deny [ ] that a person convicted of a person crime, or restrained by a protective order, is a current holder of a concealed handgun license” if three conditions are met: (1) the disclosure is made “to a victim of the person crime or to a person who is protected by the protective order” (2) the disclosure is made in response to a request for disclosure that provides the public body with the name and age of the person convicted of the person crime or restrained by the protective order” and (3) the person seeking the disclosure provides the public body with written proof that the person is a victim of the person crime or is protected by the protective order. ors 192. 448 (1) (e) .
“notwithstanding any other provision of law, a public body that receives a request for disclosure under” the “victim or protected person” or “news media” exceptions is authorized by law to “conduct an investigation, including a criminal records check, to determine whether a person * * * has been convicted of a person crime or a crime involving the use or possession of a firearm or is restrained by a protective order. ” ors 192. 448 (3) .
a person may require the public body to provide a copy of a requested record if the record is susceptible to copying. [ 42 ] ors 192. 440 (1) also requires public bodies to furnish “reasonable opportunity to inspect or copy” public records. this duty includes allowing requesters to use their own equipment to make copies, subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by the public body to protect the integrity of the records and to prevent interference with the regular duties of the public body. a person requesting a record generally can choose between receiving a copy of the record provided by the custodian, physically inspecting the record, or making a copy of the record using the requester’s own equipment at the custodian’s place of business. [ 43 ]
since you probably don' t speak 18th - century scottish dialect, we' ll translate for you :
draiglet
= drags ,
wat
= wet ,
gin
= when, and
ken
= know. in other words, jenny is out in the rye with a wet body, dragging her petticoat—and she
meets
( has sex with ?) someone. need she cry (i. e. , get emotional) about it? need the world know about it? if not, then casual sex is ok .
if the request was denied by an elected official, the requester must seek review in marion county circuit court, or the circuit court in the county where the elected official is located. note that court review is required even if the request was not made to an elected official if the request was denied by an elected official. ors 192. 480 .
even if the public body perceives reasons to withhold the record, it must disclose the record unless an express statutory exemption applies to the record. naturally, the type of information appearing in a record will always be relevant to determining whether an exemption applies. many exemptions in the public records law also require a public body to weigh public interests favoring nondisclosure against public interests favoring disclosure, with a presumption favoring disclosure. moreover, unless disclosure is prohibited, the policies underlying the public records law mean that public bodies should generally favor disclosure even if an exemption from disclosure is available .
public body employee or volunteer addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth and telephone numbers contained in personnel records maintained by the public body that is the employer or the recipient of volunteer services. this exemption :
the “news media ” exception. under this exception, a public body may “confirm [ ] or deny [ ] that a person convicted of a crime involving the use or possession of a firearm is a current holder of a concealed handgun license” if three conditions are met: the disclosure is made to a bona fide representative of the news media, ” (2) “the disclosure is made in response to a request for disclosure that provides the name and age of the person convicted of the crime involving the use or possession of a firearm, ” and (3) the person seeking the disclosure “provides the public body with written proof that the person is a bona fide representative of the news media. ” ors 192. 448 (1) (f) .
( d) information of an applicant pertaining to litigation to which the applicant is a party if the complaint has been filed, or if the complaint has not been filed, if the applicant shows that such litigation is reasonably likely to occur; this exemption does not apply to litigation which has been concluded, and nothing in this subparagraph shall limit any right or opportunity granted by discovery or deposition statutes to a party to litigation or potential litigation .
if you prefer to suggest your own revision of the article, you can go to edit mode (requires login) .
if a body meets a body is the first stooge film to employ a revamped performance of the' sliding strings' version of
three blind mice
as the stooges' official theme song. the original' sliding strings' version was regularly used from 1939' s we want our mummy until 1942' s what' s the matador? . due to the timing of this theme' s usage, it is often associated with the post - stroke curly howard era, as the new theme coincidentally made its debut in the same film that curly' s illness became apparent. this version of
three blind mice
would only be utilized in four films during the shemp howard era: fright night, out west, squareheads of the round table and the hot scots .
the dam a beaver makes or a hive a bee helps to build is in (and also is) its body. the body tells the animal what to do. and the animal does exactly as it is told. but the human has a body that is mute. it says nothing, demands nothing, insists on nothing. like the best slave, the body simply waits and receives and is obedient to the human that passes through it in a form that is consistent with a current natural or social configuration. it provides no instructions for anything. the nineteenth - century american philosopher and psychologist william james proposed that the human is the animal that does not have instincts in its body but puts them there through learning and experience. an example of this is the instinct for riding a bicycle. it is learned. it becomes a part of the body. and so what separates us from, say, a horse is that its instincts are there from beginning to end, whereas ours are accumulated through experience and learning and, as a consequence, can be unlearned by the same process. we can build a house not by listening to and following the commands of the body but from a concept of a house. and because this concept is not locked in the body, it can be not only adjusted but also judged. the bee has no idea if the hive it helps make is ugly or beautiful. it just is. humans, on the other hand, are the art animal because concepts—or more specifically, culture—is our species - being. we are
the law requires a multi - part analysis to evaluate fee waiver or reduction requests. [ 61 ] under this analysis, a public body determines (a) whether the “public interest” test is satisfied, and (b) whether to grant a fee waiver or reduction. back to top
the names, home addresses and telephone numbers of licensees and other persons contained in a public body’s records are “personal” information. whether a public body may withhold that information depends, in part, upon whether disclosure would constitute an invasion of privacy that an ordinary reasonable person would deem highly offensive. [ 192 ]
if tried in a magistrates court, the maximum penalty for contravening the pressure equipment regulations is currently a fine of £5, 000 or, in some cases, imprisonment for up to three months, or both .
but in fact, the human body is not blank or silent. it has lots and lots of things to say. the r & b singer r. kelly once sang about hearing the body calling (“it’s unbelievable how your body’s calling … i can just hear it callin’ callin’”). he was right. the human body talks. it has a call. but what is it? r. kelly would have us believe that it is: fuck me. but the human body does not say this all of the time, and to everybody it meets. the human is not the fucking animal. indeed, all animals are fucking animals. of the five kingdoms of life on this planet—monera, protista, fungi, plantae, and animalia—only monera and protista are non - fucking. even plants fuck, albeit from a distance usually, or with the aid of a companion species. the knowledge that’s gained from learning that a beaver fucks now and then is very small. birds do it, bees do it, fleas do it, and so on. but to learn that, say, a beaver makes dams is of enormous importance. and a beaver’s body—its flat tail, its big teeth, its slick fur—is a collection of tools that announces the kind of animal it is in every situation: i am a builder of dams. now, what does the human body say in every situation to all other human bodies ?
i wonder if the other members who have reviewed this short are looking at it through rose colored glasses. that tends to happen a lot with some of the weaker curly efforts; some fans are unwilling to admit that curly was capable of not knocking it out of the park, and not everything curly touched turned to gold. i' m not saying if a body meets a body is a terrible short by any stretch. however i don' t think it deserves
near classic... 3 1 / 2 pokes... a +
etc. this is the first short where it is painfully obvious something is wrong is curly: his speech, movement and reflexes have slowed considerably since the legit classic idiot' s deluxe and like it or not this does have an effect on the short as a whole. i love curly as much as the next person but let' s be realistic. shemp is my favorite stooge but i' m not going to sit here and say every short of his was a slice of greatness and the same goes for curly. 2 1 / 2 pokes
we know life happens, so if something comes up, you can return or exchange your tickets up until the posted showtime .
ors 192. 420 broadly extends the coverage of the public records law to any public body in this state. for purposes of the records law, ors 192. 410 (3) defines the term “public body” as including :
lastly, we note that when a party to civil litigation involving a public body uses the public records law to request information relating to the litigation, the party must send a written request to both the public body and its attorney. ors 192. 420 (2). this rule also applies when the requester has filed a notice of tort claim under ors 30. 275 (5) (a). (see discussion above .) back to top
information submitted to a public body in confidence and not otherwise required by law to be submitted, where such information should reasonably be considered confidential, the public body has obliged itself in good faith not to disclose the information, and when the public interest would suffer by the disclosure .
a public body occasionally may wish to disclose an exempt public record to a specific private individual, but not to the public at large. the question then arises whether, by selectively disclosing an exempt record, the public body loses its discretionary power to claim the exemption as to other requesters. we have concluded that, under certain circumstances, the public body still retains that power, stating: “ [ w ] here limited disclosure of a public record does not thwart the policy supporting the exemption, the public body does not thereby waive its prerogative not to disclose the record to others. ” [ 266 ]
if tried in a crown court, the penalty for contravening the regulations is currently an unlimited fine or, in some cases, imprisonment for up to two years, or both .
( e) may not result in liability for the county if the name of the public safety officer is disclosed after a request for exemption from disclosure is made under this subsection .
the human is helpless without other humans. that is the nature of its body. and if we fail to recognize the depth and extent of this dependency, we will not see the source and function of human social learning. the human body forces us to learn from the experiences of other human bodies because its guiding impulse is to increase and intensify cooperation. anything that gets in the way of learning (sharp teeth, claws, big muscles) is shed by the body. the human body is not empty, it is radically open for the reception and transmission of experiences that are not its own. the experiences of a rabbit, for example, are mostly locked in its body. a rabbit cannot learn much from another rabbit, especially if it is a stranger. as a consequence, the culture of rabbits is very limited. and this brings us to the question of culture. what is it? the accumulation of human experiences across time and space. and it is only when a culture is not open to all bodies that an ideology appears, is shaped, is transmitted .
a statement that the public body is the custodian of at least some of the requested public records, an estimate of the time the public body requires before the public records may be inspected or copies of the records will be provided and an estimate of the fees that the requester must pay as a condition of receiving the public records .
ors 192. 440 (5) does not require a public body to grant a fee waiver or reduction, even if the public interest test is met. [ 73 ] instead, the decision to waive or reduce fees is discretionary with the public body, although it must act reasonably. [ 74 ] the oregon court of appeals has said that reasonableness is “an objective standard, ” which requires examination of “the totality of the circumstances presented. ” [ 75 ] requests for a fee waiver or reduction must be evaluated on a case - by - case basis .
the distinction between disclosing an existing record and creating a record is especially important in relation to computer stored data. public bodies at every level of government use computers extensively. computer data and printouts generated for use by the public body are public records. but, a public body is not required to create new information using its computer programs nor to create a new program to extract data in a manner requested by the public. [ 20 ]
( 1) as used in this section, “public body” has the meaning given that term in ors 174. 109 .
if any public record contains material which is not exempt under ors 192. 501 and 192. 502, as well as material which is exempt from disclosure, the public body shall separate the exempt and nonexempt material and make the nonexempt material available for examination .
( c) the mathematical and statistical formulas which would be used if the manipulated forms of the original data were to be produced manually .
this prohibition applies to a “public body” as defined in ors 174. 109, which differs slightly from the definition of “public body” that applies to the remainder of the public records law. see ors 192. 410 (3). for example, the following entities are statutorily excluded from the definition of “public body” in ors 174. 109, so the prohibition in ors 192. 447 does not apply to them :
under ors 192. 440 (6), the procedure for challenging a public body’s denial of a fee waiver or reduction as “unreasonable” is the same as that for challenging the denial of the right to inspect public records .
[ 180 ] guard publishing co v. lane county school dist. , 310 or 32, 37 - 38, 791 p2d 854 (1990) (“an individual claiming an exemption from disclosure must initially show a public body that the exemption is legally and factually justified. * * * if the public body is satisfied that a claimed exemption from disclosure is justified, it may, but is not required to, withhold disclosure of the information. ”) (see app c).
if a body meets a body is the 86th short film released by columbia pictures in 1945 starring american slapstick comedy team the three stooges ( moe howard , larry fine and curly howard ) . the comedians released 190 short films for the studio between 1934 and 1959 . 
if a body meets a body is the 86th short film released by columbia pictures in 1945 starring american slapstick comedy team the three stooges (moe howard, larry fine and curly howard). the comedians released 190 short films for the studio between 1934 and 1959.
if a body meets a body is the 86th short film released by columbia pictures in 1945 starring american slapstick comedy team the three stooges (moe howard, larry fine and curly howard). the comedians released 190 short films for the studio between 1934 and 1959.