Thank you for the clarification, pykälö. I understand the hierarchy of "suuralueet," "tilastoalueet," and "pienalueet," but I’m still trying to grasp how these are represented on maps, especially when names differ from colloquial usage.

When I mentioned label size, I was referring to the font size and visibility of certain place names on maps, which can be misleading if not consistently applied. This affects how we decide which names to use and how to tag them accurately.

Regarding the Jyväskylä map service's pohjakartta, places like "Sulkula" and "Suuruspää" appear on the map but aren't listed in map layers, while "Tikantori" is a "pienalue" but isn't shown on the map. This inconsistency in displaying the size and prominence of place names makes tagging in OSM challenging.

There is a similar challenge with the MML map, which is also available in the Jyväskylä map service as the "peruskartta." For example, at certain zoom levels, Ainolanranta doesn’t appear at all, but Ainola and Suuruspää do, even though neither is listed in the official map layers. This makes building a hierarchy based solely on visual cues challenging.

Given these challenges, I’d like to know your recommendations for tagging place names in Kuokkala. Do the "place" tag values I suggested earlier make sense to you? What would you recommend?

Ps. I'm also happy to discuss this in Finnish, as I wasn't sure what's the recommended language to use on the notes. 