text_original: More comfortable and less risky perhaps than its opposite, but also pettier, meaner! So that morality would really be saddled with the guilt, if the maximum potentiality of the power and splendour of the human species were never to be attained? So that really morality would be the danger of dangers?
text_transcription: MORE COMFORTABLE AND LESS RISKY PERHAPS THAN ITS OPPOSITE BUT ALSO PETTIER MEANER SO THAT MORALITY WOULD REALLY BE SADDLED WITH THE GUILT IF THE MAXIMUM POTENTIALITY OF THE POWER SPLENDOUR OF THE HUMAN SPECIES WERE NEVER TO BE ATTAINED SO THAT REALLY MORALITY WOULD BE THE DANGER OF DANGERS
phonemes: mˈɔːɹ kˈʌmftəbəl ænd lˈɛs ɹˈɪski pɚhˈæps ðɐn ɪts ˈɑːpəzˌɪt, bˌʌt ˈɔːlsoʊ pˈɛɾɪɚ, mˈiːnɚ! sˌoʊ ðæt mɔːɹˈælᵻɾi wʊd ɹˈiəli biː sˈædəld wɪððə ɡˈɪlt, ɪf ðə mˈæksɪməm pətˈɛnʃɪˈælᵻɾi ʌvðə pˈaʊɚ ænd splˈɛndɚɹ ʌvðə hjˈuːmən spˈiːsiːz wɜː nˈɛvɚ təbi ɐtˈeɪnd? sˌoʊ ðæt ɹˈiəli mɔːɹˈælᵻɾi wʊd biː ðə dˈeɪndʒɚɹ ʌv dˈeɪndʒɚz?