text: So if you went with the definition of parks=public land, you'd be looking at like 75% of the western united states being tagged as leisure=park. It's really not workable in any way what so ever. The tag becomes essentially useless at that point. If you just confine it to California, it's still over half. That's totally not realistic. Maybe you could ignore that and the actual park definition in the wiki by tagging everything public owned in Santa Cruz as parks, but then it's still probably like 30 or 40 percent there if not more. Which doesn't even work on a local level. Not to mention that you'd have a park silo. Where everything there is tagged different then everywhere else and people from other places would be like "well Santa Cruz has everything tagged as parks" why can't my town be mapped that way? Then ultimately your looking at like 40% of America getting tagged as parks. At the expense of a lot of other better tags none the less. That's just in public land to. But no way in hell would it work for over 50% of California to be tagged as leisure=park just because it's public land. Totally totally un doable in Nevada. They'd have nothing else left. 