| 1 |
| 00:00:15,580 --> 00:00:19,700 |
| In general, the regression equation is given by |
|
|
| 2 |
| 00:00:19,700 --> 00:00:26,460 |
| this equation. Y represents the dependent variable |
|
|
| 3 |
| 00:00:26,460 --> 00:00:30,680 |
| for each observation I. Beta 0 is called |
|
|
| 4 |
| 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:35,280 |
| population Y intercept. Beta 1 is the population |
|
|
| 5 |
| 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:39,400 |
| stop coefficient. Xi is the independent variable |
|
|
| 6 |
| 00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:44,040 |
| for each observation, I. Epsilon I is the random |
|
|
| 7 |
| 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:48,420 |
| error theorem. Beta 0 plus beta 1 X is called |
|
|
| 8 |
| 00:00:48,420 --> 00:00:53,410 |
| linear component. While Y and I are random error |
|
|
| 9 |
| 00:00:53,410 --> 00:00:57,130 |
| components. So, the regression equation mainly has |
|
|
| 10 |
| 00:00:57,130 --> 00:01:01,970 |
| two components. One is linear and the other is |
|
|
| 11 |
| 00:01:01,970 --> 00:01:05,830 |
| random. In general, the expected value for this |
|
|
| 12 |
| 00:01:05,830 --> 00:01:08,810 |
| error term is zero. So, for the predicted |
|
|
| 13 |
| 00:01:08,810 --> 00:01:12,410 |
| equation, later we will see that Y hat equals B |
|
|
| 14 |
| 00:01:12,410 --> 00:01:15,930 |
| zero plus B one X.this term will be ignored |
|
|
| 15 |
| 00:01:15,930 --> 00:01:19,770 |
| because the expected value for the epsilon equals |
|
|
| 16 |
| 00:01:19,770 --> 00:01:20,850 |
| zero. |
|
|
| 17 |
| 00:01:36,460 --> 00:01:43,580 |
| So again linear component B0 plus B1 X I and the |
|
|
| 18 |
| 00:01:43,580 --> 00:01:46,860 |
| random component is the epsilon term. |
|
|
| 19 |
| 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:53,560 |
| So if we have X and Y axis, this segment is called |
|
|
| 20 |
| 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,620 |
| Y intercept which is B0. The change in y divided |
|
|
| 21 |
| 00:01:57,620 --> 00:02:01,480 |
| by change in x is called the slope. Epsilon i is |
|
|
| 22 |
| 00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:04,480 |
| the difference between the observed value of y |
|
|
| 23 |
| 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:10,400 |
| minus the expected value or the predicted value. |
|
|
| 24 |
| 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,200 |
| The observed is the actual value. So actual minus |
|
|
| 25 |
| 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,480 |
| predicted, the difference between these two values |
|
|
| 26 |
| 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:20,800 |
| is called the epsilon. So epsilon i is the |
|
|
| 27 |
| 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,460 |
| difference between the observed value of y for x, |
|
|
| 28 |
| 00:02:25,220 --> 00:02:28,820 |
| minus the predicted or the estimated value of Y |
|
|
| 29 |
| 00:02:28,820 --> 00:02:33,360 |
| for XR. So this difference actually is called the |
|
|
| 30 |
| 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:36,920 |
| error tier. So the error is just observed minus |
|
|
| 31 |
| 00:02:36,920 --> 00:02:38,240 |
| predicted. |
|
|
| 32 |
| 00:02:40,980 --> 00:02:44,540 |
| The estimated regression equation is given by Y |
|
|
| 33 |
| 00:02:44,540 --> 00:02:50,210 |
| hat equals V0 plus V1X. as i mentioned before the |
|
|
| 34 |
| 00:02:50,210 --> 00:02:53,450 |
| epsilon term is cancelled because the expected |
|
|
| 35 |
| 00:02:53,450 --> 00:02:57,590 |
| value for the epsilon equals zero here we have y |
|
|
| 36 |
| 00:02:57,590 --> 00:03:00,790 |
| hat instead of y because this one is called the |
|
|
| 37 |
| 00:03:00,790 --> 00:03:05,670 |
| estimated or the predicted value for y for the |
|
|
| 38 |
| 00:03:05,670 --> 00:03:09,670 |
| observation i for example b zero is the estimated |
|
|
| 39 |
| 00:03:09,670 --> 00:03:12,590 |
| of the regression intercept or is called y |
|
|
| 40 |
| 00:03:12,590 --> 00:03:18,030 |
| intercept b one the estimate of the regression of |
|
|
| 41 |
| 00:03:18,030 --> 00:03:21,930 |
| the slope so this is the estimated slope b1 xi |
|
|
| 42 |
| 00:03:21,930 --> 00:03:26,270 |
| again is the independent variable so x1 It means |
|
|
| 43 |
| 00:03:26,270 --> 00:03:28,630 |
| the value of the independent variable for |
|
|
| 44 |
| 00:03:28,630 --> 00:03:31,350 |
| observation number one. Now this equation is |
|
|
| 45 |
| 00:03:31,350 --> 00:03:34,530 |
| called linear regression equation or regression |
|
|
| 46 |
| 00:03:34,530 --> 00:03:37,230 |
| model. It's a straight line because here we are |
|
|
| 47 |
| 00:03:37,230 --> 00:03:41,170 |
| assuming that the relationship between x and y is |
|
|
| 48 |
| 00:03:41,170 --> 00:03:43,490 |
| linear. It could be non-linear, but we are |
|
|
| 49 |
| 00:03:43,490 --> 00:03:48,760 |
| focusing here in just linear regression. Now, the |
|
|
| 50 |
| 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,000 |
| values for B0 and B1 are given by these equations, |
|
|
| 51 |
| 00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:56,480 |
| B1 equals RSY divided by SX. So, in order to |
|
|
| 52 |
| 00:03:56,480 --> 00:04:01,040 |
| determine the values of B0 and B1, we have to know |
|
|
| 53 |
| 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:07,760 |
| first the value of R, the correlation coefficient. |
|
|
| 54 |
| 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:24,980 |
| Sx and Sy, standard deviations of x and y, as well |
|
|
| 55 |
| 00:04:24,980 --> 00:04:29,880 |
| as the means of x and y. |
|
|
| 56 |
| 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:39,500 |
| B1 equals R times Sy divided by Sx. B0 is just y |
|
|
| 57 |
| 00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:43,600 |
| bar minus b1 x bar, where Sx and Sy are the |
|
|
| 58 |
| 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:48,350 |
| standard deviations of x and y. So this, how can |
|
|
| 59 |
| 00:04:48,350 --> 00:04:53,190 |
| we compute the values of B0 and B1? Now the |
|
|
| 60 |
| 00:04:53,190 --> 00:04:59,350 |
| question is, what's our interpretation about B0 |
|
|
| 61 |
| 00:04:59,350 --> 00:05:05,030 |
| and B1? And B0, as we mentioned before, is the Y |
|
|
| 62 |
| 00:05:05,030 --> 00:05:10,510 |
| or the estimated mean value of Y when the value X |
|
|
| 63 |
| 00:05:10,510 --> 00:05:10,910 |
| is 0. |
|
|
| 64 |
| 00:05:17,420 --> 00:05:22,860 |
| So if X is 0, then Y hat equals B0. That means B0 |
|
|
| 65 |
| 00:05:22,860 --> 00:05:26,420 |
| is the estimated mean value of Y when the value of |
|
|
| 66 |
| 00:05:26,420 --> 00:05:32,280 |
| X equals 0. B1, which is called the estimated |
|
|
| 67 |
| 00:05:32,280 --> 00:05:36,880 |
| change in the mean value of Y as a result of one |
|
|
| 68 |
| 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:42,360 |
| unit change in X. That means the sign of B1, |
|
|
| 69 |
| 00:05:48,180 --> 00:05:55,180 |
| the direction of the relationship between X and Y. |
|
|
| 70 |
| 00:06:03,020 --> 00:06:09,060 |
| So the sine of B1 tells us the exact direction. It |
|
|
| 71 |
| 00:06:09,060 --> 00:06:12,300 |
| could be positive if the sine of B1 is positive or |
|
|
| 72 |
| 00:06:12,300 --> 00:06:17,040 |
| negative. on the other side. So that's the meaning |
|
|
| 73 |
| 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:22,040 |
| of B0 and B1. Now first thing we have to do in |
|
|
| 74 |
| 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:23,980 |
| order to determine if there exists linear |
|
|
| 75 |
| 00:06:23,980 --> 00:06:26,800 |
| relationship between X and Y, we have to draw |
|
|
| 76 |
| 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,620 |
| scatter plot, Y versus X. In this specific |
|
|
| 77 |
| 00:06:30,620 --> 00:06:34,740 |
| example, X is the square feet, size of the house |
|
|
| 78 |
| 00:06:34,740 --> 00:06:38,760 |
| is measured by square feet, and house selling |
|
|
| 79 |
| 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:43,220 |
| price in thousand dollars. So we have to draw Y |
|
|
| 80 |
| 00:06:43,220 --> 00:06:47,420 |
| versus X. So house price versus size of the house. |
|
|
| 81 |
| 00:06:48,140 --> 00:06:50,740 |
| Now by looking carefully at this scatter plot, |
|
|
| 82 |
| 00:06:51,340 --> 00:06:54,200 |
| even if it's a small sample size, but you can see |
|
|
| 83 |
| 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,160 |
| that there exists positive relationship between |
|
|
| 84 |
| 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:02,640 |
| house price and size of the house. The points |
|
|
| 85 |
| 00:07:03,750 --> 00:07:06,170 |
| Maybe they are close little bit to the straight |
|
|
| 86 |
| 00:07:06,170 --> 00:07:08,370 |
| line, it means there exists maybe strong |
|
|
| 87 |
| 00:07:08,370 --> 00:07:11,350 |
| relationship between X and Y. But you can tell the |
|
|
| 88 |
| 00:07:11,350 --> 00:07:15,910 |
| exact strength of the relationship by using the |
|
|
| 89 |
| 00:07:15,910 --> 00:07:19,270 |
| value of R. But here we can tell that there exists |
|
|
| 90 |
| 00:07:19,270 --> 00:07:22,290 |
| positive relationship and that relation could be |
|
|
| 91 |
| 00:07:22,290 --> 00:07:23,250 |
| strong. |
|
|
| 92 |
| 00:07:25,730 --> 00:07:31,350 |
| Now simple calculations will give B1 and B0. |
|
|
| 93 |
| 00:07:32,210 --> 00:07:37,510 |
| Suppose we know the values of R, Sy, and Sx. R, if |
|
|
| 94 |
| 00:07:37,510 --> 00:07:41,550 |
| you remember last time, R was 0.762. It's moderate |
|
|
| 95 |
| 00:07:41,550 --> 00:07:46,390 |
| relationship between X and Y. Sy and Sx, 60 |
|
|
| 96 |
| 00:07:46,390 --> 00:07:52,350 |
| divided by 4 is 117. That will give 0.109. So B0, |
|
|
| 97 |
| 00:07:53,250 --> 00:07:59,430 |
| in this case, 0.10977, B1. |
|
|
| 98 |
| 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:08,720 |
| B0 equals Y bar minus B1 X bar. B1 is computed in |
|
|
| 99 |
| 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,680 |
| the previous step, so plug that value here. In |
|
|
| 100 |
| 00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:15,440 |
| addition, we know the values of X bar and Y bar. |
|
|
| 101 |
| 00:08:15,980 --> 00:08:19,320 |
| Simple calculation will give the value of B0, |
|
|
| 102 |
| 00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:25,340 |
| which is about 98.25. After computing the values |
|
|
| 103 |
| 00:08:25,340 --> 00:08:30,600 |
| of B0 and B1, we can state the regression equation |
|
|
| 104 |
| 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:34,360 |
| by house price, the estimated value of house |
|
|
| 105 |
| 00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:39,960 |
| price. Hat in this equation means the estimated or |
|
|
| 106 |
| 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:43,860 |
| the predicted value of the house price. Equals b0 |
|
|
| 107 |
| 00:08:43,860 --> 00:08:49,980 |
| which is 98 plus b1 which is 0.10977 times square |
|
|
| 108 |
| 00:08:49,980 --> 00:08:54,420 |
| feet. Now here, by using this equation, we can |
|
|
| 109 |
| 00:08:54,420 --> 00:08:58,280 |
| tell number one. The direction of the relationship |
|
|
| 110 |
| 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:03,620 |
| between x and y, how surprised and its size. Since |
|
|
| 111 |
| 00:09:03,620 --> 00:09:05,900 |
| the sign is positive, it means there exists |
|
|
| 112 |
| 00:09:05,900 --> 00:09:09,000 |
| positive associations or relationship between |
|
|
| 113 |
| 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:12,420 |
| these two variables, number one. Number two, we |
|
|
| 114 |
| 00:09:12,420 --> 00:09:17,060 |
| can interpret carefully the meaning of the |
|
|
| 115 |
| 00:09:17,060 --> 00:09:21,340 |
| intercept. Now, as we mentioned before, y hat |
|
|
| 116 |
| 00:09:21,340 --> 00:09:25,600 |
| equals b zero only if x equals zero. Now there is |
|
|
| 117 |
| 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:28,900 |
| no sense about square feet of zero because we |
|
|
| 118 |
| 00:09:28,900 --> 00:09:32,960 |
| don't have a size of a house to be zero. But the |
|
|
| 119 |
| 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:37,880 |
| slope here is 0.109, it has sense because as the |
|
|
| 120 |
| 00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:41,450 |
| size of the house increased by one unit. it's |
|
|
| 121 |
| 00:09:41,450 --> 00:09:46,290 |
| selling price increased by this amount 0.109 but |
|
|
| 122 |
| 00:09:46,290 --> 00:09:48,990 |
| here you have to be careful to multiply this value |
|
|
| 123 |
| 00:09:48,990 --> 00:09:52,610 |
| by a thousand because the data is given in |
|
|
| 124 |
| 00:09:52,610 --> 00:09:56,830 |
| thousand dollars for Y so here as the size of the |
|
|
| 125 |
| 00:09:56,830 --> 00:10:00,590 |
| house increased by one unit by one feet one square |
|
|
| 126 |
| 00:10:00,590 --> 00:10:05,310 |
| feet it's selling price increases by this amount 0 |
|
|
| 127 |
| 00:10:05,310 --> 00:10:10,110 |
| .10977 should be multiplied by a thousand so |
|
|
| 128 |
| 00:10:10,110 --> 00:10:18,560 |
| around $109.77. So that means extra one square |
|
|
| 129 |
| 00:10:18,560 --> 00:10:24,040 |
| feet for the size of the house, it cost you around |
|
|
| 130 |
| 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:30,960 |
| $100 or $110. So that's the meaning of B1 and the |
|
|
| 131 |
| 00:10:30,960 --> 00:10:35,060 |
| sign actually of the slope. In addition to that, |
|
|
| 132 |
| 00:10:35,140 --> 00:10:39,340 |
| we can make some predictions about house price for |
|
|
| 133 |
| 00:10:39,340 --> 00:10:42,900 |
| any given value of the size of the house. That |
|
|
| 134 |
| 00:10:42,900 --> 00:10:46,940 |
| means if you know that the house size equals 2,000 |
|
|
| 135 |
| 00:10:46,940 --> 00:10:50,580 |
| square feet. So just plug this value here and |
|
|
| 136 |
| 00:10:50,580 --> 00:10:54,100 |
| simple calculation will give the predicted value |
|
|
| 137 |
| 00:10:54,100 --> 00:10:58,230 |
| of the ceiling price of a house. That's the whole |
|
|
| 138 |
| 00:10:58,230 --> 00:11:03,950 |
| story for the simple linear regression. In other |
|
|
| 139 |
| 00:11:03,950 --> 00:11:08,030 |
| words, we have this equation, so the |
|
|
| 140 |
| 00:11:08,030 --> 00:11:12,690 |
| interpretation of B0 again. B0 is the estimated |
|
|
| 141 |
| 00:11:12,690 --> 00:11:16,110 |
| mean value of Y when the value of X is 0. That |
|
|
| 142 |
| 00:11:16,110 --> 00:11:20,700 |
| means if X is 0, in this range of the observed X |
|
|
| 143 |
| 00:11:20,700 --> 00:11:24,540 |
| -values. That's the meaning of the B0. But again, |
|
|
| 144 |
| 00:11:24,820 --> 00:11:27,700 |
| because a house cannot have a square footage of |
|
|
| 145 |
| 00:11:27,700 --> 00:11:31,680 |
| zero, so B0 has no practical application. |
|
|
| 146 |
| 00:11:34,740 --> 00:11:38,760 |
| On the other hand, the interpretation for B1, B1 |
|
|
| 147 |
| 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:43,920 |
| equals 0.10977, that means B1 again estimates the |
|
|
| 148 |
| 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:46,880 |
| change in the mean value of Y as a result of one |
|
|
| 149 |
| 00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:51,160 |
| unit increase in X. In other words, since B1 |
|
|
| 150 |
| 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:55,680 |
| equals 0.10977, that tells us that the mean value |
|
|
| 151 |
| 00:11:55,680 --> 00:12:02,030 |
| of a house Increases by this amount, multiplied by |
|
|
| 152 |
| 00:12:02,030 --> 00:12:05,730 |
| 1,000 on average for each additional one square |
|
|
| 153 |
| 00:12:05,730 --> 00:12:09,690 |
| foot of size. So that's the exact interpretation |
|
|
| 154 |
| 00:12:09,690 --> 00:12:14,630 |
| about P0 and P1. For the prediction, as I |
|
|
| 155 |
| 00:12:14,630 --> 00:12:18,430 |
| mentioned, since we have this equation, and our |
|
|
| 156 |
| 00:12:18,430 --> 00:12:21,530 |
| goal is to predict the price for a house with 2 |
|
|
| 157 |
| 00:12:21,530 --> 00:12:25,450 |
| ,000 square feet, just plug this value here. |
|
|
| 158 |
| 00:12:26,450 --> 00:12:31,130 |
| Multiply this value by 0.1098, then add the result |
|
|
| 159 |
| 00:12:31,130 --> 00:12:37,750 |
| to 98.25 will give 317.85. This value should be |
|
|
| 160 |
| 00:12:37,750 --> 00:12:41,590 |
| multiplied by 1000, so the predicted price for a |
|
|
| 161 |
| 00:12:41,590 --> 00:12:49,050 |
| house with 2000 square feet is around 317,850 |
|
|
| 162 |
| 00:12:49,050 --> 00:12:54,910 |
| dollars. That's for making the prediction for |
|
|
| 163 |
| 00:12:54,910 --> 00:13:02,050 |
| selling a price. The last section in chapter 12 |
|
|
| 164 |
| 00:13:02,050 --> 00:13:07,550 |
| talks about coefficient of determination R |
|
|
| 165 |
| 00:13:07,550 --> 00:13:11,550 |
| squared. The definition for the coefficient of |
|
|
| 166 |
| 00:13:11,550 --> 00:13:16,190 |
| determination is the portion of the total |
|
|
| 167 |
| 00:13:16,190 --> 00:13:19,330 |
| variation in the dependent variable that is |
|
|
| 168 |
| 00:13:19,330 --> 00:13:21,730 |
| explained by the variation in the independent |
|
|
| 169 |
| 00:13:21,730 --> 00:13:25,130 |
| variable. Since we have two variables X and Y. |
|
|
| 170 |
| 00:13:29,510 --> 00:13:34,490 |
| And the question is, what's the portion of the |
|
|
| 171 |
| 00:13:34,490 --> 00:13:39,530 |
| total variation that can be explained by X? So the |
|
|
| 172 |
| 00:13:39,530 --> 00:13:42,030 |
| question is, what's the portion of the total |
|
|
| 173 |
| 00:13:42,030 --> 00:13:46,070 |
| variation in Y that is explained already by the |
|
|
| 174 |
| 00:13:46,070 --> 00:13:54,450 |
| variation in X? For example, suppose R² is 90%, 0 |
|
|
| 175 |
| 00:13:54,450 --> 00:13:59,770 |
| .90. That means 90% in the variation of the |
|
|
| 176 |
| 00:13:59,770 --> 00:14:05,700 |
| selling price is explained by its size. That means |
|
|
| 177 |
| 00:14:05,700 --> 00:14:12,580 |
| the size of the house contributes about 90% to |
|
|
| 178 |
| 00:14:12,580 --> 00:14:17,700 |
| explain the variability of the selling price. So |
|
|
| 179 |
| 00:14:17,700 --> 00:14:20,460 |
| we would like to have R squared to be large |
|
|
| 180 |
| 00:14:20,460 --> 00:14:26,620 |
| enough. Now, R squared for simple regression only |
|
|
| 181 |
| 00:14:26,620 --> 00:14:30,200 |
| is given by this equation, correlation between X |
|
|
| 182 |
| 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:31,100 |
| and Y squared. |
|
|
| 183 |
| 00:14:34,090 --> 00:14:36,510 |
| So if we have the correlation between X and Y and |
|
|
| 184 |
| 00:14:36,510 --> 00:14:40,070 |
| then you just square this value, that will give |
|
|
| 185 |
| 00:14:40,070 --> 00:14:42,370 |
| the correlation or the coefficient of |
|
|
| 186 |
| 00:14:42,370 --> 00:14:45,730 |
| determination. So simply, determination |
|
|
| 187 |
| 00:14:45,730 --> 00:14:49,510 |
| coefficient is just the square of the correlation |
|
|
| 188 |
| 00:14:49,510 --> 00:14:54,430 |
| between X and Y. We know that R ranges between |
|
|
| 189 |
| 00:14:54,430 --> 00:14:55,670 |
| minus 1 and plus 1. |
|
|
| 190 |
| 00:14:59,150 --> 00:15:05,590 |
| So R squared should be ranges between 0 and 1, |
|
|
| 191 |
| 00:15:06,050 --> 00:15:09,830 |
| because minus sign will be cancelled since we are |
|
|
| 192 |
| 00:15:09,830 --> 00:15:12,770 |
| squaring these values, so r squared is always |
|
|
| 193 |
| 00:15:12,770 --> 00:15:17,690 |
| between 0 and 1. So again, r squared is used to |
|
|
| 194 |
| 00:15:17,690 --> 00:15:22,430 |
| explain the portion of the total variability in |
|
|
| 195 |
| 00:15:22,430 --> 00:15:24,950 |
| the dependent variable that is already explained |
|
|
| 196 |
| 00:15:24,950 --> 00:15:31,310 |
| by the variability in x. For example, Sometimes R |
|
|
| 197 |
| 00:15:31,310 --> 00:15:36,590 |
| squared is one. R squared is one only happens if R |
|
|
| 198 |
| 00:15:36,590 --> 00:15:41,190 |
| is one or negative one. So if there exists perfect |
|
|
| 199 |
| 00:15:41,190 --> 00:15:45,490 |
| relationship either negative or positive, I mean |
|
|
| 200 |
| 00:15:45,490 --> 00:15:49,890 |
| if R is plus one or negative one, then R squared |
|
|
| 201 |
| 00:15:49,890 --> 00:15:55,130 |
| is one. That means perfect linear relationship |
|
|
| 202 |
| 00:15:55,130 --> 00:16:01,020 |
| between Y and X. Now the value. of 1 for R squared |
|
|
| 203 |
| 00:16:01,020 --> 00:16:07,040 |
| means that 100% of the variation Y is explained by |
|
|
| 204 |
| 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:11,460 |
| variation X. And that's really never happened in |
|
|
| 205 |
| 00:16:11,460 --> 00:16:15,720 |
| real life. Because R equals 1 or plus 1 or |
|
|
| 206 |
| 00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:21,140 |
| negative 1 cannot be happened in real life. So R |
|
|
| 207 |
| 00:16:21,140 --> 00:16:25,180 |
| squared always ranges between 0 and 1, never |
|
|
| 208 |
| 00:16:25,180 --> 00:16:29,500 |
| equals 1, because if R squared is 1, that means |
|
|
| 209 |
| 00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:33,440 |
| all the variation in Y is explained by the |
|
|
| 210 |
| 00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:38,220 |
| variation in X. But for sure there is an error, |
|
|
| 211 |
| 00:16:38,820 --> 00:16:41,700 |
| and that error may be due to some variables that |
|
|
| 212 |
| 00:16:41,700 --> 00:16:45,540 |
| are not included in the regression model. Maybe |
|
|
| 213 |
| 00:16:45,540 --> 00:16:50,870 |
| there is Random error in the selection, maybe the |
|
|
| 214 |
| 00:16:50,870 --> 00:16:53,210 |
| sample size is not large enough in order to |
|
|
| 215 |
| 00:16:53,210 --> 00:16:55,770 |
| determine the total variation in the dependent |
|
|
| 216 |
| 00:16:55,770 --> 00:16:58,990 |
| variable. So it makes sense that R squared will be |
|
|
| 217 |
| 00:16:58,990 --> 00:17:04,450 |
| less than 100. So generally speaking, R squared |
|
|
| 218 |
| 00:17:04,450 --> 00:17:09,870 |
| always between 0 and 1. Weaker linear relationship |
|
|
| 219 |
| 00:17:09,870 --> 00:17:15,690 |
| between X and Y, it means R squared is not 1. So |
|
|
| 220 |
| 00:17:15,690 --> 00:17:20,070 |
| R², since it lies between 0 and 1, it means sum, |
|
|
| 221 |
| 00:17:21,070 --> 00:17:24,830 |
| but not all the variation of Y is explained by the |
|
|
| 222 |
| 00:17:24,830 --> 00:17:28,410 |
| variation X. Because as mentioned before, if R |
|
|
| 223 |
| 00:17:28,410 --> 00:17:32,510 |
| squared is 90%, it means some, not all, the |
|
|
| 224 |
| 00:17:32,510 --> 00:17:35,830 |
| variation Y is explained by the variation X. And |
|
|
| 225 |
| 00:17:35,830 --> 00:17:38,590 |
| the remaining percent in this case, which is 10%, |
|
|
| 226 |
| 00:17:38,590 --> 00:17:42,790 |
| this one due to, as I mentioned, maybe there |
|
|
| 227 |
| 00:17:42,790 --> 00:17:46,490 |
| exists some other variables that affect the |
|
|
| 228 |
| 00:17:46,490 --> 00:17:52,020 |
| selling price besides its size, maybe location. of |
|
|
| 229 |
| 00:17:52,020 --> 00:17:57,900 |
| the house affects its selling price. So R squared |
|
|
| 230 |
| 00:17:57,900 --> 00:18:02,640 |
| is always between 0 and 1, it's always positive. R |
|
|
| 231 |
| 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:07,180 |
| squared equals 0, that only happens if there is no |
|
|
| 232 |
| 00:18:07,180 --> 00:18:12,620 |
| linear relationship between Y and X. Since R is 0, |
|
|
| 233 |
| 00:18:13,060 --> 00:18:17,240 |
| then R squared equals 0. That means the value of Y |
|
|
| 234 |
| 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:20,870 |
| does not depend on X. Because here, as X |
|
|
| 235 |
| 00:18:20,870 --> 00:18:26,830 |
| increases, Y stays nearly in the same position. It |
|
|
| 236 |
| 00:18:26,830 --> 00:18:30,190 |
| means as X increases, Y stays the same, constant. |
|
|
| 237 |
| 00:18:31,010 --> 00:18:33,730 |
| So that means there is no relationship or actually |
|
|
| 238 |
| 00:18:33,730 --> 00:18:37,010 |
| there is no linear relationship because it could |
|
|
| 239 |
| 00:18:37,010 --> 00:18:40,710 |
| be there exists non-linear relationship. But here |
|
|
| 240 |
| 00:18:40,710 --> 00:18:44,980 |
| we are. Just focusing on linear relationship |
|
|
| 241 |
| 00:18:44,980 --> 00:18:50,020 |
| between X and Y. So if R is zero, that means the |
|
|
| 242 |
| 00:18:50,020 --> 00:18:52,400 |
| value of Y does not depend on the value of X. So |
|
|
| 243 |
| 00:18:52,400 --> 00:18:58,360 |
| as X increases, Y is constant. Now for the |
|
|
| 244 |
| 00:18:58,360 --> 00:19:03,620 |
| previous example, R was 0.7621. To determine the |
|
|
| 245 |
| 00:19:03,620 --> 00:19:06,760 |
| coefficient of determination, One more time, |
|
|
| 246 |
| 00:19:07,460 --> 00:19:11,760 |
| square this value, that's only valid for simple |
|
|
| 247 |
| 00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:14,980 |
| linear regression. Otherwise, you cannot square |
|
|
| 248 |
| 00:19:14,980 --> 00:19:17,580 |
| the value of R in order to determine the |
|
|
| 249 |
| 00:19:17,580 --> 00:19:20,820 |
| coefficient of determination. So again, this is |
|
|
| 250 |
| 00:19:20,820 --> 00:19:26,420 |
| only true for |
|
|
| 251 |
| 00:19:26,420 --> 00:19:29,980 |
| simple linear regression. |
|
|
| 252 |
| 00:19:35,460 --> 00:19:41,320 |
| So R squared is 0.7621 squared will give 0.5808. |
|
|
| 253 |
| 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:46,120 |
| Now, the meaning of this value, first you have to |
|
|
| 254 |
| 00:19:46,120 --> 00:19:53,280 |
| multiply this by 100. So 58.08% of the variation |
|
|
| 255 |
| 00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:57,440 |
| in house prices is explained by the variation in |
|
|
| 256 |
| 00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:05,190 |
| square feet. So 58, around 0.08% of the variation |
|
|
| 257 |
| 00:20:05,190 --> 00:20:12,450 |
| in size of the house, I'm sorry, in the price is |
|
|
| 258 |
| 00:20:12,450 --> 00:20:16,510 |
| explained by |
|
|
| 259 |
| 00:20:16,510 --> 00:20:25,420 |
| its size. So size by itself. Size only explains |
|
|
| 260 |
| 00:20:25,420 --> 00:20:30,320 |
| around 50-80% of the selling price of a house. Now |
|
|
| 261 |
| 00:20:30,320 --> 00:20:35,000 |
| the remaining percent which is around, this is the |
|
|
| 262 |
| 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,860 |
| error, or the remaining percent, this one is due |
|
|
| 263 |
| 00:20:38,860 --> 00:20:50,040 |
| to other variables, other independent variables. |
|
|
| 264 |
| 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:53,820 |
| That might affect the change of price. |
|
|
| 265 |
| 00:21:04,840 --> 00:21:11,160 |
| But since the size of the house explains 58%, that |
|
|
| 266 |
| 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:15,660 |
| means it's a significant variable. Now, if we add |
|
|
| 267 |
| 00:21:15,660 --> 00:21:19,250 |
| more variables, to the regression equation for |
|
|
| 268 |
| 00:21:19,250 --> 00:21:23,950 |
| sure this value will be increased. So maybe 60 or |
|
|
| 269 |
| 00:21:23,950 --> 00:21:28,510 |
| 65 or 67 and so on. But 60% or 50 is more enough |
|
|
| 270 |
| 00:21:28,510 --> 00:21:31,870 |
| sometimes. But R squared, as R squared increases, |
|
|
| 271 |
| 00:21:32,090 --> 00:21:35,530 |
| it means we have good fit of the model. That means |
|
|
| 272 |
| 00:21:35,530 --> 00:21:41,230 |
| the model is accurate to determine or to make some |
|
|
| 273 |
| 00:21:41,230 --> 00:21:46,430 |
| prediction. So that's for the coefficient of |
|
|
| 274 |
| 00:21:46,430 --> 00:21:58,350 |
| determination. Any question? So we covered simple |
|
|
| 275 |
| 00:21:58,350 --> 00:22:01,790 |
| linear regression model. We know now how can we |
|
|
| 276 |
| 00:22:01,790 --> 00:22:06,390 |
| compute the values of B0 and B1. We can state or |
|
|
| 277 |
| 00:22:06,390 --> 00:22:10,550 |
| write the regression equation, and we can do some |
|
|
| 278 |
| 00:22:10,550 --> 00:22:14,370 |
| interpretation about P0 and P1, making |
|
|
| 279 |
| 00:22:14,370 --> 00:22:21,530 |
| predictions, and make some comments about the |
|
|
| 280 |
| 00:22:21,530 --> 00:22:27,390 |
| coefficient of determination. That's all. So I'm |
|
|
| 281 |
| 00:22:27,390 --> 00:22:31,910 |
| going to stop now, and I will give some time to |
|
|
| 282 |
| 00:22:31,910 --> 00:22:33,030 |
| discuss some practice. |
|
|
|
|