text: arrgh.  *every* time i post something today the link is down.  i shouldd look at the blinkenlights first.  try again...
  
  sure, when you detached the shop/entrance labels, a new node was left behind in the old position, so you can lose the entrance tagging from the detached node, and re-add it to the untagged outline nodes, then i need not bother with reverting/merging.
  
  there is another school of thought to use the minimum of nodes, rather than separate address, entrance, and identity nodes.  i'm happy with either as they both have advantages, like visible housenumvers when separate.
  
  the non-anon code has been committed but not yet rolled out into production, which will happen Real Soon Now.  seems the russian troll/vandal has taken the announcement as gospel and has only been posting crap, as i've seen no followups for a couple days.
  
  i bid farewell to a different anon followupper in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1904766 ; there is one in the uk who follows up on misplaced spam with advice to mappers where i'd simply resolve the misplaced note.
  
  your amazon claim i've addressed in a nearby note there; as you mention it here i decided to go to v1 of 8 years ago.  same tagging.  amazon created two ways and touched six others with the edit.