text: the sizes are completely implausible and the tagging is partly rubbish.
  
  user's other edit appears to be fantasy mapping as well and poorly executed, totally loosely based on the cited imagery.
  
  i'd revert them both because if this is remotely true, it would be far better to start from updated aerials than to fix the poor outlines here.
  
  unfortunately, one item i checked was already on v2 from a human-guided mechanical edit, so a commandline revert here would not be totally successful.