cassandra-bce-tram2 / README.md
cassandra-anon's picture
Align README with paper: numbers, title, section refs
5698e6e verified
---
license: mit
library_name: pytorch
tags:
- cti
- attack-classification
- mitre-attack
- cybersecurity
- text-classification
- multi-label-classification
language:
- en
base_model: ibm-research/CTI-BERT
---
# CASSANDRA — BCE configuration on TRAM2
Fine-tuned CTI-BERT models for extracting MITRE ATT&CK techniques from cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports. This repository contains the **BCE configuration** of the CASSANDRA recipe trained on **TRAM2** (50 ATT&CK sub-techniques), comprising **3 ensemble members** trained with seeds {42, 123, 456}.
> Anonymous artifact for ACM CCS 2026 review. Final author identification will be added after review.
## Headline result
On the **TRAM2** test set (30 scored documents):
- **3-seed ensemble per-document F1 (Ï„=0.5): 73.87%**
- Exceeds Llama 3.1 8B (72.50%, Buchel et al. 2025) at 73× fewer parameters.
The per-seed table below shows the live artifact's individual seed F1s and ensemble F1; small variance from the headline (≤0.3 F1) reflects inference-time floating-point ordering on different hardware. Full per-seed and ensemble metrics are in [`results.json`](./results.json).
## Architecture
`LabelAttentionClassifier`: a 110M-parameter CTI-BERT encoder followed by a per-label attention head.
- Encoder: [`ibm-research/CTI-BERT`](https://huggingface.co/ibm-research/CTI-BERT) (110M params, 768 hidden)
- Head: 50 learned 768-dim label queries that attend over the encoder's `last_hidden_state`, followed by a shared 1-output linear layer applied per-label
- Loss: BCE with `pos_weight=5.0`
- Regularization / training tricks: layer-wise learning rate decay (α=0.85), exponential moving average (β=0.999), multi-seed probability averaging at inference
The architecture is custom (not derived from `transformers.PreTrainedModel`), so loading requires the [`modeling.py`](./modeling.py) file shipped with this repo.
## Training data
- **TRAM2** (Threat Report ATT&CK Mapping v2): 151 reports, 19,178 sentences, 50 ATT&CK sub-techniques. Mean of ~82 positive examples per class.
- **Splits**: report-level train/test split from Buchel et al. (2025) "SoK: A Survey of Approaches for ATT&CK Classifier Construction" (120 train reports, 31 test reports — one test report excluded from per-document F1 due to empty in-vocabulary ground truth).
- **Validation**: 80:20 sentence-level random split within the training reports for early stopping and threshold selection.
## Intended use
Map free-text CTI sentences (analyst reports, incident write-ups, vendor advisories) to ATT&CK techniques. The model takes a single sentence and outputs a probability for each of 50 techniques.
**Aggregation to document level (paper convention):** apply per-sentence inference, take the per-class max across sentences in a document, threshold that, report the union of predicted techniques per document. F1 is computed against the document-level technique set.
**Limitations:**
- Trained on English-language CTI; behavior on other languages is not characterized.
- The label vocabulary is fixed at the 50 TRAM2 sub-techniques.
- Within TRAM2, the rarest techniques have ~7 positive examples; predictions for these classes are noisier than for densely-populated techniques.
## How to load and run
```python
from modeling import load_ensemble, predict_ensemble
import os, glob
seed_dirs = sorted(glob.glob(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "seeds", "seed-*")))
seeds = load_ensemble(seed_dirs, device="cuda")
sentences = [
"The malware uses Windows Command Shell to execute encoded scripts.",
"After initial access, persistence was established via Registry Run Keys.",
]
results = predict_ensemble(seeds, sentences, threshold=0.5)
for sentence, techniques in results:
print(sentence, "->", techniques)
```
A complete CLI example is in [`inference_example.py`](./inference_example.py):
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
python inference_example.py
```
## Per-seed members
| Seed | Per-document F1 (Ï„=0.5) | Selected weights |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | 73.78% | EMA |
| 123 | 71.97% | EMA |
| 456 | 75.59% | EMA |
| **3-seed ensemble** | **73.87%** | — |
For verification without re-running the model, each seed directory contains a `seed_probs.npz` file with the model's per-sentence sigmoid probabilities on the test and dev splits — sufficient to recompute every F1 number in the model card.
## Citation
```bibtex
@inproceedings{cassandra2026,
title = {CASSANDRA: How Many Parameters Suffice to Automate TTP Extractions from CTI Reports---Pushing Towards the Lower Bound},
author = {Anonymous},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2026 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)},
year = {2026},
note = {Under review — anonymous submission}
}
```
Please also cite the TRAM2 dataset and the CTI-BERT encoder.
## License
MIT — see [`LICENSE`](./LICENSE).