text_original: To him it is just the excitement of the will (the "interest") by the beauty that seems the essential fact. And does not Schopenhauer ultimately lay himself open to the objection, that he is quite wrong in regarding himself as a Kantian on this point, that he has absolutely failed to understand in a Kantian sense the Kantian definition of the beautiful — that the beautiful pleased him as well by means of an interest, by means, in fact, of the strong  est and most personal interest of all, that of the victim of torture who escapes from his torture?
text_transcription: TO HIM IT IS JUST THE EXCITEMENT OF THE WILL THE INTEREST BY THE BEAUTY THAT SEEMS THE ESSENTIAL FACT AND DOES NOT SCHOPENHAU ULTIMATELY LAY HIMSELF OPEN TO THAT OBJECTION THAT HE IS QUITE WRONG IN REGARDING HIMSELF AS A KANTIAN ON THIS POINT THAT HE HAS ABSOLUTELY FAILED TO UNDERSTAND IN A CONTINE SENSE THE CONTIENT DEFINITION OF THE BEAUTIFUL THAT THIS BEAUTIFUL PLEASED HIM AS WELL BY MEANING OF AN INTEREST BY MEANS IN FACT OF THE STRONGEST AND MOST PERSONAL INTEREST OF ALL THAT OF THE VICTIM OF TORTURE WHO ESCAPES FROM HIS TORTURE
phonemes: tə hˌɪm ɪɾ ɪz dʒˈʌst ðɪ ɛksˈaɪtmənt ʌvðə wˈɪl (ðə "ˈɪntɹɛst") baɪ ðə bjˈuːɾi ðæt sˈiːmz ðɪ ᵻsˈɛnʃəl fˈækt. ænd dʌznˌɑːt skˈoʊpənhˌaʊɚɹ ˈʌltᵻmətli lˈeɪ hɪmsˈɛlf ˈoʊpən tə ðɪ ɑːbdʒˈɛkʃən, ðæt hiː ɪz kwˈaɪt ɹˈɔŋ ɪn ɹᵻɡˈɑːɹdɪŋ hɪmsˈɛlf æz ɐ kˈænʃən ˌɔn ðɪs pˈɔɪnt, ðæt hiː hɐz ˌæbsəlˈuːtli fˈeɪld tʊ ˌʌndɚstˈænd ɪn ɐ kˈænʃən sˈɛns ðə kˈænʃən dˌɛfɪnˈɪʃən ʌvðə bjˈuːɾifəl — ðætðə bjˈuːɾifəl plˈiːzd hˌɪm æz wˈɛl baɪ mˈiːnz əvən ˈɪntɹɛst, baɪ mˈiːnz, ɪn fˈækt, ʌvðə stɹˈɔŋ ˌiːˌɛstˈiː ænd mˈoʊst pˈɜːsənəl ˈɪntɹɛst ʌv ˈɔːl, ðæt ʌvðə vˈɪktɪm ʌv tˈɔːɹtʃɚ hˌuː ɛskˈeɪps fɹʌm hɪz tˈɔːɹtʃɚ?