text_original: Wherefore we see a kingdom and tyranny are not diverse forms of government, but one and the self same monarch bath the name of a king given him in point of bonour and reverence to him, and of a tyrant in Way of contumely and reproach. But what we frequently find in books said against tyrants, took its original from Greek and Roman writers, whose government was partly democratieal, and partly aristocratical, and therefore not tyrants only, but even kings were odious to them.
text_transcription: WHEREFORE WE SEE A KINGDOM AND TYRANNY ARE NOT DIVERS FORMS OF GOVERNMENT BUT ONE AND THE SELF SAME MONARCH HATH THE NAME OF A KING GIVEN HIM IN POINT OF HONOR AND REVERENCE TO HIM AND THAT OF A TYRANT IN WAY OF CONTUM REPROACH BUT WHAT WE FREQUENTLY FIND IN BOOKS SAID AGAINST TYRANTS TOOK ITS ORIGINAL FROM GREEK AND ROMAN WRITERS WHOSE GOVERNMENT WAS PARTLY DEMOCRATICAL AND PARTLY ARISTOCRATICAL AND THEREFORE NOT TYRANTS ONLY BUT EVEN KINGS WERE ODIOUS TO THEM
phonemes: wˈɛɹfɔːɹ wiː sˈiː ɐ kˈɪŋdəm ænd tˈɪɹəni ɑːɹ nˌɑːt daɪvˈɜːs fˈɔːɹmz ʌv ɡˈʌvɚnmənt, bˌʌt wˈʌn ænd ðə sˈɛlf sˈeɪm mˈɑːnɚk bˈæθ ðə nˈeɪm əvə kˈɪŋ ɡˈɪvən hˌɪm ɪn pˈɔɪnt ʌv bˈɑːnɚ ænd ɹˈɛvɚɹəns tə hˌɪm, ænd əvə tˈaɪɹənt ɪn wˈeɪ ʌv kəntˈuːmli ænd ɹᵻpɹˈoʊtʃ. bˌʌt wʌt wiː fɹˈiːkwəntli fˈaɪnd ɪn bˈʊks sˈɛd ɐɡˈɛnst tˈaɪɹənts, tˈʊk ɪts ɚɹˈɪdʒɪnəl fɹʌm ɡɹˈiːk ænd ɹˈoʊmən ɹˈaɪɾɚz, hˌuːz ɡˈʌvɚnmənt wʌz pˈɑːɹtli dˈɛməkɹˌæɾɪəl, ænd pˈɑːɹtli ɚɹˌɪstəkɹˈæɾɪkəl, ænd ðˈɛɹfɔːɹ nˌɑːt tˈaɪɹənts ˈoʊnli, bˌʌt ˈiːvən kˈɪŋz wɜːɹ ˈoʊdiəs tə ðˌɛm.