text_original: To put the question yet again, why can suffer  ing be a compensation for "owing"? — Because the inflic  tion of suffering produces the highest degree of happi  ness, because the injured party will get in exchange for his loss (including his vexation at his loss) an extraordi  nary counter pleasure: the infliction of suffering — a real feast, something that, as I have said, was all the more appreciated the greater the paradox created by the rank and social status of the creditor.
text_transcription: TO PUT THE QUESTION YET AGAIN WHY CAN SUFFERING BE A COMPENSATION FOR OWING BECAUSE THE INFLICTION OF SUFFERING PRODUCES THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF HAPPINESS BECAUSE THE INJURED PARTY WILL GET IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS LOSS INCLUDING HIS VEXATION AT HIS LOSS AN EXTRAORDINARY COUNTER PLEASURE THE INFLICTION OF SUFFERING A REAL FEAST SOMETHING THAT AS I HAVE SAID WAS ALL THE MORE APPRECIATED THE GREATER THE PARADOX CREATED BY THE RANK AND SOCIAL STATUS OF THE CREDITOR
phonemes: tə pˌʊt ðə kwˈɛstʃən jˈɛt ɐɡˈɛn, wˌaɪ kæn sˈʌfɚɹ ˈɪŋ biː ɐ kˌɑːmpənsˈeɪʃən fɔːɹ "ˈoʊɪŋ"? — bɪkˈʌz ðɪ ɪnflˈɪk tɪˈɑːn ʌv sˈʌfɚɹɪŋ pɹədˈuːsᵻz ðə hˈaɪɪst dᵻɡɹˈiː ʌv hˈæpi nˈɛs, bɪkˈʌz ðɪ ˈɪndʒɚd pˈɑːɹɾi wɪl ɡɛt ɪn ɛkstʃˈeɪndʒ fɔːɹ hɪz lˈɔs (ɪŋklˈuːdɪŋ hɪz vɛksˈeɪʃən æt hɪz lˈɔs) ɐn ɛkstɹˈɔːɹdi nˈɛɹi kˈaʊntɚ plˈɛʒɚ: ðɪ ɪnflˈɪkʃən ʌv sˈʌfɚɹɪŋ — ɐ ɹˈiːəl fˈiːst, sˈʌmθɪŋ ðˈæt, æz aɪ hæv sˈɛd, wʌz ˈɔːl ðə mˈɔːɹ ɐpɹˈiːʃɪˌeɪɾᵻd ðə ɡɹˈeɪɾɚ ðə pˈæɹədˌɑːks kɹiːˈeɪɾᵻd baɪ ðə ɹˈæŋk ænd sˈoʊʃəl stˈæɾəs ʌvðə kɹˈɛdɪɾɚ.