Okay, stepping in here.

I'll be the first to vouch that Jakka is by no means acting in bad faith.

There's two things to distinguish:
* How the data is tied to the map (and what is available to end users of the data)
* What data is held in notes.

I'm inclined to agree that 'access' restrictions can be tagged as part of the data. However, whatever data is held in nodes is:
1) by default not visible to end users on the map, unless the notes layer is toggled on.
2) this data is NOT fed into the data that end users (map makers and such) work with.

As such, the note itself holds little value, and such comments let on the map obstruct keeping track of the 'to do' issues which notes were created for. From that last point, I have to agree with Jakka.

Now, in an attempt to turn this the constructive way: what exactly is the issue with trespassing? Them venturing into the forrest, or then using Voetweg 7 and Voetwegel 61?