freebeer
Hi,
I seem to be trying to answer your question within an hour (or two, not sure if the deleted time I see is UTC) of the user who created it, deleting it.
.
A g00gle text search returns: YES!@!  multiple links to https://maps.me/catalog/recreation/leisure-park/ with no references (in the text) to Openstreetmap data, so it must be true!!!
And another data mangler who only mentions Google maps on their result page, disclaiming a connection with OSM (don't know what other pages may say; when researching the viennese Peter Paul Berg all the results mentioned the OSM nature of the data on the page with the results.
.
The aerial imagery is poor.  In the leaf-off ESRI I can make out a black structure near this former location, perhaps a slide.  In the Mapbox imagery, both zoomed out and zoomed in I can see a clearing with what appears to be a sandy ground cover.  This clearing and ground are even more visible in the DigitalGlobe Standard aerials.
It could be someone's backyard, but I notice something significant: In the ESRI imagery, look at what emerges with the driveways onto the Drive, just south of the turning circle: a footpath and kerb access.
What I thought was a solid stop line for pedestrians crossing is most likely a streetlamp overhead, see at the intersection south.
So there is definitely a sidewalk path leading at least towards this area, although I cannot make out if it heads further into the woods.
This leads me to suspect the park does exist with official access, but not with this name.
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494027475/history
I'm not sure what unwanted addition means.
And I see that the deleted time was UTC displayed, so in fact I caught the deletion less than an hour after it occurred, causing me much confusion with the cached tiles.
It only remains for me to research the proper name...