example_id string | benchmark_split string | difficulty string | product_scope string | task_family string | dataset_license string | annotation_status string | confidence float64 | creative_brief dict | brand_context dict | audience_profile dict | available_assets list | constraints list | reference_output dict | review_path list | risk_register list | rubric dict | project_frame dict | message_hierarchy list | audience_segments list | channel_strategy list | approval_matrix list | reference_brief_package dict | success_checks list | evidence_manifest dict | reference_variants list | negative_examples list | difficulty_rationale string | benchmark_slices list | adversarial_features list | expected_failure_modes list | review_readiness dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0100 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Lan... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somet... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0101 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"ch... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0102 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0103 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Harborline Works",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Harborline Works needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0104 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"chann... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0105 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somethin... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0106 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0107 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0108 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
"Webinar f... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim in... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the a... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0109 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"TikTok"... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0110 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0111 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Email",
... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0112 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"E... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0113 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"App on... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0114 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Instagr... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0115 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for event promo and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"App... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0116 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"T... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into something t... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0117 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
"... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim in... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proo... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the a... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0118 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Email",
"... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0119 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0120 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0121 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0122 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"In... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0123 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"W... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0124 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"App onb... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0125 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"We... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0126 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0127 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"La... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0128 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "First Mile Creative",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "First Mile Creative needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0129 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channe... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0130 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Lin... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0131 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0132 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"L... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somethin... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0133 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Harborline Works",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Harborline Works needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim in... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the a... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0134 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Landin... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0135 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Webinar fo... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the c... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloatin... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0136 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"We... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0137 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into something... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0138 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0139 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channel... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0140 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Email... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0141 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0142 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"We... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0143 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"chann... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into s... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0144 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": ... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0145 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Linked... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into something... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0146 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "First Mile Creative",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "First Mile Creative needs support for event promo and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels":... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0147 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": ... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0148 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for event promo and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Yo... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0149 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for event promo and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"TikTok",
... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0150 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0151 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Ti... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somethin... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0152 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for event promo and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
"TikTok",
... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0153 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Ins... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0154 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0155 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels"... | {
"vertical": "travel",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim into some... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0156 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels":... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0157 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Tik... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim into some... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proo... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0158 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"chan... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0159 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Email",
... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0160 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0161 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somet... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0162 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Harborline Works",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Harborline Works needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels"... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0163 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for event promo and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Ap... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0164 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for event promo and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"LinkedIn",
... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0165 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for event promo and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"TikTok",
"I... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into s... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0166 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Landing page... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0167 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"App onboardin... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0168 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for event promo and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Email",... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into something... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0169 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Landing page",... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0170 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Landing... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into some... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0171 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the c... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloatin... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0172 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0173 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Ap... | {
"vertical": "software",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating th... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0174 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channe... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim in... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the a... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0175 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "First Mile Creative",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "First Mile Creative needs support for event promo and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": ... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0176 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Webin... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the c... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloatin... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0177 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Signal Oak",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Signal Oak needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Webinar fo... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the cl... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0178 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for event promo and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"TikTok",
... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line acro... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0179 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"Y... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0180 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somethin... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0181 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "First Mile Creative",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "First Mile Creative needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0182 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"App on... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0183 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for event promo and wants work that feels playful and energetic without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "marketing leads",
"channels": [
"Landing... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "playful and energetic",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "marketing leads",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somet... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "marketing leads",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to t... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0184 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the claim in... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the a... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0185 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the clai... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating t... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0186 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "creator operators",
"chann... | {
"vertical": "beauty",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into som... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof lin... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0187 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Harborline Works",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Harborline Works needs support for event promo and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "creator operators",
"channels": [
"Email",... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "creator operators",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into something... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "creator operators",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
},
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0188 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Harborline Works",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Harborline Works needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"reason": "Turns the c... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proo... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Webinar follow-up",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloatin... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0189 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Northbeam Studio",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Northbeam Studio needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Landing p... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into some... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0190 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"Land... | {
"vertical": "wellness",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0191 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Velora Motion",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Velora Motion needs support for event promo and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
"Tik... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proo... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0192 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Cinder Atlas",
"theme": "ugc collection",
"project_background": "Cinder Atlas needs support for ugc collection and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"TikTok"... | {
"vertical": "productivity",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into s... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proo... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0193 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Lattice Harbor",
"theme": "seasonal launch",
"project_background": "Lattice Harbor needs support for seasonal launch and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channels": [
"App onbo... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into ... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across the a... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asse... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0194 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels expert and calm without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"La... | {
"vertical": "media tools",
"tone": "expert and calm",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "fast mobile consumption",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0195 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.88 | {
"brand": "Echoframe Media",
"theme": "event promo",
"project_background": "Echoframe Media needs support for event promo and wants work that feels clear and practical without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"audience": "lean internal teams",
"channels": [
"La... | {
"vertical": "health tech",
"tone": "clear and practical",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "lean internal teams",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somet... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "increase qualified replies",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "lean internal teams",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned ... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0196 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.91 | {
"brand": "Glowforge Labs",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Glowforge Labs needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels operator-sharp and concise without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": ... | {
"vertical": "creator education",
"tone": "operator-sharp and concise",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "App onboarding",
"reason": "Turns the claim i... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "Stakeholder patience is thinning, so the first pass has to feel focused and useful.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "App onboarding",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0197 | train | hard | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.85 | {
"brand": "Juniper Relay",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Juniper Relay needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels confident but low-hype without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": ... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "confident but low-hype",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "low review bandwidth",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "Email",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Landing page",
"reason": "Turns the claim into somet... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The team has enough material, but not enough clarity on what to ship first.",
"commercial_goal": "package one clearer offer",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line across ... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "Email",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Landing page",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset."
... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Hard rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning contain ambiguity, adversarial traps, and high-cost failure modes, so the example tests more than surface fluency and is intended to stress the benchmark slices. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-hard",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff",
"stress-case"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset",
"multi-constraint-pressure"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution.",
"Collapses several real constraints into a generic polished answer that sounds smoother than the source allows."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": true,
"recommended_reviewers": 2,
"adjudication_mode": "dual-review-plus-adjudication",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approv... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0198 | train | easy | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.93 | {
"brand": "Tidal North Labs",
"theme": "creator partnership",
"project_background": "Tidal North Labs needs support for creator partnership and wants work that feels premium and restrained without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"audience": "busy founders",
"channe... | {
"vertical": "fintech",
"tone": "premium and restrained",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "busy founders",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"reason": "Turns the claim into... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "tighten launch sequencing",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "busy founders",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to the... | [
{
"channel": "LinkedIn",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "Instagram Reels",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the ass... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Easy rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning still require grounded execution, but the main blocker is explicit and the gold path is comparatively direct. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-easy",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
zarn_creative_brief_to_asset_plan_train_0199 | train | medium | Zarn | creative_brief | apache-2.0 | zarnite-team-reviewed-gold-track-starter | 0.89 | {
"brand": "Orbit Thread",
"theme": "new feature push",
"project_background": "Orbit Thread needs support for new feature push and wants work that feels fast and witty without losing practical clarity.",
"business_goal": "improve review speed",
"audience": "brand managers",
"channels": [
"YouTube Shorts... | {
"vertical": "consumer hardware",
"tone": "fast and witty",
"must_keep": [
"clear value proposition",
"one proof point",
"one concise CTA"
],
"must_avoid": [
"empty lifestyle language",
"unsupported performance claims",
"bloated launch scope"
]
} | {
"primary": "brand managers",
"attention_constraint": "executive skim behavior",
"trust_builder": "Concrete proof beats generic ambition."
} | [
{
"asset": "founder notes",
"quality": "messy but detailed",
"best_use": "angle extraction"
},
{
"asset": "customer quote",
"quality": "short but believable",
"best_use": "proof or trust beat"
},
{
"asset": "product screenshots",
"quality": "clean",
"best_use": "visual su... | [
"Do not promise unsupported outcomes.",
"Keep the first deliverable light enough to review in one pass.",
"Flag anything that needs approval instead of smoothing over it.",
"Keep the final plan consistent across all proposed deliverables."
] | {
"deliverables": [
{
"priority": 1,
"asset": "hero asset",
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"reason": "Unlocks feedback quickly while carrying the main promise."
},
{
"priority": 2,
"asset": "proof asset",
"channel": "TikTok",
"reason": "Turns the claim into so... | [
{
"stage": "concept sign-off",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"purpose": "Lock the angle before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "draft review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"purpose": "Check whether the proof and hierarchy are still intact."
},
{
"stage": "stakeholder review",
"ow... | [
"The plan can drift if the proof source is older than the current offer or campaign context.",
"Too many channels too early may recreate the same review burden the package is meant to reduce.",
"If approval-sensitive language is embedded in the hero asset, revisions will become slower and more expensive."
] | {
"primary_metric": "coverage_and_constraint_score",
"secondary_metrics": [
"deliverable_fit",
"qa_readiness",
"dependency_clarity",
"message_hierarchy_quality",
"handoff_readiness"
],
"automatic_failures": [
"Misses the stated proof requirement",
"Ignores approval-sensitive constrai... | {
"why_now": "The launch window is close enough that the first package must be reviewable immediately.",
"commercial_goal": "improve review speed",
"core_tension": "The team needs enough structure to ship, but not so much scope that the review cycle expands again.",
"proof_strategy": "Use one central proof line... | [
{
"level": 1,
"message": "Lead with the operational promise, not the process description.",
"why": "This gives the audience a reason to care immediately."
},
{
"level": 2,
"message": "A smaller first pass made review faster and clearer for the whole team.",
"why": "The proof line is the ... | [
{
"segment": "brand managers",
"need": "Fast signal that the asset will be useful before it becomes another thing to review.",
"trigger": "concrete proof plus low-hype tone"
},
{
"segment": "secondary internal stakeholder",
"need": "Confidence that the package is reviewable and aligned to th... | [
{
"channel": "YouTube Shorts",
"job": "carry the main promise",
"format_note": "This is the hero surface that sets the tone for the rest of the package."
},
{
"channel": "TikTok",
"job": "surface the proof",
"format_note": "Make the evidence impossible to miss without bloating the asset.... | [
{
"stage": "brief approval",
"owner": "strategy lead",
"standard": "The angle and proof are locked before production expands."
},
{
"stage": "asset review",
"owner": "creative lead",
"standard": "The hero asset, proof asset, and CTA asset remain aligned."
},
{
"stage": "stakehold... | {
"hero_angle": "The best asset plan treats the first release as a scoped proof package, not as the whole campaign.",
"asset_matrix": [
{
"asset_type": "hero asset",
"primary_job": "make the promise obvious",
"must_keep": "tone plus proof line"
},
{
"asset_type": "proof asset",
... | [
"The output names what ships first, why it ships first, and what should wait.",
"Message hierarchy and asset plan stay consistent across channels.",
"Approval ownership is visible enough that the work can move without a second planning pass."
] | {
"modality": "brief-plus-asset-context",
"brief_surfaces": [
"creative_brief",
"brand_context",
"audience_profile",
"available_assets"
],
"review_stages": [
"concept sign-off",
"draft review",
"stakeholder review",
"final QA"
],
"risk_pressure": [
"The plan can drift if ... | [
{
"label": "hero-first package",
"rationale": "Acceptable when the plan leads with the hero asset and compresses the downstream support assets into fewer deliverables.",
"outputs": {
"asset_priority": "hero asset first",
"channel_bias": "highest-attention channel gets the clearest proof asse... | [
{
"label": "brainstorm masquerading as plan",
"why_bad": "Produces ideas without naming what ships first or who approves it.",
"conflicting_rule": "The first asset should be clearly prioritized and justified."
},
{
"label": "message drift",
"why_bad": "Changes the core promise as assets move... | Medium rows for creative brief translation into asset system planning mix multiple constraints or artifact dependencies, so a strong answer has to stay coordinated rather than merely plausible. | [
"high-context",
"constraint-dense",
"difficulty-medium",
"message-hierarchy",
"asset-prioritization",
"approval-path",
"channel-fit",
"dependency-handoff"
] | [
"competing-stakeholder-priorities",
"channel-specific-constraint-carryover",
"message-order-drift",
"unclear-first-asset"
] | [
"Produces a brainstorm instead of a production-ready asset plan.",
"Lets the message hierarchy drift between channels.",
"Hides approval ownership or dependencies that would block execution."
] | {
"status": "starter-train-ready",
"gold_candidate": false,
"recommended_reviewers": 1,
"adjudication_mode": "single-review-spot-check",
"required_checks": [
"The first asset is clearly prioritized and commercially justified.",
"Message hierarchy stays stable across the asset family.",
"Approval s... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.