text_original: And how much in the latter is perhaps just an echo of the former? But there is no doubt but that the theme would have dealt with the praise of chastity. And certainly it would also have dealt with the praise of sensuality, and even so, it would seem quite in order, and 96 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS even so, it would have been equally Wagnerian. For there is no necessary antithesis between chastity and sen  suality: every good marriage, every authentic heart felt love transcends this antithesis.
text_transcription: AND HOW MUCH IN THE LATTER IS PERHAPS JUST AN ECHO OF THE FORMER BUT THERE IS NO DOUBT BUT THAT THE WOULD HAVE DEALT WITH THE PRAISE OF CHASTITY AND CERTAINLY IT WOULD HAVE ALSO HAVE DEALT WITH THE PRAISE OF SENSUALITY AND EVEN SO IT WOULD SEEM QUITE IN ORDER AND EVEN SO IT WOULD HAVE BEEN EQUALLY WAGNERIAN FOR THERE IS NO NECESSARY ANTITHESIS BETWEEN CHASTITY AND SENSUALITY EVERY GOOD MARRIAGE EVERY AUTHENTIC HEARTFELT LOVE TRANSCENDS THIS ANTITHESIS
phonemes: ænd hˌaʊ mˈʌtʃ ɪnðə lˈæɾɚɹ ɪz pɚhˈæps dʒˈʌst ɐn ˈɛkoʊ ʌvðə fˈɔːɹmɚ? bˌʌt ðɛɹ ɪz nˈoʊ dˈaʊt bˌʌt ðætðə θˈiːm wʊdhɐv dˈɛlt wɪððə pɹˈeɪz ʌv tʃˈæstᵻɾi. ænd sˈɜːʔn̩li ɪt wʊd ˈɔːlsoʊ hæv dˈɛlt wɪððə pɹˈeɪz ʌv sˌɛnʃuːˈælᵻɾi, ænd ˈiːvən sˈoʊ, ɪt wʊd sˈiːm kwˈaɪt ɪn ˈɔːɹdɚ, ænd nˈaɪnti sˈɪks ðə dʒˌiːnɪˈælədʒi ʌv mˈɔːɹəlz ˈiːvən sˈoʊ, ɪt wʊdhɐv bˌɪn ˈiːkwəli wæɡnˈɪɹiən. fɔːɹ ðɛɹ ɪz nˈoʊ nˈɛsᵻsɚɹi æntˈɪθəsˌɪs bᵻtwˌiːn tʃˈæstᵻɾi ænd sˈɛn ʒuːˈælᵻɾi: ˈɛvɹi ɡˈʊd mˈæɹɪdʒ, ˈɛvɹi ɔːθˈɛntɪk hˈɑːɹt fˈɛlt lˈʌv tɹænsˈɛndz ðɪs æntˈɪθəsˌɪs.