text: Stating "you are pretty sure" isn't evidence, it is opinion.
  
  The area is tagged correctly as far as OSM is concerned, although I agree with you that it could be tagged more specifically as to individual parcels being more strictly retail as opposed to more strictly commercial.
  
  However, as commercial does encompass retail (though I agree with you, less specifically), it isn't strictly incorrect.  If you wish to correct it, please correct it with data that are superior.  (Likely from on-the-ground, locally-sourced research).  I mean, I order Chinese take out from Red Pearl fairly frequently (it's really good food) so I could say that the single parcel that surrounds that restaurant could/should be changed from commercial to retail.  But I haven't the patience to do this for every building/business/parcel surrounded by this multipolygon.  If you have the data, knowledge and patience to do so, you are welcome to do so.  But because you don't, doesn't make this a Note to be Resolved as "could be better."  That could be said all over the map and so data entries such as these effectively communicate nothing.
  
  Closing as resolved.