| 1 |
| 00:00:11,020 --> 00:00:13,920 |
| The last chapter we are going to talk in this |
|
|
| 2 |
| 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,820 |
| semester is correlation and simple linearization. |
|
|
| 3 |
| 00:00:18,380 --> 00:00:23,300 |
| So we are going to explain two types in chapter |
|
|
| 4 |
| 00:00:23,300 --> 00:00:29,280 |
| 12. One is called correlation. And the other type |
|
|
| 5 |
| 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:33,500 |
| is simple linear regression. Maybe this chapter |
|
|
| 6 |
| 00:00:33,500 --> 00:00:40,020 |
| I'm going to spend about two lectures in order to |
|
|
| 7 |
| 00:00:40,020 --> 00:00:45,000 |
| cover these objectives. The first objective is to |
|
|
| 8 |
| 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:48,810 |
| calculate the coefficient of correlation. The |
|
|
| 9 |
| 00:00:48,810 --> 00:00:51,210 |
| second objective, the meaning of the regression |
|
|
| 10 |
| 00:00:51,210 --> 00:00:55,590 |
| coefficients beta 0 and beta 1. And the last |
|
|
| 11 |
| 00:00:55,590 --> 00:00:58,710 |
| objective is how to use regression analysis to |
|
|
| 12 |
| 00:00:58,710 --> 00:01:03,030 |
| predict the value of dependent variable based on |
|
|
| 13 |
| 00:01:03,030 --> 00:01:06,010 |
| an independent variable. It looks like that we |
|
|
| 14 |
| 00:01:06,010 --> 00:01:10,590 |
| have discussed objective number one in chapter |
|
|
| 15 |
| 00:01:10,590 --> 00:01:16,470 |
| three. So calculation of the correlation |
|
|
| 16 |
| 00:01:16,470 --> 00:01:20,740 |
| coefficient is done in chapter three, but here |
|
|
| 17 |
| 00:01:20,740 --> 00:01:26,060 |
| we'll give some details about correlation also. A |
|
|
| 18 |
| 00:01:26,060 --> 00:01:28,480 |
| scatter plot can be used to show the relationship |
|
|
| 19 |
| 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:31,540 |
| between two variables. For example, imagine that |
|
|
| 20 |
| 00:01:31,540 --> 00:01:35,400 |
| we have a random sample of 10 children. |
|
|
| 21 |
| 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:47,940 |
| And we have data on their weights and ages. And we |
|
|
| 22 |
| 00:01:47,940 --> 00:01:51,640 |
| are interested to examine the relationship between |
|
|
| 23 |
| 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:58,400 |
| weights and age. For example, suppose child number |
|
|
| 24 |
| 00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:06,260 |
| one, his |
|
|
| 25 |
| 00:02:06,260 --> 00:02:12,060 |
| or her age is two years with weight, for example, |
|
|
| 26 |
| 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:12,880 |
| eight kilograms. |
|
|
| 27 |
| 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,880 |
| His weight or her weight is four years, and his or |
|
|
| 28 |
| 00:02:21,880 --> 00:02:24,500 |
| her weight is, for example, 15 kilograms, and so |
|
|
| 29 |
| 00:02:24,500 --> 00:02:29,680 |
| on. And again, we are interested to examine the |
|
|
| 30 |
| 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,640 |
| relationship between age and weight. Maybe they |
|
|
| 31 |
| 00:02:32,640 --> 00:02:37,400 |
| exist sometimes. positive relationship between the |
|
|
| 32 |
| 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:41,100 |
| two variables that means if one variable increases |
|
|
| 33 |
| 00:02:41,100 --> 00:02:45,260 |
| the other one also increase if one variable |
|
|
| 34 |
| 00:02:45,260 --> 00:02:47,980 |
| increases the other will also decrease so they |
|
|
| 35 |
| 00:02:47,980 --> 00:02:52,980 |
| have the same direction either up or down so we |
|
|
| 36 |
| 00:02:52,980 --> 00:02:58,140 |
| have to know number one the form of the |
|
|
| 37 |
| 00:02:58,140 --> 00:03:02,140 |
| relationship this one could be linear here we |
|
|
| 38 |
| 00:03:02,140 --> 00:03:06,890 |
| focus just on linear relationship between X and Y. |
|
|
| 39 |
| 00:03:08,050 --> 00:03:13,730 |
| The second, we have to know the direction of the |
|
|
| 40 |
| 00:03:13,730 --> 00:03:21,270 |
| relationship. This direction might be positive or |
|
|
| 41 |
| 00:03:21,270 --> 00:03:22,350 |
| negative relationship. |
|
|
| 42 |
| 00:03:25,150 --> 00:03:27,990 |
| In addition to that, we have to know the strength |
|
|
| 43 |
| 00:03:27,990 --> 00:03:33,760 |
| of the relationship between the two variables of |
|
|
| 44 |
| 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:37,320 |
| interest the strength can be classified into three |
|
|
| 45 |
| 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:46,480 |
| categories either strong, moderate or there exists |
|
|
| 46 |
| 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:50,580 |
| a weak relationship so it could be positive |
|
|
| 47 |
| 00:03:50,580 --> 00:03:53,320 |
| -strong, positive-moderate or positive-weak, the |
|
|
| 48 |
| 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:58,360 |
| same for negative so by using scatter plot we can |
|
|
| 49 |
| 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:02,530 |
| determine the form either linear or non-linear, |
|
|
| 50 |
| 00:04:02,690 --> 00:04:06,130 |
| but here we are focusing on just linear |
|
|
| 51 |
| 00:04:06,130 --> 00:04:10,310 |
| relationship. Also, we can determine the direction |
|
|
| 52 |
| 00:04:10,310 --> 00:04:12,870 |
| of the relationship. We can say there exists |
|
|
| 53 |
| 00:04:12,870 --> 00:04:15,910 |
| positive or negative based on the scatter plot. |
|
|
| 54 |
| 00:04:16,710 --> 00:04:19,530 |
| Also, we can know the strength of the |
|
|
| 55 |
| 00:04:19,530 --> 00:04:23,130 |
| relationship, either strong, moderate or weak. For |
|
|
| 56 |
| 00:04:23,130 --> 00:04:29,810 |
| example, suppose we have again weights and ages. |
|
|
| 57 |
| 00:04:30,390 --> 00:04:33,590 |
| And we know that there are two types of variables |
|
|
| 58 |
| 00:04:33,590 --> 00:04:36,710 |
| in this case. One is called dependent and the |
|
|
| 59 |
| 00:04:36,710 --> 00:04:41,330 |
| other is independent. So if we, as we explained |
|
|
| 60 |
| 00:04:41,330 --> 00:04:47,890 |
| before, is the dependent variable and A is |
|
|
| 61 |
| 00:04:47,890 --> 00:04:48,710 |
| independent variable. |
|
|
| 62 |
| 00:04:52,690 --> 00:04:57,270 |
| Always dependent |
|
|
| 63 |
| 00:04:57,270 --> 00:04:57,750 |
| variable |
|
|
| 64 |
| 00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:05,560 |
| is denoted by Y and always on the vertical axis so |
|
|
| 65 |
| 00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:11,300 |
| here we have weight and independent variable is |
|
|
| 66 |
| 00:05:11,300 --> 00:05:17,760 |
| denoted by X and X is in the X axis or horizontal |
|
|
| 67 |
| 00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:26,300 |
| axis now scatter plot for example here child with |
|
|
| 68 |
| 00:05:26,300 --> 00:05:30,820 |
| age 2 years his weight is 8 So two years, for |
|
|
| 69 |
| 00:05:30,820 --> 00:05:36,760 |
| example, this is eight. So this star represents |
|
|
| 70 |
| 00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:42,320 |
| the first pair of observation, age of two and |
|
|
| 71 |
| 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:46,820 |
| weight of eight. The other child, his weight is |
|
|
| 72 |
| 00:05:46,820 --> 00:05:52,860 |
| four years, and the corresponding weight is 15. |
|
|
| 73 |
| 00:05:53,700 --> 00:05:58,970 |
| For example, this value is 15. The same for the |
|
|
| 74 |
| 00:05:58,970 --> 00:06:02,430 |
| other points. Here we can know the direction. |
|
|
| 75 |
| 00:06:04,910 --> 00:06:10,060 |
| In this case they exist. Positive. Form is linear. |
|
|
| 76 |
| 00:06:12,100 --> 00:06:16,860 |
| Strong or weak or moderate depends on how these |
|
|
| 77 |
| 00:06:16,860 --> 00:06:20,260 |
| values are close to the straight line. Closer |
|
|
| 78 |
| 00:06:20,260 --> 00:06:24,380 |
| means stronger. So if the points are closer to the |
|
|
| 79 |
| 00:06:24,380 --> 00:06:26,620 |
| straight line, it means there exists stronger |
|
|
| 80 |
| 00:06:26,620 --> 00:06:30,800 |
| relationship between the two variables. So closer |
|
|
| 81 |
| 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:34,480 |
| means stronger, either positive or negative. In |
|
|
| 82 |
| 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:37,580 |
| this case, there exists positive. Now for the |
|
|
| 83 |
| 00:06:37,580 --> 00:06:42,360 |
| negative association or relationship, we have the |
|
|
| 84 |
| 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:46,060 |
| other direction, it could be this one. So in this |
|
|
| 85 |
| 00:06:46,060 --> 00:06:49,460 |
| case there exists linear but negative |
|
|
| 86 |
| 00:06:49,460 --> 00:06:51,900 |
| relationship, and this negative could be positive |
|
|
| 87 |
| 00:06:51,900 --> 00:06:56,100 |
| or negative, it depends on the points. So it's |
|
|
| 88 |
| 00:06:56,100 --> 00:07:02,660 |
| positive relationship. The other direction is |
|
|
| 89 |
| 00:07:02,660 --> 00:07:06,460 |
| negative. So the points, if the points are closed, |
|
|
| 90 |
| 00:07:06,820 --> 00:07:10,160 |
| then we can say there exists strong negative |
|
|
| 91 |
| 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:14,440 |
| relationship. So by using scatter plot, we can |
|
|
| 92 |
| 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:17,280 |
| determine all of these. |
|
|
| 93 |
| 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,460 |
| and direction and strength now here the two |
|
|
| 94 |
| 00:07:24,460 --> 00:07:27,060 |
| variables we are talking about are numerical |
|
|
| 95 |
| 00:07:27,060 --> 00:07:30,480 |
| variables so the two variables here are numerical |
|
|
| 96 |
| 00:07:30,480 --> 00:07:35,220 |
| variables so we are talking about quantitative |
|
|
| 97 |
| 00:07:35,220 --> 00:07:39,850 |
| variables but remember in chapter 11 We talked |
|
|
| 98 |
| 00:07:39,850 --> 00:07:43,150 |
| about the relationship between two qualitative |
|
|
| 99 |
| 00:07:43,150 --> 00:07:47,450 |
| variables. So we use chi-square test. Here we are |
|
|
| 100 |
| 00:07:47,450 --> 00:07:49,630 |
| talking about something different. We are talking |
|
|
| 101 |
| 00:07:49,630 --> 00:07:52,890 |
| about numerical variables. So we can use scatter |
|
|
| 102 |
| 00:07:52,890 --> 00:07:58,510 |
| plot, number one. Next correlation analysis is |
|
|
| 103 |
| 00:07:58,510 --> 00:08:02,090 |
| used to measure the strength of the association |
|
|
| 104 |
| 00:08:02,090 --> 00:08:05,190 |
| between two variables. And here again, we are just |
|
|
| 105 |
| 00:08:05,190 --> 00:08:09,560 |
| talking about linear relationship. So this chapter |
|
|
| 106 |
| 00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:13,340 |
| just covers the linear relationship between the |
|
|
| 107 |
| 00:08:13,340 --> 00:08:17,040 |
| two variables. Because sometimes there exists non |
|
|
| 108 |
| 00:08:17,040 --> 00:08:23,180 |
| -linear relationship between the two variables. So |
|
|
| 109 |
| 00:08:23,180 --> 00:08:26,120 |
| correlation is only concerned with the strength of |
|
|
| 110 |
| 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:30,500 |
| the relationship. No causal effect is implied with |
|
|
| 111 |
| 00:08:30,500 --> 00:08:35,220 |
| correlation. We just say that X affects Y, or X |
|
|
| 112 |
| 00:08:35,220 --> 00:08:39,580 |
| explains the variation in Y. Scatter plots were |
|
|
| 113 |
| 00:08:39,580 --> 00:08:43,720 |
| first presented in Chapter 2, and we skipped, if |
|
|
| 114 |
| 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:48,480 |
| you remember, Chapter 2. And it's easy to make |
|
|
| 115 |
| 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:52,620 |
| scatter plots for Y versus X. In Chapter 3, we |
|
|
| 116 |
| 00:08:52,620 --> 00:08:56,440 |
| talked about correlation, so correlation was first |
|
|
| 117 |
| 00:08:56,440 --> 00:09:00,060 |
| presented in Chapter 3. But here I will give just |
|
|
| 118 |
| 00:09:00,060 --> 00:09:07,240 |
| a review for computation about correlation |
|
|
| 119 |
| 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:11,460 |
| coefficient or coefficient of correlation. First, |
|
|
| 120 |
| 00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:15,680 |
| coefficient of correlation measures the relative |
|
|
| 121 |
| 00:09:15,680 --> 00:09:19,920 |
| strength of the linear relationship between two |
|
|
| 122 |
| 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:23,740 |
| numerical variables. So here, we are talking about |
|
|
| 123 |
| 00:09:23,740 --> 00:09:28,080 |
| numerical variables. Sample correlation |
|
|
| 124 |
| 00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:31,500 |
| coefficient is given by this equation. which is |
|
|
| 125 |
| 00:09:31,500 --> 00:09:36,180 |
| sum of the product of xi minus x bar, yi minus y |
|
|
| 126 |
| 00:09:36,180 --> 00:09:41,100 |
| bar, divided by n minus 1 times standard deviation |
|
|
| 127 |
| 00:09:41,100 --> 00:09:44,960 |
| of x times standard deviation of y. We know that x |
|
|
| 128 |
| 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:47,240 |
| bar and y bar are the means of x and y |
|
|
| 129 |
| 00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:51,360 |
| respectively. And Sx, Sy are the standard |
|
|
| 130 |
| 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:55,540 |
| deviations of x and y values. And we know this |
|
|
| 131 |
| 00:09:55,540 --> 00:09:58,460 |
| equation before. But there is another equation |
|
|
| 132 |
| 00:09:58,460 --> 00:10:05,330 |
| that one can be used For computation, which is |
|
|
| 133 |
| 00:10:05,330 --> 00:10:09,290 |
| called shortcut formula, which is just sum of xy |
|
|
| 134 |
| 00:10:09,290 --> 00:10:15,310 |
| minus n times x bar y bar divided by square root |
|
|
| 135 |
| 00:10:15,310 --> 00:10:18,690 |
| of this quantity. And we know this equation from |
|
|
| 136 |
| 00:10:18,690 --> 00:10:23,650 |
| chapter three. Now again, x bar and y bar are the |
|
|
| 137 |
| 00:10:23,650 --> 00:10:30,060 |
| means. Now the question is, Do outliers affect the |
|
|
| 138 |
| 00:10:30,060 --> 00:10:36,440 |
| correlation? For sure, yes. Because this formula |
|
|
| 139 |
| 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:39,940 |
| actually based on the means and the standard |
|
|
| 140 |
| 00:10:39,940 --> 00:10:44,300 |
| deviations, and these two measures are affected by |
|
|
| 141 |
| 00:10:44,300 --> 00:10:47,880 |
| outliers. So since R is a function of these two |
|
|
| 142 |
| 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:51,340 |
| statistics, the means and standard deviations, |
|
|
| 143 |
| 00:10:51,940 --> 00:10:54,280 |
| then outliers will affect the value of the |
|
|
| 144 |
| 00:10:54,280 --> 00:10:55,940 |
| correlation coefficient. |
|
|
| 145 |
| 00:10:57,890 --> 00:11:01,170 |
| Some features about the coefficient of |
|
|
| 146 |
| 00:11:01,170 --> 00:11:09,570 |
| correlation. Here rho is the population |
|
|
| 147 |
| 00:11:09,570 --> 00:11:13,210 |
| coefficient of correlation, and R is the sample |
|
|
| 148 |
| 00:11:13,210 --> 00:11:17,730 |
| coefficient of correlation. Either rho or R have |
|
|
| 149 |
| 00:11:17,730 --> 00:11:21,390 |
| the following features. Number one, unity free. It |
|
|
| 150 |
| 00:11:21,390 --> 00:11:24,890 |
| means R has no units. For example, here we are |
|
|
| 151 |
| 00:11:24,890 --> 00:11:28,820 |
| talking about whales. And weight in kilograms, |
|
|
| 152 |
| 00:11:29,300 --> 00:11:33,700 |
| ages in years. And for example, suppose the |
|
|
| 153 |
| 00:11:33,700 --> 00:11:37,080 |
| correlation between these two variables is 0.8. |
|
|
| 154 |
| 00:11:38,620 --> 00:11:41,760 |
| It's unity free, so it's just 0.8. So there is no |
|
|
| 155 |
| 00:11:41,760 --> 00:11:45,640 |
| unit. You cannot say 0.8 kilogram per year or |
|
|
| 156 |
| 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:51,040 |
| whatever it is. So just 0.8. So the first feature |
|
|
| 157 |
| 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:53,360 |
| of the correlation coefficient is unity-free. |
|
|
| 158 |
| 00:11:54,180 --> 00:11:56,340 |
| Number two ranges between negative one and plus |
|
|
| 159 |
| 00:11:56,340 --> 00:12:00,380 |
| one. So R is always, or rho, is always between |
|
|
| 160 |
| 00:12:00,380 --> 00:12:04,560 |
| minus one and plus one. So minus one smaller than |
|
|
| 161 |
| 00:12:04,560 --> 00:12:07,340 |
| or equal to R smaller than or equal to plus one. |
|
|
| 162 |
| 00:12:07,420 --> 00:12:11,420 |
| So R is always in this range. So R cannot be |
|
|
| 163 |
| 00:12:11,420 --> 00:12:15,260 |
| smaller than negative one or greater than plus |
|
|
| 164 |
| 00:12:15,260 --> 00:12:20,310 |
| one. The closer to minus one or negative one, the |
|
|
| 165 |
| 00:12:20,310 --> 00:12:23,130 |
| stronger negative relationship between or linear |
|
|
| 166 |
| 00:12:23,130 --> 00:12:26,770 |
| relationship between x and y. So, for example, if |
|
|
| 167 |
| 00:12:26,770 --> 00:12:33,370 |
| R is negative 0.85 or R is negative 0.8. Now, this |
|
|
| 168 |
| 00:12:33,370 --> 00:12:39,690 |
| value is closer to minus one than negative 0.8. So |
|
|
| 169 |
| 00:12:39,690 --> 00:12:43,230 |
| negative 0.85 is stronger than negative 0.8. |
|
|
| 170 |
| 00:12:44,590 --> 00:12:48,470 |
| Because we are looking for closer to minus 1. |
|
|
| 171 |
| 00:12:49,570 --> 00:12:55,310 |
| Minus 0.8, the value itself is greater than minus |
|
|
| 172 |
| 00:12:55,310 --> 00:12:59,610 |
| 0.85. But this value is closer to minus 1 than |
|
|
| 173 |
| 00:12:59,610 --> 00:13:03,790 |
| minus 0.8. So we can say that this relationship is |
|
|
| 174 |
| 00:13:03,790 --> 00:13:05,070 |
| stronger than the other one. |
|
|
| 175 |
| 00:13:07,870 --> 00:13:11,730 |
| Also, the closer to plus 1, the stronger the |
|
|
| 176 |
| 00:13:11,730 --> 00:13:16,040 |
| positive linear relationship. Here, suppose R is 0 |
|
|
| 177 |
| 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:22,740 |
| .7 and another R is 0.8. 0.8 is closer to plus one |
|
|
| 178 |
| 00:13:22,740 --> 00:13:26,740 |
| than 0.7, so 0.8 is stronger. This one makes |
|
|
| 179 |
| 00:13:26,740 --> 00:13:31,800 |
| sense. The closer to zero, the weaker relationship |
|
|
| 180 |
| 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:35,420 |
| between the two variables. For example, suppose R |
|
|
| 181 |
| 00:13:35,420 --> 00:13:40,720 |
| is plus or minus 0.05. This value is very close to |
|
|
| 182 |
| 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:44,420 |
| zero. It means there exists weak. relationship. |
|
|
| 183 |
| 00:13:44,980 --> 00:13:47,960 |
| Sometimes we can say that there exists moderate |
|
|
| 184 |
| 00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:57,080 |
| relationship if R is close to 0.5. So it could be |
|
|
| 185 |
| 00:13:57,080 --> 00:14:01,360 |
| classified into these groups closer to minus 1, |
|
|
| 186 |
| 00:14:01,500 --> 00:14:06,220 |
| closer to 1, 0.5 or 0. So we can know the |
|
|
| 187 |
| 00:14:06,220 --> 00:14:11,680 |
| direction by the sign of R negative it means |
|
|
| 188 |
| 00:14:11,680 --> 00:14:14,320 |
| because here our ranges as we mentioned between |
|
|
| 189 |
| 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:19,520 |
| minus one and plus one here zero so this these |
|
|
| 190 |
| 00:14:19,520 --> 00:14:24,560 |
| values it means there exists negative above zero |
|
|
| 191 |
| 00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:26,760 |
| all the way up to one it means there exists |
|
|
| 192 |
| 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:31,020 |
| positive relationship between the two variables so |
|
|
| 193 |
| 00:14:31,020 --> 00:14:35,520 |
| the sign gives the direction of the relationship |
|
|
| 194 |
| 00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:40,840 |
| The absolute value gives the strength of the |
|
|
| 195 |
| 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:43,500 |
| relationship between the two variables. So the |
|
|
| 196 |
| 00:14:43,500 --> 00:14:49,260 |
| same as we had discussed before. Now, some types |
|
|
| 197 |
| 00:14:49,260 --> 00:14:51,880 |
| of scatter plots for different types of |
|
|
| 198 |
| 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,740 |
| relationship between the two variables is |
|
|
| 199 |
| 00:14:54,740 --> 00:14:59,100 |
| presented in this slide. For example, if you look |
|
|
| 200 |
| 00:14:59,100 --> 00:15:03,940 |
| carefully at figure one here, sharp one, this one, |
|
|
| 201 |
| 00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:13,020 |
| and the other one, In each one, all points are |
|
|
| 202 |
| 00:15:13,020 --> 00:15:15,820 |
| on the straight line, it means they exist perfect. |
|
|
| 203 |
| 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:21,720 |
| So if all points fall exactly on the straight |
|
|
| 204 |
| 00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:24,220 |
| line, it means they exist perfect. |
|
|
| 205 |
| 00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:35,160 |
| Here there exists perfect negative. So this is |
|
|
| 206 |
| 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:37,740 |
| perfect negative relationship. The other one |
|
|
| 207 |
| 00:15:37,740 --> 00:15:41,240 |
| perfect positive relationship. In reality you will |
|
|
| 208 |
| 00:15:41,240 --> 00:15:45,680 |
| never see something |
|
|
| 209 |
| 00:15:45,680 --> 00:15:49,380 |
| like perfect positive or perfect negative. Maybe |
|
|
| 210 |
| 00:15:49,380 --> 00:15:53,270 |
| in real situation. In real situation, most of the |
|
|
| 211 |
| 00:15:53,270 --> 00:15:56,730 |
| time, R is close to 0.9 or 0.85 or something like |
|
|
| 212 |
| 00:15:56,730 --> 00:16:02,070 |
| that, but it's not exactly equal one. Because |
|
|
| 213 |
| 00:16:02,070 --> 00:16:05,330 |
| equal one, it means if you know the value of a |
|
|
| 214 |
| 00:16:05,330 --> 00:16:08,630 |
| child's age, then you can predict the exact |
|
|
| 215 |
| 00:16:08,630 --> 00:16:13,510 |
| weight. And that never happened. If the data looks |
|
|
| 216 |
| 00:16:13,510 --> 00:16:18,770 |
| like this table, for example. Suppose here we have |
|
|
| 217 |
| 00:16:18,770 --> 00:16:25,750 |
| age and weight. H1 for example 3, 5, 7 weight for |
|
|
| 218 |
| 00:16:25,750 --> 00:16:32,450 |
| example 10, 12, 14, 16 in this case they exist |
|
|
| 219 |
| 00:16:32,450 --> 00:16:37,610 |
| perfect because x increases by 2 units also |
|
|
| 220 |
| 00:16:37,610 --> 00:16:41,910 |
| weights increases by 2 units or maybe weights for |
|
|
| 221 |
| 00:16:41,910 --> 00:16:50,180 |
| example 9, 12, 15, 18 and so on So X or A is |
|
|
| 222 |
| 00:16:50,180 --> 00:16:53,260 |
| increased by two units for each value for each |
|
|
| 223 |
| 00:16:53,260 --> 00:16:58,860 |
| individual and also weights are increased by three |
|
|
| 224 |
| 00:16:58,860 --> 00:17:03,080 |
| units for each person. In this case there exists |
|
|
| 225 |
| 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:06,820 |
| perfect relationship but that never happened in |
|
|
| 226 |
| 00:17:06,820 --> 00:17:13,300 |
| real life. So perfect means all points are lie on |
|
|
| 227 |
| 00:17:13,300 --> 00:17:16,260 |
| the straight line otherwise if the points are |
|
|
| 228 |
| 00:17:16,260 --> 00:17:21,230 |
| close Then we can say there exists strong. Here if |
|
|
| 229 |
| 00:17:21,230 --> 00:17:24,750 |
| you look carefully at these points corresponding |
|
|
| 230 |
| 00:17:24,750 --> 00:17:30,150 |
| to this regression line, it looks like not strong |
|
|
| 231 |
| 00:17:30,150 --> 00:17:32,630 |
| because some of the points are not closed, so you |
|
|
| 232 |
| 00:17:32,630 --> 00:17:35,450 |
| can say there exists maybe moderate negative |
|
|
| 233 |
| 00:17:35,450 --> 00:17:39,530 |
| relationship. This one, most of the points are |
|
|
| 234 |
| 00:17:39,530 --> 00:17:42,390 |
| scattered away from the straight line, so there |
|
|
| 235 |
| 00:17:42,390 --> 00:17:46,930 |
| exists weak relationship. So by just looking at |
|
|
| 236 |
| 00:17:46,930 --> 00:17:50,290 |
| the scatter path, sometimes you can, sometimes |
|
|
| 237 |
| 00:17:50,290 --> 00:17:53,290 |
| it's hard to tell, but most of the time you can |
|
|
| 238 |
| 00:17:53,290 --> 00:17:58,250 |
| tell at least the direction, positive or negative, |
|
|
| 239 |
| 00:17:59,410 --> 00:18:04,150 |
| the form, linear or non-linear, or the strength of |
|
|
| 240 |
| 00:18:04,150 --> 00:18:09,100 |
| the relationship. The last one here, now x |
|
|
| 241 |
| 00:18:09,100 --> 00:18:13,800 |
| increases, y remains the same. For example, |
|
|
| 242 |
| 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:18,580 |
| suppose x is 1, y is 10. x increases to 2, y still |
|
|
| 243 |
| 00:18:18,580 --> 00:18:22,220 |
| is 10. So as x increases, y stays the same |
|
|
| 244 |
| 00:18:22,220 --> 00:18:26,140 |
| position, it means there is no linear relationship |
|
|
| 245 |
| 00:18:26,140 --> 00:18:28,900 |
| between the two variables. So based on the scatter |
|
|
| 246 |
| 00:18:28,900 --> 00:18:33,240 |
| plot you can have an idea about the relationship |
|
|
| 247 |
| 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:37,800 |
| between the two variables. Here I will give a |
|
|
| 248 |
| 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:41,120 |
| simple example in order to determine the |
|
|
| 249 |
| 00:18:41,120 --> 00:18:45,160 |
| correlation coefficient. A real estate agent |
|
|
| 250 |
| 00:18:45,160 --> 00:18:50,380 |
| wishes to examine the relationship between selling |
|
|
| 251 |
| 00:18:50,380 --> 00:18:54,580 |
| the price of a home and its size measured in |
|
|
| 252 |
| 00:18:54,580 --> 00:18:57,140 |
| square feet. So in this case, there are two |
|
|
| 253 |
| 00:18:57,140 --> 00:19:02,400 |
| variables of interest. One is called selling price |
|
|
| 254 |
| 00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:13,720 |
| of a home. So here, selling price of a home and |
|
|
| 255 |
| 00:19:13,720 --> 00:19:18,020 |
| its size. Now, selling price in $1,000. |
|
|
| 256 |
| 00:19:25,360 --> 00:19:29,380 |
| And size in feet squared. Here we have to |
|
|
| 257 |
| 00:19:29,380 --> 00:19:35,640 |
| distinguish between dependent and independent. So |
|
|
| 258 |
| 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:39,740 |
| your dependent variable is house price, sometimes |
|
|
| 259 |
| 00:19:39,740 --> 00:19:41,620 |
| called response variable. |
|
|
| 260 |
| 00:19:45,750 --> 00:19:49,490 |
| The independent variable is the size, which is in |
|
|
| 261 |
| 00:19:49,490 --> 00:19:54,570 |
| square feet, sometimes called sub-planetary |
|
|
| 262 |
| 00:19:54,570 --> 00:19:54,850 |
| variable. |
|
|
| 263 |
| 00:19:59,570 --> 00:20:06,370 |
| So my Y is ceiling rise, and size is square feet, |
|
|
| 264 |
| 00:20:07,530 --> 00:20:12,910 |
| or size of the house. In this case, there are 10. |
|
|
| 265 |
| 00:20:14,290 --> 00:20:17,890 |
| It's sample size is 10. So the first house with |
|
|
| 266 |
| 00:20:17,890 --> 00:20:26,850 |
| size 1,400 square feet, it's selling price is 245 |
|
|
| 267 |
| 00:20:26,850 --> 00:20:31,670 |
| multiplied by 1,000. Because these values are in |
|
|
| 268 |
| 00:20:31,670 --> 00:20:37,950 |
| $1,000. Now based on this data, you can first plot |
|
|
| 269 |
| 00:20:37,950 --> 00:20:46,590 |
| the scatterplot of house price In Y direction, the |
|
|
| 270 |
| 00:20:46,590 --> 00:20:51,870 |
| vertical direction. So here is house. And rise. |
|
|
| 271 |
| 00:20:54,230 --> 00:21:01,470 |
| And size in the X axis. You will get this scatter |
|
|
| 272 |
| 00:21:01,470 --> 00:21:07,370 |
| plot. Now, the data here is just 10 points, so |
|
|
| 273 |
| 00:21:07,370 --> 00:21:12,590 |
| sometimes it's hard to tell. the relationship |
|
|
| 274 |
| 00:21:12,590 --> 00:21:15,510 |
| between the two variables if your data is small. |
|
|
| 275 |
| 00:21:16,510 --> 00:21:21,170 |
| But just this example for illustration. But at |
|
|
| 276 |
| 00:21:21,170 --> 00:21:25,370 |
| least you can determine that there exists linear |
|
|
| 277 |
| 00:21:25,370 --> 00:21:28,810 |
| relationship between the two variables. It is |
|
|
| 278 |
| 00:21:28,810 --> 00:21:35,490 |
| positive. So the form is linear. Direction is |
|
|
| 279 |
| 00:21:35,490 --> 00:21:41,880 |
| positive. Weak or strong or moderate. Sometimes |
|
|
| 280 |
| 00:21:41,880 --> 00:21:45,620 |
| it's not easy to tell if it is strong or moderate. |
|
|
| 281 |
| 00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:50,120 |
| Now if you look at these points, some of them are |
|
|
| 282 |
| 00:21:50,120 --> 00:21:53,700 |
| close to the straight line and others are away |
|
|
| 283 |
| 00:21:53,700 --> 00:21:56,700 |
| from the straight line. So maybe there exists |
|
|
| 284 |
| 00:21:56,700 --> 00:22:02,720 |
| moderate for example, but you cannot say strong. |
|
|
| 285 |
| 00:22:03,930 --> 00:22:08,210 |
| Here, strong it means the points are close to the |
|
|
| 286 |
| 00:22:08,210 --> 00:22:11,890 |
| straight line. Sometimes it's hard to tell the |
|
|
| 287 |
| 00:22:11,890 --> 00:22:15,230 |
| strength of the relationship, but you can know the |
|
|
| 288 |
| 00:22:15,230 --> 00:22:20,990 |
| form or the direction. But to measure the exact |
|
|
| 289 |
| 00:22:20,990 --> 00:22:24,130 |
| strength, you have to measure the correlation |
|
|
| 290 |
| 00:22:24,130 --> 00:22:29,810 |
| coefficient, R. Now, by looking at the data, you |
|
|
| 291 |
| 00:22:29,810 --> 00:22:31,430 |
| can compute |
|
|
| 292 |
| 00:22:33,850 --> 00:22:42,470 |
| The sum of x values, y values, sum of x squared, |
|
|
| 293 |
| 00:22:43,290 --> 00:22:48,170 |
| sum of y squared, also sum of xy. Now plug these |
|
|
| 294 |
| 00:22:48,170 --> 00:22:50,610 |
| values into the formula we have for the shortcut |
|
|
| 295 |
| 00:22:50,610 --> 00:22:58,210 |
| formula. You will get R to be 0.76 around 76. |
|
|
| 296 |
| 00:23:04,050 --> 00:23:10,170 |
| So there exists positive, moderate relationship |
|
|
| 297 |
| 00:23:10,170 --> 00:23:13,770 |
| between selling |
|
|
| 298 |
| 00:23:13,770 --> 00:23:19,850 |
| price of a home and its size. So that means if the |
|
|
| 299 |
| 00:23:19,850 --> 00:23:24,670 |
| size increases, the selling price also increases. |
|
|
| 300 |
| 00:23:25,310 --> 00:23:29,550 |
| So there exists positive relationship between the |
|
|
| 301 |
| 00:23:29,550 --> 00:23:30,310 |
| two variables. |
|
|
| 302 |
| 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:40,300 |
| Strong it means close to 1, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, you |
|
|
| 303 |
| 00:23:40,300 --> 00:23:44,400 |
| can say there exists strong. But fields is not |
|
|
| 304 |
| 00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:47,960 |
| strong relationship, you can say it's moderate |
|
|
| 305 |
| 00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:53,440 |
| relationship. Because it's close if now if you |
|
|
| 306 |
| 00:23:53,440 --> 00:23:57,080 |
| just compare this value and other data gives 9%. |
|
|
| 307 |
| 00:23:58,830 --> 00:24:03,790 |
| Other one gives 85%. So these values are much |
|
|
| 308 |
| 00:24:03,790 --> 00:24:08,550 |
| closer to 1 than 0.7, but still this value is |
|
|
| 309 |
| 00:24:08,550 --> 00:24:09,570 |
| considered to be high. |
|
|
| 310 |
| 00:24:15,710 --> 00:24:16,810 |
| Any question? |
|
|
| 311 |
| 00:24:19,850 --> 00:24:22,810 |
| Next, I will give some introduction to regression |
|
|
| 312 |
| 00:24:22,810 --> 00:24:23,390 |
| analysis. |
|
|
| 313 |
| 00:24:26,970 --> 00:24:32,210 |
| regression analysis used to number one, predict |
|
|
| 314 |
| 00:24:32,210 --> 00:24:35,050 |
| the value of a dependent variable based on the |
|
|
| 315 |
| 00:24:35,050 --> 00:24:39,250 |
| value of at least one independent variable. So by |
|
|
| 316 |
| 00:24:39,250 --> 00:24:42,490 |
| using the data we have for selling price of a home |
|
|
| 317 |
| 00:24:42,490 --> 00:24:48,370 |
| and size, you can predict the selling price by |
|
|
| 318 |
| 00:24:48,370 --> 00:24:51,510 |
| knowing the value of its size. So suppose for |
|
|
| 319 |
| 00:24:51,510 --> 00:24:54,870 |
| example, You know that the size of a house is |
|
|
| 320 |
| 00:24:54,870 --> 00:25:03,510 |
| 1450, 1450 square feet. What do you predict its |
|
|
| 321 |
| 00:25:03,510 --> 00:25:10,190 |
| size, its sale or price? So by using this value, |
|
|
| 322 |
| 00:25:10,310 --> 00:25:16,510 |
| we can predict the selling price. Next, explain |
|
|
| 323 |
| 00:25:16,510 --> 00:25:19,890 |
| the impact of changes in independent variable on |
|
|
| 324 |
| 00:25:19,890 --> 00:25:23,270 |
| the dependent variable. You can say, for example, |
|
|
| 325 |
| 00:25:23,510 --> 00:25:30,650 |
| 90% of the variability in the dependent variable |
|
|
| 326 |
| 00:25:30,650 --> 00:25:36,790 |
| in selling price is explained by its size. So we |
|
|
| 327 |
| 00:25:36,790 --> 00:25:39,410 |
| can predict the value of dependent variable based |
|
|
| 328 |
| 00:25:39,410 --> 00:25:42,890 |
| on a value of one independent variable at least. |
|
|
| 329 |
| 00:25:43,870 --> 00:25:47,090 |
| Or also explain the impact of changes in |
|
|
| 330 |
| 00:25:47,090 --> 00:25:49,550 |
| independent variable on the dependent variable. |
|
|
| 331 |
| 00:25:51,420 --> 00:25:53,920 |
| Sometimes there exists more than one independent |
|
|
| 332 |
| 00:25:53,920 --> 00:25:59,680 |
| variable. For example, maybe there are more than |
|
|
| 333 |
| 00:25:59,680 --> 00:26:04,500 |
| one variable that affects a price, a selling |
|
|
| 334 |
| 00:26:04,500 --> 00:26:10,300 |
| price. For example, beside selling |
|
|
| 335 |
| 00:26:10,300 --> 00:26:16,280 |
| price, beside size, maybe location. |
|
|
| 336 |
| 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:23,580 |
| Maybe location is also another factor that affects |
|
|
| 337 |
| 00:26:23,580 --> 00:26:27,360 |
| the selling price. So in this case there are two |
|
|
| 338 |
| 00:26:27,360 --> 00:26:32,240 |
| variables. If there exists more than one variable, |
|
|
| 339 |
| 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:36,080 |
| in this case we have something called multiple |
|
|
| 340 |
| 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:38,680 |
| linear regression. |
|
|
| 341 |
| 00:26:42,030 --> 00:26:46,710 |
| Here, we just talk about one independent variable. |
|
|
| 342 |
| 00:26:47,030 --> 00:26:51,610 |
| There is only, in this chapter, there is only one |
|
|
| 343 |
| 00:26:51,610 --> 00:26:58,330 |
| x. So it's called simple linear |
|
|
| 344 |
| 00:26:58,330 --> 00:26:59,330 |
| regression. |
|
|
| 345 |
| 00:27:02,190 --> 00:27:07,930 |
| The calculations for multiple takes time. So we |
|
|
| 346 |
| 00:27:07,930 --> 00:27:11,430 |
| are going just to cover one independent variable. |
|
|
| 347 |
| 00:27:11,930 --> 00:27:14,290 |
| But if there exists more than one, in this case |
|
|
| 348 |
| 00:27:14,290 --> 00:27:18,250 |
| you have to use some statistical software as SPSS. |
|
|
| 349 |
| 00:27:18,470 --> 00:27:23,390 |
| Because in that case you can just select a |
|
|
| 350 |
| 00:27:23,390 --> 00:27:25,970 |
| regression analysis from SPSS, then you can run |
|
|
| 351 |
| 00:27:25,970 --> 00:27:28,590 |
| the multiple regression without doing any |
|
|
| 352 |
| 00:27:28,590 --> 00:27:34,190 |
| computations. But here we just covered one |
|
|
| 353 |
| 00:27:34,190 --> 00:27:36,820 |
| independent variable. In this case, it's called |
|
|
| 354 |
| 00:27:36,820 --> 00:27:41,980 |
| simple linear regression. Again, the dependent |
|
|
| 355 |
| 00:27:41,980 --> 00:27:44,600 |
| variable is the variable we wish to predict or |
|
|
| 356 |
| 00:27:44,600 --> 00:27:50,020 |
| explain, the same as weight. Independent variable, |
|
|
| 357 |
| 00:27:50,180 --> 00:27:52,440 |
| the variable used to predict or explain the |
|
|
| 358 |
| 00:27:52,440 --> 00:27:54,000 |
| dependent variable. |
|
|
| 359 |
| 00:27:57,400 --> 00:28:00,540 |
| For simple linear regression model, there is only |
|
|
| 360 |
| 00:28:00,540 --> 00:28:01,800 |
| one independent variable. |
|
|
| 361 |
| 00:28:04,830 --> 00:28:08,450 |
| Another example for simple linear regression. |
|
|
| 362 |
| 00:28:08,770 --> 00:28:11,590 |
| Suppose we are talking about your scores. |
|
|
| 363 |
| 00:28:14,210 --> 00:28:17,770 |
| Scores is the dependent variable can be affected |
|
|
| 364 |
| 00:28:17,770 --> 00:28:21,050 |
| by number of hours. |
|
|
| 365 |
| 00:28:25,130 --> 00:28:31,030 |
| Hour of study. Number of studying hours. |
|
|
| 366 |
| 00:28:36,910 --> 00:28:39,810 |
| Maybe as number of studying hour increases, your |
|
|
| 367 |
| 00:28:39,810 --> 00:28:43,390 |
| scores also increase. In this case, if there is |
|
|
| 368 |
| 00:28:43,390 --> 00:28:46,330 |
| only one X, one independent variable, it's called |
|
|
| 369 |
| 00:28:46,330 --> 00:28:51,110 |
| simple linear regression. Maybe another variable, |
|
|
| 370 |
| 00:28:52,270 --> 00:28:59,730 |
| number of missing classes or |
|
|
| 371 |
| 00:28:59,730 --> 00:29:03,160 |
| attendance. As number of missing classes |
|
|
| 372 |
| 00:29:03,160 --> 00:29:06,380 |
| increases, your score goes down. That means there |
|
|
| 373 |
| 00:29:06,380 --> 00:29:09,400 |
| exists negative relationship between missing |
|
|
| 374 |
| 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:13,540 |
| classes and your score. So sometimes, maybe there |
|
|
| 375 |
| 00:29:13,540 --> 00:29:16,580 |
| exists positive or negative. It depends on the |
|
|
| 376 |
| 00:29:16,580 --> 00:29:20,040 |
| variable itself. In this case, if there are more |
|
|
| 377 |
| 00:29:20,040 --> 00:29:23,180 |
| than one variable, then we are talking about |
|
|
| 378 |
| 00:29:23,180 --> 00:29:28,300 |
| multiple linear regression model. But here, we |
|
|
| 379 |
| 00:29:28,300 --> 00:29:33,630 |
| have only one independent variable. In addition to |
|
|
| 380 |
| 00:29:33,630 --> 00:29:37,230 |
| that, a relationship between x and y is described |
|
|
| 381 |
| 00:29:37,230 --> 00:29:40,850 |
| by a linear function. So there exists a straight |
|
|
| 382 |
| 00:29:40,850 --> 00:29:46,270 |
| line between the two variables. The changes in y |
|
|
| 383 |
| 00:29:46,270 --> 00:29:50,210 |
| are assumed to be related to changes in x only. So |
|
|
| 384 |
| 00:29:50,210 --> 00:29:54,270 |
| any change in y is related only to changes in x. |
|
|
| 385 |
| 00:29:54,730 --> 00:29:57,810 |
| So that's the simple case we have for regression, |
|
|
| 386 |
| 00:29:58,890 --> 00:30:01,170 |
| that we have only one independent |
|
|
| 387 |
| 00:30:03,890 --> 00:30:07,070 |
| Variable. Types of relationships, as we mentioned, |
|
|
| 388 |
| 00:30:07,210 --> 00:30:12,190 |
| maybe there exist linear, it means there exist |
|
|
| 389 |
| 00:30:12,190 --> 00:30:16,490 |
| straight line between X and Y, either linear |
|
|
| 390 |
| 00:30:16,490 --> 00:30:22,050 |
| positive or negative, or sometimes there exist non |
|
|
| 391 |
| 00:30:22,050 --> 00:30:25,830 |
| -linear relationship, it's called curved linear |
|
|
| 392 |
| 00:30:25,830 --> 00:30:29,290 |
| relationship. The same as this one, it's parabola. |
|
|
| 393 |
| 00:30:32,570 --> 00:30:35,150 |
| Now in this case there is no linear relationship |
|
|
| 394 |
| 00:30:35,150 --> 00:30:39,690 |
| but there exists curved linear or something like |
|
|
| 395 |
| 00:30:39,690 --> 00:30:45,910 |
| this one. So these types of non-linear |
|
|
| 396 |
| 00:30:45,910 --> 00:30:49,530 |
| relationship between the two variables. Here we |
|
|
| 397 |
| 00:30:49,530 --> 00:30:54,070 |
| are covering just the linear relationship between |
|
|
| 398 |
| 00:30:54,070 --> 00:30:56,570 |
| the two variables. So based on the scatter plot |
|
|
| 399 |
| 00:30:56,570 --> 00:31:00,620 |
| you can determine the direction. The form, the |
|
|
| 400 |
| 00:31:00,620 --> 00:31:03,860 |
| strength. Here, the form we are talking about is |
|
|
| 401 |
| 00:31:03,860 --> 00:31:04,720 |
| just linear. |
|
|
| 402 |
| 00:31:08,700 --> 00:31:13,260 |
| Now, another type of relationship, the strength of |
|
|
| 403 |
| 00:31:13,260 --> 00:31:16,940 |
| the relationship. Here, the points, either for |
|
|
| 404 |
| 00:31:16,940 --> 00:31:20,570 |
| this graph or the other one, These points are |
|
|
| 405 |
| 00:31:20,570 --> 00:31:24,570 |
| close to the straight line, it means there exists |
|
|
| 406 |
| 00:31:24,570 --> 00:31:28,210 |
| strong positive relationship or strong negative |
|
|
| 407 |
| 00:31:28,210 --> 00:31:31,230 |
| relationship. So it depends on the direction. So |
|
|
| 408 |
| 00:31:31,230 --> 00:31:35,710 |
| strong either positive or strong negative. Here |
|
|
| 409 |
| 00:31:35,710 --> 00:31:38,850 |
| the points are scattered away from the regression |
|
|
| 410 |
| 00:31:38,850 --> 00:31:41,790 |
| line, so you can say there exists weak |
|
|
| 411 |
| 00:31:41,790 --> 00:31:45,090 |
| relationship, either weak positive or weak |
|
|
| 412 |
| 00:31:45,090 --> 00:31:49,650 |
| negative. It depends on the direction of the |
|
|
| 413 |
| 00:31:49,650 --> 00:31:54,270 |
| relationship between the two variables. Sometimes |
|
|
| 414 |
| 00:31:54,270 --> 00:31:59,680 |
| there is no relationship or actually there is no |
|
|
| 415 |
| 00:31:59,680 --> 00:32:02,340 |
| linear relationship between the two variables. If |
|
|
| 416 |
| 00:32:02,340 --> 00:32:05,660 |
| the points are scattered away from the regression |
|
|
| 417 |
| 00:32:05,660 --> 00:32:09,800 |
| line, I mean you cannot determine if it is |
|
|
| 418 |
| 00:32:09,800 --> 00:32:13,160 |
| positive or negative, then there is no |
|
|
| 419 |
| 00:32:13,160 --> 00:32:16,220 |
| relationship between the two variables, the same |
|
|
| 420 |
| 00:32:16,220 --> 00:32:20,580 |
| as this one. X increases, Y stays nearly in the |
|
|
| 421 |
| 00:32:20,580 --> 00:32:24,540 |
| same position, then there exists no relationship |
|
|
| 422 |
| 00:32:24,540 --> 00:32:29,280 |
| between the two variables. So, a relationship |
|
|
| 423 |
| 00:32:29,280 --> 00:32:32,740 |
| could be linear or curvilinear. It could be |
|
|
| 424 |
| 00:32:32,740 --> 00:32:37,280 |
| positive or negative, strong or weak, or sometimes |
|
|
| 425 |
| 00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:41,680 |
| there is no relationship between the two |
|
|
| 426 |
| 00:32:41,680 --> 00:32:49,200 |
| variables. Now the question is, how can we write |
|
|
| 427 |
| 00:32:51,250 --> 00:32:55,290 |
| Or how can we find the best regression line that |
|
|
| 428 |
| 00:32:55,290 --> 00:32:59,570 |
| fits the data you have? We know the regression is |
|
|
| 429 |
| 00:32:59,570 --> 00:33:06,270 |
| the straight line equation is given by this one. Y |
|
|
| 430 |
| 00:33:06,270 --> 00:33:20,130 |
| equals beta 0 plus beta 1x plus epsilon. This can |
|
|
| 431 |
| 00:33:20,130 --> 00:33:21,670 |
| be pronounced as epsilon. |
|
|
| 432 |
| 00:33:24,790 --> 00:33:29,270 |
| It's a great letter, the same as alpha, beta, mu, |
|
|
| 433 |
| 00:33:29,570 --> 00:33:35,150 |
| sigma, and so on. So it's epsilon. I, it means |
|
|
| 434 |
| 00:33:35,150 --> 00:33:39,250 |
| observation number I. I 1, 2, 3, up to 10, for |
|
|
| 435 |
| 00:33:39,250 --> 00:33:42,710 |
| example, is the same for selling price of a home. |
|
|
| 436 |
| 00:33:43,030 --> 00:33:46,970 |
| So I 1, 2, 3, all the way up to the sample size. |
|
|
| 437 |
| 00:33:48,370 --> 00:33:54,830 |
| Now, Y is your dependent variable. Beta 0 is |
|
|
| 438 |
| 00:33:54,830 --> 00:33:59,810 |
| population Y intercept. For example, if we have |
|
|
| 439 |
| 00:33:59,810 --> 00:34:00,730 |
| this scatter plot. |
|
|
| 440 |
| 00:34:04,010 --> 00:34:10,190 |
| Now, beta 0 is |
|
|
| 441 |
| 00:34:10,190 --> 00:34:15,370 |
| this one. So this is your beta 0. So this segment |
|
|
| 442 |
| 00:34:15,370 --> 00:34:21,550 |
| is beta 0. it could be above the x-axis I mean |
|
|
| 443 |
| 00:34:21,550 --> 00:34:34,890 |
| beta zero could be positive might be negative now |
|
|
| 444 |
| 00:34:34,890 --> 00:34:40,270 |
| this beta zero fall below the x-axis so beta zero |
|
|
| 445 |
| 00:34:40,270 --> 00:34:43,850 |
| could be negative or |
|
|
| 446 |
| 00:34:46,490 --> 00:34:49,350 |
| Maybe the straight line passes through the origin |
|
|
| 447 |
| 00:34:49,350 --> 00:34:56,990 |
| point. So in this case, beta zero equals zero. So |
|
|
| 448 |
| 00:34:56,990 --> 00:34:59,890 |
| it could be positive and negative or equal zero, |
|
|
| 449 |
| 00:35:00,430 --> 00:35:05,510 |
| but still we have positive relationship. That |
|
|
| 450 |
| 00:35:05,510 --> 00:35:09,970 |
| means The value of beta zero, the sign of beta |
|
|
| 451 |
| 00:35:09,970 --> 00:35:13,310 |
| zero does not affect the relationship between Y |
|
|
| 452 |
| 00:35:13,310 --> 00:35:17,850 |
| and X. Because here in the three cases, there |
|
|
| 453 |
| 00:35:17,850 --> 00:35:22,390 |
| exists positive relationship, but beta zero could |
|
|
| 454 |
| 00:35:22,390 --> 00:35:25,370 |
| be positive or negative or equal zero, but still |
|
|
| 455 |
| 00:35:25,370 --> 00:35:31,720 |
| we have positive relationship. I mean, you cannot |
|
|
| 456 |
| 00:35:31,720 --> 00:35:35,060 |
| determine by looking at beta 0, you cannot |
|
|
| 457 |
| 00:35:35,060 --> 00:35:37,940 |
| determine if there is a positive or negative |
|
|
| 458 |
| 00:35:37,940 --> 00:35:41,720 |
| relationship. The other term is beta 1. Beta 1 is |
|
|
| 459 |
| 00:35:41,720 --> 00:35:46,900 |
| the population slope coefficient. Now, the sign of |
|
|
| 460 |
| 00:35:46,900 --> 00:35:50,010 |
| the slope determines the direction of the |
|
|
| 461 |
| 00:35:50,010 --> 00:35:54,090 |
| relationship. That means if the slope has positive |
|
|
| 462 |
| 00:35:54,090 --> 00:35:56,570 |
| sign, it means there exists positive relationship. |
|
|
| 463 |
| 00:35:57,330 --> 00:35:59,370 |
| Otherwise if it is negative, then there is |
|
|
| 464 |
| 00:35:59,370 --> 00:36:01,390 |
| negative relationship between the two variables. |
|
|
| 465 |
| 00:36:02,130 --> 00:36:05,310 |
| So the sign of the slope determines the direction. |
|
|
| 466 |
| 00:36:06,090 --> 00:36:11,290 |
| But the sign of beta zero has no meaning about the |
|
|
| 467 |
| 00:36:11,290 --> 00:36:15,470 |
| relationship between Y and X. X is your |
|
|
| 468 |
| 00:36:15,470 --> 00:36:19,630 |
| independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 469 |
| 00:36:19,630 --> 00:36:19,630 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 470 |
| 00:36:19,630 --> 00:36:19,650 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 471 |
| 00:36:19,650 --> 00:36:21,250 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 472 |
| 00:36:21,250 --> 00:36:21,250 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 473 |
| 00:36:21,250 --> 00:36:21,250 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 474 |
| 00:36:21,250 --> 00:36:21,250 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 475 |
| 00:36:21,250 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 476 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 477 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 478 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 479 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 480 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 481 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 482 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 483 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 484 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 485 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 486 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,370 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 487 |
| 00:36:24,370 --> 00:36:24,430 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 488 |
| 00:36:24,430 --> 00:36:24,770 |
| your independent variable, Y is your independent |
|
|
| 489 |
| 00:36:24,770 --> 00:36:27,490 |
| variable, Y is your independent variable, Y is |
|
|
| 490 |
| 00:36:27,490 --> 00:36:30,110 |
| your independent variable, Y is your It means |
|
|
| 491 |
| 00:36:30,110 --> 00:36:32,450 |
| there are some errors you don't know about it |
|
|
| 492 |
| 00:36:32,450 --> 00:36:36,130 |
| because you ignore some other variables that may |
|
|
| 493 |
| 00:36:36,130 --> 00:36:39,410 |
| affect the selling price. Maybe you select a |
|
|
| 494 |
| 00:36:39,410 --> 00:36:42,490 |
| random sample, that sample is small. Maybe there |
|
|
| 495 |
| 00:36:42,490 --> 00:36:46,270 |
| is a random, I'm sorry, there is sampling error. |
|
|
| 496 |
| 00:36:47,070 --> 00:36:52,980 |
| So all of these are called random error term. So |
|
|
| 497 |
| 00:36:52,980 --> 00:36:57,420 |
| all of them are in this term. So epsilon I means |
|
|
| 498 |
| 00:36:57,420 --> 00:37:00,340 |
| something you don't include in your regression |
|
|
| 499 |
| 00:37:00,340 --> 00:37:03,280 |
| modeling. For example, you don't include all the |
|
|
| 500 |
| 00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:06,180 |
| independent variables that affect Y, or your |
|
|
| 501 |
| 00:37:06,180 --> 00:37:09,700 |
| sample size is not large enough. So all of these |
|
|
| 502 |
| 00:37:09,700 --> 00:37:14,260 |
| measured in random error term. So epsilon I is |
|
|
| 503 |
| 00:37:14,260 --> 00:37:18,840 |
| random error component, beta 0 plus beta 1X is |
|
|
| 504 |
| 00:37:18,840 --> 00:37:25,070 |
| called linear component. So that's the simple |
|
|
| 505 |
| 00:37:25,070 --> 00:37:31,430 |
| linear regression model. Now, the data you have, |
|
|
| 506 |
| 00:37:32,850 --> 00:37:38,210 |
| the blue circles represent the observed value. So |
|
|
| 507 |
| 00:37:38,210 --> 00:37:47,410 |
| these blue circles are the observed values. So we |
|
|
| 508 |
| 00:37:47,410 --> 00:37:49,370 |
| have observed. |
|
|
| 509 |
| 00:37:52,980 --> 00:37:57,940 |
| Y observed value of Y for each value X. The |
|
|
| 510 |
| 00:37:57,940 --> 00:38:03,360 |
| regression line is the blue, the red one. It's |
|
|
| 511 |
| 00:38:03,360 --> 00:38:07,560 |
| called the predicted values. Predicted Y. |
|
|
| 512 |
| 00:38:08,180 --> 00:38:14,760 |
| Predicted Y is denoted always by Y hat. Now the |
|
|
| 513 |
| 00:38:14,760 --> 00:38:19,740 |
| difference between Y and Y hat. It's called the |
|
|
| 514 |
| 00:38:19,740 --> 00:38:20,200 |
| error term. |
|
|
| 515 |
| 00:38:24,680 --> 00:38:28,000 |
| It's actually the difference between the observed |
|
|
| 516 |
| 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:31,600 |
| value and its predicted value. Now, the predicted |
|
|
| 517 |
| 00:38:31,600 --> 00:38:34,720 |
| value can be determined by using the regression |
|
|
| 518 |
| 00:38:34,720 --> 00:38:39,180 |
| line. So this line is the predicted value of Y for |
|
|
| 519 |
| 00:38:39,180 --> 00:38:44,480 |
| XR. Again, beta zero is the intercept. As we |
|
|
| 520 |
| 00:38:44,480 --> 00:38:46,260 |
| mentioned before, it could be positive or negative |
|
|
| 521 |
| 00:38:46,260 --> 00:38:52,600 |
| or even equal zero. The slope is changing Y. |
|
|
| 522 |
| 00:38:55,140 --> 00:38:57,580 |
| Divide by change of x. |
|
|
| 523 |
| 00:39:01,840 --> 00:39:07,140 |
| So these are the components for the simple linear |
|
|
| 524 |
| 00:39:07,140 --> 00:39:10,840 |
| regression model. Y again represents the |
|
|
| 525 |
| 00:39:10,840 --> 00:39:14,960 |
| independent variable. Beta 0 y intercept. Beta 1 |
|
|
| 526 |
| 00:39:14,960 --> 00:39:17,960 |
| is your slope. And the slope determines the |
|
|
| 527 |
| 00:39:17,960 --> 00:39:20,900 |
| direction of the relationship. X independent |
|
|
| 528 |
| 00:39:20,900 --> 00:39:25,270 |
| variable epsilon i is the random error term. Any |
|
|
| 529 |
| 00:39:25,270 --> 00:39:25,650 |
| question? |
|
|
| 530 |
| 00:39:31,750 --> 00:39:36,610 |
| The relationship may be positive or negative. It |
|
|
| 531 |
| 00:39:36,610 --> 00:39:37,190 |
| could be negative. |
|
|
| 532 |
| 00:39:40,950 --> 00:39:42,710 |
| Now, for negative relationship, |
|
|
| 533 |
| 00:39:57,000 --> 00:40:04,460 |
| Or negative, where beta zero is negative. |
|
|
| 534 |
| 00:40:04,520 --> 00:40:08,700 |
| Or beta |
|
|
| 535 |
| 00:40:08,700 --> 00:40:09,740 |
| zero equals zero. |
|
|
| 536 |
| 00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:20,620 |
| So here there exists negative relationship, but |
|
|
| 537 |
| 00:40:20,620 --> 00:40:22,060 |
| beta zero may be positive. |
|
|
| 538 |
| 00:40:25,870 --> 00:40:30,210 |
| So again, the sign of beta 0 also does not affect |
|
|
| 539 |
| 00:40:30,210 --> 00:40:31,990 |
| the relationship between the two variables. |
|
|
| 540 |
| 00:40:36,230 --> 00:40:40,590 |
| Now, we don't actually know the values of beta 0 |
|
|
| 541 |
| 00:40:40,590 --> 00:40:44,510 |
| and beta 1. We are going to estimate these values |
|
|
| 542 |
| 00:40:44,510 --> 00:40:48,110 |
| from the sample we have. So the simple linear |
|
|
| 543 |
| 00:40:48,110 --> 00:40:50,970 |
| regression equation provides an estimate of the |
|
|
| 544 |
| 00:40:50,970 --> 00:40:55,270 |
| population regression line. So here we have Yi hat |
|
|
| 545 |
| 00:40:55,270 --> 00:41:00,010 |
| is the estimated or predicted Y value for |
|
|
| 546 |
| 00:41:00,010 --> 00:41:00,850 |
| observation I. |
|
|
| 547 |
| 00:41:03,530 --> 00:41:08,220 |
| The estimate of the regression intercept P0. The |
|
|
| 548 |
| 00:41:08,220 --> 00:41:11,360 |
| estimate of the regression slope is b1, and this |
|
|
| 549 |
| 00:41:11,360 --> 00:41:16,680 |
| is your x, all independent variable. So here is |
|
|
| 550 |
| 00:41:16,680 --> 00:41:20,340 |
| the regression equation. Simple linear regression |
|
|
| 551 |
| 00:41:20,340 --> 00:41:24,400 |
| equation is given by y hat, the predicted value of |
|
|
| 552 |
| 00:41:24,400 --> 00:41:29,380 |
| y equals b0 plus b1 times x1. |
|
|
| 553 |
| 00:41:31,240 --> 00:41:35,960 |
| Now these coefficients, b0 and b1 can be computed |
|
|
| 554 |
| 00:41:37,900 --> 00:41:43,040 |
| by the following equations. So the regression |
|
|
| 555 |
| 00:41:43,040 --> 00:41:52,920 |
| equation is |
|
|
| 556 |
| 00:41:52,920 --> 00:41:57,260 |
| given by y hat equals b0 plus b1x. |
|
|
| 557 |
| 00:41:59,940 --> 00:42:06,140 |
| Now the slope, b1, is r times standard deviation |
|
|
| 558 |
| 00:42:06,140 --> 00:42:10,540 |
| of y Times standard deviation of x. This is the |
|
|
| 559 |
| 00:42:10,540 --> 00:42:13,820 |
| simplest equation to determine the value of the |
|
|
| 560 |
| 00:42:13,820 --> 00:42:18,980 |
| star. B1r, r is the correlation coefficient. Sy is |
|
|
| 561 |
| 00:42:18,980 --> 00:42:25,080 |
| xr, the standard deviations of y and x. Where b0, |
|
|
| 562 |
| 00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:30,880 |
| which is y intercept, is y bar minus b x bar, or |
|
|
| 563 |
| 00:42:30,880 --> 00:42:38,100 |
| b1 x bar. Sx, as we know, is the sum of x minus y |
|
|
| 564 |
| 00:42:38,100 --> 00:42:40,460 |
| squared divided by n minus 1 under square root, |
|
|
| 565 |
| 00:42:40,900 --> 00:42:47,060 |
| similarly for y values. So this, how can we, these |
|
|
| 566 |
| 00:42:47,060 --> 00:42:52,380 |
| formulas compute the values of b0 and b1. So we |
|
|
| 567 |
| 00:42:52,380 --> 00:42:54,600 |
| are going to use these equations in order to |
|
|
| 568 |
| 00:42:54,600 --> 00:42:58,960 |
| determine the values of b0 and b1. |
|
|
| 569 |
| 00:43:04,670 --> 00:43:07,710 |
| Now, what's your interpretation about the slope |
|
|
| 570 |
| 00:43:07,710 --> 00:43:13,130 |
| and the intercept? For example, suppose we are |
|
|
| 571 |
| 00:43:13,130 --> 00:43:18,610 |
| talking about your score Y and |
|
|
| 572 |
| 00:43:18,610 --> 00:43:22,110 |
| X number of missing classes. |
|
|
| 573 |
| 00:43:29,210 --> 00:43:35,460 |
| And suppose, for example, Y hat Equal 95 minus 5x. |
|
|
| 574 |
| 00:43:37,780 --> 00:43:41,420 |
| Now let's see what's the interpretation of B0. |
|
|
| 575 |
| 00:43:42,300 --> 00:43:45,060 |
| This is B0. So B0 is 95. |
|
|
| 576 |
| 00:43:47,660 --> 00:43:51,960 |
| And B1 is 5. Now what's your interpretation about |
|
|
| 577 |
| 00:43:51,960 --> 00:43:57,740 |
| B0 and B1? B0 is the estimated mean value of Y |
|
|
| 578 |
| 00:43:57,740 --> 00:44:02,560 |
| when the value of X is 0. that means if the |
|
|
| 579 |
| 00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:08,500 |
| student does not miss any class that means x |
|
|
| 580 |
| 00:44:08,500 --> 00:44:13,260 |
| equals zero in this case we predict or we estimate |
|
|
| 581 |
| 00:44:13,260 --> 00:44:19,880 |
| the mean value of his score or her score is 95 so |
|
|
| 582 |
| 00:44:19,880 --> 00:44:27,500 |
| 95 it means when x is zero if x is zero then we |
|
|
| 583 |
| 00:44:27,500 --> 00:44:35,350 |
| expect his or Here, the score is 95. So that means |
|
|
| 584 |
| 00:44:35,350 --> 00:44:39,830 |
| B0 is the estimated mean value of Y when the value |
|
|
| 585 |
| 00:44:39,830 --> 00:44:40,630 |
| of X is 0. |
|
|
| 586 |
| 00:44:43,370 --> 00:44:46,590 |
| Now, what's the meaning of the slope? The slope in |
|
|
| 587 |
| 00:44:46,590 --> 00:44:51,290 |
| this case is negative Y. B1, which is the slope, |
|
|
| 588 |
| 00:44:51,590 --> 00:44:57,610 |
| is the estimated change in the mean of Y. as a |
|
|
| 589 |
| 00:44:57,610 --> 00:45:03,050 |
| result of a one unit change in x for example let's |
|
|
| 590 |
| 00:45:03,050 --> 00:45:07,070 |
| compute y for different values of x suppose x is |
|
|
| 591 |
| 00:45:07,070 --> 00:45:15,510 |
| one now we predict his score to be 95 minus 5 |
|
|
| 592 |
| 00:45:15,510 --> 00:45:25,470 |
| times 1 which is 90 when x is 2 for example Y hat |
|
|
| 593 |
| 00:45:25,470 --> 00:45:28,570 |
| is 95 minus 5 times 2, so that's 85. |
|
|
| 594 |
| 00:45:31,950 --> 00:45:39,970 |
| So for each one unit, there is a drop by five |
|
|
| 595 |
| 00:45:39,970 --> 00:45:43,750 |
| units in his score. That means if number of |
|
|
| 596 |
| 00:45:43,750 --> 00:45:47,550 |
| missing classes increases by one unit, then his or |
|
|
| 597 |
| 00:45:47,550 --> 00:45:51,790 |
| her weight is expected to be reduced by five units |
|
|
| 598 |
| 00:45:51,790 --> 00:45:56,150 |
| because the sign is negative. another example |
|
|
| 599 |
| 00:45:56,150 --> 00:46:05,910 |
| suppose again we are interested in whales and |
|
|
| 600 |
| 00:46:05,910 --> 00:46:16,170 |
| angels and imagine that just |
|
|
| 601 |
| 00:46:16,170 --> 00:46:21,670 |
| for example y equal y hat equals three plus four x |
|
|
| 602 |
| 00:46:21,670 --> 00:46:29,830 |
| now y hat equals 3 if x equals zero. That has no |
|
|
| 603 |
| 00:46:29,830 --> 00:46:34,510 |
| meaning because you cannot say age of zero. So |
|
|
| 604 |
| 00:46:34,510 --> 00:46:40,450 |
| sometimes the meaning of y intercept does not make |
|
|
| 605 |
| 00:46:40,450 --> 00:46:46,150 |
| sense because you cannot say x equals zero. Now |
|
|
| 606 |
| 00:46:46,150 --> 00:46:50,690 |
| for the stock of four, that means as his or her |
|
|
| 607 |
| 00:46:50,690 --> 00:46:55,550 |
| weight increases by one year, Then we expect his |
|
|
| 608 |
| 00:46:55,550 --> 00:47:00,470 |
| weight to increase by four kilograms. So as one |
|
|
| 609 |
| 00:47:00,470 --> 00:47:05,130 |
| unit increase in x, y is our, his weight is |
|
|
| 610 |
| 00:47:05,130 --> 00:47:10,150 |
| expected to increase by four units. So again, |
|
|
| 611 |
| 00:47:10,370 --> 00:47:16,950 |
| sometimes we can interpret the y intercept, but in |
|
|
| 612 |
| 00:47:16,950 --> 00:47:18,670 |
| some cases it has no meaning. |
|
|
| 613 |
| 00:47:24,970 --> 00:47:27,190 |
| Now for the previous example, for the selling |
|
|
| 614 |
| 00:47:27,190 --> 00:47:32,930 |
| price of a home and its size, B1rSy divided by Sx, |
|
|
| 615 |
| 00:47:33,790 --> 00:47:43,550 |
| r is computed, r is found to be 76%, 76%Sy divided |
|
|
| 616 |
| 00:47:43,550 --> 00:47:49,990 |
| by Sx, that will give 0.109. B0y bar minus B1x |
|
|
| 617 |
| 00:47:49,990 --> 00:47:50,670 |
| bar, |
|
|
| 618 |
| 00:47:53,610 --> 00:48:00,150 |
| Y bar for this data is 286 minus D1. So we have to |
|
|
| 619 |
| 00:48:00,150 --> 00:48:03,490 |
| compute first D1 because we use it in order to |
|
|
| 620 |
| 00:48:03,490 --> 00:48:08,590 |
| determine D0. And calculation gives 98. So that |
|
|
| 621 |
| 00:48:08,590 --> 00:48:16,450 |
| means based on these equations, Y hat equals 0 |
|
|
| 622 |
| 00:48:16,450 --> 00:48:22,990 |
| .10977 plus 98.248. |
|
|
| 623 |
| 00:48:24,790 --> 00:48:29,370 |
| times X. X is the size. |
|
|
| 624 |
| 00:48:32,890 --> 00:48:39,830 |
| 0.1 B1 |
|
|
| 625 |
| 00:48:39,830 --> 00:48:45,310 |
| is |
|
|
| 626 |
| 00:48:45,310 --> 00:48:56,650 |
| 0.1, B0 is 98, so 98.248 plus B1. So this is your |
|
|
| 627 |
| 00:48:56,650 --> 00:49:03,730 |
| regression equation. So again, the intercept is |
|
|
| 628 |
| 00:49:03,730 --> 00:49:09,750 |
| 98. So this amount, the segment is 98. Now the |
|
|
| 629 |
| 00:49:09,750 --> 00:49:14,790 |
| slope is 0.109. So house price, the expected value |
|
|
| 630 |
| 00:49:14,790 --> 00:49:21,270 |
| of house price equals B098 plus 0.109 square feet. |
|
|
| 631 |
| 00:49:23,150 --> 00:49:27,630 |
| So that's the prediction line for the house price. |
|
|
| 632 |
| 00:49:28,510 --> 00:49:34,370 |
| So again, house price equal B0 98 plus 0.10977 |
|
|
| 633 |
| 00:49:34,370 --> 00:49:36,930 |
| times square root. Now, what's your interpretation |
|
|
| 634 |
| 00:49:36,930 --> 00:49:41,950 |
| about B0 and B1? B0 is the estimated mean value of |
|
|
| 635 |
| 00:49:41,950 --> 00:49:46,430 |
| Y when the value of X is 0. So if X is 0, this |
|
|
| 636 |
| 00:49:46,430 --> 00:49:52,980 |
| range of X observed X values and you have a home |
|
|
| 637 |
| 00:49:52,980 --> 00:49:57,860 |
| or a house of size zero. So that means this value |
|
|
| 638 |
| 00:49:57,860 --> 00:50:02,680 |
| has no meaning. Because a house cannot have a |
|
|
| 639 |
| 00:50:02,680 --> 00:50:06,400 |
| square footage of zero. So B0 has no practical |
|
|
| 640 |
| 00:50:06,400 --> 00:50:10,040 |
| application in this case. So sometimes it makes |
|
|
| 641 |
| 00:50:10,040 --> 00:50:17,620 |
| sense, in other cases it doesn't have that. So for |
|
|
| 642 |
| 00:50:17,620 --> 00:50:21,790 |
| this specific example, B0 has no practical |
|
|
| 643 |
| 00:50:21,790 --> 00:50:28,210 |
| application in this case. But B1 which is 0.1097, |
|
|
| 644 |
| 00:50:28,930 --> 00:50:33,050 |
| B1 estimates the change in the mean value of Y as |
|
|
| 645 |
| 00:50:33,050 --> 00:50:36,730 |
| a result of one unit increasing X. So for this |
|
|
| 646 |
| 00:50:36,730 --> 00:50:41,640 |
| value which is 0.109, it means This fellow tells |
|
|
| 647 |
| 00:50:41,640 --> 00:50:46,420 |
| us that the mean value of a house can increase by |
|
|
| 648 |
| 00:50:46,420 --> 00:50:52,280 |
| this amount, increase by 0.1097, but we have to |
|
|
| 649 |
| 00:50:52,280 --> 00:50:55,700 |
| multiply this value by a thousand because the data |
|
|
| 650 |
| 00:50:55,700 --> 00:51:01,280 |
| was in thousand dollars, so around 109, on average |
|
|
| 651 |
| 00:51:01,280 --> 00:51:05,160 |
| for each additional one square foot of a size. So |
|
|
| 652 |
| 00:51:05,160 --> 00:51:09,990 |
| that means if a house So if house size increased |
|
|
| 653 |
| 00:51:09,990 --> 00:51:14,630 |
| by one square foot, then the price increased by |
|
|
| 654 |
| 00:51:14,630 --> 00:51:19,530 |
| around 109 dollars. So for each one unit increased |
|
|
| 655 |
| 00:51:19,530 --> 00:51:22,990 |
| in the size, the selling price of a home increased |
|
|
| 656 |
| 00:51:22,990 --> 00:51:29,590 |
| by 109. So that means if the size increased by |
|
|
| 657 |
| 00:51:29,590 --> 00:51:35,860 |
| tenth, It means the selling price increased by |
|
|
| 658 |
| 00:51:35,860 --> 00:51:39,400 |
| 1097 |
|
|
| 659 |
| 00:51:39,400 --> 00:51:46,600 |
| .7. Make sense? So for each one unit increase in |
|
|
| 660 |
| 00:51:46,600 --> 00:51:50,300 |
| its size, the house selling price increased by |
|
|
| 661 |
| 00:51:50,300 --> 00:51:55,540 |
| 109. So we have to multiply this value by the unit |
|
|
| 662 |
| 00:51:55,540 --> 00:52:02,280 |
| we have. Because Y was 8000 dollars. Here if you |
|
|
| 663 |
| 00:52:02,280 --> 00:52:06,600 |
| go back to the previous data we have, the data was |
|
|
| 664 |
| 00:52:06,600 --> 00:52:11,120 |
| house price wasn't thousand dollars, so we have to |
|
|
| 665 |
| 00:52:11,120 --> 00:52:15,840 |
| multiply the slope by a thousand. |
|
|
| 666 |
| 00:52:19,480 --> 00:52:23,720 |
| Now we |
|
|
| 667 |
| 00:52:23,720 --> 00:52:30,380 |
| can use also the regression equation line to make |
|
|
| 668 |
| 00:52:30,380 --> 00:52:35,390 |
| some prediction. For example, we can predict the |
|
|
| 669 |
| 00:52:35,390 --> 00:52:42,290 |
| price of a house with 2000 square feet. You just |
|
|
| 670 |
| 00:52:42,290 --> 00:52:43,590 |
| plug this value. |
|
|
| 671 |
| 00:52:46,310 --> 00:52:52,210 |
| So we have 98.25 plus 0.109 times 2000. That will |
|
|
| 672 |
| 00:52:52,210 --> 00:53:01,600 |
| give the house price. for 2,000 square feet. So |
|
|
| 673 |
| 00:53:01,600 --> 00:53:05,920 |
| that means the predicted price for a house with 2 |
|
|
| 674 |
| 00:53:05,920 --> 00:53:10,180 |
| ,000 square feet is this amount multiplied by 1 |
|
|
| 675 |
| 00:53:10,180 --> 00:53:18,260 |
| ,000. So that will give $317,850. So that's how |
|
|
| 676 |
| 00:53:18,260 --> 00:53:24,240 |
| can we make predictions for why I mean for house |
|
|
| 677 |
| 00:53:24,240 --> 00:53:29,360 |
| price at any given value of its size. So for this |
|
|
| 678 |
| 00:53:29,360 --> 00:53:36,020 |
| data, we have a house with 2000 square feet. So we |
|
|
| 679 |
| 00:53:36,020 --> 00:53:43,180 |
| predict its price to be around 317,850. |
|
|
| 680 |
| 00:53:44,220 --> 00:53:50,920 |
| I will stop at coefficient of correlation. I will |
|
|
| 681 |
| 00:53:50,920 --> 00:53:54,190 |
| stop at coefficient of determination for next time |
|
|
| 682 |
| 00:53:54,190 --> 00:53:57,770 |
| that's |
|
|
| 683 |
| 00:53:57,770 --> 00:53:57,990 |
| all |
|
|
|
|