thank you for your recurrent work on data quality. but here I don't really understand the interest of the note:
- if it's to correct the data, wasn't it as quick to edit the object? there are so few in the base
- if it's to prevent the problem, since it's a new one using iD, isn't it rather to iD to be improved? iD's presets and auto-fill are made to hide the technical detail from the user, I'm sure he'll answer "iD suggested it to me". a rule in iD and josm would also avoid new cases.
I close the note to avoid that another user consults it thinking that there is something left to do.
but don't hesitate to reopen it to answer.
PS: this one is fixed