text: The correction seems that it has been applied a long time ago, even if this road cannot be included in a pedestrian route where instead the walk-in would be allowed and, considering the distance that there is from the bridge on the river and the subsequent railway passage, i would say that this shortcut shouldn't be underestimated, especially for those who are coming from the other side of the river and want to return to their camping site, otherwise there would be 3km more to walk by.
  However, a bridge for bycicles and pedestrians is under construction, right on the river's mouth. It's a matter of time before we can see a cyclable road connection for the camping site from south side.