Lee Carré
See node #8902290231

“This isn't a pelican crossing. Pelicans are stand-alone.”
Fair enough; I'll avoid the term and use more descriptive language (and photos) in future.

“I'm not sure how to map pedestrian crossings that are part of a signalised junction.”
Sigh; mis-tapped and lost most of what I'd composed. The gist was as follows;

The proper way, from my understanding, would be to untag the shared central node (I gather that's the quick & dirty method) since there are no lights in the very centre of the junction (just tarmac). Instead, have a node (which is part of the roadway) at the position of each combo set of lights & crossing (approximately where each of the 4 notes are).

Each of the 4 nodes would be tagged as both traffic_signals and crossing.

Would need some extra tags, for the benefit of routing algorithms, to specify which direction each set of lights controls (backward or forward along the direction of the way, depending how the way was mapped).

Instead of trying to explain something quite abstract, it may be simpler to leave the notes open (since they're not actually resolved), and I'll make the actual nodal changes myself, preferably during another survey if I get the chance in the near-future, else I'll do it from memory (and set source=local knowledge), and later confirm the details with a survey (since there are also some street_cabinets (likely for the control electronics for the quad of traffic lights), and it would also be sensible to refine the tagging of the different lanes (since they're for going in different directions from the junction) of Minden Place).

If I could think of a junction where I know it's been done the proper way, I'd cite that, but I haven't seen any in Jersey.

I can well imagine that the idea of the previous mapper was to mark the junction as having traffic lights at all, for it to be refined in future.

I'll drop a comment, here, when it's done, so that you can see the concept which I'm trying to describe.