text: It wasn't "reverted" it was resolved because you "better tagged" it (adding access=children, which I'd never seen and isn't documented, but taginfo says has 33 worldwide OSM occurrences, so, I suppose you're not the only one adding a creative tag that others have used as well).
  
  So, I can say "hm, creative tagging, I'm OK with adding a tag I've never seen and isn't documented," but you can't?  This tagging meets the definition of leisure=playground (which seems to be your objection).  Elsewhere (I believe in the leisure=park/Talk wiki), you've called this "stretching the definition a little" (but not incorrect.  And the only other person (Mateusz, who suggested this note be here) called your argument "absurd."  So really, YOU settled this!  If you want Mateusz to comment here, you are welcome to ask him to do so.  I'll hold off Resolving this to give you a chance to do that, but otherwise, many have considered this to be tagged according to definition for years:  including you for two weeks!
  
  It seems you are only reactivating this to annoy, not get "more opinions."