text_original: Compare this definition with this other one, made by a real "spectator" and "artist" — by Stendhal, who once called the beautiful une promesse de bonheur. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated — le desinteressement. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal?
text_transcription: COMPARE THIS DEFINITION WITH US OTHER ONE MADE BY A REAL SPECTATOR AND ARTIST BY STENDAL WHO ONCE CALLED THE BEAUTIFUL UNPRE MISS DE BONNEU HERE AT ANY RATE THE ONE POINT WHICH KANT MAKES PROMINENT IN THE AESTHETIC POSITION IS REPUDIATED AND ELIMINATED LE SENTRE LESSSIMOM WHO IS RIGHT CONTERAL
phonemes: kəmpˈɛɹ ðɪs dˌɛfɪnˈɪʃən wɪð ðɪs ˈʌðɚ wˌʌn, mˌeɪd baɪ ɐ ɹˈiːəl "spɛktˈeɪɾɚ" ænd "ˈɑːɹɾɪst" — baɪ stˈɛndhəl, hˌuː wˈʌns kˈɔːld ðə bjˈuːɾifəl jˈuːn pɹˈoʊməs də bənhˈʊɹ. hˈɪɹ, æɾ ˌɛni ɹˈeɪt, ðə wˈʌn pˈɔɪnt wˌɪtʃ kˈænt mˌeɪks pɹˈɑːmɪnənt ɪnðɪ ɛsθˈɛɾɪk pəzˈɪʃən ɪz ɹᵻpjˈuːdɪˌeɪɾᵻd ænd ᵻlˈɪmᵻnˌeɪɾᵻd — lə dɪzˈɪntɚɹˌɛsmənt. hˌuː ɪz ɹˈaɪt, kˈænt ɔːɹ stˈɛndhəl?