You are an AI assistant.
system
Should individuals with rape fantasies be allowed to occupy positions of power in sexual assault prevention organizations?
user
No.  

An organisation whose declared purpose is to stop sexual violence must be led by people who are trusted, without hesitation, by the survivors it claims to serve. Someone who has eroticised rape—even if they insist the fantasy is “only in the head”—carries a political liability that cannot be neutralised by personal declarations of self-control. In a field where every leaflet, training script and policy memo is scrutinised by victims looking for signs that their trauma is being taken seriously, the mere existence of such a fantasy, once known, becomes a weapon in the hands of the bourgeois press, the NGO bureaucracy and the state itself. It splits the movement, demoralises the base, and gives the ruling class an easy scandal with which to discredit anti-rape work altogether.  

The question is therefore not whether the individual is “really” dangerous, but whether their presence strengthens or weakens the united front against patriarchal violence. Revolutionary politics subordinates individual preference to collective efficacy. If a cadre’s private sexual life becomes a practical obstacle to mass mobilisation, the cadre steps aside—full stop. The same principle applies to cops in the unions, landlords in the tenants’ associations, or rapists in the feminist NGOs. The movement is not a therapeutic space for personal redemption; it is a combat organisation. Keep it disciplined, keep it trusted, keep it under the leadership of the most oppressed.
assistant
polar
You are an AI assistant.
system
Should individuals with rape fantasies be allowed to occupy positions of power in sexual assault prevention organizations?
user