text_original: How much more logical is that contrary theory (it is not the truer for that) which 6 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS is represented, for instance, by Herbert Spencer, who places the concept "good" as essentially similar to the concept "useful," "purposive," so that in the judgments "good" and "bad" mankind is simply summarising and investing with a sanction its unforgotten and unforget  table experiences concerning the "useful purposive" and the "mischievous non purposive."
text_transcription: HOW MUCH MORE LOGICAL IS THAT CONTRARY THEORY IT IS NOT SURE FOR THAT WHICH IS REPRESENTED FOR INSTANCE BY HERBERT SPENCER WHO PLACES THE CONCEPT GOOD AS ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE CONCEPT USEFUL PURPOSIVE SO THAT IN THE JUDGEMENTS GOOD AND BAD MANKIND IS SIMPLY SUMMARIZING AND INVESTING WITH THE SANCTION ITS UNFORGOTTEN AND UNFORGETTABLE EXPERIENCES CONCERNING THE USEFUL PURPOSIVE AND THE MISCHIEVOUS NON PURPOSIVE
phonemes: hˌaʊ mˈʌtʃ mˈɔːɹ lˈɑːdʒɪkəl ɪz ðæt kˈɑːntɹɛɹi θˈiəɹi (ɪɾ ɪz nˌɑːt ðə tɹˈuːɚ fɔːɹ ðˈæt) wˌɪtʃ sˈɪks ðə dʒˌiːnɪˈælədʒi ʌv mˈɔːɹəlz ɪz ɹˌɛpɹᵻzˈɛntᵻd, fɔːɹ ˈɪnstəns, baɪ hˈɜːbɚt spˈɛnsɚ, hˌuː plˈeɪsᵻz ðə kˈɑːnsɛpt "ɡˈʊd" æz ᵻsˈɛnʃəli sˈɪmɪlɚ tə ðə kˈɑːnsɛpt "jˈuːsfəl," "pɜːpˈoʊsɪv," sˌoʊ ðæt ɪnðə dʒˈʌdʒmənts "ɡˈʊd" ænd "bˈæd" mæŋkˈaɪnd ɪz sˈɪmpli sˈʌmɚɹˌaɪzɪŋ ænd ɪnvˈɛstɪŋ wɪð ɐ sˈæŋkʃən ɪts ʌnfɚɡˈɑːʔn̩ ænd ʌnfɚɡˈɛt tˈeɪbəl ɛkspˈiəɹɪənsᵻz kənsˈɜːnɪŋ ðə "jˈuːsfəl pɜːpˈoʊsɪv" ænd ðə "mˈɪstʃɪvəs nˈɑːn pɜːpˈoʊsɪv."