the great gatsby ( 1974 film )
a detail from the wikipedia page for the 1974 film version of the great gatsby .
anonymous
the great gatsby (1974 film) background
. gradesaver, 20 may 2017 web .
anonymous
the great gatsby (1974 film) characters
. gradesaver, 22 may 2017 web .
the great gatsby (1974 film) essays are academic essays for citation. these papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of the great gatsby (1974 film), directed by jack clayton .
a great cast... a great novel... a great motion picture
robert redford, as the great gatsby in the 1974 movie at his west egg mansion .
living the high life... the great gatsby (1974). photograph: kobal
the question and answer section for the great gatsby (1974 film) is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel .
wtop film critic jason fraley reviews baz luhrmann' s
the great gatsby .
baz luhrman' s great gatsby has kicked off this year' s cannes film festival .
great gatsby movie (1974) was not written by vladimir nabokov, philip roth, or thomas pynchon. obviously .
discuss redford' s performance in the 1974 film version of the great gatsby. with detail, address if the acting added meaning or led the audience... | enotes
jay gatsby: robert redford (1974) vs. leonardo dicaprio (2013 )
video sparknotes: gatsby' s life story from f. scott fitzgerald' s the great gatsby
a great american director recalls wrestling with the great american novelist in a paris hotel room .
some classics are timeless solely for their quality, but the great gatsby carries remarkable relevancy for today' s audiences. can baz luhrmann make a film worthy of the great gatsby name ?
hammersmith farm of newport, rhode island was used in 1974 as jay gatsbys mansion .
the great gatsby (1974 film) study guide contains a biography of director jack clayton, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis .
discuss redford' s performance in the 1974 film version of the great gatsby. with detail, address if the acting added meaning or led the audience to an altogether different path. where has the ...
santfe luxury bling 1920s the great gatsby leaf simulated pearls wedding tiara head ...
great gatsby star leonardo dicaprio opened the 66th cannes film festival ahead of the european premiere of baz luhrmann' s controversial 3d epic which kicked off the world' s most prestigious film meet .
in the 1974 great gatsby movie, two mansions were used to portray gatsby’s mansion. in addition to rosecliff, hammersmith farm was used, and to me seems a much better recreation of beacon towers .
pretty average adaptation of the great gatsby but robert redford steals every scene so i guess i’m pleased. the great napsby would probably be the more appropriate title though .
discuss redford' s performance in the 1974 film version of the great gatsby. with detail, address if the acting added meaning or led the audience to an altogether different path. where has the casting enhanced or detracted from your vision of the characters ?
daisy buchanan: mia farrow (1974) vs. carey mulligan (2013 )
nick carraway: sam waterston (1974) vs. tobey maguire (2013 )
tom buchanan: bruce dern (1974) vs. joel edgerton (2013 )
myrtle wilson: karen black (1974) vs. isla fisher (2013 )
jordan baker: lois chiles (1974) vs. elizabeth debicki (2013 )
as baz luhrmann’s jazz age spectacular the great gatsby hits cinemas, we share some discoveries from the archive of director jack clayton, director of the 1974 version of f. scott fitzgerald’s classic novel .
don’t believe the majority of babyboomer critics on this one. baz luhrmann’s “the great gatsby” is a solid adaptation .
francis ford coppola lived in
west egg ,
aka great neck, former home of f. scott fitzgerald, at the time of writing the screenplay for the great gatsby ,
whoever said that the men’s suits in the 1974 version is a little too modern, i agree .
adapted from the novel of the same name by f. scott fitzgerald, the great gatsby is a 1974 film directed by jack clayton and starring robert redford as jay gatsby. the film features other prominent actors and actresses: mia farrow as daisy buchanan, sam waterston as nick carraway, bruce dern as tom buchanan, and karen black as myrtle wilson. clayton' s film received mixed reviews, though critics leaned more on the positive side .
i disagree. the 1974 version is not completely faithful. i have yet to see a completely faithful version of “the great gatsby” and i have seen three versions – the two mentioned in this article and the 2000 television version .
this film publicity image released by warner bros. pictures shows tobey maguire as nick carraway and leonardo dicaprio as jay gatsby in a scene from
the great gatsby .
( ap photo / warner bros. pictures )
it is not a great film: but in capturing so much as a glimmer from the iridescence of the original, it becomes well worth seeing .
discover the meaning of three names in the film rosewood. apply the meanings to the characters .
the location for filming of the buchanan house, in the 1974 movie, was actually in england at heatherden hall .
this is a featured event in the one book steamboat 2013 community read of f. scott fitzgeralds' novel the great gatsby .
luhrmann is the not the sort to be daunted by problems of the past. to his thinking, “ the great gatsby ” remains a great book, its film potential untapped. and as far as the world’s filmgoers are concerned, this will be their first and only gatsby and the power of its style and vivid characters will prevail .
with baz luhrmann’s splashy adaptation of f. scott fitzgerald’s great american novel contender hitting theaters friday, flavorwire is devoting this week to all things great gatsby. click here to follow our coverage .
1974! the new version, however, got my son into gatsby, so i can’t complain. but, i did have to tell him, robert redford will always be gatsby to me .
baz luhrman carey mulligan f. scott fitzgerald isla fisher leonardo di caprio mia farrow paul rudd robert redford the great gatsby tobey maguire
nice try; but, some books should never be made into a movie. the great gatsby is one of those books .
the ballad of narayama
is a japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. what a space it opens…
and f. scott fitzgerald and his fans finally may finally stop cringing at hollywood’s efforts to embellish the “ the great gatsby ” legend .
if you go to the wikipedia page for the 1974 film adaptation of the great gatsby, you may notice something curious. on the upper right - hand side of the page, where the credits are listed, there, below francis ford coppola’s name, is vladimir nabokov’s. the famous russian - american author, the wikipedia page says, did “rewrites” on the script .
this film on blu ray looks great and provides a 70s version of the 20s. it has great actors - robert redford, mia farrow, lois chiles, and a great cameo from kathryn leigh scott (dark shadows). there are no special features. running time is approximately 2 hours 23 minutes .
the film looks as stiff and lifeless as a posh store window .
the above rating is based on a 4 - star scale. follow wtop film critic jason fraley on twitter @ abovethejfray or on his blog the film spectrum .
. it’s hard to top the prestige factor of just his presence in the film, and then you throw in francis ford coppola’s screenplay along with the film’s two oscars .
the folly of the film, lies, i think, in the damage done to the character of the narrator .
the great gatsby is an immortal american tragedy, but the story' s impact gets completely buried in luhrmann' s flash and dazzle .
the opening of 1974’s gatsby does a great job of introducing the story in a purely visual way. we see gatsby’s fancy - butt house, his scrapbook of daisy paraphernalia, his monogrammed hairbrush, and a photograph of her on his vanity. a guy with a vanity? that’s not a normal guy .
an exploration of the acting in clayton' s version of the great gatsby is going to be rooted in personal reflection. i think that a starting point could be that critical reception of the film revolved around the
lifeless
element present. in his review, new york times film critic vincent canby suggested as much :
the first attempt came just a year after the book’s release with “the great gatsby” (1926), starring warner baxter (“42nd street”) as gatsby and william powell (“the thin man”) as george wilson. sadly, this film is lost to history, like many criminally unpreserved silent films .
great old fashioned love story that has everything in it! ! just wonderful! leonardo dicaprio has nothing on robert redford! robert is the invention of swag... lol... . love it! ! great performances! ! great movie! !
i had to watch the 1974 gatsby in high school. i say had to because the only thing i remember from that experience is being bored out of my ever loving mind .
it’s interesting to note that both of these film versions of the novel got mixed reviews when they came out. critics and audiences generally complained about a lack of accuracy to the book and overall entertainment level, though the 1974 adaption is generally considered a good historical costume movie. ok, then, let’s compare the characters in the two great gatsby movies, head to head…
when a great book is turned into a film, lots of pedants (including me) immediately scrutinise the movie for deviations from the original. we regard the book as sacred, so the film will almost certainly be sacrilegious. we are most reluctant to recognise that a film is, or should be, a work of art in its own right .
future learning and skills – giving everyone the opportunity to build a lifelong relationship with film .
david denby has been a staff writer and film critic at the new yorker since 1998 .
see the third filmed version of f. scott fitzgerald' s classic 1925 novel – one of the most hyped movies of the summer of 1974 .
with oscar award victories for its score and costumes, the 1974 film stars robert redford, mia farrow, bruce dern and sam waterston, with a screenplay by francis ford coppola. it was directed by jack clayton .
no one’s been able to truly capture the book’s complexity on film, though many have tried .
baz luhrmann took me by surprise four years ago when he confided over lunch that he intended to shoot “the great gatsby” as his next movie — he explained that he had become obsessed with the “gatsby” story. i told him that i, too, admired the great f. scott fitzgerald novel but could never quite [ … ]
most people remember the 1974 version, starring robert redford, mia farrow and bruce dern, written by francis ford coppola the same year he wrote and directed “the conversation” (1974) and “the godfather: part ii” (1974). “gatsby” seems small by comparison, living alone like hackman, but lacking pacino’s ability to see the killer lurking behind blowing curtains. frankly, i’m surprised at the number of folks holding up this “gatsby” as an untouchable classic. even coppola couldn’t save the lack of chemistry between redford and farrow and the lack of imagination by director jack clayton .
the great gatsby is a standout novel that is brilliantly written with a simple story. this book adaptation captures the feel and tone of f. scott fitzgerald' s classic work. i did enjoy the new version of the great gatsby, but i felt that this one was of course a superior film, a film that boasted some terrific performances and brilliant direction with wonderful storytelling. what makes the great gatsby such a great story is that it' s a simple plot that is both poignant and dramatic, and these elements combine perfectly to create something quite wonderful. this is a superb picture, a film that is captivating from start to finish, and it' s easily a classic. i really enjoyed the book, and it' s one of my favorites as well, and with this adaptation, i felt that they managed to keep plenty of elements intact that has made the book so good. there are several great performances, and each actor brings something unique to the screen, which elevate the film significantly. if you' ve enjoyed the book, then by all means, this adaptation is by far the best take on fitzgerald' s material, and it' s a film well worth your time if you' ve enjoyed the book or if you' re looking for a finely crafted drama with some fine performances. like i said, i did enjoy the current retelling of the great gatsby, and i do believe it' s a bit underrated; however, this is the film version to watch of f. scott fitzgerald' s literary classic. give this film a shot, it' s well worth your time, and it' s a brilliantly acted and directed film that tells a great story .
the australian director' s adaptation targets a younger generation who have never seen the 1974 version, which starred robert redford and mia farrow in the leading roles .
leitch’s piece is a good example of how this sort of misinformation can affect discussion of the film in question. expressing his displeasure with the news that baz lurhmann would be adapting fitzgerald’s novel, leitch wrote: “the following three people worked on the script for the 1974 version of the great gatsby: francis ford coppola, philip roth, and vladimir nabokov. you’re telling us that baz freaking lurhmann' s the one who figured it out? ”
the problem with the great gatsby in the united states is rather like the problem with brideshead revisited in england. people who film either story pick up, in each case, on the author’s half - hidden attraction towards the excesses he depicts. what they miss is both his satirical and his tragic sense .
the film is faithful to the letter of f. scott fitzgerald' s novel but entirely misses its spirit .
soundtrack. it makes the film infinitely more marketable, especially to the coveted younger crowds filling multiplexes this summer .
explain how the tension in james cameron' s film' titanic' developed and contributed to the ...
the film, which is not in competition at cannes, came in second behind the blockbuster iron man 3 .
elizabeth debicki plays golf star jordan baker in the most recent gatsby, and she rocks that role out. i love jordan now! lois chiles opens her mouth and blinks a few times in her portrayal of the character. you could honestly cut jordan out of the 1974 film altogether and no one would notice .
has there ever been a truly great film made from a truly great novel? i liked the recent anna karenina with keira knightley even if no one else did, but i wouldn’t call it great. maybe the ice storm, if we’re talking contemporary classics? (an oxymoron, but you know what i mean .) generally, first - rank movies are built on pulpier foundations, like the godfather or gone with the wind or goldfinger .
to paraphrase fitzgerald, luhrmann’s gatsby dream seemed so close, but he did not know that it was already behind him. he believed in the flickering projector light, the orgastic film future that year by year recedes before us. it eluded us then, but that’s no matter. tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther, paint our pictures brighter. and so we beat on, gatsby film after gatsby film, boats against cinema’s current, borne back ceaselessly into the past .
the sense of place is as pervasive as a character in “moss, ” a film by daniel peddle .
filmed for a mere $ 6. 5 million — perhaps one - twentieth of the current film’s budget — the film overcame its flaccid reviews and rolled up solid numbers at the box office. vincent canby of the new york times wrote that the film was “as lifeless as a body that had been too long at the bottom of a swimming pool. ”
even though the look and location of this house may have inspired f. scott fitzgerald, it was not used in the 1974 film starring robert redford and mia farrow, as jay gatsby and daisy buchanan. lands end would have served as inspiration for tom and daisy buchanan’s house on east egg, where the “old money” lived .
also provided the dock with the flashing green light that gatsby is so obsessed with .
roger ebert echoed similar sentiments with his assertion that
clayton fails to give us a gatsby we care about .
these sentiments point to challenges within the acting in the film .
and yet filmmakers continue to tackle the big ones, beating on like boats against the current (or whatever); enter baz luhrmann’s the great gatsby, the marketing campaign for which is now careening down the turnpike like gatsby’s “gorgeous... monstrous” cream - colored death car. but what of hollywood’s most recent attempt to film fitzgerald’s novel: the unloved 1974 version starring robert redford and mia farrow? (i’m ignoring a tv version made in 2000 for a & e that starred the british actor toby stephens as gatsby, mira sorvino as daisy, and paul rudd—! ! —as nick carraway. )
other critics echo these sentiments in various ways, making it safe to say the critical reception of 1974’s the great gatsby was far less cordial than that of the novel. it’s too early to say whether or not baz luhrmann’s version will be held in a higher regard, but it’s certainly safe to say he’s not trodding on holy ground .
this hungarian film is a careful, compassionate and beautifully acted character drama with a social conscience .
in the past seven days, i’ve seen two film versions of the great gatsby: first i went to see baz luhrmann’s cinematic spectacular! —i feel like every luhrmann film title should be prefaced with circus ring leader - esque embellishment—in the theaters (this is a big deal, guys, the last time i went to a movie theater it cost four dollars), and then my mom asked me if i wanted to watch the 1974 version starring robert redford and mia farrow. the two films are actually fascinating in contrast, and if anything each made me appreciated the other more .
this film has that classic feeling. even though it isn' t as well received as you might believe, you could almost imagine this being a criterion release sort of film. the production design is one…
the film will be something of a swansong for the 50 - year - old soderbergh, who has announced his retirement .
yesterday, the mansion that likely inspired f. scott fitzgerald to write the great gatsby, in 1925, was demolished. the possibility of demolition has had journalists and bloggers talking for a few months now .
extract from 10 - page letter to jack clayton from francis' scottie' smith, daughter of f. scott fitzgerald, undated c. 1974
explain how the atmosphere and mood of james cameron' s film' titanic' developed and contributed ...
a film for the ages may appear an impossible task. just look at gatsby himself: an in - his - prime robert redford coming off his first academy award nomination for
look, neither of these movies are the definitive version of the great gatsby. that’s still the book. on the colbert report, luhrmann said the difficulty in filming the great gatsby was capturing nick’s inner monologue, but i have to disagree. movies are told from a single character’s perspective all the time. no, what makes great gatsby adaptations difficult is that, like another one of my favorite books, jane eyre, it’s about what the narrator’s not seeing, all the stuff that happens off the page. it’s not about the parties, it’s about what built the parties. even worse, it’s about what people don’t want to see, because then the parties would stop .
if f. scott fitzgerald had directed film... ...... . .
does he have the track record of a fincher, anderson (wes or paul thomas), the coen brothers or other modern masters? no. the great gatsby will be just his fifth feature, and only one of his previous four could be considered a masterpiece (moulin rouge !). i think even the most cynical luhrmann - basher, though, would admit he has the capabilities to make great films, and the attributes we’ve seen him display so far line up perfectly with those needed to make a truly great gatsby .
baz luhrmann took me by surprise four years ago when he confided over lunch that he intended to shoot “ the great gatsby” as his next movie — he explained that he had become obsessed with the “gatsby” story. i told him that i, too, admired the great f. scott fitzgerald novel but could never quite figure out its story — nor could the three directors who’d made previous “gatsbys. ”
it’s smart positioning; i lived through paramount’s 1974 effort to capture the “gatsby” magic — a project that turned out to be a new york fashion show in search of a movie. luhrmann clearly has a different “gatsby” in mind (indeed, he built a period new york in australia) .
f. scott fitzgerald' s classic novel is my favorite book of all time. it' s been adapted for a summer release starring leonardo dicaprio, who i think is really miscast by the way. it doesn' t help that i absolutely hate the director of the film. i' m pretty worried for when the film comes out, but thankfully, the 1974 version seems like the most successful adaptation to date .
[ video essay ] widely trashed by a cabal of critics who didn' t know a good film when they saw it, jack clayton' s 1974 rendition of f. scott fitzgerald' s novel beautifully captures its romantic essence and caustic social indictments .
further investigation shows the cracks in the film’s seemingly - fine foundation. the two oscars it won were for costume design and music, and they were the only nominations the film received. coppola—a staple of cinema and the oscars throughout the 1970s—was nowhere to be found. redford was also missing from the nominations’ list .
the tomatometer score — based on the opinions of hundreds of film and television critics — is a trusted measurement of critical recommendation for millions of fans. it represents the percentage of professional critic reviews that are positive for a given film or television show .
but it’s the cinematic quality of the book that is exactly why we can’t come up with a totally satisfactory gatsby movie, a great film to match the great book. because the fact of the matter is, fitzgerald’s words paint the pictures and play the scenes so vividly that most readers have already seen the movie, in their heads. thanks to the skill of the prose, we’ve already brought the story of gatsby and daisy to life, perfectly designed and impeccably cast and splendidly performed. and any movie version, hamstrung by unforgivable exclusions or peculiar additions or miscast actors or stylistic overindulgence, can only disappoint .
it’s hard to go too far off the rails with a story this true. it may not be a “great” gatsby, but it’s at least a good gatsby, arguably better than the mediocre versions that preceded it and worth seeing if only to rediscover this powerful novel. as of 9 a. m. friday, “gatsby” was the top - selling ibook .
however, the house that was chosen for the film as jay gatsby’s mansion, was rosecliff, a mansion commissioned by nevada silver heiress theresa fair oelrichs, was completed in 1902 by architect stanford white .
i think the film should have a golden look… i intend to keep going through the film a constant feeling of extreme heat… i want people to perspire all the time and i want even to see stains on people’s dresses. it is a part of the story, the heat .
an unexpected collaboration between joseph arthur and peter buck produces a great summer record of noisy, dark garage - pop .
more importantly, those who saw the film were less than ecstatic. it’s metascore (via metacritic. com) comes in at 43, implying mixed reviews (but only three points away from being “generally unfavorable”). the great gatsby ’s tomatometer is a woeful 34 percent, and none of the “top critics” give it a positive review .
john box production sketch for the pool at gatsby' s mansion, c. 1972
perhaps the oddest thing about the film is that it makes so little of the other subject of the book – america itself. it aspires to make a great american film of a great american novel, but does not locate itself observantly in the culture that fascinated and appalled fitzgerald. in the end, this is just a film about rich people behaving unpleasantly. secretly, it seems to me, it is surprisingly uncritical about that. it thinks that if you have enough waiters in tailcoats simultaneously opening french windows with a flourish, or carrying white telephones so that your boss can answer them by the swimming pool, you are being jolly stylish. it is crass .
we’ve been cataloguing director jack clayton ’s papers since last year and they will soon be made available to researchers for the first time via the bfi reuben library. the scripts, letters, notes and other production papers that make up the archive offer fascinating insights into clayton’s struggle to film f. scott fitzgerald’s the great gatsby in 1974 – there had already been two previous attempts in 1926 and 1948 – and hints at why even the talents of robert redford, mia farrow and a script by francis ford coppola had trouble making it third time lucky .
this is surely no coincidence, being built in the same year and by the same architect as lands end. but, i do wonder why the production designer, john box, of the 1974 film chose not to, or was unable to use lands end. another oddity is that while lands end was in “east egg, ” jay gatsby lived in the nouveau riche “west egg. ” somehow, i think, the house chosen to portray gatsby’s mansion would have been an even better replica of the buchanan mansion .
luhrmann also ups the ante in depicting myrtle’s car crash. the 1949 film cross - cuts the crash in a dated special effect collision, showing right away that it’s daisy driving with gatsby in the passenger seat, missing an opportunity for the mystery of the driver. the 1974 version admirably keeps the mystery of the driver, but does so by avoiding the scene entirely, only showing the aftermath. now, luhrmann takes the best of both, showing the suspense of the crash in slow - motion horror, while maintaining the mystery of the driver by controlling what we see .
if you choose to ignore all that or baz somehow botches the retelling, the misunderstood romance at the film’s center should still resonate with lovelorn theater patrons everywhere .
critics praised how the novel stayed true to its novel roots, though said it lacked the passion and emotion of the 1920' s age which it set in. there is also a 2013 remake of the great gatsby, the study guide for which can be found here .
leonardo dicaprio and his gatsby co - star carey mulligan on the red carpet at cannes .
my only casting quibble with the great gatsby 1974 is bruce dern as tom buchanan. he’s supposed to be an former polo star, not necessarily burly, but sturdy and a strong contrast to gatsby. bruce dern isn’t as typically handsome as redford (at least here), but otherwise, dern’s tom is just another guy in a tux. that said, his acting is top - notch, especially during the uncomfortable confrontations. those are straight from the book, and just as intense .
this list collects every film from the starting list that became they shoot pictures don' t they' s 1000 greatest films. this…
again, just to be sure, i wrote to someone who would know, emailing authorized philip roth biographer blake bailey to ask if the novelist was involved with the 1974 film. “actually it was roth who advised baz luhrmann to shoot it in 3 - d, ” bailey told me. “kidding. the answer is no. ”
stands in for the body of water separating the fictional long island peninsulas, east and west egg (great neck and port washington peninsulas in real life. )
clayton gave coppola copious notes and suggestions, including his idea that the pool at gatsby’s house should play a more prominent role. he wanted to introduce a love scene there between gatsby and daisy, memories of which would later pre - occupy gatsby .
in addition to the non - period costuming, the 2013 great gatsby seems to think the audience is kind of stupid. everything must be spelled out in big, bold letters, underlined three times, with an exclamation point. not that anyone who’s seen another baz luhrmann film might expect layered subtlety, but jayzuz, this great gatsby knocks you over the head with every point. nick carraway is telling the story with words. jay gatsby is magnetic but makes his money illegally. daisy is sad about her marriage. tom is a jerk and cheating on his wife. myrtle is a tramp who will end tragically. this movie hits you over the head with the plot again and again so much i got a headache .
with baz luhrmann' s gatsby on the way, coppola tells how the last one came together on paper .
when nick meets gatsby in his private office, the cord to the lamp on the desk changes location between shots. in shots facing gatsby, the cord goes from the lamp to the end of the desk to his right. in shots facing nick, the cord goes from the lamp to the side of the desk facing nick .
like many of the best comedies and tragedies, this weimar - era silent film understands how each mode is often a hair' s breadth from the other .
the 2013 version seems to be little more than an mtv music video complete. tries way too hard. the 1974 is not perfect but it’s a lot better even though mia farrow can’t act to save her life .
nick is played by sam waterston in the 1974 version and tobey maguire in 2013, and i swear to god they look exactly alike. seriously. are they related? because they definitely could be .
the great gatsby is narrated by nick carraway, neighbor to jay gatsby, a wealthy businessman who is known for the extravagant parties he throws. nick becomes enamored with the lavish life gatsby leads, seeking to decode his personality and lifestyle. nick gradually begins to realize there is much more beneath gatsby' s successful, confident exterior, revealing a complicated past and secret love for daisy buchanan, nick' s cousin who is married to tom buchanan. throughout the movie, nick observes the events and complex relationships of the socialites, and becomes deeply entrenched in their matters .
marlon brando turned down the role of jay gatsby because producers would not submit to his salary demands .
q: in the great gatsby (1949) did alan ladd wear lifts or stand on raised platforms to increase his height? he appears to be a similar height to other male characters but we know he was very small in real life .
wilson who believes redford has run over black on the road when it was actually farrow. the film is really a disgrace to fitzgerald' s wonderful novel. director clayton was all wrong for this film, a british helmsman whose sole thrust was to cover the story with a heavy blanket of hot jazz, bootleg
although the picture chokes a bit in the clutch (you don’t wanna know what luhrmann does with 3d in that auto accident scene), truth be told, this may well be the best gatsby adaptation we’ve yet had. but that’s rather a low bar, and the fact that a film with this many problems is still at the top of the heap speaks volumes about the trouble with making a good gatsby movie .
pal is a sponsor of the upcoming ri preservation celebration & rhody awards being held at rosecliff in newport, rhode island on sunday october 16, 2016 from 4: 00 - 6: 30 pm. hosted by preserve rhode island and the rhode island historical preservation and heritage commission, the event honors people who make a difference by protecting rhode island' s historic places. this year' s venue is the historic rosecliff one of the gilded age mansions of newport. it' s ballroom was used to film scenes for the 1974 version of the great gatsby, the betsy, high society, [ 9 ] true lies, and amistad. for more information on the celebration, please go to urltoken .
tale; coppola completely fails to develop gatsby' s character. fitzgerald' s daughter scottie smith was paid a whopping $ 350, 000 for the rights to the novel and redford jumped at the part of gatsby when paramount offered it, later stating :
i wanted gatsby badly .
there was trouble right from the
i was going to conclude this without addressing the party scenes, but then i realized that was the crazy talking. no director can resist the lure of a party! i swear the opportunity to film a gatsby party is the only reason this book has been made into a movie so many times .
on april 10, 1925, f. scott fitzgerald’s novel the great gastby was first published. it’s a story of the roaring ’20s, the jazz age, and prohibition, revolving around two adulterous affairs, one towering over the other, all told by a sometimes unreliable narrator who’s enamored of his subjects. at least five film or tv adaptions of the novel have been made, but the two most well - known are undoubtedly the 1974 movie directed by jack clayton and the 2013 movie directed by baz luhrmann. pour yourself a cocktail, slip into something more comfortable, and let’s compare the two films, shall we ?
i usually haven’t liked dicaprio until he got older & out grew his baby faced looks. the great gatsby is one hell of a depressing story, even tho i’m a sucker for depressing period pieces a la anna karenina, wuthering heights, etc .
as for the 2013 gatsby, i’d forgotten that luhrmann’s films always overwhelm me when i first see them. i left the theater with a massive headache and a general reaction of “meh, ” but i’ll probably like it more when i rewatch it. and it does have its redeeming qualities, especially in comparison to the 1974 version .
nick’s reaction to gatsby the man echoes my reaction to “gatsby” the movie, “representing everything for which i have an unaffected scorn (style over substance), but (the film) turned out alright in the end, it’s what preyed on (luhrmann), what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams (pomp, circumstance, 3d glasses), that temporarily turned out my interest. ”
the film won oscars for costume (theoni v. aldredge) and music (nelson riddle) and did well at the box office, but critical reaction on both sides of the atlantic was mixed. there was praise for clayton’s direction, for his actors and for the film’s exquisite ‘look’, but it was widely felt there was just something missing .
that’s why, even though clayton and coppola made more of an effort to turn the great gatsby into an actual movie, it winds up being boring, because the meaning of the book isn’t in it. despite luhrmann’s comment, i think he does he understand what the book is about; and even though his version feels at times more like a recreation of the novel than a film adaptation of it, i can appreciate that he tried to show the things that are only alluded to in the book. i loved how he preserved the absolute awkwardness of the novel and, even though the line about daisy’s voice sounding like money isn’t in the film, luhrmann shows us that gatsby doesn’t just want daisy. he wants daisy, and the house, and the car, and the pool, and the shirts. so many shirts! and daisy damn well knows it .
it' s hard to adapt a novel as fantastic and classic as the great gatsby. there' s so much to analyze in that novel, as my grade 12 english class showed me, and it' s just so much fun to do so .
the great gatsby is a clunky adaptation of f. scott fitzgerald' s classic high school reading list novel that really lacks any sort of inspiration. though handsomely shot with excellent costume design, while capturing the extravagance of gatsby' s lifestyle, as well as nicely handling its portrayal of high society and the green light, there are flaws here. from being stodgily paced and being over - written, as well as some sketchy acting, jack clayton' s take on the great gatsby lacks the impact that the novel has and, as a result, is largely quite dull to watch unfold and feels simultaneously rushed and too drawn out. this is an odd feeling and the end result is an odd…
director jack clayton seems overawed by the opulence of the production as well as by the mythic presence of fitzgerald - - and the result is a film of shimmering surface brilliance and almost complete lack of focus or substance .
anywho, i think we all know baz luhrmann can direct a party. but i have to disagree with kit (from her post am i the only person on the internet who liked the great gatsby movie ?) that he nailed the party scenes here. they seemed more disneyland than debauchery. although the party scenes in the 1974 version weren’t a spectacle by any stretch of the imagination, i could believe the people in them were actually partying. they were very nights - at - max’s - kansas - city. like i said, no one’s jumping into a pool, but they were convincingly bacchanal .
[ the film ] moves spaniel - like through f. scott fitzgerald’s text, sniffing and staring at events and objects very close up with wide, mopey ...
this is the best movie of gatsby. i use it in my teaching and it correctly portrays the characters and the time period that fitzgerald wrote about .
beyond casting or direction, the 1974 film’s biggest fault lies in treating gatsby as a grand, doomed romance when the novel is really a shrewd, streamlined near satire about a group of characters who are either nasty pieces of work or foolish or both. it’s wised up and funny and tough, more neil labute than nicholas sparks. true, there’s a bruised heart at the bottom of it all, but it’s fitzgerald’s, not gatsby’s; the tragedy is almost outside the story, in inference. francis coppola, then at the height of his powers, is credited with the screenplay, but he and the former paramount executive peter bart both say his script was paved over during the shoot; i’d love to read the original someday and see what he really made of the book .
from hollywood’s point of view, the great gatsby might be as emptily, ruinously alluring as the title character’s parties. it’s got a great setting, big emotions, bad behavior, and a lurid ending, but its essence might be unfilmable, or at least uncommerical. i like baz luhrmann’s films, but i wonder if the director of romeo + juliet and moulin rouge! will capture the anti - romantic shiver at the heart of gatsby’s romance. judging from the trailer, he seems to be going for something pop - operatic, which doesn’t bode well. frankly, i’m also worried about dicaprio’s accent—and more acutely, his “old sports. ”
“the great gatsby” was published, on april 10, 1925, f. scott fitzgerald, living high in france after his early success, cabled max perkins, his editor at scribners, and demanded to know if the news was good. mostly, it was not. the book received some reviews that were dismissive (“
in roger ebert’s two - and - a - half star critique, the late legend says the great gatsby is “a superficially beautiful hunk of a movie with nothing much in common with the spirit of f. scott fitzgerald’s novel. ” vincent canby of the new york times writes, “nothing... comes close to catching the spirit of fitzgerald’s impatient brilliance. ”
i probably first saw this version soon after reading the great gatsby in high school, and i’ve seen the movie a few times since. when i realized it was on netflix, i had to watch this gatsby again (a few times) because it so perfectly captures the novel, the language, the mood, everything. also, it’s vintage robert redford at his dreamiest (and he’s not usually my type! but damn, those blue eyes !) .
the 1974 film, like the new one, arrived amid a gusher of hype, especially surrounding the genuinely gorgeous costumes, designed by theoni v. aldredge (who won an oscar), with assistance from then tyro ralph lauren. a paramount marketing executive bragged that “the entire country will be gatsby - ized. ” and it might have been, but then the movie itself was released. like many films that are extravagantly promoted, it did well enough at the box office, though no one was particularly enthusiastic about it—critics or audiences. vincent canby, writing in the new york times, offered a pretty good summary :
clayton admired fitzgerald, but felt the great gatsby had some flaws in its dramatic construction. he thought truman capote’s first draft screenplay – by faithfully adhering to the book – was overlong and needed variety of pace. it lacked detail about daisy and gatsby’s past relationship and crammed too much action into its final pages. “it is like a great fish that is all head and no tail”, he told capote in his notes. capote was replaced by francis ford coppola – who had already won a screenwriting oscar for patton (1969) and was about to release his directorial masterpiece the godfather (1972) .
what is the most reliably unfilmable novel of the 20th century? some might argue for joyce' s ulysses, or nabokov' s pale fire; pynchon' s the crying of lot 49 or burroughs' the naked lunch (although cronenberg made a decent fist of that one). me, i' m tempted to go for the great gatsby, if only because it looks so straightforward, so reassuringly high concept when it is actually a fiendish will - o - the - wisp; a deadly honey - trap for all but the shrewdest, most sensitive film - maker .
at its heart, the great gatsby is a ruthless attack on materialism and corruption brought on by devotion to the almighty dollar. anyone thinking these inapplicable to modern day american living isn’t taking part in it. gatsby’s gaudy get - togethers will never appear as wasteful or hollow, while his misunderstanding of requisite social conventions will be more endearing than ever. the divisions between his new, illegitimate money and the buchanans’ old, inherited wealth should spark vital conversation about the distribution of wealth today .
luhrmann' s gatsby has left critics in the united states and britain divided on whether it amounts to inspiration or a turkey .
over the many months leading up to this week’s release of baz luhrmann’s hotly - anticipated literary adaptation of the great gatsby, much has been made about the anticipated accommodations, additions, and outright alterations to f. scott fitzgerald’s classic story. has mr. luhrmann’s obsession with modernization gone awry, or is he aptly adjusting an 88 - year - old book (and a 39 - year - old film) for the very different expectations of today’s audiences? we won’t know for sure until friday, but here’s why at least one writer thinks he’s the perfect man for the job .
nick carraway, a young midwesterner now living on long island, finds himself fascinated by the mysterious past and lavish lifestyle of his neighbor, the nouveau riche jay gatsby. he is drawn into gatsby' s circle, becoming a witness to obsession and tragedy .
nick carraway, a young midwesterner now living on long island, finds himself fascinated by the mysterious past and lavish lifetyle of his landlord, the nouveau riche jay gatsby. he is drawn into gatsby' s circle, becoming a witness to obsession and tragedy .
what is it that makes gatsby such a difficult book to adapt? part of the problem, i suppose, is the old tone - and - content conundrum: the task of marrying the author' s cool, refined style with his wild, ritzy settings. the most obvious hurdle, however, is gatsby himself .
director reportedly worked on the script. the film cost $ 13 million to produce and vanished with box office receipts that barely inched over the break - even point. winner of two academy awards: best scoring and best costume design .
so what of this 3d fourth screen version of the great gatsby? it is, you might say, a story of three eggs. the mysterious central character is the self - made jay gatsby, a millionaire bootlegger who in the summer of 1922 lives at west egg, the township outside manhattan on long island sound where the nouveaux riches have built their mansions. across the bay at east egg are the grand houses of the old - money people, among them the rich, brutal, ivy league philistine tom buchanan, husband of the southern belle daisy, whom gatsby courted as an officer and temporary gentleman in the first world war. after losing her to buchanan because he was penniless, he now seeks to recapture her. the third egg is baz luhrmann' s curate' s egg of a film, good and bad in parts, but mainly a misconceived venture. luhrmann is a cheerful vulgarian and his movie suggestive of proust directed by michael winner.
the great gatsby is a 1974 american romantic drama film produced by newdon productions and distributed by paramount pictures . it was directed by jack clayton and produced by david merrick from a screenplay by francis ford coppola , and was based on f. scott fitzgerald 's 1925 novel of the same name . the film stars robert redford in the title role of jay gatsby , along with mia farrow , sam waterston , bruce dern , karen black , scott wilson and lois chiles , with howard da silva ( who previously appeared in the 1949 version ) , roberts blossom and edward herrmann . 
the great gatsby is a 1974 american romantic drama film produced by newdon productions and distributed by paramount pictures. it was directed by jack clayton and produced by david merrick from a screenplay by francis ford coppola, and was based on f. scott fitzgerald's 1925 novel of the same name. the film stars robert redford in the title role of jay gatsby, along with mia farrow, sam waterston, bruce dern, karen black, scott wilson and lois chiles, with howard da silva (who previously appeared in the 1949 version), roberts blossom and edward herrmann.
the great gatsby is a 1974 american romantic drama film produced by newdon productions and distributed by paramount pictures. it was directed by jack clayton and produced by david merrick from a screenplay by francis ford coppola, and was based on f. scott fitzgerald's 1925 novel of the same name. the film stars robert redford in the title role of jay gatsby, along with mia farrow, sam waterston, bruce dern, karen black, scott wilson and lois chiles, with howard da silva (who previously appeared in the 1949 version), roberts blossom and edward herrmann.