old_contents: // Separate Numbers with Commas in JavaScript **Pairing Challenge**
  
  
  // I worked on this challenge with: Peter L..
  
  // Pseudocode - The function will take in an integer. First split the integer and convert it to a string so that we can iterate over each item. We want to put a comma after every three zeros, so working from the back if the length / 3 leaves no remainders, and the output isn't an empty string, then you want to shovel into the output a comma. Otherwise, you want to shovel into the output  the number at that index. Once you have the array, you need to reverse the array since we started from the back, in order to have the numbers in the correct order, and return that output. 
  
  var numCommas = function(number) {
   var num = String(number);
   var output = ""
    for (var i = num.length - 1; i >= 0 ; i --){
      if ((num.length - i - 1) % 3 === 0  && output != ''){
       output = output + ','
      }
      output = output + num[i] 
    }
    var output2 = ''
    for (var i = output.length -1; i >= 0; i --) {
      output2 = output2 + output[i]
    }
    return output2
  }
  
  // Refactored Solution
  
  var numCommas = function(number) {
   var num = String(number);
   var output = ""
    for (var i = num.length - 1; i >= 0 ; i --){
      if ((num.length - i - 1) % 3 === 0  && output != ''){
       output += ','
      }
      output += num[i] 
    }
     return output.split('').reverse().join('')
  }
  
  
  
  // Your Own Tests (OPTIONAL)
  console.log(numCommas(1,000)
  console.log(numCommas(10,000)
  console.log(numCommas(1,000,000)
  console.log(numCommas(10,000,000)
  console.log(numCommas(100,000,000)
  
  
  
  // Reflection
new_contents: // Separate Numbers with Commas in JavaScript **Pairing Challenge**
  
  
  // I worked on this challenge with: Peter L..
  
  // Pseudocode - The function will take in an integer. First split the integer and convert it to a string so that we can iterate over each item. We want to put a comma after every three zeros, so working from the back if the length / 3 leaves no remainders, and the output isn't an empty string, then you want to shovel into the output a comma. Otherwise, you want to shovel into the output  the number at that index. Once you have the array, you need to reverse the array since we started from the back, in order to have the numbers in the correct order, and return that output. 
  
  var numCommas = function(number) {
   var num = String(number);
   var output = ""
    for (var i = num.length - 1; i >= 0 ; i --){
      if ((num.length - i - 1) % 3 === 0  && output != ''){
       output = output + ','
      }
      output = output + num[i] 
    }
    var output2 = ''
    for (var i = output.length -1; i >= 0; i --) {
      output2 = output2 + output[i]
    }
    return output2
  }
  
  // Refactored Solution
  
  var numCommas = function(number) {
   var num = String(number);
   var output = ""
    for (var i = num.length - 1; i >= 0 ; i --){
      if ((num.length - i - 1) % 3 === 0  && output != ''){
       output += ','
      }
      output += num[i] 
    }
     return output.split('').reverse().join('')
  }
  
  
  
  // Your Own Tests (OPTIONAL)
  console.log(numCommas(1,000)
  console.log(numCommas(10,000)
  console.log(numCommas(1,000,000)
  console.log(numCommas(10,000,000)
  console.log(numCommas(100,000,000)
  
  
  // Reflection
  
  // What was it like to approach the problem from the perspective of JavaScript? Did you approach the problem differently? - It required a little different thinking. I forgot how wonderful ruby is with all its built in methods, so we really had to piece apart every step to solve this with limited methods. 
  // What did you learn about iterating over arrays in JavaScript? - You iterate over the index, so if you want to element, when using a for loop, you need to reference the array. ex array[i] and not just do i to try and access the element in the array. 
  // What was different about solving this problem in JavaScript? - Using only the index instead of iterating over each item took me a while to wrap my head around the process as I was used to using .each with Ruby. In addition, the syntax is quite different so it's important to remember to add parenthesis, semicolons, and curly braces.
  // What built-in methods did you find to incorporate in your refactored solution? - We used .reverse, .split, and .join for the refactored solution.
subject: Add reflection to nums commas challenge