text_original: The second Reform Bill was in substance very much the same as its predecessor had been, but of course its principle was debated on the motion of the second reading with as much heat, although not at such great length, as in the case of the first Reform Bill a few weeks before.
text_transcription: THE SECOND REFORM BILL WAS IN SUBSTANCE VERY MUCH THE SAME AS ITS PREDECESSOR HAD BEEN BUT OF COURSE ITS PRINCIPLE WAS DEBATED ON THE MOTION OF THE SECOND READING WITH AS MUCH HEAT ALTHOUGH NOT AT SUCH GREAT LENGTH AS IN THE CASE OF THE FIRST REFORM BILL A FEW WEEKS BEFORE
phonemes: ðə sˈɛkənd ɹᵻfˈɔːɹm bˈɪl wʌz ɪn sˈʌbstəns vˈɛɹi mˈʌtʃ ðə sˈeɪm æz ɪts pɹˈɛdᵻsˌɛsɚ hɐdbɪn, bˌʌt ʌv kˈɔːɹs ɪts pɹˈɪnsɪpəl wʌz dᵻbˈeɪɾᵻd ɔnðə mˈoʊʃən ʌvðə sˈɛkənd ɹˈiːdɪŋ wɪð æz mˈʌtʃ hˈiːt, ɔːlðˈoʊ nˌɑːt æt sˈʌtʃ ɡɹˈeɪt lˈɛŋθ, æz ɪnðə kˈeɪs ʌvðə fˈɜːst ɹᵻfˈɔːɹm bˈɪl ɐ fjˈuː wˈiːks bᵻfˈɔːɹ.