eteb3
These mosques appear to be duplicate entries. It's hard to be sure, but a highly-regarded dataset has the mosque in the easter building, with an address of 159-161. Bing aerial (of uncertain vintage) shows bright stone paths (=redevelopment) only in the easter building, again implying that is the sole site.

A puzzle is that the histories of both buildings have them as building=church. That suggests the error (if it is one) is long-standing: it seems highly unlikely to have two churches next to each other in a planned estate like this one.