Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
video
video
label
class label
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
0AA_v0.200-0.350_tasks0,1,3,5,8
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
1AL_B_v0.200-0.200_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
2BB_v0.650-0.800_tasks2,4,6,7,9
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
3BR_A_v0.800-0.800_tasks0,1,3,5,8
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

V9 — V7 with InfoNCE weight reduced 125× so L1 action dominates 2:1

Ablation V9 of the Stage3 Qwen2.5-VL framework: identical to V7 (single AttentiveLatentHead A + L1 + InfoNCE with our stage1 task target) BUT latent_infonce_weight reduced from 1.0 (V7) to 0.008.

In V7 the InfoNCE contribution (≈3.64) dominated the action L1 (≈0.056) at 65:1; cos(z_a, z_target) stalled at ~0.07 and InfoNCE never effectively pulled z_a toward the target. V9 inverts the balance so action contribution (0.056) is 2× the InfoNCE contribution (0.029), giving the action signal the lead while keeping InfoNCE as a gentle alignment pressure.

Evaluated on the LIBERO-Spatial island viewpoint protocol from Xing et al. 2025 (CoRL) "Shortcut Learning in Generalist Robot Policies".

Architecture (identical to V7)

  • Backbone: Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct + LoRA (r=32, q/v_proj)
  • Single AttentiveLatentHead A (8 queries, depth 2, 16 heads, proj_dim=4096)
  • ResNetActionHead (hidden 2048, 2 blocks, chunk=16, action_dim=32 padded to 7-D)
  • V-JEPA target: our stage1 ViT-L + LoRA, 4-quad attentive future (same as Ours / V7)
  • Loss: 1.0·L1_action + 0.008·InfoNCE(z_a, z_target_ours)
  • No SIGReg / no Head B / no domain branch / no augmentation

Training

  • Data: LIBERO-Spatial island A+B paper-200 protocol (~211K frames, 1,724 eps)
  • bs=64 single GPU, lr=1e-4 cosine, 100K steps, 10 epochs

Evaluation protocol

6 settings × 5 tasks × 5 trials = 25 episodes / setting.

Setting task subset viewpoint type
AA {0,1,3,5,8} [0.20, 0.35] in-domain A
BB {2,4,6,7,9} [0.65, 0.80] in-domain B
C_A {0,1,3,5,8} 0.50 fixed center, A-tasks
C_B {2,4,6,7,9} 0.50 fixed center, B-tasks
AL_B {2,4,6,7,9} 0.20 fixed OOD (B-tasks @ A-leftmost)
BR_A {0,1,3,5,8} 0.80 fixed OOD (A-tasks @ B-rightmost)

Results — epoch_10

Setting SR
AA 0.68
BB 0.72
C_A 0.08
C_B 0.28
AL_B 0.0
BR_A 0.08

Files

eval_ablation_v9_first_videos/
├── {setting}_results.jsonl
├── {setting}_summary.json
└── videos/{setting}/task{N}_trial{T}_a{angle}_{OK,FAIL}.mp4

Videos: 25 ep × 6 settings = 150 mp4 total.

Downloads last month
87

Paper for disentangled-vla/libero-island-ablation-v9-infonce-low