SHARCRASH
Oh yeah? How funny... You are still coming here with such a pride and ignoring on the fact that tomolobla had tampered OSM data even though here third part user loukote proves that the tracks and paths do exist! Not astonishing actually considering you had chosen to ignore the evidences I've posted publicly on several cases to support my reports against tomolobla, there are at least 6 of them that have been surveyed again recently and have been proven to exist! I am sure I will find more cases after I've WASTED more of my time doing again surveys but you will apparently continue to ignore them, hence the verb "to waste". Now about my contributions, you talk about proofs where I invent paths based on LIDAR, yet you have NEVER EVER shown them. Feel free to post them publicly, I even beg you, I will gladly have a look and possibly prove you once again how wrong you are. Big words from someone who ignores a lot, has not been on terrain, hasn't been able to give any evidence to contradict me, hasn't been able to resolve the conflict with a valid investigation after several months, allows a VANDAL to tamper data with some kind of favouritism and even misleads people with erroneous understating of OSM tags, example: on the following changeset about the tag smoothness=impassable you said to tomolobla that "if something is impassable then it is not a track anymore; delete it, or use "abandoned:highway=track" or something like that" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89202209 Whereas the value "impassable" for that key is only applicable for wheeled vehicles! Which means pedestrians can still use the way though! Yet you said to delete it! WOAW! Indeed big words from you, woodpeck!  Any further big words, please explain this... 