text_original: And so we get from our philosophers, from the very beginning, definitions on which the lack of a subtler personal experience squats like a fat worm of crass error, as it does on Kant's famous definition of the beautiful. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without interesting." Without interesting!
text_transcription: AND SO WE GET FROM OUR PHILOSOPHERS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING DEFINITIONS ON WHICH THE LACK OF A SUBTLER PERSONAL EXPERIENCE SQUATS LIKE A FAT WORM OF CRASS ERROR AS IT DOES ON VICANT'S FAMOUS DEFINITION OF THE BEAUTIFUL THAT IS BEAUTIFUL SAYS KANT WHICH PLEASES WITHOUT INTERESTING WITHOUT INTERESTING
phonemes: ænd sˌoʊ wiː ɡɛt fɹʌm ˌaʊɚ fɪlˈɑːsəfɚz, fɹʌmðə vˈɛɹi bɪɡˈɪnɪŋ, dˌɛfɪnˈɪʃənz ˌɔn wˌɪtʃ ðə lˈæk əvə sˈʌtlɚ pˈɜːsənəl ɛkspˈiəɹɪəns skwˈɑːts lˈaɪk ɐ fˈæt wˈɜːm ʌv kɹˈæs ˈɛɹɚ, æz ɪt dˈʌz ˌɔn kˈænts fˈeɪməs dˌɛfɪnˈɪʃən ʌvðə bjˈuːɾifəl. "ðæt ɪz bjˈuːɾifəl," sˈɛz kˈænt, "wˌɪtʃ plˈiːzᵻz wɪðˌaʊt ˈɪntɹɛstɪŋ." wɪðˌaʊt ˈɪntɹɛstɪŋ!