Thanks - this now looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12204775#map=19/53.36136/-6.25968 .  I've also done https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26500150#map=16/53.3589/-6.2520 the same way but left https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15536378#map=19/53.36132/-6.25948 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15536379#map=19/53.36160/-6.25958 as they are both proposed, and the cycle infrastructure isn't clear yet.