Papers
arxiv:2604.14314

DharmaOCR: Specialized Small Language Models for Structured OCR that outperform Open-Source and Commercial Baselines

Published on Apr 15
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

Specialized small language models for structured OCR are developed with improved transcription quality and reduced computational costs through novel training methods and benchmarking.

AI-generated summary

This manuscript introduces DharmaOCR Full and Lite, a pair of specialized small language models (SSLMs) for structured OCR that jointly optimize transcription quality, generation stability, and inference cost. It also presents DharmaOCR-Benchmark, a benchmark that covers printed, handwritten, and legal/administrative documents, and proposes a unified evaluation protocol that measures fidelity and structure while explicitly tracking text degeneration as a first-class benchmark metric (alongside unit cost). Beyond reporting degeneration rates, the manuscript empirically shows degeneration is not merely a quality failure, since it materially worsens production performance by increasing response time, reducing throughput, and inflating computational cost due to abnormally long generations. To the best of the author's knowledge, as a methodological contribution, this is the first application of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) for OCR, explicitly using degenerate generations as rejected examples to penalize looping behavior. Combined with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) for enforcing a strict JSON schema (header, margin, footer, and text), DPO consistently reduces degeneration rate across model families (up to 87.6% relative) while preserving or improving extraction quality. The resulting models, namely, DharmaOCR Full (7B) and DharmaOCR Lite (3B), set a new state-of-the-art on DharmaOCR-Benchmark, outperforming each open-source and commercial baseline model evaluated regarding extraction quality, reaching 0.925 and 0.911 scores with 0.40% and 0.20% degeneration rates. AWQ quantization reduced up to 22% per-page cost with negligible quality loss, enabling a strong quality-cost trade-off in comparison to proprietary OCR APIs and open-source alternatives.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2604.14314
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.14314 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.