text: Communities like these are age restricted (55+) and a mixture of permanent residents and seasonal residents who live here for only part of the year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowbird_(person) And a lot them travel and live in RVs. And so yes, these are rented caravan sites mixed in with (mostly permanent) mobile homes.
  
  And you are correct that sometimes the vacant lots are vacant because it's a mobile home site with the mobile home removed and not a RV camping site. But for this community directly under the note, you can see in the imagery the RVs sitting in most of the sites with their awnings and "pop-outs" unfolded like they're camping.
  
  However the smaller community just north, Cypress Estates (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43247638), very much looks like its just a mobile home park and not a caravan_site (even though it's currently tagged as such). This because there are very few vacant lots (4) in the imagery and none of them have any RVs in them.
  
  I'll go ahead and work on fixing this area. I just wanted to ask first about the tags because it would be a lot of editing to fix it, and I didn't know if you already had an opinion on how to tag it.
  
  As for how tourism=camp_pitch gets rendered, I'm not sure since I never used it before but I believe all we should worry about is if we're using the tags correctly as they're meant to represent. It's up to the map style/rendering projects to decided how they look. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
  
  And thanks for creating the note, it did need attention. No worries about "doing research" first; notes are easy to resolve.