text_original: I am con  founded at the secretary's severe sentence. There is no proof of my client Schumacker's crime. There is no evi  dence that he has had any direct share in the insurrec  tion ; and since my other client, Ordener Guldenlew, confesses that he made unlawful use of Schumacker's name, and moreover that he is the sole author of tins damnable sedition, all evidence against Schumacker dis  appears ; you should therefore acquit him.
text_transcription: I AM CONFOUNDED AT THE SECRETARY'S SEVERE SENTENCE THERE IS NO PROOF OF MY CLIENT SCHUMANKA'S CRIME THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT HE HAS HAD ANY DIRECT SHARE IN THE INSURRECTION AND SINCE MY OTHER CLIENT ORDINAR GUDENEV CONFESSES THAT HE MADE UNLAWFUL USE OF SCHUMAGA'S NAME AND MOREOVER THAT HE IS THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS DAMNABLE SEDITION ALL EVIDENCE AGAINST CHUMACHA DISAPPEARS YOU SHOULD THEREFORE ACQUIT HIM
phonemes: aɪɐm kˈɑːn fˈaʊndᵻd æt ðə sˈɛkɹətɹiz sᵻvˈɪɹ sˈɛntəns. ðɛɹ ɪz nˈoʊ pɹˈuːf ʌv maɪ klˈaɪənt ʃˈuːmækɚz kɹˈaɪm. ðɛɹ ɪz nˈoʊ ˈɛvi dˈɛns ðæt hiː hɐz hˌæd ˌɛni dᵻɹˈɛkt ʃˈɛɹ ɪnðɪ ɪnsɚɹˈɛk tɪˈɑːn ; ænd sˈɪns maɪ ˈʌðɚ klˈaɪənt, ˈɔːɹdənɚ ɡˈʌldənlˌuː, kənfˈɛsᵻz ðæt hiː mˌeɪd ʌnlˈɔːfəl jˈuːs ʌv ʃˈuːmækɚz nˈeɪm, ænd mɔːɹˈoʊvɚ ðæt hiː ɪz ðə sˈoʊl ˈɔːθɚɹ ʌv tˈɪnz dˈæməbəl sɪdˈɪʃən, ˈɔːl ˈɛvɪdəns ɐɡˈɛnst ʃˈuːmækɚ dˈɪs ɐpˈɪɹz ; juː ʃˌʊd ðˈɛɹfɔːɹ ɐkwˈɪt hˌɪm.