Hhhmmm. Thanks for messaging the person about it and providing the link here. What's your opinion on it? It seems like the user has legitimate reasons for reverting himself and it was his edits originally, but after being there that long etc, it seems like it might have been worth saving. Also, if it was going to be deleted, it would have been nice if there was at least an attempt to re-tagged the trails access restrictions based on the data before it got removed. As that's the main concern in my opinion and the only thing that's somewhat useful and ground truth verifiable.