text: i won't be editing here - i am far away, those are small, or vice versa.  in truth, it is too painful to edit with my equipment apart from trivial maps.me swatting, but i can view things in potlatch2 without too much discomfort.
  
  actually what i meant, is it seems you are a local, and this map is only for locals.
  
  (if you are wondering what i am on, it is a mixture of chronic insomnia mixed with father ted and the league of gentlemen above.)
  
  i don't think a tunnel or culvert is right in these two/three locations.  further upstream there is a definite culvert and not a bridge, but from far away, these three look like bridges in out-of-date imagery.  it may be different now, but as i mention, i don't think the investment here to change things is worth it.
  
  what i meant about
  > You said something about bridges being added if the stream was continued
  is that i see further bridges upstream that would need to be added, as i tend to concentrate on one feature, that is, the path followed by the waterway, much like the roads i mapped in north korea ignoring the visible bridges or unclear probable fords.
  
  the reason why i don't edit is that there is too much painful delay between what i do and visible feedback, as now i am limited to a tablet with the boxing-glove android cursor obscuring the area i would be mapping, with a wlan-networked X11 display that prevents responsiveness (took  ten seconds for the last two words to appear).  mea culpa, i know, as i have chosen not to replace stolen or bad-caps-death equipment.