text_original: So far as all this kind of priestly medicine mongering,' 1 54 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS the "guilty" kind, is concerned, every word of criticism superfluous. As for the suggestion that emotional excess of the type, which in these cases the ascetic priest is fain to order to his sick patients (under the most sacred .hemism, as is obvious, and equally impregnated with the sanctity of his purpose), has ever really been of use to any sick man, who, forsooth, would feel inclined to maintain a proposition of that character?
text_transcription: SO FAR AS ALL THIS KIND OF PRIESTLY MEDICINE MONGERING THE GUILTY KIND IS CONCERNED EVERY WORD OF CRITICISM IS SUPERFLUOUS AS FOR THE SUGGESTION THAT EMOTIONAL ACCESS OF THE TYPE WHICH IN THESE CASES THE ASCETIC PRIEST IS FAIN TO ORDER TO HIS SICK PATIENTS UNDER THE MOST SACRED EUPHEMISM AS IS OBVIOUS AND EQUALLY IMPREGNATED WITH THE SANCTITY OF HIS PURPOSE HAS EVER REALLY BEEN OF USE TO ANY SICK MAN WHO FORSOOTH WOULD FEEL INCLINED TO MAINTAIN A PROPOSITION OF THAT CHARACTER
phonemes: sˈoʊ fˌɑːɹ æz ˈɔːl ðɪs kˈaɪnd ʌv pɹˈiːstli mˈɛdəsən mˈɔndʒɚɹɪŋ,wˈʌn fˈɪfti fˈɔːɹ ðə dʒˌiːnɪˈælədʒi ʌv mˈɔːɹəlz ðə "ɡˈɪlti" kˈaɪnd, ɪz kənsˈɜːnd, ˈɛvɹi wˈɜːd ʌv kɹˈɪɾɪsˌɪzəm suːpˈɜːfluːəs. æz fɚðə sədʒˈɛstʃən ðæt ɪmˈoʊʃənəl ɛksˈɛs ʌvðə tˈaɪp, wˌɪtʃ ɪn ðiːz kˈeɪsᵻz ðɪ ɐsˈɛɾɪk pɹˈiːst ɪz fˈeɪn tʊ ˈɔːɹdɚ tə hɪz sˈɪk pˈeɪʃənts (ˌʌndɚ ðə mˈoʊst sˈeɪkɹɪd .hˈiːmɪzəm, ˌæzˌɪz ˈɑːbviəs, ænd ˈiːkwəli ɪmpɹˈɛɡneɪɾᵻd wɪððə sˈæŋktᵻɾi ʌv hɪz pˈɜːpəs), hɐz ˈɛvɚ ɹˈiəli bˌɪn ʌv jˈuːs tʊ ˌɛni sˈɪk mˈæn, hˈuː, fɔːɹsˈuːð, wʊd fˈiːl ɪŋklˈaɪnd tə meɪntˈeɪn ɐ pɹˌɑːpəzˈɪʃən ʌv ðæt kˈæɹɪktɚ?