text_original: Surely nothing could be more absurd or preposterous than the articles of this covenant, which she insisted upon with such inflexibility. How could she suppose that her pretended lover would be restrained by an oath, when the very occasion of incurring it was an intention to act in violation of all laws human and divine?
text_transcription: SURELY NOTHING COULD BE MORE ABSURD OR PREPOSTEROUS THAN THE ARTICLES OF THIS COVENANT WHICH SHE INSISTED UPON WITH SUCH INFLEXIBILITY HOW COULD SHE SUPPOSE THAT HER PRETENDED LOVER WOULD BE RESTRAINED BY AN OATH WHEN THE VERY OCCASION OF INCURRING IT WAS AN INTENTION TO ACT IN VIOLATION OF ALL LAWS HUMAN AND DIVINE
phonemes: ʃˈʊɹli nˈʌθɪŋ kʊd biː mˈɔːɹ ɐbsˈɜːd ɔːɹ pɹɪpˈɔstɚɹəs ðɐn ðɪ ˈɑːɹɾɪkəlz ʌv ðɪs kˈʌvɛnənt, wˌɪtʃ ʃiː ɪnsˈɪstᵻd əpˌɑːn wɪð sˈʌtʃ ɪnflˌɛksəbˈɪlᵻɾi. hˌaʊ kʊd ʃiː səpˈoʊz ðæt hɜː pɹɪtˈɛndᵻd lˈʌvɚ wʊd biː ɹᵻstɹˈeɪnd baɪ ɐn ˈoʊθ, wˌɛn ðə vˈɛɹi əkˈeɪʒən ʌv ɪŋkˈɜːɹɪŋ ɪt wʌz ɐn ɪntˈɛnʃən tʊ ˈækt ɪn vaɪəlˈeɪʃən ʌv ˈɔːl lˈɔːz hjˈuːmən ænd dᵻvˈaɪn?