martianfreeloader
The path is already marked with sac_scale=alpine_hiking + trail_visibility=intermediate + width=0.3, which considering your report, seems to be in accordance with the ground truth.

I think all OSM should do is strive to provide accurate data (which seems to be the case here). It is up to the user to decide what to do of that.

For alpine enthusiasts, this well tagged path might be very valuable and exactly what they're looking for, so I'd refrain from deleting it.