text_original: We must guard ourselves against the confusion, into which an artist himself would fall only too easily (to em  ploy the English terminology) out of psychological "con  tiguity"; as though the artist' himself actually were the object which he is able to represent, imagine, and express.
text_transcription: WE MUST GUARD OURSELVES AGAINST THE CONFUSION INTO WHICH AN ARTIST WOULD FALL ONLY TOO EASILY TO EMPLOY THE ENGLISH TERMINOLOGY OUT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTIGUITY AS THOUGH THE ARTIST HIMSELF ACTUALLY WERE THE OBJECT WHICH HE IS ABLE TO REPRESENT IMAGINE AND EXPRESS
phonemes: wiː mˈʌst ɡˈɑːɹd aʊɚsˈɛlvz ɐɡˈɛnst ðə kənfjˈuːʒən, ˌɪntʊ wˌɪtʃ ɐn ˈɑːɹɾɪst hɪmsˈɛlf wʊd fˈɔːl ˈoʊnli tˈuː ˈiːzili (tʊ ˈɛm plˈɔɪ ðɪ ˈɪŋɡlɪʃ tˌɜːmɪnˈɑːlədʒi) ˌaʊɾəv saɪkəlˈɑːdʒɪkəl "kˈɑːn tɪɡjˈuːɪɾi"; æz ðˌoʊ ðɪ ˈɑːɹɾɪst hɪmsˈɛlf ˈæktʃuːəli wɜː ðɪ ˈɑːbdʒɛkt wˌɪtʃ hiː ɪz ˈeɪbəl tə ɹˌɛpɹᵻzˈɛnt, ɪmˈædʒɪn, ænd ɛkspɹˈɛs.