Sure, no problem. 

I see an opportunity for another lesson though😁: 

If you map the cycleways separately you need connect the cycleways to the other carriageways, even if there isn't a visible connection on the ground. This is an approximation we have to live with, because routing software needs the ways to be connected.

For example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=33.858202&mlon=-118.346613#map=19/33.858128/-118.346670&layers=N
In this case you can connect the cyclepath to the sidestreet, even if it only starts a few yards after it.

If there is no sidestreet at the start or end, then just connect the cyclepath to the main carriageway (provided there is no physical separation). 

Without such connections, navigation and routing software can't access the paths. You can test this with the integrated routing as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=33.858313%2C-118.346001%3B33.858115%2C-118.351574#map=18/33.858260/-118.348795&layers=N
(side note:  the routing doesn't update instantly if you edit something, afaik it takes more than a day for the routing to be updated)

Same actually goes for mapping sidewalks separately, although sidewalks sometimes really stop in a dead-end without a connection to the road.

Some people mark these "fake" connections with 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlink
or 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:virtual
but neither has really caught on and marking the connection is not widespread.
