freebeer
What an ambiguous statement --
currently out-of-date OSM mapped layout that corresponds to the data within OSM at the time I wrote that but does not reflect the present reality, is that seen in the archival ESRI Classic (formerly Bing-provided and maybe a decade out-of-date).  Which of course again I mis-type as Classic instead of Clarity, for here Mapbox offers superior clarity in its newer imagery.
Which at least in one area of Tennessee, is about a year and a half out of date, but slide over to another nearby Note and it shows an intact subdivision where the Bing-like satellite still shows the start of construction.
Too much info.