text: I also disagree I think. The classification of 'track' to represent something which is/was built to accommodate vehicles, whether or not it's actually used for vehicles regularly, is one of the very very few ways in which we can sensibly distinguish one type of path/track from another. This path/track has always seemed to me (for most of its length) to have been built to a standard for vehicle use. (Although I'd like to look again to check my memory). I don't think that the fact that vehicles are very rare, and only would be used for maintenance, is a factor. 