text_original: It is said that, in his conversation with the Eang, Walpole pointed out that to the minister would be attributed every disaster that might occur during a war, his opposition to which would always be considered a crime. But would there be anything very unfair or unreasonable in that?
text_transcription: IT IS SAID THAT IN HIS CONVERSATION WITH THE KING WALPOLE POINTED OUT THAT TO THE MINISTER WOULD BE ATTRIBUTED EVERY DISASTER THAT MIGHT OCCUR DURING A WAR HIS OPPOSITION TO WHICH WOULD ALWAYS BE CONSIDERED A CRIME BUT WOULD THERE BE ANYTHING VERY UNFAIR OR UNREASONABLE IN THAT
phonemes: ɪɾ ɪz sˈɛd ðˈæt, ɪn hɪz kɑːnvɚsˈeɪʃən wɪððɪ ˈiːŋ, wˈɔlpoʊl pˈɔɪntᵻd ˈaʊt ðæt tə ðə mˈɪnɪstɚ wʊd biː ɐtɹˈɪbjuːɾᵻd ˈɛvɹi dɪzˈæstɚ ðæt mˌaɪt əkˈɜː dˈʊɹɹɪŋ ɐ wˈɔːɹ, hɪz ˌɑːpəzˈɪʃən tʊ wˌɪtʃ wʊd ˈɔːlweɪz biː kənsˈɪdɚd ɐ kɹˈaɪm. bˌʌt wʊd ðɛɹbˈiː ˈɛnɪθˌɪŋ vˈɛɹi ʌnfˈɛɹ ɔːɹ ʌnɹˈiːzənəbəl ɪn ðˈæt?