text: " One of the earliest criticisms is that anarchism defies and fails to understand the biological inclination to authority.Joseph Raz states that the acceptance of authority implies the belief that following their instructions will afford more success.Raz believes that this argument is true in following both authorities' successful and mistaken instruction.Anarchists reject this criticism because challenging or disobeying authority does not entail the disappearance of its advantages by acknowledging authority such as doctors or lawyers as reliable, nor does it involve a complete surrender of independent judgment.Anarchist perception of human nature, rejection of the state, and commitment to social revolution has been criticised by academics as naive, overly simplistic, and unrealistic, respectively.Classical anarchism has been criticised for relying too heavily on the belief that the abolition of the state will lead to human cooperation prospering.Friedrich Engels, considered to be one of the principal founders of Marxism, criticised anarchism's anti-authoritarianism as inherently counter-revolutionary because in his view a revolution is by itself authoritarian.Academic John Molyneux writes in his book Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism that "anarchism cannot win", believing that it lacks the ability to properly implement its ideas.The Marxist criticism of anarchism is that it has a utopian character because all individuals should have anarchist views and values.According to the Marxist view, that a social idea would follow directly from this human ideal and out of the free will of every individual formed its essence.Marxists state that this contradiction was responsible for their inability to act.In the anarchist vision, the conflict between liberty and equality was resolved through coexistence and intertwining.