text_original: Churchill was not a man of irreproachable character, of unimpeachable morality, or of unswerving austerity. But he was as different from the Sandwiches and the Dashwoods as dawn is different from dusk, and in enumerating all of the many arguments that are to be accumulated in defence of Wilkes, not the least weighty arguments are that while on the one hand he earned the hatred of Sandwich and of Dashwood, on the other hand he earned the love of Charles Churchill.
text_transcription: CHURCHILL WAS NOT A MAN OF IRREPROACHABLE CHARACTER OF UNIMPEACHABLE MORALITY OR OF UNSWERVING AUSTERITY BUT HE WAS AS DIFFERENT FROM THE SANDWICHES AND THE DASHWOODS AS DAWN IS DIFFERENT FROM DUSK AND IN ENUMERATING ALL OF THE MANY ARGUMENTS THAT ARE TO BE ACCUMULATED IN DEFENSE OF WILKES NOT THE LEAST WEIGHTY ARGUMENTS ARE THAT WHILE ON THE ONE HAND HE EARNED THE HATRED OF SANDWICH AND OF DASHWOOD ON THE OTHER HAND HE EARNED THE LOVE OF CHARLES CHURCHILL
phonemes: tʃˈɜːtʃɪl wʌz nˌɑːɾə mˈæn ʌv ɪɹᵻpɹˈoʊtʃəbəl kˈæɹɪktɚ, ʌv ˌʌnɪmpˈiːtʃəbəl mɔːɹˈælᵻɾi, ɔːɹ ʌv ʌnswˈɜːvɪŋ ɔːstˈɛɹᵻɾi. bˌʌt hiː wʌz æz dˈɪfɹənt fɹʌmðə sˈændwɪtʃᵻz ænd ðə dˈæʃwʊdz æz dˈɔːn ɪz dˈɪfɹənt fɹʌm dˈʌsk, ænd ɪn ɪnˈuːmɚɹˌeɪɾɪŋ ˈɔːl ʌvðə mˈɛni ˈɑːɹɡjuːmənts ðæt ɑːɹ təbi ɐkjˈuːmjʊlˌeɪɾᵻd ɪn dᵻfˈɛns ʌv wˈɪlks, nˌɑːt ðə lˈiːst wˈeɪɾi ˈɑːɹɡjuːmənts ɑːɹ ðæt wˌaɪl ɔnðə wˈʌn hˈænd hiː ˈɜːnd ðə hˈeɪtɹɪd ʌv sˈændwɪtʃ ænd ʌv dˈæʃwʊd, ɔnðɪ ˈʌðɚ hˈænd hiː ˈɜːnd ðə lˈʌv ʌv tʃˈɑːɹlz tʃˈɜːtʃɪl.