text: yep, i remember twice mapping there.
  
  first time there was an even wider selection of different imageries with obviously different dates but none new enough, and also not aligned to each other.
  
  second i found meself in a small z23 area, and went wow.
  
  the reason you see clarity at all is because when the original bing z19 decade old but well-aligned imagery  from the continental us and at least parts of other countries is not available, it tries to redirect elsewhere rather than ovrzooming.  i do not allow that to happen in my editor so here i se nothing.
  
  bing and mapbox match near here.  the llow-res part of esri west matches both in this area.
  
  maxar layers are the same with the wispy cloud, and disagree with the others.
  
  but if look closely around the school, you will se it is not far from esri z23.
  
  supposedly maxar is supposed to be somewhat better in some ways than the others, newer (not in canada), and what one shluld dois take a waas-enabled (if available in hawaii) gps unit and mark a point where the error settles to 2m or less (i've never tried a multi-system unit yet).
  
  i'm guessing maxar and the z23 areas will turn out closest.
  
  if bung is the Default (argh, my touchscren typoing is getting unreadable) in hawaii in iD, grr.  i'd say align to z23 esri where available, check against the satellite maxar, and around here, map against maxar, resulting in the inevitable eddit wars as those unaware of anything but bing move things back and un-straighten lines.
  
  but do check the gps offset of maxar in areas by the water and up hills.  it seems more overhead around the school than i have seen in other areas, but i have seen the newer bing satellite imagery vary by metres over a short area compared against the older and better corrected aeroplane overflights around rivers.
  
  
  sorry for all the typos, and hope this helps.  now tl submit without proofreading...