text_original: They could scarcely be considered likely attributes of '' le joyeux Bonaventure." Dismissing, then, this theory of Nodier's, let us consider the merits of the '* Heptameron " itself. THE '' HEPTAMERONP 229 To day it is scarcely a work that one would choose to read from end to end for pleasure. This is not only on account of its grossness, for it is infinitely less indecent 'than many works of the Sixteenth Century which are certainly well read at present.
text_transcription: THEY COULD SCARCELY BE CONSIDERED LIKE THE ATTRIBUTES OF LOIS BONAVANTUE DISMISSING THEN THIS THEORY OF NOIRTIER'S LET US CONSIDER THE MERITS OF THE HEPTAMERON ITSELF TO DAY IT IS SCARCELY A WORK THAT ONE WOULD CHOOSE TO READ FROM END END FOR PLEASURE THIS IS NOT ONLY ON ACCOUNT OF ITS GROSSNESS FOR IT IS INFINITELY LESS INDECENT THAN MANY WORKS OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY WHICH ARE CERTAINLY WELL READ AT PRESENT
phonemes: ðeɪ kʊd skˈɛɹsli biː kənsˈɪdɚd lˈaɪkli ˈætɹɪbjˌuːts ʌv lə dʒˈɔɪjuː bˌɑːneɪvˈɛntʃɚ." dɪsmˈɪsɪŋ, ðˈɛn, ðɪs θˈiəɹi ʌv nˈoʊdiɚz, lˈɛt ˌʌs kənsˈɪdɚ ðə mˈɛɹɪts ʌvðə ˈæstɚɹˌɪsk hˈɛptɐmɚɹən " ɪtsˈɛlf. ðə hˈɛptɐmɚɹˌɑːnp tˈuːhˈʌndɹɪd twˈɛnti nˈaɪn tə dˈeɪ ɪɾ ɪz skˈɛɹsli ɐ wˈɜːk ðˈætwˌʌn wʊd tʃˈuːz tə ɹˈiːd fɹʌm ˈɛnd tʊ ˈɛnd fɔːɹ plˈɛʒɚ. ðɪs ɪz nˌɑːt ˈoʊnli ˌɔn ɐkˈaʊnt ʌv ɪts ɡɹˈoʊsnəs, fɔːɹ ɪɾ ɪz ˈɪnfɪnətli lˈɛs ˌɪndˈiːsənt ðɐn mˈɛni wˈɜːks ʌvðə sˈɪkstiːnθ sˈɛntʃɚɹi wˌɪtʃ ɑːɹ sˈɜːʔn̩li wˈɛl ɹˈiːd æt pɹˈɛzənt.