text_original: Nor is it possible to describe the charming vivacity seen in the works of Antonio da Correggio, who painted hair in detail, not in the precise manner used by the masters before him, which was constrained, sharp, and dry, but soft and feathery, with each single hair visible, such was his facility in making them; and they seemed like gold and more beautiful than real hair, which is surpassed by that which he painted.
text_transcription: NOR IS IT POSSIBLE TO DESCRIBE THE CHARMING VIVACITY SEEN IN THE WORKS OF ANTONIO DE CORREGGIO WHO PAINTED HAIR IN DETAIL NOT IN THE PRECISE MANNER USED BY THE MASTERS BEFORE HIM WHICH WAS CONSTRAINED SHARP AND DRY BUT SOFT AND FEATHERY WITH EACH SINGLE HAIR VISIBLE SUCH WAS HIS FACILITY IN MAKING THEM IN THEY SEEMED LIKE GOLD AND MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN REAL HAIR WHICH IS SURPASSED BY THAT WHICH HE PAINTED
phonemes: nˈɔːɹ ɪz ɪt pˈɑːsᵻbəl tə dᵻskɹˈaɪb ðə tʃˈɑːɹmɪŋ vɪvˈæsᵻɾi sˈiːn ɪnðə wˈɜːks ʌv æntˈoʊnɪˌoʊ dˈɑː kɔɹˈɛɡɪˌoʊ, hˌuː pˈeɪntᵻd hˈɛɹ ɪn diːtˈeɪl, nˌɑːt ɪnðə pɹɪsˈaɪs mˈænɚ jˈuːzd baɪ ðə mˈæstɚz bᵻfˈɔːɹ hˌɪm, wˌɪtʃ wʌz kənstɹˈeɪnd, ʃˈɑːɹp, ænd dɹˈaɪ, bˌʌt sˈɔft ænd fˈɛðɚɹi, wɪð ˈiːtʃ sˈɪŋɡəl hˈɛɹ vˈɪzᵻbəl, sˈʌtʃ wʌz hɪz fəsˈɪlᵻɾi ɪn mˈeɪkɪŋ ðˌɛm; ænd ðeɪ sˈiːmd lˈaɪk ɡˈoʊld ænd mˈɔːɹ bjˈuːɾifəl ðɐn ɹˈiːəl hˈɛɹ, wˌɪtʃ ɪz sɚpˈæst baɪ ðæt wˌɪtʃ hiː pˈeɪntᵻd.