text: Map well.  Discuss (concisely, I say that, but I am called loquacious, I'll nod my head to that sometimes) only when and as much as is necessary.  There is a sweet spot, yet for whatever reasons, you and I go way too far and I find it exhausting.  Hence, me saying "map this better if you think it needs to be better; I don't, but let's see what you've got."
  
  Please don't let the fear of a mistake, especially a minor one, prevent you from mapping well.  Discussing first is polite and largely correct, though disagreements do occur; this seems to be one between us.  Of course, it's imperative to have solid knowledge of how tags are and should be used (this can be difficult sometimes, especially with "park" and its histories and how landuse/landcover issues have been confused in many minds, and for other reasons I've noted).
  
  And please don't indict me for what you predict my behavior will be when I haven't done it.
  
  Do you feel "damned if you do or don't?"  Yes, OSM can be that way sometimes, especially over contentious issues.  If/as we strip away misunderstandings (if any) we usually come closer to agreement.  Not always, but the right thing to do is give it our best shot.  With you and me, it seems to take thousands of words.  So, let's try fewer words and more (correct, smart, agreed-upon-semantics) mapping.