text_original: As regards Atterbury, the whole question Digiti zed by Google 1723 51 ATTEKBURyS EXILE AND DEATH. 291 was whether he was really the person described in the correspondence now as Jones and now as niington. There might have been no evidence which even a ^ secret, wise ' committee of that day would have cared to accept but for the fact that the bishop's wife had received, or was to have received, from France a present of a dog called Harlequin, and that there was mention in the correspondence about poor Mr. IDington being in grief for the loss of his dog Harlequin.
text_transcription: AS REGARDS ADTERBURY THE WHOLE QUESTION WAS WHETHER HE WAS REALLY THE PERSON DESCRIBED IN THE CORRESPONDENCE NOW AS JONES AND NOW AS ILLINGTON THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN NO EVIDENCE WHICH EVEN A SECRET WISE COMMITTEE OF THAT DAY WOULD HAVE CARED TO ACCEPT BUT FOR THE FACT THAT THE BISHOP'S WIFE HAD RECEIVED OR WAS TO HAVE RECEIVED FROM FRANCE A PRESENT OF A DOG CALLED HARLEQUIN AND THAT THERE WAS MENTIONED IN THE CORRESPONDENCE ABOUT POOR MISTER ILLINGTON BEING IN GRIEF FOR THE LOSS OF HIS DOG HARLEQUIN
phonemes: æz ɹᵻɡˈɑːɹdz ɐɾɚbˈɛɹi, ðə hˈoʊl kwˈɛstʃən dɪdʒˈiːɾi zˈɛd baɪ ɡˈuːɡəl wˈʌn θˈaʊzənd sˈɛvənhˈʌndɹɪd twˈɛnti θɹˈiː fˈɪfti wˈʌn ɐtˈɛkbuː ɹˈaɪ ˈɛs ˈɛɡzaɪl ænd dˈɛθ. tˈuːhˈʌndɹɪd nˈaɪnti wˈʌn wʌz wˈɛðɚ hiː wʌz ɹˈiəli ðə pˈɜːsən dᵻskɹˈaɪbd ɪnðə kˌɔːɹɪspˈɑːndəns nˈaʊ æz dʒˈoʊnz ænd nˈaʊ æz nˈɪɪŋtən. ðɛɹ mˌaɪthɐv bˌɪn nˈoʊ ˈɛvɪdəns wˌɪtʃ ˈiːvən ɐ sˈiːkɹᵻt, wˈaɪz kəmˈɪɾi ʌv ðæt dˈeɪ wʊdhɐv kˈɛɹd tʊ ɐksˈɛpt bˌʌt fɚðə fˈækt ðætðə bˈɪʃəps wˈaɪf hæd ɹᵻsˈiːvd, ɔːɹ wʌz tə hæv ɹᵻsˈiːvd, fɹʌm fɹˈæns ɐ pɹˈɛzənt əvə dˈɑːɡ kˈɔːld hˈɑːɹlɪkwˌɪn, ænd ðæt ðɛɹwˌʌz mˈɛnʃən ɪnðə kˌɔːɹɪspˈɑːndəns ɐbˌaʊt pˈʊɹ mˈɪstɚ. aɪ dˈɪŋtən bˌiːɪŋ ɪn ɡɹˈiːf fɚðə lˈɔs ʌv hɪz dˈɑːɡ hˈɑːɹlɪkwˌɪn.