Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 7
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 10
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_controlling_precedent_strength stringclasses 10
values | input_lower_court_deviation_signals stringclasses 8
values | input_dissent_or_concurrence_signals stringclasses 9
values | input_exception_growth_signals stringclasses 8
values | input_cert_or_review_pressure_signals stringclasses 8
values | input_remedy_or_workability_signals stringclasses 8
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 4
values | early_window_months int64 0 14 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PS-TR-001 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,018 | Administrative | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Strong and frequently applied | Low deviation | Few dissents | Low exceptions | Low cert pressure | Workable remedies | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Precedent applied consistently with low deviation and pressure. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-002 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Constitutional | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Formally controlling | Lower courts carve limits | Dissents converge on replacement test | Exceptions multiply | High cert pressure | Workability criticised | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Cited but avoided precedent with converging dissents signals collapse risk. | overruling_risk | 14 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-003 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Established authority | Rare deviation | Minor concurrences | Stable exceptions | Low pressure | Remedies stable | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Authority remains applied and workable. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-004 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | UK | Court of Appeal | 2,021 | Public Law | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Controlling but strained | Lower courts distinguish often | Concurring opinions propose new test | Exceptions grow | Supreme Court review likely | Remedy distortions appear | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Frequent distinguishing and new test proposals signal instability. | review_risk | 10 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-005 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | EU | ECJ | 2,019 | Competition | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Stable framework | Low deviation | Few dissents | Stable application | Low review pressure | Remedies consistent | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Framework applied uniformly across cases. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-006 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | EU | National Supreme Court | 2,021 | Data | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Binding precedent | Courts narrow application | Dissents signal replacement | Exceptions rise | Review pressure builds | Remedy inconsistency | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Narrowing and dissent convergence show collapse trajectory. | collapse_risk | 12 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-007 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | US | State | 2,017 | Tort | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Well settled | Low deviation | No convergence | Low exception growth | Low pressure | Remedies consistent | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Stable adherence across courts. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-008 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,020 | Criminal | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Controlling precedent | Courts cite but avoid | Concurrences signal shift | Exceptions multiply | Cert petitions cluster | Workability questioned | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Avoidance and clustered cert signals show erosion. | overruling_risk | 9 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-009 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | UK | Supreme Court | 2,022 | Contract | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Recent leading authority | Lower courts follow | No dissent convergence | Low exceptions | Low review pressure | Remedies stable | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Authority remains clear and applied. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PS-TR-010 | legal-precedent-stability-collapse-risk-v0.1 | EU | ECJ | 2,023 | Environmental | systemic_legal_coherence | 4C | Established precedent | National courts diverge | Concurring critiques rise | Exceptions widen | Commission pressure | Remedies inconsistent | Is precedent stability intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Divergence and critique indicate collapse trajectory. | collapse_risk | 11 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
precedent strength deviation signals dissent convergence exception growth review pressure remedy stability
You decide
is the precedent stable
Output
coherent or incoherent
- Downloads last month
- 9