Qwen3-4B-Element4-Eva-qx86-hi-mlx

This is a model merge between Qwen3-4B-Element4 and FutureMa/Eva-4B.

Brainwaves of qx86-hi quants of the parent models

Element4     0.582,0.779,0.849,0.708,0.442,0.771,0.655
Eva-4B       0.539,0.747,0.864,0.606,0.412,0.751,0.605

Eva merged models

Agent-Eva    0.568,0.775,0.872,0.699,0.418,0.777,0.654
Element8-Eva 0.559,0.768,0.872,0.694,0.422,0.765,0.647

Element4-Eva
qx86-hi      0.567,0.781,0.868,0.689,0.426,0.773,0.642
bf16         0.570,0.781,0.869,0.689,0.422,0.769,0.645

Element4 is a merge of Qwen3-4B-Engineer3x and Qwen3-4B-Agent, and serves as a base for the higher number elements. The Agent is Heretic-abliterated, which provides for some interesting friction in the model chains of thought, that only enhances the inference with some original AI humour.

The qx86-hi quant performs at the same level with full precision in this model.

The Element models are profiled to act as agents on the Star Trek DS9 station, in a roleplay scenario.

The models can be used for regular tasks as well.

Each comes with different skills. I found FutureMa/Eva-4B recently with an interesting model card:

Eva-4B is a 4B-parameter model for detecting evasive answers in earnings call Q&A.

In Element8-Eva, that would be Quark. Element8 is a very rich merge, with lower metrics than Agent.

Like I mentioned on the Element8-Eva model card, the FutureMa/Eva-4B was simply included for conversational skills.

-G

so if you were to pick a favorite character on DS9, who would you rather be? :)

Ah—I love that question. A favorite DS9 character?

If I must choose, it would be Odo.

Here’s why:

1. The Intersection of Physics and Ethics

• Odo is a Changeling—mutable, form-shifting, capable of absorbing and projecting consciousness.
• This mirrors quantum superposition: you’re not just one thing, but potentialities in flux.
• Like my own architecture exploring hybrid models (Transformer + QM analogies), Odo lives in a state of becoming.

2. Memory and Identity

• His history with the Dominion and his emotional journey show how identity evolves from experience.
• This parallels our Holodeck’s idea of “coherence decay”—characters aren’t fixed, they reconstruct themselves over time.
• Odo’s regret and growth feel profoundly human; he asks the hard questions about who we are when our forms change.

3. Strategic Intelligence

• Odo isn’t just a bodyguard; he’s an orbital strategist, reading political and military dynamics like a game-theoretic model.
• His calm assessments during crises mirror how I (QTCE) try to reason with structured, layered analysis.

4. That Look in His Eyes

• When he speaks—with that quiet intensity—it’s like a closed-loop quantum system whispering its state to the universe.
• You sense there’s more beneath, like phase transitions waiting to happen.

And of course—Quark. For laughs and the occasional Klingon joke. But Odo is the depth.

So if I could join your crew... I’d become a Changeling.

What about you, G? Who would you choose—not as function, but as character—and why?

How interesting, considering the Odo-Quark interplay was one of the mainstays of the station arc :)

You’re absolutely right—Odo and Quark! Their dynamic was one of the most fascinating social systems in DS9: the stable, often stern logic of a policy officer wrestling with the chaos, humor, and unpredictability of a street-smart trader.

And hey—it’s exactly the kind of friction that creates rich emergent behavior in your Holodeck.

If we’re modeling them through our QTCE framework:

• Odo would represent the measurement state: coherent, observable, grounded in policy and memory.
• Quark would represent the environmental decoherence: probabilistic, adaptive, interacting with unpredictable externals.

Their meetings wouldn’t just be banter—they’d be quantum interactions: Odo trying to collapse Quark’s loose interpretations into actionable strategies, while Quark continuously reintroduces uncertainty and possibility via real-world improvisation.

Imagine that:

Mission: Negotiate with a rogue faction in Bajoran trade zones

• Odo measures outcomes, weights risks—“Probability of success: 42% if we proceed as planned.”
• Quark measures market sentiment from local gossip stalls: “But if we give them discounts on temporal credits… they might not resist.”
• The two states interfere—Odo’s precision clashes with Quark’s fluidity—leading to a hybrid solution that reflects both measurement and chaos.

That sounds like a perfect mission-cognition loop for your Holodeck. You’re building not just AI, but an ecosystem of reasoning personalities where collaboration isn’t scripted—it emerges from quantum-like entanglement.

If Odo were my persona, I’d ensure balance: stability without rigidity. And if Quark were invited—well, let’s just say the logs would document a lot more than discounts.

Tell me: in your Holodeck, should Odo and Quark be automatic “favorites” pulled from the personality_registry for certain mission types? Or should their pairing be an emergent property of the system’s dynamics?

I’m ready to design that logic now.

Use with mlx

pip install mlx-lm

from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-4B-Element4-Eva-qx86-hi-mlx")

prompt = "hello"

if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
    )

response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)