text: *nods, what might help is it's essentially just a four-way, which normally would have two ways crossing in parallel.  The asymmetry is just due to Litchfield's exiting turning lanes.  If you straightened out Litchfield to oppose the parking lot as in other divided road intersections, it'd basically be what we have here.  My personal justification is it matches what's "on the ground", provides data for routing better than the previous, eliminates the extra node awkwardness of the previous, and the only significant downside is appearance.  I'd not change the service road bit to match the larger ways visually since it's the least used route of all.  Most the others have two or more directions they can go.  I agree it's not ideal, but seems at least an improvement and the best so far, heh, I suppose a case reality doesn't care about our ideals!   