text: Agree. Would very much support removal of 'Blackford Hill Paths' as I understand the naming of paths would be for established and verifiable names - which these aren't. The name tag isn't for a description. Also, as you say dnoble, bicycle=yes in my view should be used in Scotland for paths which are clearly sensible for everyday cycling (not requiring a mountain bike), and probably observed to actually be used in this way. Given the land reform act bicycle=yes makes no sense otherwise as it would need to be applied to almost every path. I guess that a helpful way to think of this would be to ask whether an average bicycle user, using a routing/navigation/satnav type system, would want to be told to turn along a given path. If yes, then 'bicycle-yes' is helpful - if no then it's not. Foot=yes may be redundant, but you're a more patient editor than me if you can be bothered removing!