freebeer
ciao constable,
I think one of the several reverts restored an unwanted intermediate step.
generally I would keep out of edit wars like this so as not to impede the work of the Big Guns when their ire is raised and a full revert is deemed necessary, but these vandalisms appear piecemeal that I probably won't make things much worse.
I may give it a go.
To Darwin: you are treading on thin ice by deliberately introducing errors,falsehoods and fiction, damaging the fact-based work of others, which could imperil your other factual and verifiable contributions.
You have so far received politely-worded warnings from others, yet you continue to antagonise the community, attempting to evade the openness underlying OSM by abusing the inter-mapper notes communication system hoping to hide your activities, and continuing to falsify information and introducing creative geofiction despite the warnings.
Your contributions are not devoid of value as they can in part be verified in a newly developed area, which is why I do not want to see a mass deletion of the items which I initially regarded as suspicious but verified against the latest imageries, particularly after how much effort you have put into contributing actual and factual items.
However OSM holds the integrity of its dataset to a higher standard than accepting the bad with the good, and the value of the contributions of the community as a whole, to the point of turning down contributions from a member who fails and is unable to work together with the community on the project, which has far different goals than to simply serve a game.