text: Really? I don't. Well there might be a faint outline of one in a small area. Which could jut as easily be from the people who live there or their kids walking around to the small grassy area. It's not prove of anything. and the Street Side images are pretty clear there's a private lawn with the wooden curbs, bushes, and the resident's driveway where you mapped the path. Which contradicts you. or at least the path doesn't go into the street like you have it and just because is a path, which it's extremely unlikely there is, it doesn't mean there's a park attached to it.. If it was a path to a park, there wouldn't bushes and a wooden curb in the way with know way to get to it without going through someone's yard and no parking for people visiting the park, except a private driveway and no sign or anything saying it's a park anywhere. Plus, the path would be more visible from the images. It definitely wouldn't go through the dense trees and brush across the gully like it's currently mapped either.  
  
  Or your saying it's a park that know one visits (due to the path being barely even visible, has no way to visit because the path you claim is attached it is in someone's side yard and you have to go through their lawn, bushes and planters through bushes to get to it, no parking because the only parking is a private space for the residence, no sign or anything else saying it's a park or anything else indicating there's anything there besides a small piece of grass between some people's yards, and that the invisible magical none existent park goes into a heavily dense and overgrown  gulch and across a stream to the other side....alrighty then. Well, you do also think the gulch is an industrial area. So...
  
  Hey, like I said before, if your so certain it's a park just go down the private road to it, over the people's planters, over the bushes, through their side yard, down into the gully you claim people are doing recreational things in and map it with mapilary.  