text: I wasn't the editor that added landuse=recreation_ground and must have missed it when doing tag corrections.
  
  Anyways, I still believe that the sports complex should be based on GIS even though some parts of the land are not easily accessible. It should reflect what land is owned by the place. The owners could potentially build more sport fields when they get the funds. Take parks for example; some parks areas are difficult to be accessible due to natural or man-made barriers. That area is still a park because according to GIS, the city owns the land (sometimes the GIS would have the park name, too). It looks right if the sports complex can match the GIS.