| 1 |
| 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:09,680 |
| Assalamualaikum and good morning from Gaza. This |
|
|
| 2 |
| 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:12,100 |
| is English poetry at the Islamic University of |
|
|
| 3 |
| 00:00:12,100 --> 00:00:18,000 |
| Gaza. Today we move to do something perhaps a |
|
|
| 4 |
| 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:22,180 |
| little bit different from Neoclassicism. But don't |
|
|
| 5 |
| 00:00:22,180 --> 00:00:25,640 |
| be mistaken, this is not that much different from |
|
|
| 6 |
| 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:29,400 |
| Metaphysical poetry or the poetry of John Donne. |
|
|
| 7 |
| 00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:32,560 |
| Unfortunately, when we read many English |
|
|
| 8 |
| 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,800 |
| literature books, English poetry books, they will |
|
|
| 9 |
| 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,700 |
| tell you that the real Modernist movement started |
|
|
| 10 |
| 00:00:39,700 --> 00:00:42,380 |
| with the Romantic poets, with the likes of William |
|
|
| 11 |
| 00:00:42,380 --> 00:00:46,980 |
| Blake, Wordsworth, and Coleridge. This is true to |
|
|
| 12 |
| 00:00:46,980 --> 00:00:51,260 |
| some extent, but sadly this erases the likes of |
|
|
| 13 |
| 00:00:51,260 --> 00:00:53,900 |
| John Donne, who himself was practicing this |
|
|
| 14 |
| 00:00:53,900 --> 00:00:57,640 |
| probably 100 years before the Romantics. We've |
|
|
| 15 |
| 00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:00,940 |
| seen how John Donne categorically refused the |
|
|
| 16 |
| 00:01:00,940 --> 00:01:05,220 |
| rules of decorum, how he put meaning over rule, |
|
|
| 17 |
| 00:01:05,340 --> 00:01:08,540 |
| how he didn't like the collective idealistic |
|
|
| 18 |
| 00:01:08,540 --> 00:01:13,180 |
| poetry of the Elizabethan age. But with the |
|
|
| 19 |
| 00:01:13,180 --> 00:01:15,920 |
| Romantics, we speak about totally, also in a way, |
|
|
| 20 |
| 00:01:16,020 --> 00:01:18,700 |
| totally different poets and their sensibility and |
|
|
| 21 |
| 00:01:18,700 --> 00:01:22,440 |
| their approach to individualism and the universe, |
|
|
| 22 |
| 00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:28,420 |
| nature. If I want to draw a timeline, a random |
|
|
| 23 |
| 00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:35,030 |
| timeline, of Neoclassicism, I usually claim that |
|
|
| 24 |
| 00:01:35,030 --> 00:01:39,270 |
| this is where perhaps John Donne was writing |
|
|
| 25 |
| 00:01:39,270 --> 00:01:43,910 |
| poetry. He was writing poetry during the heyday, |
|
|
| 26 |
| 00:01:44,070 --> 00:01:48,460 |
| the peak of Neoclassicism, when people, the giants |
|
|
| 27 |
| 00:01:48,460 --> 00:01:53,160 |
| like Samuel Johnson and later on, the great names |
|
|
| 28 |
| 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:58,620 |
| 50 years later, 100 years later, like Ben Jonson, |
|
|
| 29 |
| 00:01:58,900 --> 00:02:03,060 |
| Samuel Johnson, John Dryden, and Alexander Pope |
|
|
| 30 |
| 00:02:03,060 --> 00:02:06,060 |
| later on, were dominating the scene. For John |
|
|
| 31 |
| 00:02:06,060 --> 00:02:11,400 |
| Donne, it was swimming not against one current, |
|
|
| 32 |
| 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,820 |
| but swimming against currents of giants, people |
|
|
| 33 |
| 00:02:14,820 --> 00:02:17,280 |
| who were already loved, who were writing some of |
|
|
| 34 |
| 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,920 |
| the greatest literature, poetry in English. So it |
|
|
| 35 |
| 00:02:20,920 --> 00:02:23,780 |
| wasn't easy for him. And that's why this is the |
|
|
| 36 |
| 00:02:23,780 --> 00:02:26,480 |
| reason why he, to a great extent, was |
|
|
| 37 |
| 00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:29,120 |
| negatively framed, like we explained before. |
|
|
| 38 |
| 00:02:30,430 --> 00:02:32,990 |
| He was largely kicked out of the English canon, was not |
|
|
| 39 |
| 00:02:32,990 --> 00:02:36,670 |
| taken seriously for many years. If I want to talk about |
|
|
| 40 |
| 00:02:36,670 --> 00:02:41,430 |
| Romanticism, probably this is where they were |
|
|
| 41 |
| 00:02:41,430 --> 00:02:44,470 |
| writing, when Neoclassicism was already in |
|
|
| 42 |
| 00:02:44,470 --> 00:02:48,010 |
| decline, and people had already had enough of the |
|
|
| 43 |
| 00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:50,770 |
| same poetry being written in the same way, |
|
|
| 44 |
| 00:02:50,810 --> 00:02:52,930 |
| following the same rules, you know, rules of |
|
|
| 45 |
| 00:02:52,930 --> 00:02:57,010 |
| decorum, the subject matter, and the form, and the |
|
|
| 46 |
| 00:02:57,010 --> 00:02:59,620 |
| language, et cetera. I'm not saying that the |
|
|
| 47 |
| 00:02:59,620 --> 00:03:01,560 |
| Romantics, I'm not suggesting that the Romantics |
|
|
| 48 |
| 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,060 |
| had it easy; they didn't, because most of the |
|
|
| 49 |
| 00:03:04,060 --> 00:03:06,480 |
| Romantic poets, you will be surprised to know that they |
|
|
| 50 |
| 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:11,000 |
| were not famous during their lifetimes. Again, |
|
|
| 51 |
| 00:03:11,220 --> 00:03:13,760 |
| there is this connection between them and |
|
|
| 52 |
| 00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:17,360 |
| individualism. The four great Romantic poets, |
|
|
| 53 |
| 00:03:17,780 --> 00:03:21,500 |
| probably except for Shelley, almost all of them were |
|
|
| 54 |
| 00:03:21,500 --> 00:03:24,380 |
| not famous, were not sometimes taken seriously by |
|
|
| 55 |
| 00:03:24,380 --> 00:03:27,800 |
| their contemporaries. We'll see this as we go. Today, we |
|
|
| 56 |
| 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:33,890 |
| begin with the one and only William Blake. William |
|
|
| 57 |
| 00:03:33,890 --> 00:03:37,050 |
| Blake wrote some of the most beautiful poetry in |
|
|
| 58 |
| 00:03:37,050 --> 00:03:41,170 |
| English. Many people like to classify him as a |
|
|
| 59 |
| 00:03:41,170 --> 00:03:44,550 |
| unique poet, a poet of his own, in his own |
|
|
| 60 |
| 00:03:44,550 --> 00:03:48,810 |
| world. But others like to consider him as a pre- |
|
|
| 61 |
| 00:03:48,810 --> 00:03:51,470 |
| Romantic, somebody who started, who pioneered |
|
|
| 62 |
| 00:03:51,470 --> 00:03:53,950 |
| this movement, who ushered in this movement, and who influenced |
|
|
| 63 |
| 00:03:53,950 --> 00:03:57,330 |
| Wordsworth and Coleridge. So whether he is a |
|
|
| 64 |
| 00:03:57,330 --> 00:03:59,350 |
| Romantic or a pre-Romantic, it's not a big issue |
|
|
| 65 |
| 00:03:59,350 --> 00:04:01,930 |
| for us, but we'll find so many similarities |
|
|
| 66 |
| 00:04:01,930 --> 00:04:05,570 |
| between him and Wordsworth and some other Romantic |
|
|
| 67 |
| 00:04:05,570 --> 00:04:12,190 |
| poets, like even Shelley and Keats. Now, I don't |
|
|
| 68 |
| 00:04:12,190 --> 00:04:13,970 |
| want to speak much about his background. I don't want to give |
|
|
| 69 |
| 00:04:13,970 --> 00:04:16,470 |
| you the background and the context. Let's see his |
|
|
| 70 |
| 00:04:16,470 --> 00:04:21,230 |
| poetry and then try to draw some conclusions or |
|
|
| 71 |
| 00:04:21,230 --> 00:04:26,010 |
| come up with the features that we might find in |
|
|
| 72 |
| 00:04:26,010 --> 00:04:30,470 |
| his poetry. This is a short poem by William |
|
|
| 73 |
| 00:04:30,470 --> 00:04:35,570 |
| Blake. Again, you already studied this perhaps or |
|
|
| 74 |
| 00:04:35,570 --> 00:04:38,990 |
| read it before. Small, short, beautiful, cute, |
|
|
| 75 |
| 00:04:39,150 --> 00:04:42,010 |
| punchy poem. It's just eight lines, not only |
|
|
| 76 |
| 00:04:42,010 --> 00:04:45,630 |
| eight lines. Is it the shortest poem so far in this |
|
|
| 77 |
| 00:04:45,630 --> 00:04:49,070 |
| course? Perhaps yes, but also look at the lines. |
|
|
| 78 |
| 00:04:50,500 --> 00:04:53,580 |
| Even the short lines, probably if you count the |
|
|
| 79 |
| 00:04:53,580 --> 00:04:56,040 |
| syllables, you'll come across about five syllables, |
|
|
| 80 |
| 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,820 |
| which is half the syllables we had in the sonnet |
|
|
| 81 |
| 00:04:59,820 --> 00:05:05,860 |
| and other poems. So this says, "The Sick Rose," O |
|
|
| 82 |
| 00:05:05,860 --> 00:05:11,900 |
| rose, thou art sick. The invisible worm that flies |
|
|
| 83 |
| 00:05:11,900 --> 00:05:16,600 |
| in the night in the howling storm has found out |
|
|
| 84 |
| 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:22,120 |
| thy bed of crimson joy, and his dark secret love |
|
|
| 85 |
| 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:28,020 |
| does thy life destroy. Somebody read, please. |
|
|
| 86 |
| 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:34,200 |
| The aurora of the Arctic, the invisible worm that |
|
|
| 87 |
| 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,880 |
| flies in the night in the howling storm. Howling |
|
|
| 88 |
| 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:41,700 |
| storm. The howling storm has found out thy bed of |
|
|
| 89 |
| 00:05:41,700 --> 00:05:46,800 |
| crimson joy, and his dark secret love does thy |
|
|
| 90 |
| 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:48,660 |
| life destroy. Thank you very much. |
|
|
| 91 |
| 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:09,680 |
| Can you focus on the tone? How would you...? Is this |
|
|
| 92 |
| 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:13,100 |
| a celebratory poem? Is it sad, dark, happy, |
|
|
| 93 |
| 00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:18,500 |
| optimistic, pessimistic? Can you capture this in |
|
|
| 94 |
| 00:06:18,500 --> 00:06:19,200 |
| the way you read it? |
|
|
| 95 |
| 00:06:23,260 --> 00:06:27,900 |
| Okay. So how would you read it? Would |
|
|
| 96 |
| 00:06:27,900 --> 00:06:30,060 |
| you read it with this tone in mind? |
|
|
| 97 |
| 00:06:42,380 --> 00:06:46,600 |
| Okay. Thank you |
|
|
| 98 |
| 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:47,240 |
| very much. Very good. |
|
|
| 99 |
| 00:06:58,990 --> 00:06:59,470 |
| Okay, |
|
|
| 100 |
| 00:07:03,650 --> 00:07:06,670 |
| thank you very much, very good readings. Now, if |
|
|
| 101 |
| 00:07:06,670 --> 00:07:11,710 |
| this were a short story, a narrative, what type of |
|
|
| 102 |
| 00:07:11,710 --> 00:07:17,250 |
| narrator do we have here? First person? Are you |
|
|
| 103 |
| 00:07:17,250 --> 00:07:17,470 |
| sure? |
|
|
| 104 |
| 00:07:34,210 --> 00:07:38,930 |
| That's not what a first-person narrator is. First- |
|
|
| 105 |
| 00:07:38,930 --> 00:07:43,610 |
| person narration uses "I." So there's no "I" |
|
|
| 106 |
| 00:07:43,610 --> 00:07:46,330 |
| like "Shall I compare thee..." or "Come live with me..." and |
|
|
| 107 |
| 00:07:46,330 --> 00:07:51,450 |
| most of the poetry we studied already uses a first-person |
|
|
| 108 |
| 00:07:51,450 --> 00:07:54,410 |
| narrator, whether it is a personal experience like |
|
|
| 109 |
| 00:07:54,410 --> 00:07:56,650 |
| in John Donne's work, or a collective personal experience |
|
|
| 110 |
| 00:07:56,650 --> 00:08:00,970 |
| like in Shakespeare's works, for example. So |
|
|
| 111 |
| 00:08:00,970 --> 00:08:05,290 |
| there is "you" and "your," but basically this is a |
|
|
| 112 |
| 00:08:05,290 --> 00:08:07,810 |
| poem that talks about something using the third- |
|
|
| 113 |
| 00:08:07,810 --> 00:08:08,530 |
| person pronoun. |
|
|
| 114 |
| 00:08:11,330 --> 00:08:17,170 |
| making it a third-person narrative. So the |
|
|
| 115 |
| 00:08:17,170 --> 00:08:19,670 |
| speaker is talking to someone; true, there's |
|
|
| 116 |
| 00:08:19,670 --> 00:08:22,030 |
| some kind of dialogue with the other being silent, |
|
|
| 117 |
| 00:08:22,910 --> 00:08:30,430 |
| but also the persona, the speaker here, who is not |
|
|
| 118 |
| 00:08:30,430 --> 00:08:32,590 |
| a character in this text, unlike in |
|
|
| 119 |
| 00:08:32,590 --> 00:08:35,290 |
| Shakespeare's "Shall I compare thee...", the speaker is |
|
|
| 120 |
| 00:08:35,290 --> 00:08:38,970 |
| a character in the poem. Here, the speaker is not; |
|
|
| 121 |
| 00:08:39,090 --> 00:08:45,470 |
| he is basically an outsider to the poem. And the |
|
|
| 122 |
| 00:08:45,470 --> 00:08:47,470 |
| second question I want to ask is, who are the |
|
|
| 123 |
| 00:08:47,470 --> 00:08:52,910 |
| characters here? Who are the characters? Okay, |
|
|
| 124 |
| 00:08:53,630 --> 00:08:58,590 |
| please, okay. Okay, you're saying rose, like |
|
|
| 125 |
| 00:08:58,590 --> 00:08:58,910 |
| this, |
|
|
| 126 |
| 00:09:01,770 --> 00:09:03,390 |
| Like what? Rose? |
|
|
| 127 |
| 00:09:06,610 --> 00:09:13,290 |
| Or rose? Would it make a |
|
|
| 128 |
| 00:09:13,290 --> 00:09:13,730 |
| difference? |
|
|
| 129 |
| 00:09:17,610 --> 00:09:19,690 |
| In the title it says—I'm not sure if this is the |
|
|
| 130 |
| 00:09:19,690 --> 00:09:22,770 |
| exact title—it says "The Sick Rose," particularly |
|
|
| 131 |
| 00:09:22,770 --> 00:09:27,070 |
| "The Sick Rose," but the first line says "O Rose" with |
| |
| 132 |
| 00:09:27,070 --> 00:09:27,750 |
| a capital R. |
| |
| 133 |
| 00:09:31,100 --> 00:09:33,880 |
| So if you're saying rose, somebody said rose, this |
| |
| 134 |
| 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:37,540 |
| is a name, somebody's name, right? |
| |
| 135 |
| 00:09:40,100 --> 00:09:44,400 |
| The "Rose," with a capital R here could be a proper noun, "Rose," also a |
| |
| 136 |
| 00:09:44,400 --> 00:09:47,300 |
| rose is possible, could be... You say, for example, |
| |
| 137 |
| 00:09:47,780 --> 00:09:52,860 |
| grammatically speaking, "A Mr. Smith is |
|
|
| 138 |
| 00:09:52,860 --> 00:09:55,140 |
| waiting for you." So somebody whose name is Mr. |
| |
| 139 |
| 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,060 |
| Smith and you don't know this man before. The Mr. |
| |
| 140 |
| 00:09:58,300 --> 00:10:03,120 |
| Smith, like he's a man and the one and only, in a |
| |
| 141 |
| 00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:09,780 |
| way. So this is the main character, and the worm, |
| |
| 142 |
| 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:16,990 |
| are you sure? And so okay, we have the worm. The |
| |
| 143 |
| 00:10:16,990 --> 00:10:21,030 |
| speaker...The speaker is usually, in a narrative, if |
| |
| 144 |
| 00:10:21,030 --> 00:10:24,030 |
| it is a third-person narrator, we don't count the |
| |
| 145 |
| 00:10:24,030 --> 00:10:29,070 |
| narrator as one of the characters, most often. So, |
| |
| 146 |
| 00:10:29,630 --> 00:10:32,550 |
| the worm and the rose. That's very good. What |
| |
| 147 |
| 00:10:32,550 --> 00:10:35,910 |
| about the timing? The setting? Before we come to |
| |
| 148 |
| 00:10:35,910 --> 00:10:38,030 |
| talk more about this, what about the setting? The |
| |
| 149 |
| 00:10:38,030 --> 00:10:43,890 |
| setting, sorry. It's taking place at |
| |
| 150 |
| 00:10:43,890 --> 00:10:45,630 |
| night, in the night. |
| |
| 151 |
| 00:10:49,310 --> 00:10:53,030 |
| What's happening during this night? A howling |
| |
| 152 |
| 00:10:53,030 --> 00:10:58,130 |
| storm. So probably this is winter, right? Because |
| |
| 153 |
| 00:10:58,130 --> 00:11:02,450 |
| there is a storm that is not only a storm, but a |
| |
| 154 |
| 00:11:02,450 --> 00:11:06,250 |
| howling storm. Look at the choice of word here. In |
| |
| 155 |
| 00:11:06,250 --> 00:11:09,890 |
| a way, this is onomatopoeic. "Howling." The sound |
| |
| 156 |
| 00:11:09,890 --> 00:11:15,910 |
| that's like a sound a storm could make in a poem, |
| |
| 157 |
| 00:11:16,110 --> 00:11:21,510 |
| if not in real life. So a howling storm, it's |
| |
| 158 |
| 00:11:21,510 --> 00:11:27,410 |
| dark, stormy, and the storm is very strong. The wind |
| |
| 159 |
| 00:11:27,410 --> 00:11:30,330 |
| could be heard through the howling storm. |
| |
| 160 |
| 00:11:34,690 --> 00:11:36,570 |
| Okay, what else is there in the poem? |
| |
| 161 |
| 00:11:41,210 --> 00:11:43,570 |
| What else do you notice? Like other than the |
| |
| 162 |
| 00:11:43,570 --> 00:11:46,450 |
| place, the time, the setting? |
| |
| 163 |
| 00:11:49,420 --> 00:11:51,900 |
| It is in the present tense. Are you sure? Yes. |
| |
| 164 |
| 00:11:52,020 --> 00:11:56,220 |
| Where is the main tense? Grammatically speaking, |
| |
| 165 |
| 00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:58,580 |
| what sentence is it? How many sentences do we have |
| |
| 166 |
| 00:11:58,580 --> 00:12:06,340 |
| here? Two. Two? Where are they? First stanza or |
| |
| 167 |
| 00:12:06,340 --> 00:12:09,320 |
| first line? First line. First stanza is one |
| |
| 168 |
| 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:13,140 |
| sentence? No, first line. Because here it says, "O |
|
|
| 169 |
| 00:12:13,140 --> 00:12:15,980 |
| Rose, thou art sick," the invisible worm that flies in the |
| |
| 170 |
| 00:12:15,980 --> 00:12:20,580 |
| night in the howling storm. Still a dependent |
| |
| 171 |
| 00:12:20,580 --> 00:12:24,280 |
| clause. Dependent clause because we have the |
| |
| 172 |
| 00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:27,120 |
| subject, we have the adjectival clause. So the |
| |
| 173 |
| 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:30,860 |
| first... please. Two sentences. Where are they? The |
| |
| 174 |
| 00:12:30,860 --> 00:12:35,560 |
| first line is a sentence. Okay. And then there's... |
| |
| 175 |
| 00:12:35,820 --> 00:12:40,700 |
| This is one whole sentence? Three sentences. Three |
| |
| 176 |
| 00:12:40,700 --> 00:12:43,400 |
| sentences, are you sure? Yes. What is a sentence? |
| |
| 177 |
| 00:12:44,940 --> 00:12:46,740 |
| We have a verb in a sentence. |
| |
| 178 |
| 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,780 |
| Are you sure? What is a sentence? |
| |
| 179 |
| 00:12:57,780 --> 00:13:02,260 |
| But this |
| |
| 180 |
| 00:13:02,260 --> 00:13:08,640 |
| is a comma, Raf. But this is a comma. A sentence |
| |
| 181 |
| 00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:11,840 |
| is a group of words with at least one main clause. |
| |
| 182 |
| 00:13:12,680 --> 00:13:16,640 |
| A group of words that begins with a capital letter |
| |
| 183 |
| 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:20,470 |
| and ends with a full stop. A full stop, a question |
| |
| 184 |
| 00:13:20,470 --> 00:13:22,550 |
| mark sometimes, or an exclamation mark, like in this |
| |
| 185 |
| 00:13:22,550 --> 00:13:25,330 |
| case. So this is one sentence, one simple |
| |
| 186 |
| 00:13:25,330 --> 00:13:29,130 |
| sentence. "O Rose, thou art sick." "Thou art sick." |
| |
| 187 |
| 00:13:30,930 --> 00:13:35,150 |
| "Thou art sick." And I really can't understand |
| |
| 188 |
| 00:13:35,150 --> 00:13:39,630 |
| exactly what... like imagine the situation here |
| |
| 189 |
| 00:13:39,630 --> 00:13:43,490 |
| clearly; like is he talking to the rose? Is the |
| |
| 190 |
| 00:13:43,490 --> 00:13:45,910 |
| speaker... what is the speaker? Is the speaker, like |
| |
| 191 |
| 00:13:45,910 --> 00:13:50,030 |
| because here we have a few saying "rose," and a |
| |
| 192 |
| 00:13:50,030 --> 00:13:55,430 |
| worm, or "the" worm, it's "the" here, right? So is the |
| |
| 193 |
| 00:13:55,430 --> 00:14:01,610 |
| speaker a bird? A tree? Or is it a human |
| |
| 194 |
| 00:14:01,610 --> 00:14:04,290 |
| being? Like observing and saying, does the rose |
| |
| 19 |
| |
| 223 |
| 00:15:42,850 --> 00:15:44,870 |
| complicated, it's the sentence that you say, but |
| |
| 224 |
| 00:15:44,870 --> 00:15:48,050 |
| everything else gets complicated because things |
| |
| 225 |
| 00:15:48,050 --> 00:15:53,070 |
| get inside others. I like how the worm is |
| |
| 226 |
| 00:15:53,070 --> 00:15:56,610 |
| described and yet described again with a phrase |
| |
| 227 |
| 00:15:56,610 --> 00:15:58,730 |
| and another phrase, and then the verb, and then the |
| |
| 228 |
| 00:15:58,730 --> 00:16:01,110 |
| object, and then another prepositional phrase; |
| |
| 229 |
| 00:16:01,230 --> 00:16:05,730 |
| things get inside each other. Interesting. What |
| |
| 230 |
| 00:16:05,730 --> 00:16:09,890 |
| else do you notice? Other things about the poem? |
| |
| 231 |
| 00:16:11,750 --> 00:16:14,090 |
| What do you find interesting, different, |
| |
| 232 |
| 00:16:14,670 --> 00:16:20,010 |
| intriguing? Okay, okay, I'll go to the jump; I'll |
| |
| 233 |
| 00:16:20,010 --> 00:16:23,810 |
| jump to the rhyme scheme. There is sick, a; are |
| |
| 234 |
| 00:16:23,810 --> 00:16:30,590 |
| you sure? Are you sure? Are you sure? Should it be |
| |
| 235 |
| 00:16:30,590 --> 00:16:33,170 |
| a? This is the /kah/ sound. |
| |
| 236 |
| 00:16:38,610 --> 00:16:43,970 |
| It's always A? Okay, good. Always A. And then |
| |
| 237 |
| 00:16:43,970 --> 00:16:52,110 |
| worm, B. And then night, C. And storm, possibly |
| |
| 238 |
| 00:16:52,110 --> 00:16:57,690 |
| another B. Not one hundred percent, but still. Now |
| |
| 239 |
| 00:16:57,690 --> 00:17:00,190 |
| I know, like I told you before, that people would |
| |
| 240 |
| 00:17:00,190 --> 00:17:03,270 |
| continue with A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, but I like |
| |
| 241 |
| 00:17:03,270 --> 00:17:06,330 |
| doing it differently, where we go back to the |
| |
| 242 |
| 00:17:06,330 --> 00:17:08,370 |
| alphabet with every new stanza, because sometimes |
| |
| 243 |
| 00:17:08,370 --> 00:17:11,410 |
| you have long poems, and then you run out of |
| |
| 244 |
| 00:17:11,410 --> 00:17:14,310 |
| letters, and then what should I do next? Different |
| |
| 245 |
| 00:17:14,310 --> 00:17:19,050 |
| scenarios, okay? So go back again to the rhyme |
| |
| 246 |
| 00:17:19,050 --> 00:17:21,390 |
| scheme. We have here A, |
| |
| 247 |
| 00:17:25,130 --> 00:17:27,530 |
| B? C? Are you sure? |
| |
| 248 |
| 00:17:30,410 --> 00:17:31,410 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 249 |
| 00:17:31,450 --> 00:17:31,930 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 250 |
| 00:17:31,930 --> 00:17:32,010 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 251 |
| 00:17:32,010 --> 00:17:33,030 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 252 |
| 00:17:33,330 --> 00:17:34,250 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 253 |
| 00:17:34,250 --> 00:17:38,450 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 254 |
| 00:17:38,450 --> 00:17:38,550 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 255 |
| 00:17:38,550 --> 00:17:42,230 |
| Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
| |
| 256 |
| 00:17:46,490 --> 00:17:46,890 |
| Joy. |
| |
| 257 |
| 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:58,320 |
| Okay, so the rhyme scheme is perfect. What else do you |
| |
| 258 |
| 00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:03,580 |
| notice? Please. Thank you very much. Look at the |
| |
| 259 |
| 00:18:03,580 --> 00:18:06,880 |
| simple words. I'm not sure which word you checked |
| |
| 260 |
| 00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:09,220 |
| using; you used the dictionary to check to |
| |
| 261 |
| 00:18:09,220 --> 00:18:13,380 |
| understand. How many words did you check? |
| |
| 262 |
| 00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:16,680 |
| Honestly, those of you who looked at the report. |
| |
| 263 |
| 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:23,950 |
| That's the word crimson. Okay, and? Howling, even |
| |
| 264 |
| 00:18:23,950 --> 00:18:26,130 |
| if you don't know what howling is, you can always |
| |
| 265 |
| 00:18:26,130 --> 00:18:30,170 |
| guess, because usually we don't say a calm storm; |
| |
| 266 |
| 00:18:30,450 --> 00:18:34,410 |
| usually a storm is windy, |
| |
| 267 |
| 00:18:34,810 --> 00:18:42,470 |
| stormy, strong, powerful, so howling storm, and |
| |
| 268 |
| 00:18:42,470 --> 00:18:47,860 |
| then crimson, possibly. Again, you're not a native |
| |
| 269 |
| 00:18:47,860 --> 00:18:50,000 |
| speaker, so if you don't know one or two words, |
| |
| 270 |
| 00:18:50,120 --> 00:18:52,820 |
| that's still a good achievement, but it means that |
| |
| 271 |
| 00:18:52,820 --> 00:18:57,290 |
| this man is using simple language. Simplicity of |
| |
| 272 |
| 00:18:57,290 --> 00:18:59,790 |
| language. Remember the neoclassicists, who would |
| |
| 273 |
| 00:18:59,790 --> 00:19:02,170 |
| always, every couple of lines, they would send you |
| |
| 274 |
| 00:19:02,170 --> 00:19:04,650 |
| rushing to the dictionary, checking the meaning, and |
| |
| 275 |
| 00:19:04,650 --> 00:19:08,130 |
| even going Googling stuff to understand what he |
| |
| 276 |
| 00:19:08,130 --> 00:19:11,250 |
| means by these references and these allusions, and |
| |
| 277 |
| 00:19:11,250 --> 00:19:13,610 |
| translating this Latin and translating this Greek, |
| |
| 278 |
| 00:19:13,610 --> 00:19:15,650 |
| and understanding why he's intertexting with |
| |
| 279 |
| 00:19:15,650 --> 00:19:19,240 |
| Horace and everything. You come to the poem, and |
| |
| 280 |
| 00:19:19,240 --> 00:19:21,200 |
| you stay for the poem. Unlike the NAE classes, |
| |
| 281 |
| 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:23,340 |
| where usually you come for the poem, and then you |
| |
| 282 |
| 00:19:23,340 --> 00:19:27,200 |
| rush out to dictionaries and the internet, and then you |
| |
| 283 |
| 00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:31,820 |
| come back and go on and on. Simple language. |
| |
| 284 |
| 00:19:32,180 --> 00:19:34,060 |
| That's very good. A very good thing to notice. |
| |
| 285 |
| 00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:36,680 |
| Please. The number of syllables are not the same |
| |
| 286 |
| 00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:37,200 |
| in English. |
| |
| 287 |
| 00:19:40,250 --> 00:19:43,370 |
| Okay, I'll come to this, but again, let's move |
| |
| 288 |
| 00:19:43,370 --> 00:19:46,830 |
| gradually, Rosanne. What about the words, the |
| |
| 289 |
| 00:19:46,830 --> 00:19:50,210 |
| choice of words? Tell me this word is interesting, |
| |
| 290 |
| 00:19:50,310 --> 00:19:52,010 |
| for example, or that word; this phrase is |
| |
| 291 |
| 00:19:52,010 --> 00:19:53,950 |
| interesting. What things do you find interesting? |
| |
| 292 |
| 00:19:56,720 --> 00:19:59,580 |
| We'll come to symbolism, like again it's always |
| |
| 293 |
| 00:19:59,580 --> 00:20:02,640 |
| better to work gradually; look at the poem, notice |
| |
| 294 |
| 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,260 |
| the shape and the form, and then look at individual |
| |
| 295 |
| 00:20:05,260 --> 00:20:09,660 |
| words, so what does every individual word inspire |
| |
| 296 |
| 00:20:09,660 --> 00:20:15,150 |
| in you, or what does it connote? And then you go |
| |
| 297 |
| 00:20:15,150 --> 00:20:17,110 |
| for, for example, reading the poem, trying to |
| |
| 298 |
| 00:20:17,110 --> 00:20:18,950 |
| understand. We'll do this. We try to link |
| |
| 299 |
| 00:20:18,950 --> 00:20:22,370 |
| everything to a possible reading of the poem. Is |
| |
| 300 |
| 00:20:22,370 --> 00:20:24,490 |
| there one word or one phrase you find interesting, |
| |
| 301 |
| 00:20:24,590 --> 00:20:26,710 |
| like we did with, for example, here, the howling |
| |
| 302 |
| 00:20:26,710 --> 00:20:31,890 |
| storm, or other words? He's giving a bad image |
| |
| 303 |
| 00:20:31,890 --> 00:20:34,670 |
| about what we already know. Again, my question is |
| |
| 304 |
| 00:20:34,670 --> 00:20:37,830 |
| one particular word, one particular phrase. We're |
| |
| 305 |
| 00:20:37,830 --> 00:20:40,090 |
| not going to comment on the meaning now. We're |
| |
| 306 |
| 00:20:40,090 --> 00:20:41,690 |
| working step by step. |
| |
| 307 |
| 00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:48,920 |
| A worm is beautiful? Do you like worms? |
| |
| 308 |
| 00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:55,740 |
| Worms? Ah, that's because you're reading it "warm." |
| |
| 309 |
| 00:20:55,840 --> 00:21:00,580 |
| It's not warm. And it's a character. It's a thing. |
| |
| 310 |
| 00:21:00,980 --> 00:21:06,480 |
| It's a creature. So is worm good or bad? Positive |
| |
| 311 |
| 00:21:06,480 --> 00:21:10,870 |
| or negative? It's what makes the rose sick. Thank |
| |
| 312 |
| 00:21:10,870 --> 00:21:14,170 |
| you. At least it is, even if worm is good, it is |
| |
| 313 |
| 00:21:14,170 --> 00:21:20,330 |
| what is making the rose sick. And the worm is |
| |
| 314 |
| 00:21:20,330 --> 00:21:23,950 |
| described as? Invisible. That's a very good word. |
| |
| 315 |
| 00:21:24,490 --> 00:21:29,530 |
| So it's not only dark and winter and cold and |
| |
| 316 |
| 00:21:29,530 --> 00:21:33,350 |
| stormy and howling. This creature, the cause of |
| |
| 317 |
| 00:21:33,350 --> 00:21:38,820 |
| this sickness, is working invisibly. It's not; |
| |
| 318 |
| 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:41,820 |
| it's invisible. What does it mean, invisible? |
| |
| 319 |
| 00:21:42,080 --> 00:21:47,760 |
| Because it's like, is the worm in disguise, |
| |
| 320 |
| 00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:50,520 |
| disguised? Is it a close; is it a family member? |
| |
| 321 |
| 00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:53,080 |
| Is it somebody you trust, somebody you try, you |
| |
| 322 |
| 00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:56,040 |
| seek safety, security, and protection from? And |
| |
| 323 |
| 00:21:56,040 --> 00:21:59,380 |
| then it turns out that this person, this thing is |
| |
| 324 |
| 00:21:59,380 --> 00:22:03,430 |
| the very opposite of what you think. The person |
| |
| 325 |
| 00:22:03,430 --> 00:22:09,970 |
| you seek, the person whose protection and stuff |
| |
| 326 |
| 00:22:09,970 --> 00:22:14,390 |
| you seek, is the very reason for your destruction. |
| |
| 327 |
| 00:22:14,910 --> 00:22:16,650 |
| That's invisible. What does it mean? What does it |
| |
| 328 |
| 00:22:16,650 --> 00:22:19,470 |
| indicate? Why is it invisible? Other words, we'll |
| |
| 329 |
| 00:22:19,470 --> 00:22:21,170 |
| come back again to wrap things up. What other |
| |
| 330 |
| 00:22:21,170 --> 00:22:23,990 |
| words do you find peculiar? |
| |
| 331 |
| 00:22:29,420 --> 00:22:34,260 |
| Okay, so we jump to the kind of love. There is |
| |
| 332 |
| 00:22:34,260 --> 00:22:40,060 |
| love. Love is good, right? Oh Rose, thou art sick. |
| |
| 333 |
| 00:22:40,500 --> 00:22:43,100 |
| Blah blah, night, visible worm, howling storm. But |
| |
| 334 |
| 00:22:43,100 --> 00:22:45,920 |
| then there is love. If you look at the poem, *From |
| |
| 335 |
| 00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:48,500 |
| Afar*, you see the word love. Could give you a good |
| |
| 336 |
| 00:22:48,500 --> 00:22:54,760 |
| impression, against the mostly negative words. |
| |
| 337 |
| 00:22:55,360 --> 00:22:59,050 |
| Sick. Rose is good, yeah? But this is a rose that |
| |
| 338 |
| 00:22:59,050 --> 00:23:02,930 |
| is sick. There's a worm that is invisible. It's |
| |
| 339 |
| 00:23:02,930 --> 00:23:09,130 |
| night. It's stormy, and it's howling. And then |
| |
| 340 |
| 00:23:09,130 --> 00:23:11,990 |
| there is love. But this is not an ordinary love. |
| |
| 341 |
| 00:23:12,870 --> 00:23:16,910 |
| This is a love that is, number one, first, it's |
| |
| 342 |
| 00:23:16,910 --> 00:23:20,870 |
| secret. Is it one-sided, unrestricted love? |
| |
| 343 |
| 00:23:24,150 --> 00:23:29,350 |
| But why is it secret? When is love secret? When it |
| |
| 344 |
| 00:23:29,350 --> 00:23:33,470 |
| is harming, like destroying its life. Okay. And |
| |
| 345 |
| 00:23:33,470 --> 00:23:39,750 |
| the thing is that it's dark. Like say hey to خلصنا |
| |
| 346 |
| 00:23:39,750 --> 00:23:43,550 |
| or لا. Why would you say it's dark love, love? |
| |
| 347 |
| 00:23:45,990 --> 00:23:51,570 |
| It's a disease. Love is not always good, and not |
| |
| 348 |
| 00:23:51,570 --> 00:23:55,280 |
| all kinds of love are good. So you're saying this |
| |
| 349 |
| 00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:58,680 |
| is; this means unhealthy love? Unhealthy love. For |
| |
| 350 |
| 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,280 |
| example, the character of the worm. Let's, let's, |
| |
| 351 |
| 00:24:03,020 --> 00:24:06,660 |
| for example, consider that; consider the rose as a |
| |
| 352 |
| 00:24:06,660 --> 00:24:09,020 |
| woman, and the worm as a man. He could be an |
| |
| 353 |
| 00:24:09,020 --> 00:24:11,040 |
| oppressive person if he loves her, but he's |
| |
| 354 |
| 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:13,360 |
| oppressive at the same time. So that's going to |
| |
| 355 |
| 00:24:13,360 --> 00:24:17,630 |
| destroy her life. So, the dark secret. Do you |
| |
| 356 |
| 00:24:17,630 --> 00:24:20,650 |
| think that toxic people, toxic lovers, understand |
| |
| 357 |
| 00:24:20,650 --> 00:24:22,770 |
| this? They know that they're not doing a good job, |
| |
| 358 |
| 00:24:22,890 --> 00:24:24,670 |
| that they're being abusive and everything? It's |
| |
| 359 |
| 00:24:24,670 --> 00:24:26,610 |
| their nature. They don't know that what they're |
| |
| 360 |
| 00:24:26,610 --> 00:24:32,410 |
| doing is unhealthy, but it is unhealthy. That's |
| |
| 361 |
| 00:24:32,410 --> 00:24:35,510 |
| why it's invisible. That's why it's invisible? |
| |
| 362 |
| 00:24:36,050 --> 00:24:39,370 |
| Invisible to whom? To the rose? |
| |
| 363 |
| 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:46,060 |
| The speaker knows. The speaker is diagnosing |
| |
| 364 |
| 00:24:46,060 --> 00:24:49,180 |
| everything. The speaker is all-knowing. He's a |
| |
| 365 |
| 00:24:49,180 --> 00:24:52,200 |
| third-person narrator. He knows that there is a |
| |
| 366 |
| 00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,940 |
| worm that is feeding and that it is invisible. Is |
| |
| 367 |
| 00:24:55,940 --> 00:24:59,480 |
| there |
| |
| 368 |
| 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:01,240 |
| an indication in the text that the speaker is |
| |
| 369 |
| 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:07,540 |
| guessing? No. Or probably invisible to the rose. |
| |
| 370 |
| 00:25:08,470 --> 00:25:10,770 |
| But yeah, these are all valid points. We don't |
| |
| 371 |
| 00:25:10,770 --> 00:25:12,990 |
| have, and it's again the beauty of poetry. This is |
| |
| 372 |
| 00:25:12,990 --> 00:25:15,690 |
| the beauty of even romanticism. It's an extra |
| |
| 373 |
| 00:25:15,690 --> 00:25:18,110 |
| feature we have in romanticism. You can talk about |
| |
| 374 |
| 00:25:18,110 --> 00:25:21,770 |
| a poem for a year and have different opinions and |
| |
| 375 |
| 00:25:21,770 --> 00:25:25,570 |
| everything. There are many gaps. These are poems |
| |
| 376 |
| 00:25:25,570 --> 00:25:29,320 |
| that encourage us to think, to link; try to make |
| |
| 377 |
| 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:31,420 |
| up our mind, and then something shows up, and then |
| |
| 378 |
| 00:25:31,420 --> 00:25:34,980 |
| yeah, possibly the other reading is, is also, is also |
| |
| 379 |
| 00:25:34,980 --> 00:25:39,460 |
| valid, so this is a love that is secret, but it's |
| |
| 380 |
| 00:25:39,460 --> 00:25:45,280 |
| also a love that is dark, destructive. What else? |
| |
| 381 |
| 00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:48,660 |
| There's one word, one key word, that is significant |
| |
| 382 |
| 00:25:48,660 --> 00:25:53,840 |
| that you haven't highlighted; there's |
| |
| 383 |
| 00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:56,460 |
| one word here that is also, other than the ones we |
| |
| 384 |
| 00:25:56,460 --> 00:25:58,100 |
| highlighted, a word we didn't highlight. |
| |
| 385 |
| 00:26:01,630 --> 00:26:02,270 |
| Okay, |
| |
| 386 |
| 00:26:04,970 --> 00:26:11,470 |
| I like that you paid attention to his, yeah. But |
| |
| 387 |
| 00:26:11,470 --> 00:26:15,290 |
| you're saying that she's a woman because the worm |
| |
| 388 |
| 00:26:15,290 --> 00:26:18,810 |
| is a he; not necessarily, but rose is usually taken |
| |
| 389 |
| 00:26:18,810 --> 00:26:21,770 |
| as feminine. I think this is a key word in the |
| |
| 390 |
| 00:26:21,770 --> 00:26:25,650 |
| whole poem. He could have simply said "it." |
| |
| 391 |
| 00:26:30,230 --> 00:26:36,590 |
| Does it make a difference that the worm is a "he"? In |
| |
| 392 |
| 00:26:36,590 --> 00:26:41,630 |
| what sense? He's personifying the worm in order to |
| |
| 393 |
| 00:26:41,630 --> 00:26:44,270 |
| show that this… He's also personifying the rose, |
| |
| 394 |
| 00:26:44,350 --> 00:26:46,390 |
| don't forget. Yes, okay, but here he's |
| |
| 395 |
| 00:26:46,390 --> 00:26:49,410 |
| personifying the rose to raise, let's say, raise |
| |
| 396 |
| 00:26:49,410 --> 00:26:53,850 |
| her awareness, to raise her awareness to what she |
| |
| 397 |
| 00:26:53,850 --> 00:26:56,890 |
| is facing, but she does not know. Like we're saying, |
| |
| 398 |
| 00:26:56,890 --> 00:27:00,250 |
| hey, we're saying here that you are sick, and you |
| |
| 399 |
| 00:27:00,250 --> 00:27:02,790 |
| do not know that there is an invisible worm. Why |
| |
| 400 |
| 00:27:02,790 --> 00:27:05,780 |
| is the worm a "he"? The worm is here because he |
| |
| 401 |
| 00:27:05,780 --> 00:27:09,360 |
| wants to give it the traits of people, of human |
| |
| 402 |
| 00:27:09,360 --> 00:27:11,780 |
| beings; like they are deceptive. Why isn't the |
| |
| 403 |
| 00:27:11,780 --> 00:27:13,040 |
| worm a "she"? |
| |
| 404 |
| 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:25,220 |
| We can consider his return to "worm," because his |
| |
| 405 |
| 00:27:25,220 --> 00:27:31,340 |
| return to the worm itself. Yeah, "his" refers to |
| |
| 406 |
| 00:27:31,340 --> 00:27:33,220 |
| worm. Do I agree on this? |
| |
| 407 |
| 00:27:37,340 --> 00:27:40,940 |
| Because the poet wants to say that his dark; maybe |
| |
| 408 |
| 00:27:40,940 --> 00:27:43,840 |
| the rest she doesn't know about this love; she |
| |
| 409 |
| 00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:47,600 |
| doesn' |
| |
| 445 |
| 00:29:48,410 --> 00:29:52,170 |
| a mess like this. He's informing her, please. I |
| |
| 446 |
| 00:29:52,170 --> 00:29:55,730 |
| think this poem goes beyond a relationship between |
| |
| 447 |
| 00:29:55,730 --> 00:29:58,630 |
| a man and a woman. I think he's actually lamenting |
| |
| 448 |
| 00:29:58,630 --> 00:30:01,850 |
| the loss of innocence in any way. But there's |
| |
| 449 |
| 00:30:01,850 --> 00:30:04,450 |
| nothing wrong even with taking it on this |
| |
| 450 |
| 00:30:04,450 --> 00:30:07,090 |
| particular level, on a man-woman relationship. |
| |
| 451 |
| 00:30:09,590 --> 00:30:12,470 |
| As I said, he's lamenting the loss of innocence in |
| |
| 452 |
| 00:30:12,470 --> 00:30:15,270 |
| any kind of way. Okay. The warmth is something |
| |
| 453 |
| 00:30:15,270 --> 00:30:19,630 |
| that makes you lose your interest. Okay. Now we'll |
| |
| 454 |
| 00:30:19,630 --> 00:30:22,750 |
| come now to the symbolism, but somebody said |
| |
| 455 |
| 00:30:22,750 --> 00:30:25,730 |
| something about the number of syllables. Okay. How |
| |
| 456 |
| 00:30:25,730 --> 00:30:27,230 |
| many syllables do we have in line number one? |
| |
| 457 |
| 00:30:27,250 --> 00:30:32,890 |
| Five. Usually, if you have five, it means there are |
| |
| 458 |
| 00:30:32,890 --> 00:30:37,740 |
| two feet. Because some feet consist of three |
| |
| 459 |
| 00:30:37,740 --> 00:30:40,260 |
| syllables. Yes, most feet consist of two syllables. |
| |
| 460 |
| 00:30:40,260 --> 00:30:42,840 |
| But some of them consist of three syllables, so |
| |
| 461 |
| 00:30:42,840 --> 00:30:47,620 |
| we'll take this as, you know, as a two-feet line. |
| |
| 462 |
| 00:30:47,620 --> 00:30:53,620 |
| Number two, how many, how many syllables are |
| |
| 463 |
| 00:30:53,620 --> 00:31:03,950 |
| there? You sure? Say again: "the invisible worm." Okay, three |
| |
| 464 |
| 00:31:03,950 --> 00:31:10,650 |
| feet. And then, "that flies in the night," five; in |
| |
| 465 |
| 00:31:10,650 --> 00:31:16,770 |
| the howling storm," also five; and then, "has found out |
| |
| 466 |
| 00:31:16,770 --> 00:31:23,770 |
| thy bed," five syllables; "of crimson joy," four; and |
|
|
| 467 |
| 00:31:23,770 --> 00:31:30,930 |
| then, "his dark secret love?" And then |
|
|
| 468 |
| 00:31:30,930 --> 00:31:34,050 |
| finally, "does thy life destroy?" |
|
|
| 469 |
| 00:31:36,810 --> 00:31:40,850 |
| Of course |
|
|
| 470 |
| 00:31:40,850 --> 00:31:43,510 |
| it's irregular, going from four to five to five to six |
|
|
| 471 |
| 00:31:43,510 --> 00:31:49,730 |
| to four to five. Does this make "The Sick Rose" any |
|
|
| 472 |
| 00:31:49,730 --> 00:31:52,070 |
| less of a poem? |
|
|
| 473 |
| 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:58,520 |
| It doesn't make it unpoetic; it doesn't lose some of |
|
|
| 474 |
| 00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,400 |
| its poeticality, some of its beauty, because it |
|
|
| 475 |
| 00:32:01,400 --> 00:32:05,860 |
| doesn't conform, it doesn't obey the rules of |
|
|
| 476 |
| 00:32:05,860 --> 00:32:10,940 |
| decorum. Now, we'll talk about this in a bit, what |
|
|
| 477 |
| 00:32:10,940 --> 00:32:14,400 |
| the Romantics think about the rules of decorum. |
|
|
| 478 |
| 00:32:15,260 --> 00:32:18,220 |
| And I'm sure that the likes of Alexander Pope, |
|
|
| 479 |
| 00:32:18,500 --> 00:32:21,640 |
| methodized and systematized, speaking about rules, |
|
|
| 480 |
| 00:32:24,270 --> 00:32:26,370 |
| and those people will be pulling their hair now, |
|
|
| 481 |
| 00:32:26,470 --> 00:32:29,810 |
| that those people are like, "Sorry, this is not the |
| |
| 482 |
| 00:32:29,810 --> 00:32:33,090 |
| way we should do poetry. This is the way how we |
| |
| 483 |
| 00:32:33,090 --> 00:32:35,950 |
| should do poetry." So what about the symbolism? |
|
|
| 484 |
| 00:32:36,170 --> 00:32:42,390 |
| What does the poem stand for? What is the key |
|
|
| 485 |
| 00:32:42,390 --> 00:32:46,430 |
| issue in the poem? Like, thinking of this, thinking |
|
|
| 486 |
| 00:32:46,430 --> 00:32:49,730 |
| of the words, the negative words, even the |
|
|
| 487 |
| 00:32:49,730 --> 00:32:54,130 |
| beautiful word here is negative. The rose itself |
|
|
| 488 |
| 00:32:54,130 --> 00:32:58,290 |
| or herself. That's it. So what do you think? What |
|
|
| 489 |
| 00:32:58,290 --> 00:33:01,450 |
| does the rose symbolize? Please. |
|
|
| 490 |
| 00:33:15,470 --> 00:33:17,350 |
| This doesn't apply to William Blake. William Blake |
|
|
| 491 |
| 00:33:17,350 --> 00:33:20,150 |
| was a Londoner. He lived in London. He stayed in |
|
|
| 492 |
| 00:33:20,150 --> 00:33:23,050 |
| London. And some say he even loved London despite |
|
|
| 493 |
| 00:33:23,050 --> 00:33:25,710 |
| the fact that he was severely critical of London |
|
|
| 494 |
| 00:33:25,710 --> 00:33:29,770 |
| and the life there. So what does the rose in |
|
|
| 495 |
| 00:33:29,770 --> 00:33:34,150 |
| specific symbolize? Please. I think this word |
|
|
| 496 |
| 00:33:34,150 --> 00:33:39,070 |
| symbolizes one thing. Stop counting. Do this. |
|
|
| 497 |
| 00:33:39,990 --> 00:33:45,310 |
| Okay, the rose symbolizes love where one half of |
|
|
| 498 |
| 00:33:45,310 --> 00:33:48,710 |
| this relationship, love relationship, is sick, |
|
|
| 499 |
| 00:33:48,870 --> 00:33:51,510 |
| destroyed, and the other half is causing this |
|
|
| 500 |
| 00:33:51,510 --> 00:33:55,270 |
| destruction. Thank you, interesting. Also, stop |
|
|
| 501 |
| 00:33:55,270 --> 00:33:58,450 |
| counting, one. So okay, you think that the word |
|
|
| 502 |
| 00:33:58,450 --> 00:34:02,890 |
| rose symbolizes nature. What is destroying nature |
|
|
| 503 |
| 00:34:02,890 --> 00:34:05,230 |
| in your sense? What is man? Please. |
|
|
| 504 |
| 00:34:12,520 --> 00:34:15,680 |
| You know, yeah, sometimes you feel he loves |
|
|
| 505 |
| 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:18,160 |
| London, sometimes you think he, you realize that |
|
|
| 506 |
| 00:34:18,160 --> 00:34:19,500 |
| he hates London, he doesn't like it. |
|
|
| 507 |
| 00:34:24,340 --> 00:34:28,140 |
| He, him, oh, yeah, okay. So he's Rose, he's, it's |
|
|
| 508 |
| 00:34:28,140 --> 00:34:30,740 |
| like, you know, the Da Vinci painting, some people |
|
|
| 509 |
| 00:34:30,740 --> 00:34:33,540 |
| think that this was a self-portrait, Da Vinci |
|
|
| 510 |
| 00:34:33,540 --> 00:34:36,400 |
| drawing himself, the Mona Lisa, right? So this |
|
|
| 511 |
| 00:34:36,400 --> 00:34:40,460 |
| could be, oh, Rose looking in the mirror, and, you |
|
|
| 512 |
| 00:34:40,460 --> 00:34:43,760 |
| know, liking himself and then saying, "It's the city |
| |
| 513 |
| 00:34:43,760 --> 00:34:47,660 |
| that destroyed me." I like this. Thank you very |
|
|
| 514 |
| 00:34:47,660 --> 00:34:53,060 |
| much. Please. This is innocence and this is |
|
|
| 515 |
| 00:34:53,060 --> 00:34:54,300 |
| experience. We'll talk about innocence and |
|
|
| 516 |
| 00:34:54,300 --> 00:34:59,640 |
| experience in a bit. Please. The worm is life, the |
|
|
| 517 |
| 00:34:59,640 --> 00:35:04,500 |
| rose is life in general. Please. Stop counting. |
|
|
| 518 |
| 00:35:04,580 --> 00:35:08,800 |
| One thing. Beauty. So if beauty can be destroyed |
|
|
| 519 |
| 00:35:08,800 --> 00:35:11,880 |
| by what? What's the worm here if this is beauty? |
|
|
| 520 |
| 00:35:12,860 --> 00:35:18,160 |
| If this is beauty, what is the worm? Make-up? Or |
|
|
| 521 |
| 00:35:18,160 --> 00:35:28,320 |
| food? Age, thank you. Age. Poetry is the rose and |
|
|
| 522 |
| 00:35:28,320 --> 00:35:33,200 |
| what is destroying it is the... Okay, I find this far |
|
|
| 523 |
| 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:38,360 |
| -fetched, but also I like it. I like it. If you want |
|
|
| 524 |
| 00:35:38,360 --> 00:35:40,360 |
| to take this... the whole poem is symbolic and also |
|
|
| 525 |
| 00:35:40,360 --> 00:35:49,640 |
| a parody. Toxic |
|
|
| 526 |
| 00:35:49,640 --> 00:35:51,780 |
| because it's repressive and restrictive; it |
|
|
| 527 |
| 00:35:51,780 --> 00:35:53,980 |
| prevents you from expressing yourself, being |
|
|
| 528 |
| 00:35:53,980 --> 00:35:58,440 |
| yourself. Rose. |
|
|
| 529 |
| 00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:05,280 |
| rose. Rose. The rules? I think sometimes they do. |
|
|
| 530 |
| 00:36:06,580 --> 00:36:07,720 |
| Sometimes we do. |
|
|
| 531 |
| 00:36:13,640 --> 00:36:16,480 |
| That's my opinion. That's your opinion. Again, |
|
|
| 532 |
| 00:36:16,640 --> 00:36:18,760 |
| this is up to you, whether you want to like |
|
|
| 533 |
| 00:36:18,760 --> 00:36:20,500 |
| classical poetry, whether in Arabic or English, |
|
|
| 534 |
| 00:36:20,620 --> 00:36:23,180 |
| whether you like classical poetry more than |
|
|
| 535 |
| 00:36:23,180 --> 00:36:26,520 |
| metaphysical or Romantic poetry, free verse, blank |
|
|
| 536 |
| 00:36:26,520 --> 00:36:28,800 |
| verse, or vice versa. This is a personal |
|
|
| 537 |
| 00:36:28,800 --> 00:36:33,600 |
| preference. Please. I think you can also say that |
|
|
| 538 |
| 00:36:33,600 --> 00:36:38,420 |
| the "howling storm" symbolizes life. Okay. In this |
|
|
| 539 |
| 00:36:38,420 --> 00:36:40,660 |
| sense, what is the rose? What is the worm? |
|
|
| 540 |
| 00:36:43,430 --> 00:36:47,650 |
| Okay, so life, innocence, and experience. Now look |
|
|
| 541 |
| 00:36:47,650 --> 00:36:50,170 |
| at this. Please, finally. |
|
|
| 542 |
| 00:36:54,370 --> 00:36:59,830 |
| So you're |
|
|
| 543 |
| 00:36:59,830 --> 00:37:01,870 |
| connecting it with this understanding that this |
|
|
| 544 |
| 00:37:01,870 --> 00:37:05,650 |
| could be about the repressive rules, the invasive |
|
|
| 545 |
| 00:37:05,650 --> 00:37:08,690 |
| rules of life, of modern life, of the city |
|
|
| 546 |
| 00:37:08,690 --> 00:37:11,990 |
| controlling and limiting our imagination. Thank |
|
|
| 547 |
| 00:37:11,990 --> 00:37:12,110 |
| you. |
|
|
| 548 |
| 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:23,700 |
| Like what? Okay, what else? Who usually depends on |
|
|
| 549 |
| 00:37:23,700 --> 00:37:27,560 |
| others in society, in our life? Okay. Oh, |
|
|
| 550 |
| 00:37:27,680 --> 00:37:30,240 |
| don't say that the rose is students and the worm |
|
|
| 551 |
| 00:37:30,240 --> 00:37:34,300 |
| is a teacher. Okay. Maybe it's vice versa. Maybe |
|
|
| 552 |
| 00:37:34,300 --> 00:37:37,480 |
| we are, you know, we are sick because of the |
|
|
| 553 |
| 00:37:37,480 --> 00:37:41,380 |
| invisible worms destroying us. Assignments? What |
|
|
| 554 |
| 00:37:41,380 --> 00:37:46,040 |
| are the assignments? The "howling storm"? This |
|
|
| 555 |
| 00:37:46,040 --> 00:37:50,680 |
| sense, this oxymoron here, it's like Hamlet says, |
|
|
| 556 |
| 00:37:50,880 --> 00:37:56,100 |
| "tough love," "cruel to be kind." So this is, okay. I |
| |
| 557 |
| 00:37:56,100 --> 00:37:59,180 |
| like how this poem is helping you use your |
| |
| 558 |
| 00:37:59,180 --> 00:38:04,100 |
| imagination even more. With the Romantics, it's |
| |
| 559 |
| 00:38:04,100 --> 00:38:08,420 |
| usually, sometimes you feel that they have one |
| |
| 560 |
| 00:38:08,420 --> 00:38:12,640 |
| idea, one thing to teach in a poem; to teach and |
| |
| 561 |
| 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:15,060 |
| delight, right? But with the Romantics, you'll |
| |
| 562 |
| 00:38:15,060 --> 00:38:18,640 |
| come to a reality where a poem could mean many |
| |
| 563 |
| 00:38:18,640 --> 00:38:22,080 |
| things. And I think all your understandings and |
| |
| 564 |
| 00:38:22,080 --> 00:38:24,620 |
| interpretations are valid here. But we can also |
| |
| 565 |
| 00:38:24,620 --> 00:38:26,680 |
| take this poem to today. I remember last year, one |
| |
| 566 |
| 00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:31,280 |
| of the students was saying, "This is women now on |
|
|
| 567 |
| 00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:37,060 |
| social media, sometimes men, you know, take |
|
|
| 568 |
| 00:38:37,060 --> 00:38:39,620 |
| advantage, try to take advantage of women, of |
|
|
| 569 |
| 00:38:39,620 --> 00:38:42,540 |
| their innocence, of their, you know, and they try |
|
|
| 570 |
| 00:38:42,540 --> 00:38:45,580 |
| to destroy their lives." I like this |
| |
| 571 |
| 00:38:45,580 --> 00:38:47,640 |
| interpretation. The other day, a student was |
| |
| 572 |
| 00:38:47,640 --> 00:38:51,340 |
| saying, "La Rose is Palestine, the worm is the |
|
|
| 573 |
| 00:38:51,340 --> 00:38:54,500 |
| Zionist entity coming to Palestine, destroying |
|
|
| 574 |
| 00:38:54,500 --> 00:38:55,520 |
| Palestine, and... |
|
|
| 575 |
| 00:38:58,450 --> 00:39:01,370 |
| That is also valid. But there are two things here. |
|
|
| 576 |
| 00:39:01,430 --> 00:39:04,630 |
| We don't want to mix things. For William Blake, |
|
|
| 577 |
| 00:39:04,970 --> 00:39:07,430 |
| yes, this could be taken as some might suggest |
|
|
| 578 |
| 00:39:07,430 --> 00:39:09,870 |
| that the rose is probably an actual rose. He was |
|
|
| 579 |
| 00:39:09,870 --> 00:39:12,010 |
| walking down the road, I don't know, somewhere in |
|
|
| 580 |
| 00:39:12,010 --> 00:39:13,770 |
| London. He found a rose, where there is a woman |
|
|
| 581 |
| 00:39:13,770 --> 00:39:17,390 |
| that he made a fuss out of all of this. Or the |
|
|
| 582 |
| 00:39:17,390 --> 00:39:20,330 |
| rose could symbolize nature. It could symbolize |
|
|
| 583 |
| 00:39:20,330 --> 00:39:22,490 |
| life in a city and how it was destroyed by the |
|
|
| 584 |
| 00:39:22,490 --> 00:39:24,290 |
| Industrial Revolution and the factories and the |
|
|
| 585 |
| 00:39:24,290 --> 00:39:27,820 |
| pollution, somebody said here. Or it could mean |
|
|
| 586 |
| 00:39:27,820 --> 00:39:30,940 |
| some woman, a woman he knows, or women in general, |
|
|
| 587 |
| 00:39:31,140 --> 00:39:33,840 |
| or children. I expected some of you to say |
|
|
| 588 |
| 00:39:33,840 --> 00:39:37,940 |
| children, but there's not much indication here. |
|
|
| 589 |
| 00:39:38,020 --> 00:39:41,140 |
| But this could be about, or a child, or childhood, |
|
|
| 590 |
| 00:39:42,100 --> 00:39:46,400 |
| or innocence and experience, or beauty, or nature, |
|
|
| 591 |
| 00:39:46,520 --> 00:39:48,220 |
| or the countryside and how it's being destroyed |
|
|
| 592 |
| 00:39:48,220 --> 00:39:54,960 |
| by... Now what is it about? I think it's about all |
|
|
| 593 |
| 00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:58,140 |
| of these. And I think this is a feature of |
|
|
| 594 |
| 00:39:58,140 --> 00:40:02,920 |
| Romanticism, imagination. Encouraging imagination, |
|
|
| 595 |
| 00:40:03,480 --> 00:40:08,920 |
| encouraging using your mind, not to think |
|
|
| 596 |
| 00:40:08,920 --> 00:40:11,420 |
| intellectually, to find facts, to create facts |
|
|
| 597 |
| 00:40:11,420 --> 00:40:12,020 |
| about this, |
|
|
| 598 |
| 00:40:15,340 --> 00:40:20,380 |
| but to imagine how things could be, how things can |
|
|
| 599 |
| 00:40:20,380 --> 00:40:23,740 |
| be. The fact that the poem offers so many |
|
|
| 600 |
| 00:40:23,740 --> 00:40:27,180 |
| possibilities is the very opposite of Neoclassical |
|
|
| 601 |
| 00:40:27,180 --> 00:40:31,940 |
| literature, where usually there's one main |
|
|
| 602 |
| 00:40:31,940 --> 00:40:34,900 |
| understanding of the text. This is what it is. |
|
|
| 603 |
| 00:40:34,920 --> 00:40:37,940 |
| It's like mathematics. In a sense, I don't want to |
|
|
| 604 |
| 00:40:37,940 --> 00:40:40,740 |
| be extreme. But here, there are so many |
|
|
| 605 |
| 00:40:40,740 --> 00:40:46,240 |
| possibilities for one poem. So if in your exam I |
|
|
| 606 |
| 00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:51,460 |
| ask you, "What is the rose a symbol of?", you could |
|
|
| 607 |
| 00:40:51,460 --> 00:40:54,710 |
| say whatever you like, as long as you support your |
|
|
| 608 |
| 00:40:54,710 --> 00:40:59,770 |
| argument with things about Blake or things from |
|
|
| 609 |
| 00:40:59,770 --> 00:41:02,170 |
| the book. But don't go too far to taking it to say |
|
|
| 610 |
| 00:41:02,170 --> 00:41:07,590 |
| this, "it stands for Palestine or Facebook." What I |
|
|
| 611 |
| 00:41:07,590 --> 00:41:11,050 |
| mean here is that you could post this poem, you |
|
|
| 612 |
| 00:41:11,050 --> 00:41:16,560 |
| could have this Photoshop design; put a picture of |
|
|
| 613 |
| 00:41:16,560 --> 00:41:19,040 |
| the top of the rock or a map of Palestine and |
|
|
| 614 |
| 00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:21,600 |
| write this and it worked and say, "Oh Rose, thou |
| |
| 615 |
| 00:41:21,600 --> 00:41:26,420 |
| art sick. The invisible worm." You could say this to |
|
|
| 616 |
| 00:41:26,420 --> 00:41:29,260 |
| somebody who has been in a toxic relationship, like |
|
|
| 617 |
| 00:41:29,260 --> 00:41:32,420 |
| trying to cheer them up. I don't know, tell them |
|
|
| 618 |
| 00:41:32,420 --> 00:41:36,420 |
| it has been happening. But remember, I don't care |
|
|
| 619 |
| 00:41:36,420 --> 00:41:38,620 |
| about the authorial intention. I don't care what |
|
|
| 620 |
| 00:41:38,620 --> 00:41:42,140 |
| he intended, William Blake. He could have intended |
|
|
| 621 |
| 00:41:42,140 --> 00:41:47,280 |
| all these things you just mentioned. Now, in the |
|
|
| 622 |
| 00:41:47,280 --> 00:41:49,740 |
| remaining time, I want you to see this other |
|
|
| 623 |
| 00:41:49,740 --> 00:41:52,340 |
| beautiful poem by William Blake. |
|
|
| 624 |
| 00:41:55,660 --> 00:41:59,320 |
| William Blake was very famous for |
|
|
| 625 |
| 00:42:02,130 --> 00:42:06,750 |
| his two groups or two volumes of poetry entitled |
|
|
| 626 |
| 00:42:06,750 --> 00:42:09,470 |
| "Songs of Innocence," "Songs of Experience," where he |
| |
| 627 |
| 00:42:09,470 --> 00:42:13,010 |
| talks about the two statuses of life. Sometimes |
| |
| 628 |
| 00:42:13,010 --> 00:42:17,490 |
| the same experience is looked at because he |
| |
| 629 |
| 00:42:17,490 --> 00:42:20,870 |
| believes in the fact that the world is our own |
| |
| 630 |
| 00:42:20,870 --> 00:42:25,690 |
| perception. We create the world; we create it. How |
| |
| 631 |
| 00:42:25,690 --> 00:42:30,070 |
| we see the world is what the world is, and you |
| |
| 632 |
| 00:42:30,070 --> 00:42:35,270 |
| see it. I'll quote him in a bit. He says, "Both |
|
|
| 633 |
| 00:42:35,270 --> 00:42:41,870 |
| read the Bible day and night. Thou saw dark, I saw |
|
|
| 634 |
| 00:42:41,870 --> 00:42:45,010 |
| light." It's the same Bible, different people, |
| |
| 635 |
| 00:42:45,170 --> 00:42:48,760 |
| different understanding and perception. And |
| |
| 667 |
| 00:44:39,850 --> 00:44:42,690 |
| Keep going on to play. I have no problem with |
| |
| 668 |
| 00:44:42,690 --> 00:44:46,710 |
| that. So this is the nurse first describing what's |
| |
| 669 |
| 00:44:46,710 --> 00:44:50,030 |
| going on, and then because the sun is gone |
| |
| 670 |
| 00:44:50,030 --> 00:44:56,150 |
| down, come, come. The sun is gone, leave off play |
| |
| 671 |
| 00:44:56,150 --> 00:44:59,610 |
| and let us away until the morning appears in the |
| |
| 672 |
| 00:44:59,610 --> 00:45:05,110 |
| skies. And then the kids also, this is a quote, |
| |
| 673 |
| 00:45:05,990 --> 00:45:10,490 |
| speaking back, talking back. No, no, let us play |
| |
| 674 |
| 00:45:10,490 --> 00:45:15,890 |
| for it is yet day. It is still day, Fada. And we |
| |
| 675 |
| 00:45:15,890 --> 00:45:20,510 |
| cannot go to sleep. Besides, in the sky, little |
| |
| 676 |
| 00:45:20,510 --> 00:45:24,370 |
| birds fly. There are still birds out there. And |
| |
| 677 |
| 00:45:24,370 --> 00:45:27,310 |
| the hills are all covered with sheep. So people |
| |
| 678 |
| 00:45:27,310 --> 00:45:30,210 |
| are out there; life is there; nature is there. Why |
| |
| 679 |
| 00:45:30,210 --> 00:45:34,370 |
| would you take us back home? Well, well, and this |
| |
| 680 |
| 00:45:34,370 --> 00:45:37,830 |
| is again the nurse. Well, well, go and play until |
| |
| 681 |
| 00:45:37,830 --> 00:45:41,410 |
| the light fades away. And then go home to bed. |
| |
| 682 |
| 00:45:42,230 --> 00:45:44,570 |
| That's the end of, again, the speech here, the |
| |
| 683 |
| 00:45:44,570 --> 00:45:46,670 |
| dialogue. Look at the dialogue. You will not find |
| |
| 684 |
| 00:45:46,670 --> 00:45:50,150 |
| this dialogic thing in neoclassical, this much of |
| |
| 685 |
| 00:45:50,150 --> 00:45:56,070 |
| dialogism in neoclassical poetry. The little ones |
| |
| 686 |
| 00:45:56,070 --> 00:46:01,050 |
| leaped and shouted and laughed, and all the hills |
| |
| 687 |
| 00:46:01,050 --> 00:46:06,890 |
| echoed. Nature is laughing back. Very simple poem, |
| |
| 688 |
| 00:46:06,970 --> 00:46:09,890 |
| yeah? It's very simple. Kids playing, come back |
| |
| 689 |
| 00:46:09,890 --> 00:46:12,450 |
| home. No, we're not coming back home. There's |
| |
| 690 |
| 00:46:12,450 --> 00:46:15,490 |
| still, you know, birds and sheep out there. So |
| |
| 691 |
| 00:46:15,490 --> 00:46:19,050 |
| okay, play some more, like one more hour, 30 |
| |
| 692 |
| 00:46:19,050 --> 00:46:22,290 |
| minutes more, and then when the light fades away, |
| |
| 693 |
| 00:46:22,610 --> 00:46:25,710 |
| come back home. Look at this poem, okay? |
| |
| 694 |
| 00:46:28,960 --> 00:46:36,640 |
| This is the same experience, the same story, from a |
| |
| 695 |
| 00:46:36,640 --> 00:46:40,560 |
| different point of view, experience. The nurse's |
| |
| 696 |
| 00:46:40,560 --> 00:46:41,440 |
| song experience. |
| |
| 697 |
| 00:46:44,220 --> 00:46:46,800 |
| The first thing is that this is the whole poem. |
| |
| 698 |
| 00:46:48,540 --> 00:46:54,280 |
| Two stanzas. It's 50%, it's half |
| |
| 699 |
| 00:46:54,280 --> 00:47:00,880 |
| the song of innocence. When voices of children are |
| |
| 700 |
| 00:47:00,880 --> 00:47:05,400 |
| heard on the green, the very same first line, and |
| |
| 701 |
| 00:47:05,400 --> 00:47:11,660 |
| not laughing and giggling and playing and sounds |
| |
| 702 |
| 00:47:11,660 --> 00:47:17,300 |
| and naughtiness, whisperings. Now there is, why |
| |
| 703 |
| 00:47:17,300 --> 00:47:19,880 |
| would we whisper? It's either a secret or there's |
| |
| 704 |
| 00:47:19,880 --> 00:47:24,670 |
| fear; you're not allowed to speak. You're not |
| |
| 705 |
| 00:47:24,670 --> 00:47:26,910 |
| allowed to speak. You shouldn't speak. And |
| |
| 706 |
| 00:47:26,910 --> 00:47:31,510 |
| whisperings are in the dale. The days of my youth. |
| |
| 707 |
| 00:47:31,610 --> 00:47:33,350 |
| The poem is about the speaker; it's no longer |
| |
| 708 |
| 00:47:33,350 --> 00:47:35,210 |
| about the children. That's why it changes from |
| |
| 709 |
| 00:47:35,210 --> 00:47:39,030 |
| innocence to experience. The days of my youth rise |
| |
| 710 |
| 00:47:39,030 --> 00:47:44,330 |
| fresh in my mind. My face turns green and pale. |
| |
| 711 |
| 00:47:45,050 --> 00:47:47,950 |
| Probably an older person. Feels jealous. Feels, |
| |
| 712 |
| 00:47:47,970 --> 00:47:54,610 |
| you know, green and pale. Not happy that the kids |
| |
| 713 |
| 00:47:54,610 --> 00:47:58,490 |
| are playing; not happy that the kids are, then |
| |
| 714 |
| 00:47:58,490 --> 00:48:02,730 |
| it's not even an attempt to strike a dialogue |
| |
| 715 |
| 00:48:02,730 --> 00:48:05,330 |
| here, to begin a conversation. It's just taken |
| |
| 716 |
| 00:48:05,330 --> 00:48:08,070 |
| matter-of-factly. Then, come home, my children. |
| |
| 717 |
| 00:48:08,290 --> 00:48:11,850 |
| The sun is gone down, and the dews of night arise. |
| |
| 718 |
| 00:48:12,030 --> 00:48:17,270 |
| Your spring and your day are wasted in play, and |
| |
| 719 |
| 00:48:17,270 --> 00:48:19,610 |
| you, yeah, wasted. That's a very negative word. |
| |
| 720 |
| 00:48:19,730 --> 00:48:24,750 |
| And you winter a night in disguise. The good is |
| |
| 721 |
| 00:48:24,750 --> 00:48:27,890 |
| yet to come; the bad is yet to come. That's the |
| |
| 722 |
| 00:48:27,890 --> 00:48:30,510 |
| whole problem. There's no reply from the kids. |
| |
| 723 |
| 00:48:31,150 --> 00:48:34,730 |
| They don't talk back; they're not allowed to speak |
| |
| 724 |
| 00:48:34,730 --> 00:48:35,450 |
| back. |
| |
| 725 |
| 00:48:38,290 --> 00:48:41,770 |
| They're never taken seriously. Kids are muted. |
| |
| 726 |
| 00:48:42,170 --> 00:48:46,390 |
| Kids are repressed. And probably two of the most |
| |
| 727 |
| 00:48:46,390 --> 00:48:50,250 |
| important English poets who were fascinated with |
| |
| 728 |
| 00:48:50,250 --> 00:48:54,500 |
| the concept of childhood: William Blake and William |
| |
| 729 |
| 00:48:54,500 --> 00:48:59,340 |
| Wordsworth. Wordsworth says a child is the father |
| |
| 730 |
| 00:48:59,340 --> 00:49:03,760 |
| of man. A child is the father. It's paradoxical |
| |
| 731 |
| 00:49:03,760 --> 00:49:08,240 |
| for what it means. So look at the differences here |
| |
| 732 |
| 00:49:08,240 --> 00:49:10,360 |
| in language; look at the differences in |
| |
| 733 |
| 00:49:13,240 --> 00:49:16,220 |
| and the size and the dialogue. The most important |
| |
| 734 |
| 00:49:16,220 --> 00:49:18,840 |
| thing I like about this poem is the fact that the |
| |
| 735 |
| 00:49:18,840 --> 00:49:21,620 |
| first, the innocence poem includes the dialogue |
| |
| 736 |
| 00:49:21,620 --> 00:49:24,620 |
| that the kids are speaking, having their voice, |
| |
| 737 |
| 00:49:24,780 --> 00:49:28,420 |
| representing themselves, you know, asking for |
| |
| 738 |
| 00:49:28,420 --> 00:49:31,640 |
| their right to play, to have fun, to laugh, to |
| |
| 739 |
| 00:49:31,640 --> 00:49:31,940 |
| run. |
| |
| 740 |
| 00:49:34,980 --> 00:49:38,560 |
| And that's why the first poem is, it's a musical, |
| |
| 741 |
| 00:49:38,940 --> 00:49:43,120 |
| the positive words; it's not only the kids |
| |
| 742 |
| 00:49:43,120 --> 00:49:47,160 |
| playing; also nature, the sheep, the birds, |
| |
| 743 |
| 00:49:47,260 --> 00:49:50,300 |
| everything is also happy and singing and dancing |
| |
| 744 |
| 00:49:50,300 --> 00:49:54,340 |
| with the kids. Is he saying that when kids are |
| |
| 745 |
| 00:49:54,340 --> 00:49:56,780 |
| playing and happy, everything around will be also |
| |
| 746 |
| 00:49:56,780 --> 00:50:00,220 |
| happy? But in the second poem, because the kids |
| |
| 747 |
| 00:50:00,220 --> 00:50:04,850 |
| are not allowed to speak, we destroy them, but also |
| |
| 748 |
| 00:50:04,850 --> 00:50:07,370 |
| we destroy ourselves because we don't see the |
| |
| 749 |
| 00:50:07,370 --> 00:50:09,950 |
| beauty of the children playing and being innocent |
| |
| 750 |
| 00:50:09,950 --> 00:50:15,210 |
| and all we see is green, pale, |
| |
| 751 |
| 00:50:17,450 --> 00:50:23,850 |
| wasted, and also disguised. Yeah? Green, I think |
| |
| 752 |
| 00:50:23,850 --> 00:50:26,410 |
| like, has two indications here; it is like gloomy |
| |
| 753 |
| 00:50:26,410 --> 00:50:28,970 |
| and it's a sad indication, but there it's like |
| |
| 754 |
| 00:50:28,970 --> 00:50:32,820 |
| green, the green helps, and you. So the same thing, |
| |
| 755 |
| 00:50:32,980 --> 00:50:37,120 |
| thank you for noticing this; the idea is that this |
| |
| 756 |
| 00:50:37,120 --> 00:50:41,300 |
| is what innocence and experience, like innocence |
| |
| 757 |
| 00:50:41,300 --> 00:50:44,540 |
| is usually things viewed from the perspective of |
| |
| 758 |
| 00:50:44,540 --> 00:50:48,100 |
| children, mostly of innocence or purity. Experience |
| |
| 759 |
| 00:50:48,100 --> 00:50:51,460 |
| means like, I don't know, corruption? Like it |
| |
| 760 |
| 00:50:51,460 --> 00:50:53,240 |
| doesn't mean like having more experience; having |
| |
| 761 |
| 00:50:53,240 --> 00:50:55,480 |
| something that is negative that's destroying your |
| |
| 762 |
| 00:50:55,480 --> 00:51:00,060 |
| life. You being corrupted by age, by life, by the |
| |
| 763 |
| 00:51:00,060 --> 00:51:03,040 |
| city, by the fact that you have to compete, by |
| |
| 764 |
| 00:51:03,040 --> 00:51:05,660 |
| conflicts you have around, by the hate you have |
| |
| 765 |
| 00:51:05,660 --> 00:51:08,020 |
| when you grow up. When you are kids, you would |
| |
| 766 |
| 00:51:08,020 --> 00:51:12,240 |
| fight with somebody. But ten minutes later, you're |
| |
| 767 |
| 00:51:12,240 --> 00:51:15,380 |
| playing again, your friends again. But when you |
| |
| 768 |
| 00:51:15,380 --> 00:51:18,240 |
| grow up, if you hate somebody, sometimes you hate |
| |
| 769 |
| 00:51:18,240 --> 00:51:21,740 |
| them forever. Even if you later on realize that, |
| |
| 770 |
| 00:51:21,800 --> 00:51:26,120 |
| well, it's been some insignificant issue. It's a |
| |
| 771 |
| 00:51:26,120 --> 00:51:27,040 |
| silly thing. Please. |
| |
| 772 |
| 00:51:36,790 --> 00:51:38,630 |
| Thank you very much. Thank you very much for |
| |
| 773 |
| 00:51:38,630 --> 00:51:41,530 |
| bringing up the Industrial Revolution because it's |
| |
| 774 |
| 00:51:41,530 --> 00:51:44,570 |
| one reason for why we have the Romantic poets |
| |
| 775 |
| 00:51:44,570 --> 00:51:46,670 |
| writing the poetry they wrote. Industrial |
| |
| 776 |
| 00:51:46,670 --> 00:51:49,970 |
| Revolution, French Revolution, the American |
| |
| 777 |
| 00:51:49,970 --> 00:51:51,610 |
| Revolution. We'll talk about this more when we |
| |
| 778 |
| 00:51:51,610 --> 00:51:55,810 |
| speak about William Wordsworth. So the Industrial |
| |
| 779 |
| 00:51:55,810 --> 00:51:59,010 |
| Revolution changed life, corrupted life, polluted |
| |
| 780 |
| 00:51:59,010 --> 00:52:02,730 |
| life. But the Industrial Revolution also brought |
| |
| 781 |
| 00:52:02,730 --> 00:52:08,090 |
| people in masses from the countryside to the city. |
| |
| 782 |
| 00:52:10,130 --> 00:52:12,690 |
| And when you go to the city, you go to the city, |
| |
| 783 |
| 00:52:13,250 --> 00:52:18,230 |
| why? For the experience? For work, okay? For a |
| |
| 784 |
| 00:52:18,230 --> 00:52:22,150 |
| job, to improve your life, for looking, expecting |
| |
| 785 |
| 00:52:23,050 --> 00:52:26,490 |
| your dreams to come true. But at that time, when |
| |
| 786 |
| 00:52:26,490 --> 00:52:31,030 |
| England was becoming the greatest empire of all |
| |
| 787 |
| 00:52:31,030 --> 00:52:33,630 |
| times, the empire on which the sun never set, |
| |
| 788 |
| 00:52:37,830 --> 00:52:41,210 |
| The British armies were, and companies and |
| |
| 789 |
| 00:52:41,210 --> 00:52:44,090 |
| enterprises, they were bringing raw materials from |
| |
| 790 |
| 00:52:44,090 --> 00:52:46,710 |
| the colonies, from India, Africa, around the |
| |
| 791 |
| 00:52:46,710 --> 00:52:50,210 |
| world, and bringing most of them to the factories |
| |
| 792 |
| 00:52:50,210 --> 00:52:53,110 |
| in London, in Liverpool, in Manchester. And these |
| |
| 793 |
| 00:52:53,110 --> 00:52:56,550 |
| factories needed so many laborers and workers, and |
| |
| 794 |
| 00:52:56,550 --> 00:52:59,510 |
| they would be leaving the countryside, the rural |
| |
| 795 |
| 00:52:59,510 --> 00:53:02,090 |
| areas, hoping for a better life, and they would |
| |
| 796 |
| 00:53:02,090 --> 00:53:07,520 |
| end up enslaved in factories. They would end up |
| |
| 797 |
| 00:53:07,520 --> 00:53:12,440 |
| being controlled, working from six or eight or |
| |
| 798 |
| 00:53:12,440 --> 00:53:16,200 |
| seven a.m. until six or eight or seven p.m. |
| |
| 799 |
| 00:53:19,040 --> 00:53:23,060 |
| And thank you very much. And this is, we'll quote |
| |
| 800 |
| 00:53:23,060 --> 00:53:27,120 |
| Shelley, describing the situation. Similar to the |
| |
| 801 |
| 00:53:27,120 --> 00:53:30,760 |
| situation we live in Gaza nowadays. The poor get |
| |
| 802 |
| 00:53:30,760 --> 00:53:33,800 |
| poorer, and the rich get richer. And again, we |
| |
| 803 |
| 00:53:33,800 --> 00:53:36,180 |
| always come back to Bernie Sanders saying the 1% |
| |
| 804 |
| 00:53:36,180 --> 00:53:43,660 |
| and the 99%. So the 1%, the richest people keep |
| |
| 805 |
| 00:53:43,660 --> 00:53:46,600 |
| getting rich no matter what. And the poor people |
| |
| 806 |
| 00:53:46,600 --> 00:53:49,740 |
| are destroying their lives. Look at Amazon and GFP |
| |
| 807 |
| 00:53:49,740 --> 00:53:53,380 |
| $180 billion. |
| |
| 808 |
| 00:53:56,890 --> 00:54:00,050 |
| There was a story the other day about an employee |
| |
| 809 |
| 00:54:00,050 --> 00:54:04,090 |
| at Amazon who died, who just fell. He had a heart |
| |
| 810 |
| 00:54:04,090 --> 00:54:06,750 |
| attack and died, and nobody noticed him for 20 |
| |
| 811 |
| 00:54:06,750 --> 00:54:09,970 |
| minutes. Despite the fact that there are so many |
| |
| 812 |
| 00:54:09,970 --> 00:54:15,240 |
| people there. And I think his brother said that a |
| |
| 813 |
| 00:54:15,240 --> 00:54:20,380 |
| week before this guy mistakenly labeled a |
| |
| 814 |
| 00:54:20,380 --> 00:54:22,800 |
| different product, and within two minutes, the |
| |
| 815 |
| 00:54:22,800 --> 00:54:26,800 |
| cameras and the computer managed to find this |
| |
| 816 |
| 00:54:26,800 --> 00:54:30,880 |
| error and mistake. Two minutes. If you make a |
| |
| 817 |
| 00:54:30,880 --> 00:54:33,180 |
| mistake for a product, for a thing that brings |
| |
| 818 |
| 00:54:33,180 --> 00:54:36,260 |
| money, it can be recognized. But when somebody |
| |
| 819 |
| 00:54:36,260 --> 00:54:41,120 |
| just falls, dies, has a heart attack, a human |
| |
| 820 |
| 00:54:41,120 --> 00:54:45,150 |
| being is not as important as a product that |
| |
| 821 |
| 00:54:45,150 --> 00:54:50,170 |
| could cost, I don't know, two or three dollars. So |
| |
| 822 |
| 00:54:50,170 --> 00:54:54,450 |
| yeah, there is always this in Romantic poetry. The |
| |
| 823 |
| 00:54:54,450 --> 00:54:56,210 |
| Industrial Revolution is always in the background. |
| |
| 824 |
| 00:55:00,480 --> 00:55:02,400 |
| We can't apply the Industrial Revolution to this |
| |
| 825 |
| 00:55:02,400 --> 00:55:06,340 |
| because when a man lives in a city and he misses |
| |
| 826 |
| 00:55:06,340 --> 00:55:09,620 |
| nature, so when he goes to the countryside and he |
| |
| 827 |
| 00:55:09,620 --> 00:55:13,860 |
| values nature more because he misses it and he's |
| |
| 828 |
| 00:55:13,860 --> 00:55:15,880 |
| not used to it. But people who live in the |
| |
| 829 |
| 00:55:15,880 --> 00:55:18,300 |
| countryside, they see these flowers and nature and |
| |
| 830 |
| 00:55:18,300 --> 00:55:20,740 |
| beauty every day, so maybe it's the opposite. |
| |
| 831 |
| 00:55:21,470 --> 00:55:23,470 |
| You're right, but with the Romantics, even with |
| |
| 832 |
| 00:55:23,470 --> 00:55:25,230 |
| Wordsworth and Coleridge, who lived in the |
| |
| 833 |
| 00:55:25,230 --> 00:55:28,310 |
| countryside, they loved the countryside. I agree. |
| |
| 834 |
| 00:55:28,950 --> 00:55:31,270 |
| They actually talk about this. This is a feature |
| |
| 835 |
| 00:55:31,270 --> 00:55:35,530 |
| of Romanticism. They try to defamiliarize their |
| |
| 836 |
| 00:55:35,530 --> 00:55:40,530 |
| experiences, to rip the veil of familiarity. When |
| |
| 837 |
| 00:55:40,530 --> 00:55:43,630 |
| you live, there are flowers and roses and trees |
| |
| 838 |
| 00:55:43,630 --> 00:55:46,390 |
| and cats and birds around campus here, right? But |
| |
| 839 |
| 00:55:46,390 --> 00:55:48,470 |
| sometimes, usually we don't pay attention. I |
| |
| 840 |
| 00:55:48,470 --> 00:55:51,430 |
| usually say this, like, when is the last time you |
| |
| 841 |
| 00:55:51,430 --> 00:55:55,930 |
| looked at the moon? It's because we live in |
| |
| 842 |
| 00:55:55,930 --> 00:56:01,230 |
| concrete buildings. We don't have even a crack to |
| |
| 843 |
| 00:56:01,230 --> 00:56:03,570 |
| see the moon. We usually don't see it from our windows |
| |
| 844 |
| 00:56:03,570 --> 00:56:07,170 |
| from where we live most often. Very few of us |
| |
| 845 |
| 00:56:07,170 --> 00:56:09,510 |
| would just wait for the moon to look at how big it |
| |
| 846 |
| 00:56:09,510 --> 00:56:11,030 |
| is, how beautiful it is. Remember when we were |
| |
| 847 |
| 00:56:11,030 --> 00:56:14,490 |
| kids; we spent most of our time looking at clouds |
| |
| 848 |
| 00:56:14,490 --> 00:56:17,390 |
| and what shapes they make. We don't do this now, |
| |
| 849 |
| 00:56:17,770 --> 00:56:20,050 |
| even if you like nature, because we're busy; we |
| |
| 850 |
| 00:56:20,050 --> 00:56:21,690 |
| have exams; we have to study; we have reflections |
| |
| 851 |
| 00:56:21,690 --> 00:56:23,590 |
| to write; we have classes to attend; we have work |
| |
| 852 |
| 00:56:23,590 --> 00:56:27,090 |
| to do; we have, you know, we need, we keep rushing |
| |
| 853 |
| 00:56:27,090 --> 00:56:29,710 |
| and this is city, this is new, this is life, this |
| |
| 854 |
| 00:56:29,710 --> 00:56:34,050 |
| is civilization. Therefore, the Romantics call for |
| |
| 855 |
| 00:56:34,050 --> 00:56:36,630 |
| this thing called the childlike experience. We |
| |
| 856 |
| 00:56:36,630 --> 00:56:40,490 |
| have to see everything anew, afresh every time. |
| |
| 857 |
| 00:56:41,760 --> 00:56:44,820 |
| |
| 889 |
| 00:58:38,980 --> 00:58:42,360 |
| experiences. The subject matter could be about |
| |
| 890 |
| 00:58:42,360 --> 00:58:44,380 |
| anything. It's about a rose. It's about, I don't |
| |
| 891 |
| 00:58:44,380 --> 00:58:47,220 |
| know, it's about children playing. This wasn't the |
| |
| 892 |
| 00:58:47,220 --> 00:58:50,500 |
| case with neoclassicism. Childhood is also a |
| |
| 893 |
| 00:58:50,500 --> 00:58:54,150 |
| feature. They are fascinated with childhood. I |
| |
| 894 |
| 00:58:54,150 --> 00:58:56,370 |
| will say something. I think that decriminalization |
| |
| 895 |
| 00:58:56,370 --> 00:58:58,870 |
| appears in the word "spring." Like in "Song of |
|
|
| 896 |
| 00:58:58,870 --> 00:59:02,410 |
| Innocence," he only says "your spring and your day." |
| |
| 897 |
| 00:59:02,730 --> 00:59:06,290 |
| But in the "Song of Innocence," he illustrates more. |
| |
| 898 |
| 00:59:06,390 --> 00:59:10,570 |
| And he says, "like hell's sky fly and birds fly and |
|
|
| 899 |
| 00:59:10,570 --> 00:59:14,910 |
| sheep." So this is how children see spring, while |
| |
| 900 |
| 00:59:14,910 --> 00:59:17,590 |
| this is like the word "spring" itself is how adults |
| |
| 901 |
| 00:59:17,590 --> 00:59:18,270 |
| see spring. |
| |
| 902 |
| 00:59:21,050 --> 00:59:23,530 |
| It's possible, but defamiliarization is basically |
| |
| 903 |
| 00:59:23,530 --> 00:59:28,070 |
| making familiar things look unfamiliar. Like when |
| |
| 904 |
| 00:59:28,070 --> 00:59:31,290 |
| you read "the daffodils," the thousands of daffodils |
| |
| 905 |
| 00:59:31,290 --> 00:59:33,210 |
| dancing and tossing their heads and like that. |
| |
| 906 |
| 00:59:33,330 --> 00:59:35,610 |
| That is something like, what's his name? The guy |
| |
| 907 |
| 00:59:35,610 --> 00:59:37,710 |
| who draws the sunflowers. |
| |
| 908 |
| 00:59:39,610 --> 00:59:47,150 |
| Van Gogh. He drew hundreds of these sunflowers, and |
| |
| 909 |
| 00:59:47,150 --> 00:59:50,030 |
| every time you see them, they look different. It's |
| |
| 910 |
| 00:59:50,030 --> 00:59:51,790 |
| as if you see them for the first time. |
| |
| 911 |
| 00:59:56,370 --> 01:00:00,910 |
| I'm sorry, that Blake was interested in the |
| |
| 912 |
| 01:00:00,910 --> 01:00:05,420 |
| childlike vision more than childhood itself. And I |
| |
| 913 |
| 01:00:05,420 --> 01:00:08,800 |
| think both. I think both. But yeah, the vision is |
| |
| 914 |
| 01:00:08,800 --> 01:00:11,080 |
| like, not only the vision, the vision and the |
| |
| 915 |
| 01:00:11,080 --> 01:00:15,060 |
| state of innocence. So here we find that the nurse |
| |
| 916 |
| 01:00:15,060 --> 01:00:19,960 |
| also has that childlike vision here because she's |
| |
| 917 |
| 01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:22,320 |
| telling children to play. Okay, just play. The |
| |
| 918 |
| 01:00:22,320 --> 01:00:25,240 |
| first one. Yeah, the nurse. You're speaking about |
| |
| 919 |
| 01:00:25,240 --> 01:00:28,500 |
| a mature person here, not only the children. She |
| |
| 920 |
| 01:00:28,500 --> 01:00:31,140 |
| has a childlike vision; she supports playing; she |
| |
| 921 |
| 01:00:31,140 --> 01:00:33,280 |
| thinks it's healthy and it's something that should |
| |
| 922 |
| 01:00:33,280 --> 01:00:36,520 |
| be done. While the nurse in the other one |
| |
| 923 |
| 01:00:36,520 --> 01:00:40,220 |
| experienced that belief that it's a waste of time. |
| |
| 924 |
| 01:00:40,660 --> 01:00:44,300 |
| And again, there is no room, no space for kids to |
| |
| 925 |
| 01:00:44,300 --> 01:00:46,580 |
| express themselves. So she doesn't have the |
| |
| 926 |
| 01:00:46,580 --> 01:00:52,000 |
| childlike vision. That's right. True. And look at |
| |
| 927 |
| 01:00:52,000 --> 01:00:54,700 |
| how the kids even, I'm imagining a situation where |
| |
| 928 |
| 01:00:54,700 --> 01:00:57,300 |
| the kids are playing, and then this nurse comes and |
| |
| 929 |
| 01:00:57,300 --> 01:01:00,260 |
| everybody starts whispering rather than laughing. |
| |
| 930 |
| 01:01:00,460 --> 01:01:02,400 |
| So they know here already that she's repressive; |
| |
| 931 |
| 01:01:02,720 --> 01:01:07,820 |
| she's going to oppress them. I'll go through and |
| |
| 932 |
| 01:01:07,820 --> 01:01:10,200 |
| then finish. I'll go through some of William |
| |
| 933 |
| 01:01:10,200 --> 01:01:15,000 |
| Blake's fascinating, by the way, if you Google "top |
|
|
| 934 |
| 01:01:15,000 --> 01:01:20,890 |
| 100 most influential British people of all time," |
| |
| 935 |
| 01:01:20,890 --> 01:01:23,870 |
| "100 most influential British people," Blake is on the |
| |
| 936 |
| 01:01:23,870 --> 01:01:28,190 |
| list. Wordsworth is not. Many people you think of |
| |
| 937 |
| 01:01:28,190 --> 01:01:30,450 |
| are not on the list. But William Blake is one of |
| |
| 938 |
| 01:01:30,450 --> 01:01:32,930 |
| the people because he's a pioneer of this |
| |
| 939 |
| 01:01:32,930 --> 01:01:37,850 |
| movement. Look at what fascinating things. If you |
| |
| 940 |
| 01:01:37,850 --> 01:01:40,330 |
| are interested in Blake, you could go for more |
| |
| 941 |
| 01:01:40,330 --> 01:01:45,070 |
| quotes or things. "Prisons are built with stones of |
|
|
| 942 |
| 01:01:45,070 --> 01:01:45,310 |
| law; |
|
|
| 943 |
| 01:01:48,630 --> 01:01:54,040 |
| brothels with bricks of religion." How this man was |
| |
| 944 |
| 01:01:54,040 --> 01:01:57,060 |
| anti-establishment. In his poem "London," you should |
| |
| 945 |
| 01:01:57,060 --> 01:02:00,620 |
| read this poem. He clearly, openly attacks the |
| |
| 946 |
| 01:02:00,620 --> 01:02:03,440 |
| establishment, the palace, and the church; how |
| |
| 947 |
| 01:02:03,440 --> 01:02:08,260 |
| they exploit people, exploit their privileges to |
| |
| 948 |
| 01:02:08,260 --> 01:02:11,340 |
| destroy people; how the law is turning people into |
| |
| 949 |
| 01:02:11,340 --> 01:02:13,900 |
| criminals; how religion here is used to turn |
| |
| 950 |
| 01:02:13,900 --> 01:02:17,440 |
| people. "Great things are done when men and |
|
|
| 951 |
| 01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:23,680 |
| mountains meet," nature. "Both read the Bible day |
|
|
| 952 |
| 01:02:23,680 --> 01:02:33,020 |
| and night, but thou read black where I read |
|
|
| 953 |
| 01:02:33,020 --> 01:02:33,380 |
| white." |
| |
| 954 |
| 01:02:39,340 --> 01:02:42,980 |
| He says the Bible is different, not because the |
| |
| 955 |
| 01:02:42,980 --> 01:02:46,270 |
| Bible is different, but because we are different. If |
| |
| 956 |
| 01:02:46,270 --> 01:02:48,610 |
| you are open-minded, if you see things, you know, |
| |
| 957 |
| 01:02:49,390 --> 01:02:51,710 |
| you see good things, positive; you look at the |
| |
| 958 |
| 01:02:51,710 --> 01:02:54,790 |
| stupid cliché of looking at the half-empty cup and the |
| |
| 959 |
| 01:02:54,790 --> 01:02:58,310 |
| half-full cup. So I read, you |
| |
| 960 |
| 01:02:58,310 --> 01:03:02,450 |
| read black because of your, you know, your mind, |
| |
| 961 |
| 01:03:02,570 --> 01:03:05,230 |
| your perception. I must—I think this |
| |
| 962 |
| 01:03:05,230 --> 01:03:07,410 |
| is the most powerful thing you need to learn about |
| |
| 963 |
| 01:03:07,410 --> 01:03:10,010 |
| William Blake. I must—look at the "must" here, not |
| |
| 964 |
| 01:03:10,010 --> 01:03:14,810 |
| "should." I must create a system; create my own |
| |
| 965 |
| 01:03:14,810 --> 01:03:18,530 |
| rules, my own constructs; or be enslaved by |
| |
| 966 |
| 01:03:18,530 --> 01:03:21,630 |
| another man's. Or else I'll be enslaved by another |
| |
| 967 |
| 01:03:21,630 --> 01:03:28,090 |
| man's rules. The three? |
| |
| 968 |
| 01:03:32,370 --> 01:03:37,130 |
| A, B. Possible, it could be common with him. But |
| |
| 969 |
| 01:03:37,130 --> 01:03:41,890 |
| different from the A, B, B, A or A, B, A, B. I |
| |
| 970 |
| 01:03:41,890 --> 01:03:44,310 |
| will not reason, but again, it's not only about |
| |
| 971 |
| 01:03:44,310 --> 01:03:45,930 |
| the rhyme scheme. The rhyme scheme is just one |
| |
| 972 |
| 01:03:45,930 --> 01:03:49,570 |
| indication. I will not reason and compare, like |
| |
| 973 |
| 01:03:49,570 --> 01:03:52,330 |
| the age of intellectuality, the age of reason, the |
| |
| 974 |
| 01:03:52,330 --> 01:03:55,730 |
| Augustan Age. My business is to create. By the |
| |
| 975 |
| 01:03:55,730 --> 01:03:58,690 |
| way, he was a famous painter. If you Google his |
| |
| 976 |
| 01:03:58,690 --> 01:04:03,190 |
| poems and look at Google images, he would be doing |
| |
| 977 |
| 01:04:03,190 --> 01:04:05,850 |
| these engravings and beautiful paintings for his |
| |
| 978 |
| 01:04:05,850 --> 01:04:11,120 |
| poems. They were very expensive. "The tree which |
|
|
| 979 |
| 01:04:11,120 --> 01:04:15,080 |
| moves some to tears of joy." Again, look at how he |
| |
| 980 |
| 01:04:15,080 --> 01:04:19,040 |
| focuses on these two states, how experience and |
| |
| 981 |
| 01:04:19,040 --> 01:04:22,900 |
| our perceptions create the world we live in. "In |
|
|
| 982 |
| 01:04:22,900 --> 01:04:27,800 |
| the eyes of others, only a green thing, only a |
|
|
| 983 |
| 01:04:27,800 --> 01:04:31,080 |
| green thing could move you." Something that happens |
| |
| 984 |
| 01:04:31,080 --> 01:04:33,120 |
| all the time. You find somebody says something, is |
| |
| 985 |
| 01:04:33,120 --> 01:04:35,860 |
| telling a story, and some people are like crying |
| |
| 986 |
| 01:04:35,860 --> 01:04:39,090 |
| their eyes out, and some people are like, "Nothing. |
|
|
| 987 |
| 01:04:39,290 --> 01:04:41,170 |
| It means nothing to them." It doesn't mean you're |
| |
| 988 |
| 01:04:41,170 --> 01:04:43,830 |
| bad. It means this time, this place is not touching |
| |
| 989 |
| 01:04:43,830 --> 01:04:45,170 |
| something new. |
| |
| 990 |
| 01:04:47,460 --> 01:04:51,640 |
| But to the eyes of the man of imagination, nature |
| |
| 991 |
| 01:04:51,640 --> 01:04:54,580 |
| is imagination itself. We see this in "words, |
|
|
| 992 |
| 01:04:54,780 --> 01:04:57,840 |
| words, words." Nature is the theme. Some people say |
| |
| 993 |
| 01:04:57,840 --> 01:04:59,680 |
| Shakespeare is using nature. "Shall I compare thee |
|
|
| 994 |
| 01:04:59,680 --> 01:05:02,180 |
| to a summer's day?" He's saying "summer's day," but |
| |
| 995 |
| 01:05:02,180 --> 01:05:05,620 |
| he's using nature to ornament his poem, to make |
| |
| 996 |
| 01:05:05,620 --> 01:05:10,060 |
| his poem as metaphors. But here nature itself is |
| |
| 997 |
| 01:05:10,060 --> 01:05:12,140 |
| the theme. Imagination itself is the theme; it's |
| |
| 998 |
| 01:05:12,140 --> 01:05:16,550 |
| not only the medium or the tool. "What is now |
|
|
| 999 |
| 01:05:16,550 --> 01:05:21,310 |
| proved was once only imagined." Beautiful. What is |
| |
| 1000 |
| 01:05:21,310 --> 01:05:24,650 |
| now proved was once imagined in somebody's |
| |
| 1001 |
| 01:05:24,650 --> 01:05:28,050 |
| imagination. "Pottery fitted." I love this very much |
| |
| 1002 |
| 01:05:28,050 --> 01:05:31,610 |
| again. "Pottery," and this clearly shows how he |
| |
| 1003 |
| 01:05:31,610 --> 01:05:34,150 |
| deliberately was saying "sorry" to the rules of |
| |
| 1004 |
| 01:05:34,150 --> 01:05:38,310 |
| decorum and classicism. "Pottery fitted." Pottery |
| |
| 1005 |
| 01:05:38,310 --> 01:05:42,900 |
| that is restrained, restricted by rules, "fitters" |
| |
| 1006 |
| 01:05:42,900 --> 01:05:46,380 |
| the human race. That's an extreme opinion. If you |
| |
| 1007 |
| 01:05:46,380 --> 01:05:49,880 |
| control poetry, if you repress poetry, restrict |
| |
| 1008 |
| 01:05:49,880 --> 01:05:53,320 |
| poetry, you restrict the human race, our imagination |
| |
| 1009 |
| 01:05:53,320 --> 01:05:58,280 |
| and our experiences. "Nations are destroyed or |
|
|
| 1010 |
| 01:05:58,280 --> 01:06:01,780 |
| flourish in proportion as their poetry, painting |
|
|
| 1011 |
| 01:06:01,780 --> 01:06:05,840 |
| and music are destroyed or flourish." This feels |
| |
| 1012 |
| 01:06:05,840 --> 01:06:09,680 |
| like somebody in the 20th century, 21st century |
| |
| 1013 |
| 01:06:09,680 --> 01:06:14,010 |
| said. This is how ahead of his time he was. This |
| |
| 1014 |
| 01:06:14,010 --> 01:06:17,930 |
| is another extract from a beautiful poem. What |
| |
| 1015 |
| 01:06:17,930 --> 01:06:22,370 |
| he's doing, "to see a world in a grain of sand and |
|
|
| 1016 |
| 01:06:22,370 --> 01:06:26,010 |
| a heaven in a wildflower; hold infinity in the |
|
|
| 1017 |
| 01:06:26,010 --> 01:06:29,430 |
| palm of your hand and eternity in an hour." |
| |
| 1018 |
| 01:06:33,400 --> 01:06:35,740 |
| When I tell the truth, it's not for the sake of |
| |
| 1019 |
| 01:06:35,740 --> 01:06:38,740 |
| convincing those who don't know it, but for the |
| |
| 1020 |
| 01:06:38,740 --> 01:06:41,820 |
| sake of defending those that do. |
| |
| 1021 |
| 01:06:45,100 --> 01:06:49,240 |
| When I tell the truth, it's not for the sake of |
| |
| 1022 |
| 01:06:49,240 --> 01:06:52,160 |
| convincing those who don't know the truth, but |
| |
| 1023 |
| 01:06:52,160 --> 01:06:54,240 |
| for the sake of convincing those who know the truth or who are |
| |
| 1024 |
| 01:06:54,240 --> 01:06:58,350 |
| willing to know the truth. Those who restrain |
| |
| 1025 |
| 01:06:58,350 --> 01:07:01,790 |
| their desires do so because their desire |
| |
| 1026 |
| 01:07:01,790 --> 01:07:07,230 |
| is weak enough to be restrained. Desires, |
| |
| 1027 |
| 01:07:07,890 --> 01:07:11,330 |
| imagination, feelings shouldn't be controlled. If |
| |
| 1028 |
| 01:07:11,330 --> 01:07:14,450 |
| the doors—again the perception issue here—if the |
| |
| 1029 |
| 01:07:14,450 --> 01:07:18,770 |
| doors of perception were cleansed, everything would |
| |
| 1030 |
| 01:07:18,770 --> 01:07:21,610 |
| appear to man as it is, infinite. |
| |
| 1031 |
| 01:07:24,800 --> 01:07:28,400 |
| And again, the city life destroys our perception, |
| |
| 1032 |
| 01:07:28,800 --> 01:07:32,480 |
| makes everything mundane, boring, repetitive. |
| |
| 1033 |
| 01:07:32,480 --> 01:07:39,740 |
| "Without contraries, there is no progression." If |
| |
| 1034 |
| 01:07:39,740 --> 01:07:44,300 |
| something is very black, it could sound very black |
| |
| 1035 |
| 01:07:44,300 --> 01:07:47,800 |
| when it's next to a very white color, or something |
| |
| 1036 |
| 01:07:47,800 --> 01:07:50,180 |
| like this, very short, very tall, and these things. |
| |
| 1037 |
| 01:07:50,970 --> 01:07:53,190 |
| And that's why he's focusing on these two states |
| |
| 1038 |
| 01:07:53,190 --> 01:07:57,270 |
| of mind. If you don't understand innocence, unless |
| |
| 1039 |
| 01:07:57,270 --> 01:08:03,610 |
| there is experience there, and vice versa. And |
| |
| 1040 |
| 01:08:03,610 --> 01:08:06,050 |
| finally, this is a very powerful statement, but it |
| |
| 1041 |
| 01:08:06,050 --> 01:08:09,850 |
| shouldn't be fixed here. "I care not whether a man |
|
|
| 1042 |
| 01:08:09,850 --> 01:08:14,950 |
| is good or evil; all that I care is whether he is |
|
|
| 1043 |
| 01:08:14,950 --> 01:08:23,480 |
| a wise man or a fool. Go put off holiness and put |
|
|
| 1044 |
| 01:08:23,480 --> 01:08:28,100 |
| on intellect. Don't disguise under an attire or a |
|
|
| 1045 |
| 01:08:28,100 --> 01:08:33,680 |
| mask of religion or goodness or whatever. All I |
|
|
| 1046 |
| 01:08:33,680 --> 01:08:37,400 |
| care about is whether you are a wise man or a fool. If you are a wise man, like if you |
|
|
| 1047 |
| 01:08:37,400 --> 01:08:41,680 |
| are a fool. |
|
|
| 1048 |
| 01:08:41,680 --> 01:08:42,300 |
| I'm stopping here. Okay, I want you to think of |
|
|
| 1049 |
| 01:08:45,010 --> 01:08:48,390 |
| possible features for William Blake and his |
|
|
| 1050 |
| 01:08:48,390 --> 01:08:53,600 |
| poetry. Read more poetry by William Blake. Many |
|
|
| 1051 |
| 01:08:53,600 --> 01:08:57,180 |
| students usually approach me and ask me, "I want to |
| |
| 1052 |
| 01:08:57,180 --> 01:09:00,080 |
| write poetry. I want to like English poetry. Where |
| |
| 1053 |
| 01:09:00,080 --> 01:09:01,940 |
| should I start?" I usually point to William Blake. |
|
|
| 1054 |
| 01:09:04,520 --> 01:09:07,420 |
| If you want to write poetry, read his many, many, |
|
|
| 1055 |
| 01:09:07,420 --> 01:09:09,220 |
| many poems. You're lucky if you're doing also the |
|
|
| 1056 |
| 01:09:09,220 --> 01:09:12,800 |
| Romantic literature course because you will be |
|
|
| 1057 |
| 01:09:12,800 --> 01:09:15,180 |
| exposed to more poems by William Blake. Thank you |
|
|
| 1058 |
| 01:09:15,180 --> 01:09:17,420 |
| very much, ladies. If you have a question, you can |
|
|
| 1059 |
| 01:09:17,420 --> 01:09:18,040 |
| stay behind. |
|
|