bxl-forever
When I look at UrbIS numerical imagery, I see a perfect match between building shapes and OSM data.  And aerial imagery does not reveal any major discrepancy between our data and the buildings there.

I see a couple of housenumbers in UrbIS that are not in OSM but those are "dummy" numbers that either were reserved for buildings that were never built, or a mistake in UrbIS, which happens.

Did we miss anything special here?