SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549




                            FORM 8-K

                         CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                     Date of Report: August 6, 1997



               Exact Name of
Commission     Registrant        State or other    IRS Employer
File           as specified      Jurisdiction of   Identification
Number         in its charter    Incorporation     Number
-----------    --------------    ---------------   --------------

1-12609        PG&E Corporation  California        94-3234914

1-2348         Pacific Gas and   California        94-0742640
               Electric Company







77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177
       (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrants' telephone number, including area code:(415) 973-7000


<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events

The following information includes forward-looking statements
that involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  A
number of factors which could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements
are described in more detail below.

A.  Acquisitions

     1.  Valero Energy Corporation

On July 31, 1997, PG&E Corporation completed its acquisition of
the natural gas business and related businesses of Valero Energy
Corporation (Valero) through the merger of a wholly owned
subsidiary of PG&E Corporation with and into Valero, with Valero
being the surviving entity.  Effective at the time of the merger,
Valero's name was changed to PG&E Gas Transmission, Texas
Corporation.

In the merger, each outstanding full share of Valero common stock
was converted into the right to receive .554 share of PG&E
Corporation common stock for a total issuance of approximately
31,000,000 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock.  At the time
of the merger, the Valero businesses acquired by PG&E Corporation
were subject to approximately $800 million in long-term debt.

Immediately before the merger, Valero distributed to its
shareholders the shares of its subsidiary, Valero Refining and
Marketing Company, which held all of Valero's refining operations
and refining related assets.  Valero's remaining businesses were
acquired by PG&E Corporation including its gas gathering,
transportation, and storage facilities, its gas and electric
power marketing operations and its facilities relating to the
processing, transportation and marketing of natural gas liquids
(NGLs).

As a result of the merger, PG&E Corporation acquired
approximately 6,400 miles of natural gas pipeline and Valero's
joint ownership or leasehold interests in approximately 1,100
miles of pipeline, including the Valero-Teco West Texas pipeline
from Waha in west Texas to the San Antonio area.  This pipeline
system has the capacity to transport more than 3 billion cubic
feet of gas per day.  PG&E Corporation also acquired Valero's 536
miles of NGL pipelines and eight natural gas processing plants
with a combined capacity of approximately 1.3 billion cubic feet
per day of gas throughput, producing approximately 80,000 barrels
per day of NGLs in 1996.
<PAGE>
     2.  New England Electric System

On August 6, 1997, PG&E Corporation announced that its affiliate,
U.S. Generating Company (USGen) has agreed to acquire (through a
special purpose entity wholly owned by PG&E Corporation) a
portfolio of non-nuclear electric generating assets and power
supply contracts from the New England Electric System (NEES) for
approximately $1.59 billion, plus the purchase of fuel and other
inventories.  The assets to be acquired contain a mix of hydro,
coal, oil, and gas generation and represent the second largest
non-nuclear electric generation portfolio in New England,
comprising approximately 17% of New England's total installed
generating capacity.  NEES sold the facilities in response to
electric industry restructuring in New England.

The purchase price includes $225 million to be paid to NEES when
customer choice of energy power suppliers is broadly available in
New England.  This amount will decline in accordance with a
prorated schedule if the implementation of customer choice of
energy power suppliers in New England occurs after January 1,
1999.  In addition to the purchase price, NEES will also receive
$85 million from USGen to pay for employee retraining, early
retirement, and severance for NEES' employees affected by
industry restructuring.  USGen will also assume certain existing
collective bargaining agreements between NEES and its labor
unions.

The NEES facilities to be acquired consist of two hydro electric
systems with fourteen stations, three fossil-fuel stations with
eleven units, and a pumped storage facility, with a combined
generating capacity of approximately 4,000 megawatts (MW).  USGen
will also assume the purchase obligations under twenty-three
multi-year power purchase agreements between NEES's subsidiary,
New England Power, and other utility and non-utility wholesale
suppliers representing an additional 1,100 MW of production
capacity.  The terms of the acquisition call for New England
Power to make annual support payments ranging approximately from
$150 million to $170 million through the year 2007 to offset the
cost of power associated with these above-market contracts.  The
annual payment is a fixed obligation and is not dependent on the
actual costs under the agreements, market prices, or NEES's
regulatory status.

As part of the electric industry deregulation in Massachusetts
and Rhode Island, NEES' retail customers in those states may
choose to continue receiving power from NEES (the "Standard
Offer") at a fixed price or may choose a new power supplier.
NEES's retail customers may make this choice through the year
2004 in Massachusetts and through the year 2009 in Rhode Island.
It is expected that in late 1997 NEES will auction its wholesale
supply obligations under the Standard Offer to third parties.
NEES' remaining supply obligation for these customers will be
assigned to USGen.
<PAGE>
NEES will also assign to USGen its rights to supply power under
several long-term power supply agreements, totaling approximately
100 MW.  The acquisition also includes 100 million cubic feet per
day of long-term natural gas supply and pipeline commitments, as
well as a twelve-year lease on a self-unloading coal
transportation vessel.

USGen, a joint venture between PG&E Corporation and Bechtel
Enterprises, Inc. (Bechtel) and its affiliates currently own or
manage interests in seventeen independent power generating
facilities.  Six of these facilities, with a combined generating
capacity of 1,400 MW (most of which is committed under long-term
power supply contracts), are located in the Northeast.  USGen
also has two independent power projects under development in the
Northeast, one in New York and one in Massachusetts, with a
planned combined generating capacity of 1,440 MW.  As previously
announced in PG&E Corporation's and PG&E's Form 8-K dated June
26, 1997, PG&E Corporation intends to acquire Bechtel's interests
in USGen and two other partnerships between PG&E Corporation and
Bechtel by redemption of Bechtel's interests in such
partnerships. In addition, PG&E Corporation intends to purchase
Bechtel's interests in certain independent power projects
currently owned by PG&E Corporation and Bechtel, or by PG&E
Corporation, Bechtel and various third parties.  The redemptions
and acquisitions of Bechtel's various interests is expected to be
completed by December 31, 1997, subject to receipt of certain
regulatory and third party approvals.

USGen's acquisition of NEES's assets, which is expected to be
completed in 1998, is subject to a number of conditions,
including approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
and state regulators.

PG&E Corporation has agreed to purchase the NEES portfolio for
$1.59 billion, plus $85 million to cover early retirement and
severance costs previously committed to by NEES.  Including fuel
and other inventories and transaction costs, financing
requirements are expected to total approximately $1.75 billion,
of which approximately $1 billion will be funded through a
combination of project level debt as well as debt of USGen.  In
addition, $750 million of equity will be contributed over two
years and will be financed initially using short-term debt of
PG&E Corporation.

PG&E Corporation does not expect the acquisition to have a
material negative impact on its financial position or results of
operation.  The financial impact of the acquisition of the NEES
assets is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties,
including future market prices of power in the region where the
NEES assets are located, future fuel prices, the development of a
competitive market in the states in which the NEES assets are
located, the extent to which operating efficiencies at the NEES
plants can be attained, changes in the
<PAGE>
regulatory environment, the extent of the obligation to provide
electricity under the Standard Offer at prices below cost or market,
the extent to which a liquid, well-structured trading market develops
for wholesale electric power in the states in which the NEES assets
are located, and generating capacity expansion and retirements by
others.

B.  Gas Accord

On August 1, 1997, the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) unanimously adopted a final decision approving the Gas
Accord, a comprehensive proposed settlement which was submitted
in 1996 for CPUC approval.

The Gas Accord will restructure PG&E's gas services and its role
in the gas market, establish gas transmission rates for the five-
year period from implementation of the Gas Accord (expected to be
December 1, 1997) through December 2002, and resolve various gas
regulatory issues.  The Gas Accord is more fully described in
PG&E Corporation's and PG&E's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.

Specific provisions of the decision include the following:

 - The decision affirms the CPUC's 1994 finding that the decision
to construct Line 401 (the California segment of the PG&E/Pacific
Gas Transmission Company pipeline that extends from the Canadian
border to Kern River Station in Southern California) was
reasonable based on PG&E's management's knowledge at the time.
The decision accepts the Gas Accord's proposal to set rates for
Line 401 based on total capital costs of $736 million.

 - The decision explicitly recognizes and accepts the settlement
between PG&E and the CPUC's Consumer Services Division (CSD) of
the issue of whether PG&E misled the CPUC in violation of Rule
1, the CPUC's Code of Ethics, in certain prepared testimony and
in responses to certain discovery requests in the CPUC
proceeding to determine whether the decision to construct Line
401 was reasonable.  In addition to resolving the allegations
that PG&E violated Rule 1, the CSD-PG&E settlement agreement
stipulates that it does not constitute a finding that PG&E
violated Rule 1, acknowledges both that there was an inadvertent
discovery lapse and that PG&E testimony could have been clearer,
requires PG&E to pay an amount to the CPUC in recognition of the
burden imposed on the CPUC to investigate and resolve the
allegations, and provides for development of a course for PG&E
employees who routinely practice before the CPUC regarding
preparation and processing of discovery and prepared testimony.
<PAGE>
 - The decision adopts a rule under which PG&E is required,
whenever it discounts service for a shipper on its Line 400/401
delivering primarily Canadian gas within PG&E's service
territory, to contemporaneously offer a commensurate discount to
all shippers delivering Southwest or California source gas on
Line 300 within PG&E's service territory.

 - The decision approves the core procurement incentive
mechanisms (CPIM) proposed in the Gas Accord to replace the
traditional reasonableness review proceedings of PG&E's gas
procurement costs for the periods 1994-97 and 1998-2002.

 - The decision approves the Gas Accord's proposal that PG&E
forgo recovery of 100 percent and 50 percent of the Interstate
Transition Cost Surcharge (ITSC) amounts allocated for collection
from its core and noncore customers, respectively.  (ITCS costs
are the difference between fixed demand charges PG&E pays under
gas transportation contracts with interstate pipeline companies
for the reservation of interstate pipeline capacity that PG&E no
longer uses to serve noncore customers, and the revenues PG&E
obtains from brokering that capacity.)

 - Finally, the decision states that the CPUC's intention to
implement the rates and other provisions of the Gas Accord
throughout the Gas Accord period, is subject to the CPUC's
overreaching policy goals and the CPUC's decisions reached in the
CPUC's natural gas industry strategic plan to produce a more
competitive gas market.

As of June 30, 1997, approximately $490 million had been reserved
relating to these gas regulatory issues and capacity commitments.
As a result, PG&E Corporation believes that the decision will not
have a material adverse impact on PG&E Corporation's financial
position or results of operations.

<PAGE>


                             SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed
on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                              PG&E CORPORATION
                                     and
                              PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY



                                      KENT M. HARVEY
                              By ________________________________
                                 Kent M. Harvey
                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Treasurer
                                 (PG&E Corporation)
                                 Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Pacific Gas and Electric Company)

Dated:  August 6, 1997
[{"type": "8-K", "sequence": "1", "description": "FORM 8-K", "secsgml_size_bytes": 14257}]
{"company-data": {"conformed-name": "PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO", "cik": "0000075488", "assigned-sic": "4931", "irs-number": "940742640", "state-of-incorporation": "CA", "fiscal-year-end": "1231"}, "filing-values": {"form-type": "8-K", "act": "34", "file-number": "001-02348", "film-number": "97652275"}, "business-address": {"street1": "77 BEALE ST", "street2": "P O BOX 770000 MAIL CODE B7C", "city": "SAN FRANCISCO", "state": "CA", "zip": "94177", "phone": "4159737000"}}
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549

                            FORM 8-K

                         CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                     Date of Report: August 6, 1997

               Exact Name of
Commission     Registrant        State or other    IRS Employer
File           as specified      Jurisdiction of   Identification
Number         in its charter    Incorporation     Number
-----------    --------------    ---------------   --------------

1-12609        PG&E Corporation  California        94-3234914

1-2348         Pacific Gas and   California        94-0742640
               Electric Company

77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177
       (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrants' telephone number, including area code:(415) 973-7000
Item 5.  Other Events

The following information includes forward-looking statements
that involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  A
number of factors which could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements
are described in more detail below.

A.  Acquisitions

     1.  Valero Energy Corporation

On July 31, 1997, PG&E Corporation completed its acquisition of
the natural gas business and related businesses of Valero Energy
Corporation (Valero) through the merger of a wholly owned
subsidiary of PG&E Corporation with and into Valero, with Valero
being the surviving entity.  Effective at the time of the merger,
Valero's name was changed to PG&E Gas Transmission, Texas
Corporation.

In the merger, each outstanding full share of Valero common stock
was converted into the right to receive .554 share of PG&E
Corporation common stock for a total issuance of approximately
31,000,000 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock.  At the time
of the merger, the Valero businesses acquired by PG&E Corporation
were subject to approximately $800 million in long-term debt.

Immediately before the merger, Valero distributed to its
shareholders the shares of its subsidiary, Valero Refining and
Marketing Company, which held all of Valero's refining operations
and refining related assets.  Valero's remaining businesses were
acquired by PG&E Corporation including its gas gathering,
transportation, and storage facilities, its gas and electric
power marketing operations and its facilities relating to the
processing, transportation and marketing of natural gas liquids
(NGLs).

As a result of the merger, PG&E Corporation acquired
approximately 6,400 miles of natural gas pipeline and Valero's
joint ownership or leasehold interests in approximately 1,100
miles of pipeline, including the Valero-Teco West Texas pipeline
from Waha in west Texas to the San Antonio area.  This pipeline
system has the capacity to transport more than 3 billion cubic
feet of gas per day.  PG&E Corporation also acquired Valero's 536
miles of NGL pipelines and eight natural gas processing plants
with a combined capacity of approximately 1.3 billion cubic feet
per day of gas throughput, producing approximately 80,000 barrels
per day of NGLs in 1996.
2.  New England Electric System

On August 6, 1997, PG&E Corporation announced that its affiliate,
U.S. Generating Company (USGen) has agreed to acquire (through a
special purpose entity wholly owned by PG&E Corporation) a
portfolio of non-nuclear electric generating assets and power
supply contracts from the New England Electric System (NEES) for
approximately $1.59 billion, plus the purchase of fuel and other
inventories.  The assets to be acquired contain a mix of hydro,
coal, oil, and gas generation and represent the second largest
non-nuclear electric generation portfolio in New England,
comprising approximately 17% of New England's total installed
generating capacity.  NEES sold the facilities in response to
electric industry restructuring in New England.

The purchase price includes $225 million to be paid to NEES when
customer choice of energy power suppliers is broadly available in
New England.  This amount will decline in accordance with a
prorated schedule if the implementation of customer choice of
energy power suppliers in New England occurs after January 1,
1999.  In addition to the purchase price, NEES will also receive
$85 million from USGen to pay for employee retraining, early
retirement, and severance for NEES' employees affected by
industry restructuring.  USGen will also assume certain existing
collective bargaining agreements between NEES and its labor
unions.

The NEES facilities to be acquired consist of two hydro electric
systems with fourteen stations, three fossil-fuel stations with
eleven units, and a pumped storage facility, with a combined
generating capacity of approximately 4,000 megawatts (MW).  USGen
will also assume the purchase obligations under twenty-three
multi-year power purchase agreements between NEES's subsidiary,
New England Power, and other utility and non-utility wholesale
suppliers representing an additional 1,100 MW of production
capacity.  The terms of the acquisition call for New England
Power to make annual support payments ranging approximately from
$150 million to $170 million through the year 2007 to offset the
cost of power associated with these above-market contracts.  The
annual payment is a fixed obligation and is not dependent on the
actual costs under the agreements, market prices, or NEES's
regulatory status.

As part of the electric industry deregulation in Massachusetts
and Rhode Island, NEES' retail customers in those states may
choose to continue receiving power from NEES (the "Standard
Offer") at a fixed price or may choose a new power supplier.
NEES's retail customers may make this choice through the year
2004 in Massachusetts and through the year 2009 in Rhode Island.
It is expected that in late 1997 NEES will auction its wholesale
supply obligations under the Standard Offer to third parties.
NEES' remaining supply obligation for these customers will be
assigned to USGen.
NEES will also assign to USGen its rights to supply power under
several long-term power supply agreements, totaling approximately
100 MW.  The acquisition also includes 100 million cubic feet per
day of long-term natural gas supply and pipeline commitments, as
well as a twelve-year lease on a self-unloading coal
transportation vessel.

USGen, a joint venture between PG&E Corporation and Bechtel
Enterprises, Inc. (Bechtel) and its affiliates currently own or
manage interests in seventeen independent power generating
facilities.  Six of these facilities, with a combined generating
capacity of 1,400 MW (most of which is committed under long-term
power supply contracts), are located in the Northeast.  USGen
also has two independent power projects under development in the
Northeast, one in New York and one in Massachusetts, with a
planned combined generating capacity of 1,440 MW.  As previously
announced in PG&E Corporation's and PG&E's Form 8-K dated June
26, 1997, PG&E Corporation intends to acquire Bechtel's interests
in USGen and two other partnerships between PG&E Corporation and
Bechtel by redemption of Bechtel's interests in such
partnerships. In addition, PG&E Corporation intends to purchase
Bechtel's interests in certain independent power projects
currently owned by PG&E Corporation and Bechtel, or by PG&E
Corporation, Bechtel and various third parties.  The redemptions
and acquisitions of Bechtel's various interests is expected to be
completed by December 31, 1997, subject to receipt of certain
regulatory and third party approvals.

USGen's acquisition of NEES's assets, which is expected to be
completed in 1998, is subject to a number of conditions,
including approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
and state regulators.

PG&E Corporation has agreed to purchase the NEES portfolio for
$1.59 billion, plus $85 million to cover early retirement and
severance costs previously committed to by NEES.  Including fuel
and other inventories and transaction costs, financing
requirements are expected to total approximately $1.75 billion,
of which approximately $1 billion will be funded through a
combination of project level debt as well as debt of USGen.  In
addition, $750 million of equity will be contributed over two
years and will be financed initially using short-term debt of
PG&E Corporation.

PG&E Corporation does not expect the acquisition to have a
material negative impact on its financial position or results of
operation.  The financial impact of the acquisition of the NEES
assets is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties,
including future market prices of power in the region where the
NEES assets are located, future fuel prices, the development of a
competitive market in the states in which the NEES assets are
located, the extent to which operating efficiencies at the NEES
plants can be attained, changes in the
regulatory environment, the extent of the obligation to provide
electricity under the Standard Offer at prices below cost or market,
the extent to which a liquid, well-structured trading market develops
for wholesale electric power in the states in which the NEES assets
are located, and generating capacity expansion and retirements by
others.

B.  Gas Accord

On August 1, 1997, the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) unanimously adopted a final decision approving the Gas
Accord, a comprehensive proposed settlement which was submitted
in 1996 for CPUC approval.

The Gas Accord will restructure PG&E's gas services and its role
in the gas market, establish gas transmission rates for the five-
year period from implementation of the Gas Accord (expected to be
December 1, 1997) through December 2002, and resolve various gas
regulatory issues.  The Gas Accord is more fully described in
PG&E Corporation's and PG&E's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.

Specific provisions of the decision include the following:

 - The decision affirms the CPUC's 1994 finding that the decision
to construct Line 401 (the California segment of the PG&E/Pacific
Gas Transmission Company pipeline that extends from the Canadian
border to Kern River Station in Southern California) was
reasonable based on PG&E's management's knowledge at the time.
The decision accepts the Gas Accord's proposal to set rates for
Line 401 based on total capital costs of $736 million.

 - The decision explicitly recognizes and accepts the settlement
between PG&E and the CPUC's Consumer Services Division (CSD) of
the issue of whether PG&E misled the CPUC in violation of Rule
1, the CPUC's Code of Ethics, in certain prepared testimony and
in responses to certain discovery requests in the CPUC
proceeding to determine whether the decision to construct Line
401 was reasonable.  In addition to resolving the allegations
that PG&E violated Rule 1, the CSD-PG&E settlement agreement
stipulates that it does not constitute a finding that PG&E
violated Rule 1, acknowledges both that there was an inadvertent
discovery lapse and that PG&E testimony could have been clearer,
requires PG&E to pay an amount to the CPUC in recognition of the
burden imposed on the CPUC to investigate and resolve the
allegations, and provides for development of a course for PG&E
employees who routinely practice before the CPUC regarding
preparation and processing of discovery and prepared testimony.
- The decision adopts a rule under which PG&E is required,
whenever it discounts service for a shipper on its Line 400/401
delivering primarily Canadian gas within PG&E's service
territory, to contemporaneously offer a commensurate discount to
all shippers delivering Southwest or California source gas on
Line 300 within PG&E's service territory.

 - The decision approves the core procurement incentive
mechanisms (CPIM) proposed in the Gas Accord to replace the
traditional reasonableness review proceedings of PG&E's gas
procurement costs for the periods 1994-97 and 1998-2002.

 - The decision approves the Gas Accord's proposal that PG&E
forgo recovery of 100 percent and 50 percent of the Interstate
Transition Cost Surcharge (ITSC) amounts allocated for collection
from its core and noncore customers, respectively.  (ITCS costs
are the difference between fixed demand charges PG&E pays under
gas transportation contracts with interstate pipeline companies
for the reservation of interstate pipeline capacity that PG&E no
longer uses to serve noncore customers, and the revenues PG&E
obtains from brokering that capacity.)

 - Finally, the decision states that the CPUC's intention to
implement the rates and other provisions of the Gas Accord
throughout the Gas Accord period, is subject to the CPUC's
overreaching policy goals and the CPUC's decisions reached in the
CPUC's natural gas industry strategic plan to produce a more
competitive gas market.

As of June 30, 1997, approximately $490 million had been reserved
relating to these gas regulatory issues and capacity commitments.
As a result, PG&E Corporation believes that the decision will not
have a material adverse impact on PG&E Corporation's financial
position or results of operations.
SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed
on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PG&E CORPORATION
                                     and
                              PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

                                      KENT M. HARVEY
                              By ________________________________
                                 Kent M. Harvey
                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Treasurer
                                 (PG&E Corporation)
                                 Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Pacific Gas and Electric Company)

Dated:  August 6, 1997